120
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Low Ankle-Brachial Index is Associated with Microvascular Coronary Obstruction After Primary PCI

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 23-32 | Published online: 02 Feb 2021

References

  • Smith SC, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2001;103(24):3019–3041. doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.24.3019
  • Fukushima N, Tsurumi Y, Jujo K, et al. Impact of myocardial reperfusion status on QT dispersion after successful recanalization of the infarct‐related artery in acute myocardial infarction impact of myocardial reperfusion status on QT dispersion after successful recanalization of the infarct‐related artery in acute myocardial infarction. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27(3):252–259. doi:10.1111/joic.12093
  • van ‘T Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Circulation. 1998;97:2302–2306. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.97.23.2302
  • Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation. 2000;101:125–130. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.101.2.125
  • Stone GW, Peterson MA, Lansky AJ, Dangas G, Mehran R, Leon MB. Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:591–597. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01779-X
  • Gibson CM, Schomig A. Coronary and myocardial angiography: angiographic assessment of both epicardial and myocardial perfusion. Circulation. 2004;109:3096–3105. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000134278.50359.CB
  • Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the “no reflow” phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodelling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996;93:223–228. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.93.2.223
  • Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation. 2000;101:570–580. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.101.5.570
  • Yamada DM, Topol EJ. Importance of microembolization and inflammation in atherosclerotic heart disease. Am Heart J. 2000;140:S90–S102. doi:10.1067/mhj.2000.111611
  • Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, Ottervanger JP, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1112–1117. doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.3035
  • Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, Van‘t Hof AW, et al. Angiographic assessment of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction by myocardial blush grade. Circulation. 2003;107:2115–2119. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000065221.06430.ED
  • Porto I, Burzotta F, Brancati M, et al. Relation of myocardial blush grade to microvascular perfusion and myocardial infarct size after primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1671–1673. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.045
  • Al-Qaisi M, Nott DM, King DH, Kaddoura S. Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI): an update for practitioners. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:833–841. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S6759
  • D X, J L, Zou L, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the ankle–brachial index to diagnose peripheral artery disease: a structured review. Vasc Med. 2010;15:361–369. doi:10.1177/1358863X10378376
  • Newman AB, Siscovick DS, Manolio TA, et al. Ankle-arm index as a marker of atherosclerosis in the cardiovascular health study. Cardiovascular heart study (CHS) collaborative research group. Circulation. 1993;88:837–845. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.88.3.837
  • Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, et al. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126:2890–2909. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276fbcb
  • Manfrini O, Amaduzzi PL, Cenko E, Bugiardini R. Prognostic implications of peripheral artery disease in coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2018;39:121–128. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2018.04.005
  • Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Executive group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) task force for the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618–e651. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617
  • Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119–177. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
  • Karahan Z, Ucaman B, Ulug AV, et al. Effect of hematologic parameters on microvascular reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology. 2016;67(2):151–156. doi:10.1177/0003319715583204
  • Keeley EC, Hillis LD. Primary PCI for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:47–54. doi:10.1056/NEJMct063503
  • Araszkiewicz A, Lesiak M, Grajek S, et al. Effect of microvascular reperfusion on prognosis and left ventricular function in anterior wall myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Int J Cardiol. 2007;114(2):183–187. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.01.057
  • Zalewski J, Zmudka K, Musialek P, et al. Detection of microvascular injury by evaluating epicardial blood flow in early reperfusion following primary angioplasty. Int J Cardiol. 2004;96(3):389–396. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.08.009
  • Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades, flow grades, frame count, and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;105(16):1909–1913. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000014683.52177.B5
  • Brosh D, Assali AR, Mager A, et al. Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(4):442–445. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.054
  • Svilaas T, Vlaar PJ, van der Horst IC, et al. Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:557–567. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0706416
  • Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:765–772. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.97.8.765
  • Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, et al. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis. A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1992;85:1699–1705. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.85.5.1699
  • Porto I, Hamilton-Craig C, Brancati M, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, Crea F. Angiographic assessment of microvascular perfusion—Myocardial blush in clinical practice. Am Heart J. 2010;160:1015–1022. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.08.009
  • Fernandes MR, Fish RD, Canales J, et al. Restoration of microcirculatory patency after myocardial infarction results of current coronary interventional strategies and techniques. Tex Heart Inst J. 2012;39(3):342–350.
  • Vicente J, Mewton N, Croisille P, et al. Comparison of the angiographic myocardial blush grade with delayed-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance for the assessment of microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarctions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74:1000–1007. doi:10.1002/ccd.22157
  • Marra MP, Corbetti F, Cacciavillani L, et al. Relationship between myocardial blush grades, staining, and severe microvascular damage after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a study performed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance in a large consecutive series of patients. Am Heart J. 2010;159:1124–1132. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.03.007
  • Tarantini G, Ramondo A, Napodano M, et al. Myocardial perfusion grade and survival after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1081–1085. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.031
  • Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. The “no reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J Clin Invest. 1974;54:1496–1508. doi:10.1172/JCI107898
  • Belli G, Pezzano A, De Biase AM, et al. Adjunctive thrombus aspiration and mechanical protection from distal embolization in primary percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;50:362–370. doi:10.1002/1522-726x(200007)50:3<362::aid-ccd22>3.0.co;2-h
  • Stone PF, Raabe DS, Jaffe AS. Prognostic significance of location and type of myocardial infarction: independent adverse outcome associated with anterior location. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:453–463. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(88)91517-3
  • Qu B, Liu Q, Li J. Systematic review of association between low ankle-brachial index and all-cause cardiovascular, or non-cardiovascular mortality. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;73:571–575.
  • Lee JY, Lee SW, Lee WS, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of newly revealed, asymptomatic abnormal ankle-brachial index in patients with significant coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1303–1313. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.008
  • Dieter RS, Tomasson J, Gudjonsson T, et al. Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease. Vasc Med. 2003;8:233–236. doi:10.1191/1358863x03vm506ra
  • Md Jafar A, Akanda MA, Khalequzzaman M, et al. Association of ankle-brachial index with the angiographic severity of patient with coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc J. 2018;10(2):201–205. doi:10.3329/cardio.v10i2.36293
  • Sukhija R, Aronow WS, Yalamanchili K, Peterson SJ, Frishman WH, Babu S. Association of ankle-brachial index with severity of angiographic coronary artery disease in patients with peripheral arterial disease and coronary artery disease. Cardiology. 2005;103:158–160. doi:10.1159/000084586
  • Sabedotti M, Sarmento-Leite R, Schaan de Quadros A. Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2014;22(4):359–363. doi:10.1590/0104-1843000000060
  • Papanas N, Symeonidis G, Mavridis G, et al. Ankle-brachial index: a surrogate marker of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus? Int Angiol. 2007;26(3):253–257.