Fractional Flow Reserve: Patient Selection and Perspectives

References

• Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann FJ, Sechtem U, Banning AP, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–477. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandaswamy E, Zuo L. Recent advances in treatment of coronary artery disease: role of science and technology. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):424. doi:10.3390/ijms19020424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang AL, Maggiore PL, Brown RA, et al. CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFRCT): from gatekeeping to roadmapping. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020;71(2):201–207. doi:10.1177/0846537119893752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. New Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503–1516. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukkarinen H, Hentinen M. Treatments of coronary artery disease improve quality of life in the long term. Nurs Res. 2006;55(1):26–33. doi:10.1097/00006199-200601000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. New Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1395–1407. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, et al. ACC/AHA/ACP–ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: executive summary and recommendations. Circulation. 1999;99(21):2829–2848. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.99.21.2829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini GBJ, Hartigan PM, Shaw LJ, et al. Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial (Clinical outcomes utilizing revascularization and aggressive drug evaluation). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(2):195–201. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.10.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. Circulation. 1995;92(8):2333–2342. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.92.8.2333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Hwang D, Choi KH, et al. Prognostic impact of residual anatomic disease burden after functionally complete revascularization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okutucu S, Cilingiroglu M, Feldman MD. Physiologic assessment of coronary stenosis: current status and future directions. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021;23(7):1–10. doi:10.1007/s11886-021-01521-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier S, Collet C, Xaplanteris P, et al. Global fractional flow reserve value predicts 5-year outcomes in patients with coronary atherosclerosis but without ischemia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(24). doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.017729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Rudolph T, Rieber J, et al. Performing and interpreting fractional flow reserve measurements in clinical practice: an expert consensus document. Interv Cardiol Rev. 2017;12(2):97–109. doi:10.15420/icr.2017:13:2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bech GJW, de Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2001;103(24):2928–2934. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.103.24.2928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonino PAL, de Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. New Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–224. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. New Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1208–1217. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ, et al. Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve. New Engl J Med. 2018;379(3):250–259. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1803538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann FM, Ferrara A, Johnson NP, et al. Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(45):3182–3188. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstaedt M, Yazar A, Germing A, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery disease after deferral of surgical revascularization on the basis of fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J. 2006;152(1):156.e1–156.e9. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2006.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120(15):1505–1512. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann FJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided multivessel angioplasty in myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2017;376(13):1234–1244. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1701067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(14):1289–1367. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntalianis A, Sels JW, Davidavicius G, et al. Fractional flow reserve for the assessment of nonculprit coronary artery stenoses in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(12):1274–1281. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershlick AH, Khan JN, Kelly DJ, et al. Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and multivessel disease: the CvLPRIT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(10):963–972. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, et al. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1115–1123. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1305520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta SR, Wood DA, Storey RF, et al. Complete revascularization with multivessel PCI for myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2019;381(15):1411–1421. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1907775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrøm T, Kelbæk H, Helqvist S, et al. Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3 - PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9994):665–671. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60648-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Nam CW, Tonino PAL, et al. The prognostic value of residual coronary stenoses after functionally complete revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(14):1701–1711. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal SK, Kasula S, Hacioglu Y, Ahmed Z, Uretsky BF, Hakeem A. Utilizing post-intervention fractional flow reserve to optimize acute results and the relationship to long-term outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(10):1022–1031. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D, Huang J, Westra J, et al. Immediate post-procedural functional assessment of percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence and future directions. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(27):2695–2707. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini L, Poletti E, Demir OM, et al. Impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve measurement on procedural management and clinical outcomes: the REPEAT-FFR study. J Interv Cardiol. 2019;31(8):229–234.
   Google Scholar
• Collison D, Didagelos M, Aetesam-ur-Rahman M, et al. Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR). Eur Heart J. 2021:1–13. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449
   Google Scholar
• Pargaonkar VS, Kimura T, Kameda R, et al. Invasive assessment of myocardial bridging in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2021;16(13):1070–1078. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakeem A, Cilingiroglu M, Leesar MA. Hemodynamic and intravascular ultrasound assessment of myocardial bridging: fractional flow reserve paradox with dobutamine versus adenosine. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75(2):229–236. doi:10.1002/ccd.22237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujita K, Maehara A, Mintz GS, et al. Comparison of angiographic and intravascular ultrasonic detection of myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(12):1608–1613. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escaned J, Cortés J, Flores A, et al. Importance of diastolic fractional flow reserve and dobutamine challenge in physiologic assessment of myocardial bridging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(2):226–233. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00588-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X, Lim HS, Tahk SJ, et al. Impact of age on the functional significance of intermediate Epicardial artery disease. Circ J. 2016;80(7):1583–1589. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdoia M, Gioscia R, Nardin M, et al. Impact of age on the functional evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses with instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve. Angiology. 2021;72(1):62–69. doi:10.1177/0003319720947578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim HS, Tonino PAL, de Bruyne B, et al. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) trial substudy. Int J Cardiol. 2014;177(1):66–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClish JC, Ragosta M, Powers ER, et al. Effect of acute myocardial infarction on the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of the severity of coronary artery narrowing. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(9):1102–1106. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biscaglia S, Guiducci V, Santarelli A, et al. Physiology-guided revascularization versus optimal medical therapy of nonculprit lesions in elderly patients with myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the FIRE trial. Am Heart J. 2020;229:100–109. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahinarslan A, Kocaman SA, Olgun H, et al. The reliability of fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus. Coron Artery Dis. 2009;20(5):317–321. doi:10.1097/MCA.0b013e32832c8ca3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gioia G, Flores NS, Franco D, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting or fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with multivessel disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;(October):153–171. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009157
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa H, Chikamori T, Tanaka N, Usui Y, Takazawa K, Yamashina A. Application of pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve in assessing the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circ J. 2004;68:11. doi:10.1253/circj.68.993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Franco AJ, Jiménez-Navarro MF, Muñoz-García AJ, Alonso-Briales JH, Hernández-García JM, Galván EDT. Long-term prognosis in diabetic patients in whom revascularization is deferred following fractional flow reserve assessment. Revista Española de Cardiología. 2008;61(4):352–359. doi:10.1016/s1885-5857(08)60144-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Choi KH, Koo BK, et al. Comparison of major adverse cardiac events between instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve-guided strategy in patients with or without type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(9):857–864. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone AM, de Caterina AR, Basile E, et al. Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended by a stenosis on fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(1):29–36. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.971101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbah M, Nepper-Christensen L, Lønborg J, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI in patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy: a DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI substudy. EuroIntervention. 2021;16(7):584–590. doi:10.4244/eij-d-19-00577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhatriwalla AK, Ragosta M, Powers ER, et al. High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18(11):544–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(8). doi:10.1002/ejhf.592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Tonino PAL, de Bruyne B, et al. The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) trial. Int J Cardiol. 2016;204(2016):206–210. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Gioia G, de Bruyne B, Pellicano M, et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with reduced ejection fraction. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(17):1665–1672. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth GG, de Bruyne B, Rusinaru D, et al. Impact of right atrial pressure on fractional flow reserve measurements comparison of fractional flow reserve and myocardial fractional flow reserve in 1600 coronary stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(5):453–459. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejia-Renteria H, Nombela-Franco L, Paradis JM, et al. Angiography-based quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis. EuroIntervention. 2021;16(4):E285–E292. doi:10.4244/eij-d-19-01001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gioia G, Pellicano M, Toth GG, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization in patients with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(9):1511–1515. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesarini G, Scarsini R, Zivelonghi C, et al. Functional assessment of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of pressure overload on the evaluation of lesions severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(11):1–10. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendrik J, Ahmad Y, Eftekhari A, et al. Long-term effects of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on coronary hemodynamics in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(5). doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.015133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changal K, Patel M, Salman FNU, Nazir S, Gupta R. Meta-analysis comparing angiography-guided versus ffr-guided coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2020;135:184–185. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timbadia D, Ler A, Sazzad F, Alexiou C, Kofidis T. FFR-guided versus coronary angiogram-guided CABG: a review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. J Card Surg. 2020;35(10):2785–2793. doi:10.1111/jocs.14880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno F, D’Ascenzo F, Marengo G, et al. Fractional flow reserve guided versus angiographic guided surgical revascularization: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. doi:10.1002/ccd.29427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier S, Toth GG, de Bruyne B, et al. Six-year follow-up of fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(6):1–7. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermers J, Torguson R. FUTURE trial does not indicate advantage for FFR over angiography alone in multivessel disease patients. Available from: https://www.crtonline.org/news-detail/future-trial-does-not-indicate-advantage-ffr-over-. Accessed November 30, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Neale T. FUTURE results confirm more deaths with FFR-guided treatment choice. Available from: https://www.tctmd.com/news/future-results-confirm-more-deaths-ffr-guided-treatment-choice. Accessed November 30, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Koo BK, Park KW, Kang HJ, et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(6):726–732. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo BK, Waseda K, Kang HJ, et al. Anatomic and functional evaluation of bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(2):113–119. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.887406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn JM, Lee JY, Kang SJ, et al. Functional assessment of jailed side branches in coronary bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(2):155–161. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(4):633–637. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo BK. Physiologic evaluation of bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Interv Cardiol. 2009;22(2):110–113. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00437.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Kim WJ, et al. Functional and morphological assessment of side branch after left main coronary artery bifurcation stenting with cross-over technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(4):545–552. doi:10.1002/ccd.25057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391:10115. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9
   Google Scholar
• Soares A, Brown DL. The fallacies of fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol. 2020;302(2020):34–35. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demir OM, Schrieken C, Curio J, Rahman H. Behavioural determinants impacting the adoption rate of coronary physiology. Int J Cardiol. 2021;330:12–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waard GA, Hollander MR, Teunissen PFA, et al. Changes in coronary blood flow after acute myocardial infarction: insights from a patient study and an experimental porcine model. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(6):602–613. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thim T, Götberg M, Fröbert O, et al. Agreement between nonculprit stenosis follow-up iFR and FFR after STEMI (iSTEMI substudy). BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):1–3. doi:10.1186/s13104-020-05252-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Shi Z, Cai Y, et al. Impact of coronary tortuosity on coronary pressure: numerical simulation study. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):3–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang X, Dai Q, Ma G. Coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance in patients with coronary tortuosity and without atherosclerosis. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(9). doi:10.1177/0300060520955060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Wang Y, Zhu H, Zhou H, Zhou J. Impact of coronary tortuosity on coronary blood supply: a Patient-Specific Study. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederland Z. Farmacotherapeutisch Kompas: adenosine. Available from: https://www.farmacotherapeutischkompas.nl/bladeren/preparaatteksten/a/adenosine#contra-indicaties. Accessed November 30, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine vasodilator independent stenosis evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(15):1392–1402. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanerud J, Ahn JM, Jeremias A, et al. Validation of a novel non-hyperaemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity: the Resting Full-cycle Ratio (VALIDATE RFR) study. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(7):806–814. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson NP, Li W, Chen X, et al. Diastolic pressure ratio: new approach and validation vs. the instantaneous wave-free ratio. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(31):2585–2594. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’t Veer M, Pijls NHJ, Hennigan B, et al. Comparison of different diastolic resting indexes to iFR: are they all equal? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(25):3088–3096. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, et al. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. New Engl J Med. 2017;376(19):1824–1834. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1700445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave–intensity analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(15):1392–1402. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waard G, Di Mario C, Lerman A, Serruys P, van Royen N. Instantaneous wave-free ratio to guide coronary revascularisation: physiological framework, validation and differences from fractional flow reserve. EuroIntervention. 2017;13(4):450–458. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. New Engl J Med. 2017;376(19):1813–1823. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1616540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(19):1989–1997. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazato R, Park HB, Berman DS, et al. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(6):881–889. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur S, Achenbach S, Leipsic J, et al. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: neXt sTeps) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013;7(5):279–288. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2013.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hamersvelt RW, Voskuil M, de Jong PA, Willemink MJ, Išgum I, Leiner T. Diagnostic performance of on-site coronary CT angiography–derived fractional flow reserve based on patient-specific lumped parameter models. Radiology. 2019;1(4):e190036. doi:10.1148/ryct.2019190036
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnelly PM, Kolossváry M, Karády J, et al. Experience with an on-site coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve algorithm for the assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121(1):9–13. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, et al. Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm. Radiology. 2015;274(3):674–683. doi:10.1148/radiol.14140992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihdayhid AR, Sakaguchi T, Linde JJ, et al. Performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve using reduced-order modelling and static computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(11):1234–1243. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jey114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko BS, Cameron JD, Munnur RK, et al. Noninvasive CT-derived FFR based on structural and fluid analysis: a comparison with Invasive FFR for detection of functionally significant stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(6):663–673. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Wang R, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(9):1303–1308. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Xu L, He J, et al. Diagnostic performance of a fast non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: an initial validation study. Clin Radiol. 2019;74(12):973.e1–973.e6. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peper J, Schaap J, Kelder JC, et al. Added value of computed tomography fractional flow reserve in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–9. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86245-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeng C, Leiner T, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al. Anatomical and functional computed tomography for diagnosing hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(7):1316–1325. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu S, Barbato E, Köszegi Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(7):768–777. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2014.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet C, Onuma Y, Sonck J, et al. Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(35):3314–3321. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2024–2035. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(25):3077–3087. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, et al. Diagnostic performance of in‐procedure angiography‐derived quantitative flow reserve compared to pressure‐derived fractional flow reserve: the FAVOR II Europe‐Japan Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(14). doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.009603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery stenosis by quantitative flow ratio during invasive coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(3). doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masdjedi K, van Zandvoort LJC, Balbi MM, et al. Validation of a three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography-based software to calculate fractional flow reserve: the FAST study. EuroIntervention. 2021;16(7):591–599. doi:10.4244/eij-d-19-00466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seike F, Uetani T, Nishimura K, et al. Correlation between quantitative angiography–derived translesional pressure and fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118(8):1158–1163. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafaklis MI, Muramatsu T, Ishibashi Y, et al. Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: comparison with pressure wire - fractional flow reserve. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(5):574–583. doi:10.4244/EIJY14M07_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC, et al. Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions. Results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(2):149–157. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tröbs M, Achenbach S, Röther J, et al. Comparison of fractional flow reserve based on computational fluid dynamics modeling using coronary angiographic vessel morphology versus invasively measured fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(1):29–35. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011;124(23):574–651. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ba622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi A, Jeremias A, Fearon WF, et al. Expert consensus statement on the use of fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography: a consensus statement of the society of cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(4):509–518. doi:10.1002/ccd.25222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar