Comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate-cage construct in treatment of cervical spondylosis with regard to clinical outcomes and incidence of major complications: a meta-analysis

References

• IrvineDHFosterJBNewellDJKlukvinBNPrevalence of cervical spondylosis in general practiceLancet1965173951089109214283765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChauAMMobbsRJBone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusionEur Spine J200918444946419152011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HirparaKMButlerJSDolanRTO’ByrneJMPoyntonARNonoperative modalities to treat symptomatic cervical spondylosisAdv Orthop2012201229485721991426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ClowardRBThe anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disksJ Neurosurg195815660261713599052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KorinthMCTreatment of cervical degenerative disc disease – current status and trendsZentralbl Neurochir200869311312418666050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MummaneniPVKaiserMGMatzPGCervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathyJ Neurosurg Spine200911213014119769492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FountasKNKapsalakiEZNikolakakosLGAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complicationsSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200732212310231717906571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BazazRLeeMJYooJUIncidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective studySpine (Phila Pa 1976)200227222453245812435974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-HammondCANewKCPietrobonRCurtisDJScharverCHTurnerDAProspective analysis of incidence and risk factors of dysphagia in spinesurgery patients: comparison of anterior cervical, posterior cervical, and lumbar proceduresSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200429131441144615223936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frempong-BoaduAHoutenJKOsbornBSwallowing and speech dysfunction in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, objective preoperative and postoperative assessmentJ Spinal Disord Tech200215536236812394659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkJBChoYSRiewKDDevelopment of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plateJ Bone Joint Surg Am200587355856315741622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KulkarniAGHeeHTWongHKSolis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidenceSpine J20077220520917321970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmiederKWolzik-GrossmannMPechlivanisIEngelhardtMScholzMHardersASubsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up studyJ Neurosurg Spine20064644745316776355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeYSKimYBParkSWDoes a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate?Spine (Phila Pa 1976)20154010E563E57025955093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShiSLiuZLiXFQianLZhongGBChenFJComparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical studySpine J20151591973198025912505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangZJiangWLiXThe application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusionEur Spine J201524114815425337859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NemotoOKitadaANaitouSTachibanaAItoYFujikawaAStand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-upEur J Orthop Surg Traumatol201525Suppl 1127134
   Google Scholar
• VanekPBradacODelacyPLacmanJBenesVAnterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with Zero-P spacer: prospective comparative study-clinical and radiological results at a minimum 2 years after surgerySpine (Phila Pa 1976)20133813E792E79723524869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangLGuYLiangLStand-alone anchored spacer versus anterior plate for multilevel anterior cervical diskectomy and fusionOrthopedics20123510e1503e151023027488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangHChenDWangXYangLHeHYuanWZero-profile integrated plate and spacer device reduces rate of adjacent-level ossification development and dysphagia compared to ACDF with plating and cage systemArch Orthop Trauma Surg2015135678178725851405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangZDZhuRFYangHLThe application of a zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusionJ Clin Neurosci201421346246624262773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiYHaoDHeBWangXYanLThe efficiency of zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy fusion: a prospective controlled long-term follow-up studyJ Spinal Disord Tech Epub20131016
   Google Scholar
• QiMChenHLiuYZhangYLiangLYuanWThe use of a zero-profile device compared with an anterior plate and cage in the treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis: A preliminary clinical investigationBone Joint J201395-B454354723539708
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MiaoJShenYKuangYEarly follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusionJ Spinal Disord Tech2013265E193E19723168389
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HofstetterCPKesavabhotlaKBoockvarJAZero-profile anchored spacer reduces rate of dysphagia compared with ACDF with anterior platingJ Spinal Disord Tech2015285E284E29023429316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ScholzMReyesPMSchleicherPA new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devicesSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200934215616019139665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NayakANSteinMIJamesCRBiomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro studySpine J201414123002301024948039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaikHKangDGLehmanRAJrDo stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws provide adequate segmental stability for multilevel cervical arthrodesis?Spine J20141481740174724462812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FraserJFHartlRAnterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a meta analysis of fusion ratesJ Neurosurg Spine20076429830317436916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HidaKIwasakiYYanoSAkinoMSekiTLong-term follow-up results in patients with cervical disk disease treated by cervical anterior fusion using titanium cage implantsNeurol Med Chir (Tokyo)2008481044044618948677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NjokuIJrAlimiMLengLZAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: clinical articleJ Neurosurg Spine201421452953725105338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenYWangXLuXComparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-upEur Spine J20132271539154623568254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuWJJiangLSLiangYDaiLYCage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective studyEur Spine J20122171374138222205113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GercekEArletVDelisleJMarchesiDSubsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warningEur Spine2003125513516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeYSKimYBParkSWRisk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignmentSpine (Phila Pa 1976)201439161280128724827519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeMJBazazRFureyCGYooJInfluence of anterior cervical plate design on Dysphagia: a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up studyJ Spinal Disord Tech200518540640916189451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar