Advanced search
Publication Cover
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Volume 18, 2022 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
82
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Risk Factors for Midline Catheter Failure: A Secondary Analysis of an Existing Trial

Amit Bahl1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9495-1293View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Steven Johnson1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-8350View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Nicholas Mielke2 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USAView further author information
&
Nai-Wei Chen3 Research Institute, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USAView further author information
Pages 999-1007 | Received 23 Jul 2022, Accepted 16 Sep 2022, Published online: 07 Nov 2023

References

  • IDATA. US market report suite for vascular access devices and accessories; 2020. Available from: https://idataresearch.com/product-category/vascular-access/. Accessed June 30, 2021.
  • Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, et al. Infusion therapy standards of practice, 8th edition. J Infusion Nurs. 2021;44(1SSuppl 1):S1–S224. doi:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396
  • Chopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S, et al. The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): results from a multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(6 Suppl):S1–S39. doi:10.7326/M15-0744
  • Gidaro A, Samartin F, Salvi E, et al. Midline peripheral catheters inserted in the superficial femoral vein at mid-thigh: wise choice in COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with helmet continuous positive airway pressure. J Vasc Access. 2022;112972982210854. doi:10.1177/11297298221085450
  • Tripathi S, Kumar S, Kaushik S. The practice and complications of midline catheters: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(2):E140–E150. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004764
  • Bahl A, Diloreto E, Jankowski D, Hijazi M, Chen NW. Comparison of 2 midline catheter devices with differing antithrombogenic mechanisms for catheter-related thrombosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(10):e2127836. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27836
  • Seo H, Altshuler D, Dubrovskaya Y, et al. The safety of midline catheters for intravenous therapy at a large academic medical center. Ann Pharmacother. 2020;54(3):232–238. doi:10.1177/1060028019878794
  • Alexandrou E, Ramjan LM, Spencer T, et al. The use of midline catheters in the adult acute care setting – clinical implications and recommendations for practice. J Assoc Vasc Access. 2011;16(1):35–41. doi:10.2309/JAVA.16-1-5
  • Sharp R, Esterman A, McCutcheon H, Hearse N, Cummings M. The safety and efficacy of midlines compared to peripherally inserted central catheters for adult cystic fibrosis patients: a retrospective, observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(5):694–702. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.09.002
  • Dickson HG, Flynn O, West D, Alexandrou E, Mifflin N, Malone M. A cluster of failures of midline catheters in a hospital in the home program: a retrospective analysis. J Infusion Nurs. 2019;42(4):203–208. doi:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000330
  • Wall C, Moore J, Thachil J. Catheter-related thrombosis: a practical approach. J Intensive Care Soc. 2016;17(2):160–167. doi:10.1177/1751143715618683
  • Del Principe MI, Buccisano F, Maurillo L, et al. Infections increase the risk of central venous catheter-related thrombosis in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Thromb Res. 2013;132(5):511–514. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.007
  • Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM, et al. Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients. Chest. 1998;114(1):207–213. doi:10.1378/chest.114.1.207
  • Lisova K, Hromadkova J, Pavelková K, Zauška V, Havlin J, Charvat J. The incidence of symptomatic upper limb venous thrombosis associated with midline catheter: prospective observation. J Vasc Access. 2018;19(5):492–495. doi:10.1177/1129729818761276
  • Xu T, Kingsley L, DiNucci S, et al. Safety and utilization of peripherally inserted central catheters versus midline catheters at a large academic medical center. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(12):1458–1461. doi:10.1016/J.AJIC.2016.09.010
  • Bing S, Smotherman C, Rodriguez RG, Skarupa DJ, Ra JH, Crandall ML. PICC versus midlines: comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters with respect to incidence of thromboembolic and infectious complications. Am J Surg. 2022;223(5):983–987. doi:10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2021.09.029
  • Spiegel RJ, Eraso D, Leibner E, Thode H, Morley EJ, Weingart S. The utility of midline intravenous catheters in critically ill emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(4):538–545. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.09.018
  • Passaro G, Pittiruti M, la Greca A. The fibroblastic sleeve, the neglected complication of venous access devices: a narrative review. J Vasc Access. 2021;22(5):801–813. doi:10.1177/1129729820951035
  • Bahl A, Johnson S, Mielke N, Karabon P. Early recognition of peripheral intravenous catheter failure using serial ultrasonographic assessments. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253243. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0253243

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.