Effect of Time Interval Between LEEP and Subsequent Hysterectomy on Postoperative Infectious Morbidity

References

• Cavanagh D, Rutledge F. The cervical cone biopsy hysterectomy sequence and factors affecting the febrile morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960;80:53–59. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(16)36416-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCenzo JA, Malo T, Cavanagh D. Factors affecting cone-hysterectomy morbidity. A study of 200 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;110:380–384. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(71)90733-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tae Kim Y, Sung Yoon B, Hoon Kim S, et al. The influence of time intervals between loop electrosurgical excision and subsequent hysterectomy on the morbidity of patients with cervical neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96:500–503. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.10.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan SA, Clark LH, Staley AS, et al. Association between timing of cervical excision procedure to minimally invasive hysterectomy and surgical complications. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144:294–298. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin X, Zhu L, Tan W, et al. Time intervals between prior cervical conization and posterior hysterectomy influence postoperative infection in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer. Med Sci Monitor. 2018;24:9063. doi:10.12659/MSM.911892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Os Reis R, Andrade CEMC, Frumovitz M, et al. Radical hysterectomy and age: outcomes comparison based on a minimally invasive vs an open approach. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(7):1224–1230. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppal S, Liu JR, Reynolds RK, et al. Trends and comparative effectiveness of inpatient radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States (2012–2015). Gynecol Oncol. 2019;152(1):133–138. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salicru S, Gil-Moreno A, Montero A, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:555–568. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:588–593. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber EL, Harris B, Gehrig PA. Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):215. e1–215. e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SH, Lee JY, Nam EJ, et al. Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):908. doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4809-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samlal RA, van der Velden J, Schilthuis MS, et al. Influence of diagnostic conization on surgical morbidity and survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1997;18:478–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion KB, Azoulay L, Platt RW, et al. A multicenter observational study of incretin-based drugs and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(12):1145–1154. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1506115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till SR, Morgan DM, Bazzi AA, et al. Reducing surgical site infections after hysterectomy: metronidazole plus cefazolin compared with cephalosporin alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(2):187. e1–187. e11. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, et al. Infectious morbidity after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: does concomitant salpingectomy make a difference? BJOG. 2009;116(4):589–593. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02085.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Jang JY, Chen K, et al. The influence of interval between conization and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on the morbidity of patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33:601–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida H, Matsuo K, Furusawa A, et al. Profile of treatment-related complications in women with clinical stage IB-IIB cervical cancer: A nationwide cohort study in Japan. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210125. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Cruickshank C, et al. Risk factors for febrile morbidity after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(1):86–91. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000109219.24211.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevin BU, Ramos R, Lichtinger M, et al. Antibiotic prevention of infections complicating radical abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:539–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micha JP, Kucera PR, Birkett JP, et al. Prophylactic mezlocillin in a radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:251–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk BF, Tager IB, Shapiro M, et al. Randomised clinical trial of perioperative cefazolin in preventing infection after hysterectomy. Lancet. 1980;1:437–440. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(80)90994-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittendorf R, Aronson MP, Berry RE, et al. Avoiding serious infections associated with abdominal hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:1119–1124. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90266-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinak LR, Jeffrey RA, Dunn WJ. The conization-hysterectomy time interval: a clinical and pathologic study. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;23(3):317–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar