529
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW

Advances in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 361-368 | Received 14 Jan 2023, Accepted 01 Apr 2023, Published online: 18 Apr 2023

References

  • Xie J, Wang M, Cao Y, et al. ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction is not associated with high complication rate as before: a Meta-analysis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023;57(1–6):7–15. doi:10.1080/2000656X.2021.1981351
  • Colwell AS, Taylor EM. Recent advances in implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):421e–432e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006510
  • Czajka ML, Pfeifer C. Breast Cancer Surgery. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
  • Rocco N, Catanuto G. More evidence for implant-based breast reconstruction. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):174–175. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30831-3
  • Ter Louw RP, Nahabedian MY. Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5S):51S–59S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003942
  • Kaplan J, Wagner RD, Braun TL, Chu C, Winocour SJ. Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2019;33(4):236–239. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1696966
  • Kincaid SB. Breast reconstruction: a review. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12(5):431–448. doi:10.1097/00000637-198405000-00005
  • Riis M. Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer. Ann Med Surg. 2020;56:95–107. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.016
  • Dyrberg DL, Bille C, Gunnarsson GL, et al. Breast animation deformity. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(1):7–15. doi:10.5999/aps.2018.00479
  • Alnaif N, Safran T, Viezel-Mathieu A, Alhalabi B, Dionisopoulos T. Treatment of breast animation deformity: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(5):781–788. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2019.02.025
  • Oh C, Winocour SJ, Lemaine V. Latest trends in subpectoral breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2019;33(4):224–228. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1696964
  • Dyrberg DL, Bille C, Gunnarsson GL, Sørensen JA, Thomsen JB. Visualized pre- and subpectoral implant placement for immediate breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S251–S254. doi:10.21037/gs.2019.05.09
  • Galimberti V, Vicini E, Corso G, et al. Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications. Breast. 2017;34(Suppl1):S82–S84. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034
  • Cuomo R. Submuscular and pre-pectoral ADM assisted immediate breast reconstruction: a literature review. Medicina. 2020;56(6):256. doi:10.3390/medicina56060256
  • Damsgaard TE, Rønning H. Indocyanine green guided mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S287–S290. doi:10.21037/gs.2019.06.10
  • Kim JYS, Qiu CS, Chiu WK, et al. A Quantitative Analysis of Animation Deformity in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(2):291–301. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005800
  • Marcasciano M, Kaciulyte J, Marcasciano F, Lo Torto F, Ribuffo D, Casella D. “No Drain, No Gain”: simultaneous seroma drainage and tissue expansion in pre-pectoral tissue expander-based breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(4):1118–1119. doi:10.1007/s00266-018-1192-0
  • Chandarana M, Harries S; National Braxon Audit Study Group. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. BJS Open. 2020;4(1):71–77. doi:10.1002/bjs5.50236
  • Eichler C, Schulz C, Vogt N, Warm M. The use of Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADM) in breast reconstruction: a review. Surg Technol Int. 2017;31:53–60.
  • Cheng A, Saint-Cyr M. Comparison of different ADM materials in breast surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39(2):167–175. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2012.02.004
  • Headon H, Kasem A, Manson A, Choy C, Carmichael AR, Mokbel K. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: a prospective observational study in a single centre. Surg Oncol. 2016;25(2):104–110. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2016.03.004
  • Liu J, Hou J, Li Z, Wang B, Sun J. Efficacy of acellular dermal matrix in capsular contracture of implant-based breast reconstruction: a single-arm meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(3):735–742. doi:10.1007/s00266-019-01603-2
  • Kim A, Jung JH, Choi YL, Pyon JK. Capsule biopsy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) to predict future capsular contracture in two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(9):1576–1606. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2019.05.021
  • Namnoum JD. Expander/implant reconstruction with AlloDerm: recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):387–394. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee95b
  • Onesti MG, Di Taranto G, Ribuffo D, Scuderi N. ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction and skin reduction mastectomy: expanding the indications for subcutaneous reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(4):673–680. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.004
  • Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):287–294. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002950
  • Yang JY, Kim CW, Lee JW, Kim SK, Lee SA, Hwang E. Considerations for patient selection: prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(6):550–557. doi:10.5999/aps.2019.00353
  • Manrique OJ, Banuelos J, Abu-Ghname A, et al. Surgical outcomes of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in young women. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(3):e2119. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002119
  • van Deventer PV, Graewe FR. The blood supply of the breast revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(5):1388–1397. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002048
  • Liu DZ, Mathes DW, Zenn MR, Neligan PC. The application of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in plastic surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27(6):355–364. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281515
  • Muntean MV, Ardelean F, Strilciuc S, Pestean C, Georgescu AV, Muntean V. Flap warming improves intraoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) assessment of perfusion. An experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(7):1150–1156. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.014
  • Malagón-López P, Vilà J, Carrasco-López C, et al. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for fat necrosis reduction in the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(4):NP45–NP54. doi:10.1093/asj/sjy256
  • Pruimboom T, Schols RM, Van Kuijk SM, Van der Hulst RR, Qiu SS. Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;4(4):CD013280. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013280.pub2
  • Johnson AC, Colakoglu S, Chong TW, Mathes DW. Indocyanine green angiography in breast reconstruction: utility, limitations, and search for standardization. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(3):e2694. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002694
  • Antony AK, Poirier J, Madrigrano A, Kopkash KA, Robinson EC. Evolution of the surgical technique for “Breast in a Day” direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: transitioning from dual-plane to prepectoral implant placement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(6):1547–1556. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005627
  • Sbitany H. Important considerations for performing prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(6S):7S–13S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000004045
  • Scheflan M, Allweis TM, Ben Yehuda D, Maisel Lotan A. Meshed acellular dermal matrix in immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(11):e3265. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003265
  • Kaya B, Serel S. Breast reconstruction. Exp Oncol. 2013;35(4):280–286.
  • DellaCroce FJ, Wolfe ET. Breast reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(2):445–454. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2012.12.004
  • Gurrado A, Pasculli A, Toma A, et al. Mastectomy with one-stage or two-stage reconstruction in breast cancer: analysis of early outcomes and patient’s satisfaction [published correction appears in Updates Surg. 2022 Dec 17;:]. Updates Surg. 2023;75(1):235–243. doi:10.1007/s13304-022-01416-0
  • Atia AN, Sergesketter AR, Morris MX, et al. Predicting final implant volume in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(1):e4780. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000004780
  • Rampazzo S, Spissu N, Pinna M, et al. One-stage immediate alloplastic breast reconstruction in large and ptotic breasts: an institutional algorithm. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):1170. doi:10.3390/jcm12031170
  • Regan JP, Schaffner AD. Breast reconstruction expander implant. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
  • Crowley JS, Liu FC, Rizk NM, Nguyen D. Concurrent management of lymphedema and breast reconstruction with single-stage omental vascularized lymph node transfer and autologous breast reconstruction: a case series [published online ahead of print, 2023 Feb 8]. Microsurgery. 2023. doi:10.1002/micr.31017
  • Escandón JM, Sweitzer K, Christiano JG, et al. Subpectoral versus prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis of 30-day morbidity and long-term outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;76:76–87. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.028
  • Jacobs JMS, Salzberg CA. Direct to implant reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2023;50(2):243–248. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2022.11.003
  • Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):891–899. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677
  • Weber WP, Shaw J, Pusic A, et al. Oncoplastic breast consortium recommendations for mastectomy and whole breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy. Breast. 2022;63:123–139. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.008
  • Wilkins EG, Hamill JB, Kim HM, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: one-year outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):164–170. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002033
  • Bozzuto LM, Bartholomew AJ, Tung S, et al. Decreased postoperative pain and opioid use following prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a retrospective cohort study: pain after pre- versus subpectoral reconstruction [published online ahead of print, 2020 Dec 13]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;74(8):1763–1769. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.009
  • Schaeffer CV, Dassoulas KR, Thuman J, Campbell CA. Early functional outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction: a case-matched cohort study. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;82(6SSuppl 5):S399–S403. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001669
  • Gabriel A, Sigalove S, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral revision breast reconstruction for treatment of implant-associated animation deformity: a review of 102 reconstructions. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(5):519–526. doi:10.1093/asj/sjx261
  • Maruccia M, Elia R, Nacchiero E, Giudice G. Skin reducing mastectomy and prepectoral breast reconstruction in large ptotic breasts [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 24]. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01843-7
  • Abbate O, Rosado N, Sobti N, Vieira BL, Liao EC. Meta-analysis of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: guide to patient selection and current outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;182(3):543–554. doi:10.1007/s10549-020-05722-2
  • Kayali M, Abi Jaoude J, Tfayli A, El Saghir N, Poortmans P, Zeidan YH. Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes: no one size fits all. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;147:102880. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102880
  • Punglia RS, Ortiz Pimentel S, Cronin AM, et al. Patient-preferred outcomes measurement after post-mastectomy radiation therapy and immediate reconstruction. Breast J. 2020;26(2):319–321. doi:10.1111/tbj.13592
  • Christante D, Pommier SJ, Diggs BS, et al. Using complications associated with postmastectomy radiation and immediate breast reconstruction to improve surgical decision making. Arch Surg. 2010;145(9):873–878. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.170
  • Zhang L, Jin K, Wang X, et al. The impact of radiotherapy on reoperation rates in patients undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(4):961–968. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-07135-4
  • Ho AY, Hu ZI, Mehrara BJ, Wilkins EG. Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):e742–e753. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30617-4
  • Naoum GE, Oladeru OT, Niemierko A, et al. Optimal breast reconstruction type for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy followed by radiation therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;183(1):127–136. doi:10.1007/s10549-020-05747-7
  • Heller DR, Zhuo H, Zhang Y, et al. Surgical outcomes of mastectomy with immediate autologous reconstruction followed by radiation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(4):2169–2179. doi:10.1245/s10434-020-09122-0
  • Teotia SS, Amaya J, Haddock NT. The impact of prepectoral versus subpectoral tissue expander placement on complications and outcomes in delayed-immediate autologous patients who undergo PMRT [published online ahead of print, 2022 Dec 19]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010068
  • Graziano FD, Shay PL, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Sbitany H. Prepectoral implant reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation. Gland Surg. 2021;10(1):411–416. doi:10.21037/gs.2020.03.33
  • Long C, Kraenzlin F, Aravind P, et al. Prepectoral breast reconstruction is safe in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75(9):3041–3047. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.030
  • Sinnott CJ, Persing SM, Pronovost M, Hodyl C, McConnell D, Ott Young A. Impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2899–2908. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6602-7
  • Patel AA, Arquette CP, Yesantharao PS, et al. Examining the effects of postmastectomy radiation therapy in prepectoral versus subpectoral autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;86(5SSuppl 3):S390–S394. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002762
  • Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy: short-term outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(12):e1631. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001631
  • Nahabedian MY. What are the long-term aesthetic issues in prepectoral breast reconstruction? Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(Suppl 2):S29–S37. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaa164
  • Darrach H, Kraenzlin F, Khavanin N, Chopra K, Sacks JM. The role of fat grafting in prepectoral breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2019;8(1):61–66. doi:10.21037/gs.2018.10.09
  • Viezel-Mathieu A, Alnaif N, Aljerian A, et al. Acellular dermal matrix-sparing direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction: a comparative study including cost analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(2):139–143. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001997
  • Gfrerer L, Liao EC. Technique refinement in prepectoral implant breast reconstruction with vicryl mesh pocket and acellular dermal matrix support. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(4):e1749. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001749