Management of Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Challenges and Solutions

References

• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34. doi:10.3322/caac.21551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:932–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1415–1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1051–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled Phase 3 study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016;388:1057–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehder P, Staudacher NM, Schachtner J, et al. Hypothesis that urethral bulb (corpus spongiosum) plays an active role in male urinary continence. Adv Urol. 2016;2016:6054730.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John H, Sullivan MP, Bangerter U, Hauri D, Yalla SV. Effect of radical prostatectomy on sensory threshold and pressure transmission. J Urol. 2000;163:1761–1766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretschmer A, Nitti V. Surgical treatment of male postprostatectomy incontinence: current concepts. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3:364–376.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Løvvik A, Müller S, Patel HRH. Pharmacological treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence: what is the evidence? Drugs Aging. 2016;33:535–544. doi:10.1007/s40266-016-0388-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajewski JB, Schurch B, Hamid R, et al. An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (ANLUTD). Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:1152–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M, et al. The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:433–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim H, Abrams P. Overactive bladder: an update. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17:231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelrich TM. The urethral sphincter muscle in the male. Am J Anat. 1980;158:229–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steiner MS. The puboprostatic ligament and the male urethral suspensory mechanism: an anatomic study. Urology. 1994;44:530–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser H, Frauscher F, Helweg G, Colleselli K, Reissigl A, Bartsch G. Transurethral ultrasound: evaluation of anatomy and function of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. J Urol. 1998;159:100–104; discussion 104–105.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves F, Preece P, Kapoor J, et al. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68:692–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastore AL, Palleschi G, Illiano E, Zucchi A, Carbone A, Costantini E. The role of detrusor overactivity in urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol E Nefrol Ital J Urol Nephrol. 2017;69:234–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1998;160:1317–1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung DE, Dillon B, Kurta J, Maschino A, Cronin A, Sandhu JS. Detrusor underactivity is prevalent after radical prostatectomy: a urodynamic study including risk factors. Can Urol Assoc J J Assoc Urol Can. 2013;7:E33–E37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer RM, Sandhu J, De Ridder D, Stenzl A. Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: a review. Eur Urol. 2017;71:936–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mungovan SF, Sandhu JS, Akin O, Smart NA, Graham PL, Patel MI. Preoperative membranous urethral length measurement and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2017;71:368–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas MG, Bosch RJL, Burkhard FC, et al. EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Actas Urol Esp. 2013;37:459–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thüroff JW, Abrams P, Andersson K-E, et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2011;59:387–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Te AE, Kaplan SA, Sandhu JS. Temporal trends in adoption of and indications for the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2009;181:2622–2627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68:216–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:405–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol. 2009;56:472–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol. 2007;52:376–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco F, Gadda F, Acquati P, et al. Ricerca personale: ricostruzione dello sfintere striato uretrale [Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter]. Arch Ital Urol Androl Organo Uff Soc Ital Ecogr Urol E Nefrol. 2001;73:127–137. Italian.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2006;175:2201–2206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:996–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol. 2010;58:457–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad M-A, et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the retzius-sparing approach on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2017;72:677–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checcucci E, Veccia A, Fiori C, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes. BJU Int. 2020;125:8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Kim DK, Ahn HK, Jung HD, Lee JY, Cho KS. Effect of bladder neck preservation on long-term urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;8:2068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Wille MA, Thong AE, et al. Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Can J Urol. 2009;16:4742–4749; discussion 4749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samadi DB, Muntner P, Nabizada-Pace F, Brajtbord JS, Carlucci J, Lavery HJ. Improvements in robot-assisted prostatectomy: the effect of surgeon experience and technical changes on oncologic and functional outcomes. J Endourol. 2010;24:1105–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco KA, Meeks JJ, Wu S, Nadler RB. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged > or =70 years. BJU Int. 2009;104:1492–1495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1358–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novara G, Ficarra V, D’elia C, et al. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184:1028–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shikanov S, Desai V, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol. 2010;183:1803–1807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley DS, Osann K, Chang A, Santos R, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Hypothermic robotic radical prostatectomy: impact on continence. J Endourol. 2009;23:1443–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73:316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, et al. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180:928–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolarus TA, Hedgepeth RC, Zhang Y, et al. Does robotic technology mitigate the challenges of large prostate size? Urology. 2010;76:1117–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutolo M, Bruyneel L, Van der Aa F, et al. A novel tool to predict functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and the value of additional surgery for incontinence. BJU Int. 2021;127:575–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CA, Omar MI, Campbell SE, Hunter KF, Cody JD, Glazener CMA. Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD001843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo M, Li D. Pelvic floor images: anatomy of the levator ani muscle. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1647–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford RE, Ashton-Miller JA, Constantinou C, Coughlin G, Lutton NJ, Hodges PW. Pattern of activation of pelvic floor muscles in men differs with verbal instructions. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:457–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y-C, Chang K-V. Kegel exercises. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Wu M-L-Y, Wang C-S, Xiao Q, Peng C-H, Zeng T-Y. The therapeutic effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2019;21:170–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giggins OM, Persson UM, Caulfield B. Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2013;10:60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro LHS, Prota C, Gomes CM, et al. Long-term effect of early postoperative pelvic floor biofeedback on continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2010;184:1034–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgio KL, Goode PS, Urban DA, et al. Preoperative biofeedback assisted behavioral training to decrease post-prostatectomy incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2006;175:196–201; discussion 201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milios JE, Ackland TR, Green DJ. Pelvic floor muscle training in radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial of the impacts on pelvic floor muscle function and urinary incontinence. BMC Urol. 2019;19:116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazener C, Boachie C, Buckley B, et al. Urinary incontinence in men after formal one-to-one pelvic-floor muscle training following radical prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials. Lancet Lond Engl. 2011;378:328–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales GT, Gerber GS, Minor TX, et al. Effect of preoperative biofeedback/pelvic floor training on continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000;56:627–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JI, Lam V, Patel MI. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise and postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:460–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple CR, Khullar V, Gabriel Z, Muston D, Bitoun CE, Weinstein D. The effects of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: an update of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2008;54:543–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goepel M, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Welz-Barth A, Steinwachs K-C, Rübben H. Urinary incontinence in the elderly: part 3 of a series of articles on incontinence. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int. 2010;107:531–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porena M, Mearini E, Mearini L, Vianello A, Giannantoni A. Voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy: more than external urethral sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol. 2007;52:38–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco FJ, Albala DM, Belkoff LH, et al. A randomized, double-blind, solifenacin succinate versus placebo control, Phase 4, multicenter study evaluating urinary continence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2015;193:1305–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liss MA, Morales B, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Phase 1 clinical trial of VesicareTM (solifenacin) in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;28:1241–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim M, Kim J, Park S, et al. The therapeutic effect of solifenacin succinate on the recovery from voiding dysfunction after radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Urology. 2015;85:1123–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippi S, Morelli A, Sandner P, et al. Characterization and functional role of androgen-dependent PDE5 activity in the bladder. Endocrinology. 2007;148:1019–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelli A, Sarchielli E, Comeglio P, et al. Phosphodiesterase type 5 expression in human and rat lower urinary tract tissues and the effect of tadalafil on prostate gland oxygenation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2746–2760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson K-E, Uckert S, Stief C, Hedlund P. Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) and PDE inhibitors for treatment of LUTS. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:928–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandaglia G, Albersen M, Suardi N, et al. Postoperative phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor administration increases the rate of urinary continence recovery after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2013;20:413–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Kaminetsky JC, et al. Tadalafil relieves lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2007;177:1401–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canat L, Güner B, Gürbüz C, Atış G, Çaşkurlu T. Effects of three-times-per-week versus on-demand tadalafil treatment on erectile function and continence recovery following bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, and single-center study. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015;31:90–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caremel R, Corcos J. Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: anything new in its management? Can Urol Assoc J J Assoc Urol Can. 2014;8:202–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alan C, Eren AE, Ersay AR, Kocoglu H, Basturk G, Demirci E. Efficacy of duloxetine in the early management of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol. 2015;8:43–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornu J-N, Merlet B, Ciofu C, et al. Duloxetine for mild to moderate postprostatectomy incontinence: preliminary results of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011;59:148–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornu J-N, Sèbe P, Ciofu C, Peyrat L, Cussenot O, Haab F. Mid-term evaluation of the transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: focus on prognostic factors. BJU Int. 2011;108:236–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leicht W, Thüroff J. Behandlung der männlichen Harninkontinenz: Artifizieller Sphinkter vs. Schlingensysteme [Therapy of male urinary incontinence: artificial sphincter versus male slings]. Urol Ausg A. 2012;51:341–347. Germany.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu J-N; Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63:681–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis HGA, Bentellis I, El-Akri M, et al. Early efficacy and safety outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter for stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery: results of a large multicentric study. Eur Urol Focus. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Á GC, Colombás Vives J, Gutiérrez Castañé C, et al. What is the impact of post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence on everyday quality of life? Linking Pad usage and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short-Form (ICIQ-SF) for a COMBined definition (PICOMB definition). Neurourol Urodyn. 2021;40:840–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams P, Constable LD, Cooper D, et al. Outcomes of a noninferiority randomised controlled trial of surgery for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER). Eur Urol. 2021;79:812–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RM, Mayer ME, Gratzke C, et al. Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: results after 1 year. Eur Urol. 2009;56:928–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutolo M, Cornu J-N, Bauer RM, et al. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:710–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor RC, Nanigian DK, Patel BN, Guralnick ML, Ellision LM, Stone AR. Artificial urinary sphincter placement in elderly men. Urology. 2007;69:126–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G. Thomas D g. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Br J Urol. 1996;77:248–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staerman F, Llorens G, Leon P, Leclerc Y. ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence: a preliminary study. BJU Int. 2013;111:E202–E206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens C, Pottek T. Urinary artificial sphincter ZSI 375 for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men: 5 and 7 years follow-up report. Urologia. 2017;84:263–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knight SL, Susser J, Greenwell T, Mundy AR, Craggs MD. A new artificial urinary sphincter with conditional occlusion for stress urinary incontinence: preliminary clinical results. Eur Urol. 2006;50:574–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giammò A, Falcone M, Blecher G, et al. A novel artificial urinary sphincter (VICTO®) for the management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: description of the surgical technique and preliminary results from a multicenter series. Urol Int. 2021;105:414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivellaro S, Singla A, Aggarwal N, Frea B, Kocjancic E. Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT) and bone anchored male sling: comparison of two new treatments of post prostatectomy incontinence. Int J Urol off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2008;15:910–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivellaro S, Morlacco A, Bodo G, et al. Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:875–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori A, Romanò AL, Scieri F, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided implantation of Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT): surgical technique and clinical results after a mean follow-up of 2 years. Eur Urol. 2010;57:430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturino L, Dalpiaz O, Pummer K, Primus G. Adjustable continence balloons in men: adjustments do not translate into long-term continence. Urology. 2015;85:1448–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahokehr AA, Selph JP, Belsante MJ, et al. Mechanism of action of the transobturator sling for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a multi-institutional prospective study using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology. 2018;116:185–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehder P, Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52:860–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doudt AD, Zuckerman JM. Male slings for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Rev Urol. 2018;20:158–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornel EB, Elzevier HW, Putter H. Can advance transobturator sling suspension cure male urinary postoperative stress incontinence? J Urol. 2010;183:1459–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornu J-N, Batista Da Costa J, Henry N, Peyrat L, Beley S, Haab F. Comparative study of AdVance and AdVanceXP male slings in a tertiary reference center. Eur Urol. 2014;65:502–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RM, Grabbert MT, Klehr B, et al. 36-month data for the AdVance XP® male sling: results of a prospective multicentre study. BJU Int. 2017;119:626–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grise P, Vautherin R, Njinou-Ngninkeu B, et al. I-STOP TOMS transobturator male sling, a minimally invasive treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence: continence improvement and tolerability. Urology. 2012;79:458–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro M, Bottero D, D’Elia C, et al. Virtue male sling for post-prostatectomy stress incontinence: a prospective evaluation and mid-term outcomes. BJU Int. 2017;119:482–488. doi:10.1111/bju.13672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisterhofer K, Herzog S, Strini KA, Sebastianelli L, Bauer R, Dalpiaz O. Male slings for postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6:575–592. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inouye BM, Premo HA, Weil D, Peterson AC. The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: tips and tricks for success. Int Braz J Urol off J Braz Soc Urol. 2021;47:1131–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hübner W, et al. Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2011;59:985–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu J-N, Gozzi C, Bauer RM. Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2012;62:140–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüsch T, Kretschmer A, Obaje A, et al. Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9:1099–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner WA, Gallistl H, Rutkowski M, Huber ER. Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2011;107:777–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RM, Rutkowski M, Kretschmer A, Casuscelli J, Stief CG, Huebner W. Efficacy and complications of the adjustable sling system ArgusT for male incontinence: results of a prospective 2-center study. Urology. 2015;85:316–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa-Escandón A, Cabrera J, Mantovani F, et al. Adjustable suburethral sling (male remeex system) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1473–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquinas C, Angulo JC. Effectiveness of Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) to treat male stress incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Ther. 2019;36:426–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toia B, Gresty H, Pakzad M, Hamid R, Ockrim J, Greenwell T. Bulking for stress urinary incontinence in men: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:1804–1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chughtai B, Sedrakyan A, Isaacs AJ, et al. National study of utilization of male incontinence procedures. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo T, Augustin H, Breinl E, Schips L, Hubmer G. The use of polydimethylsiloxane in the treatment of incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol. 1997;80:923–926.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kylmälä T, Tainio H, Raitanen M, Tammela TLJ. Treatment of postoperative male urinary incontinence using transurethral macroplastique injections. J Endourol. 2003;17:113–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Uhm JIM, Vermeer M, Elzevier HW, Noordzij JW, Koldewijn EL, Cornel EB. Injectable bulking agent to treat postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: a safety and effectiveness pilot study. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:2796967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MI, Yao J, Hirschhorn AD, Mungovan SF. Preoperative pelvic floor physiotherapy improves continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2013;20:986–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkhasov RM, Lee T, Huang R, et al. Prediction of incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: development and validation of a 24-month incontinence nomogram. Cancers. 2022;14:1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG. Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol. 2009;55:322–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manassero F, Traversi C, Ales V, et al. Contribution of early intensive prolonged pelvic floor exercises on urinary continence recovery after bladder neck-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective controlled randomized trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:985–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, et al. Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005;48:734–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilssen SR, Mørkved S, Overgård M, Lydersen S, Angelsen A. Does physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training increase the quality of life in patients after radical prostatectomy? A randomized clinical study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012;46:397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgård M, Angelsen A, Lydersen S, Mørkved S. Does physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training reduce urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy? A randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2008;54:438–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar