Cost-utility analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open aortobifemoral bypass surgery

References

• ForbesJFAdamDJBellJBypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: health-related quality of life outcomes, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness analysisJ Vasc Surg2010515 Suppl43S51S20435261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CurrieICWilsonYGBairdRNLamontPMTreatment of intermittent claudication: the impact on quality of lifeEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg19951033563617552539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PellJPImpact of intermittent claudication on quality of life. The Scottish Vascular Audit GroupEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg1995944694727633995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpronkSWhiteJVBoschJLHuninkMGImpact of claudication and its treatment on quality of lifeSemin Vasc Surg20072013917386358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MonetaGLLandryGJNguyenLLDoes lower-extremity bypass improve quality of life? Is it cost effective?Semin Vasc Surg200922427528020006809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoggiaMJaverliatIDi CentaITotal laparoscopic bypass for aortoiliac occlusive lesions: 93-case experienceJ Vasc Surg200440589990615557903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LecotFSabbeTHouthoofdSDaenensKFourneauILong-term results of totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypassEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg201652558158727346447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TiekJRemyPSabbeTLaparoscopic versus open approach for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease–a multicentre randomised controlled trialEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg201243671171522386382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrulsSQuaniersJTrommePLavigneJPVan DammeHDefraigneJOComparison of laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass in the treatment of aortoiliac disease. Results of a contemporary series (2003–2009)Acta Chir Belg20121121515822442910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NioDDiksJBemelmanWAWisselinkWLegemateDALaparoscopic vascular surgery: a systematic reviewEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg200733326327117127084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HelgetveitIKrogAHTotally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease or abdominal aortic aneurysms – a systematic review and critical appraisal of literatureVasc Health Risk Manag20171318719928572732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KazmiSSHSundhagenJOFlorenesTLKroeseAJJorgensenJJLaparoscopic aortic surgery. [Norwegian] Laparoskopisk aortakirurgiTidsskr Nor Laegeforen2007127111518152017551557
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KazmiSSJørgensenJJSundhagenJOA comparative cohort study of totally laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass for the treatment of advanced atherosclerosisVasc Health Risk Manag20151154154726425098
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KazmiSSHKrogAHBergeSTSundhagenJOSahbaMFalkRSPatient perceived health-related quality of life before and after laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypassVasc Health Risk Manag20171316917628546754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrogAHSahbaMPettersenEMComparison of the acute-phase response after laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgery: a substudy of a randomized controlled trialVasc Health Risk Manag20161237137827713633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrogAHThorsbyPMSahbaMPerioperative humoral stress response to laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgeryScand J Clin Lab Invest2017772839228067075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrantAWilemanSRamsayCThe effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimal access surgery amongst people with gastrooesophageal reflux disease – a UK collaborative study. The REFLUX trialHealth Technol Assess200812311181iiiiv
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KorolijaDSauerlandSWood-DauphinéeSEvaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic SurgerySurg Endosc200418687989715108103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BragaMFrassonMZulianiWVignaliAPecorelliNDi CarloVRandomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resectionBr J Surg20109781180118620602506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SilistreliECatalyurekHKarabayOHepaguslarHAcikelUCost-effectiveness of minimally invasive-intervention in aortofemoral revascularizationJ Int Med Res200129542142411725829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsenLGHellumCStorheimKCost-effectiveness of total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain: a Norwegian multicenter RCTSpine (Philadel-phia, Pa 1976)20143912332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KindPLafataJEMatuszewskiKRaischDThe use of QALYs in clinical and patient decision-making: issues and prospectsValue Health200912Suppl 1S27S3019250128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WisloffTPriority-setting criteria in the Norwegian health servicesTidsskr Nor Laegeforen2015135151373137526315241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norwegian-Directorate-of-Health-(Helsedirektoratet)The National System for the Introduction of New Health Technologies (methods) within the Specialist Health Service (Nasjonalt system for innføring av nye metoder i spesialisthelsetjenesten) Available from: https://nyemetoder.no/englishAccessed October 1, 2015
   Google Scholar
• RamseySDWillkeRJGlickHCost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force reportValue Health201518216117225773551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RouersAMeurisseNLavigneJPPotential benefits of laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypass surgeryActa Chir Belg2005105661061516438070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NorgrenLHiattWRDormandyJANehlerMRHarrisKAFowkesFGInter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II)J Vascul Surg200745Suppl SS5S67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GomezFPRodriguez-RoisinRGlobal Initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCurr Opin Pulm Med200282818611845001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoggiaMBourriezAJaverliatIGoeau-BrissonniereOTotally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass: a new and simplified approachEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg200224327427512217292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerdmanMGudexCLloydADevelopment and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)Qual Life Res201120101727173621479777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EuroQol groupEuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of lifeHealth Policy199016319920810109801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HusebyBMKalsethBØdegaardHSAMDATA Spesialisthel-setjenesten 2014 (Data from the Norwegian Specialist Health Services)2014 Available from: https://helsedirektoratet.no/Lists/Publikasjoner/Attachments/989/SAMDATA%202014%20IS-2348.pdfAccessed December 15, 2016
   Google Scholar
• DevlinNShahKFengYMulhernBVan HoutBValuing Health-Related Quality of Life: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England2016 Available from: https://www.ohe.org/publications/valuing-health-related-quality-life-eq-5d-5l-value-set-englandAccessed January 16, 2017
   Google Scholar
• NordEEuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in NorwayHealth Policy1991181253610112299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RutherfordRBBakerJDErnstCRecommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised versionJ Vasc Surg19972635175389308598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WisløffTHagenGHamidiVMovikEKlempMOlsenJAEstimating QALY gains in applied studies: a review of cost-utility analyses published in 2010Pharmacoeconomics201432436737524477679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaarlolaAPettiläVKekkiPPerformance of two measures of general health-related quality of life, the EQ-5D and the RAND-36 among critically ill patientsIntensive Care Med200430122245225215650867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KorolijaDSauerlandSWood-DauphineeSEvaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic SurgerySurg Endosc200418687989715108103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FollesdalAShould prioritization in health care programs be based on duty or care ethics or benefit ethics?Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen20031232028972898 Norwegian14600720
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchlanderMMeasures of efficiency in healthcare: QALMs about QALYs?Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes20101043214226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WoodsBRevillPSculpherMClaxtonKCountry-level cost-effectiveness thresholds: initial estimates and the need for further rResearchValue Health201619892993527987642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrummondMFSculpherMJClaxtonKStoddartGLTorranceGWMethods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care ProgrammesOUPOxford2015
   Google Scholar
• NgSSLeungWWWongCYQuality of life after laparoscopic vs open sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancerWorld J Gastroenterol201319294764477323922475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JansonMLindholmEAnderbergBHaglindERandomized trial of health-related quality of life after open and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancerSurg Endosc200721574775317342556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChatterjeeAChenLGoldenbergEABaeHTFinlaysonSROpportunity cost in the evaluation of surgical innovations: a case study of laparoscopic versus open colectomySurg Endosc20102451075107919911224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MishraVGeiranOKrohg-SørensenKAndresenSThoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Direct hospital cost and Diagnosis Related Group reimbursementScand Cardiovasc J2008421778418273734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar