Postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review, critical appraisal, and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

References

• StegPGJamesSKAtarDTask Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevationEur Heart J201233202569261922922416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoxKACarruthersKFDunbarDRUnderestimated and under-recognized: the late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study)Eur Heart J201031222755276420805110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YellonDMHausenloyDJMyocardial reperfusion injuryN Engl J Med2007357111121113517855673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhaoZQCorveraJSHalkosMEInhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioningAm J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol20032852H579H58812860564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StaatPRifoulGPiotCPostconditioning the human heartCirculation2005112142143214816186417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangXCLiuYWangLFReduction in myocardial infarct size by postconditioning in patients after percutaneous coronary interventionJ Invasive Cardiol2007191042443017906344
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ThibaultHPiotCStaatPLong-term benefit of postconditioningCirculation200811781037104418268150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeuschGCardioprotection: chances and challenges of its translation to the clinicLancet2013381986116617523095318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SörenssonPSalehNBouvierFEffect of postconditioning on infarct size in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarctionHeart201096211710171520956486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TarantiniGFavarettoEMarraMPPostconditioning during coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the POST-AMI trialInt J Cardiol20121621333822494866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreixaXBelleraNOrtiz-PérezJTIschaemic postconditioning revisited: lack of effects on infarct size following primary percutaneous coronary interventionEur Heart J201233110311221846677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LimalanathanSAndersenGØKløwNEAbdelnoorMHoffmannPEritslandJEffect of ischemic postconditioning on infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI results of the POSTEMI (POstconditioning in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) randomized trialJ Am Heart Assoc201432e00067924760962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaskeyWKBrief repetitive balloon occlusions enhance reperfusion during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a pilot studyCatheter Cardiovasc Interv200565336136715945105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaXZhangXLiCLuoMEffect of postconditioning on coronary blood flow velocity and endothelial function and LV recovery after myocardial infarctionJ Interv Cardiol200619536737517020559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaskeyWKYoonSCalzadaNRicciardiMJConcordant improvements in coronary flow reserve and ST-segment resolution during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a benefit of postconditioningCatheter Cardiovasc Interv200872221222018546233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LønborgJKelbaekHVejlstrupNCardioprotective effects of ischemic postconditioning in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, evaluated by magnetic resonanceCirc Cardiovasc Interv201031344120118154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XueFYangXZhangBPostconditioning in human heart in percutaneous coronary interventionClin Cardiol201033743944420641122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinXMZhangZYWangLFAttenuation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha elevation and improved heart function by postconditioning for 60 seconds in patients with acute myocardial infarctionChin Med J (Engl)2010123141833183920819564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarciaSHenryTDWangYLLong-term follow-up of patients undergoing postconditioning during ST-elevation myocardial infarctionJ Cardiovasc Transl Res201141929821136310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuTKMishraAKDingFXProtective effect of ischemia postconditioning on reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarctionZhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi20113913539 Chinese21418794
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZhaoCMYangXJYangJHEffect of ischaemic postconditioning on recovery of left ventricular contractile function after acute myocardial infarctionJ Int Med Res20124031082108822906281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThunyFLairezORoubilleFPost-conditioning reduces infarct size and edema in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionJ Am Coll Cardiol201259242175218122676937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElżbieciakMWitaKGrabkaMEffect of postconditioning on infarction size, adverse left ventricular remodeling, and improvement in left ventricular systolic function in patients with first anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionPol Arch Med Wewn2013123626827623674047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DwyerNBMikamiYHillandDNo cardioprotective benefit of ischemic postconditioning in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionJ Interv Cardiol201326548249024106745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HahnJYSongYBKimEKIschemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the effects of postconditioning on myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (POST) randomized trialCirculation2013128171889189624068776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DongMMuNGuoFThe beneficial effects of postconditioning on no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarctionJ Thromb Thrombolysis201438220821424249309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoubilleFMewtonNElbazMNo post-conditioning in the human heart with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 2–3 on admissionEur Heart J201435251675168224585265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MewtonNThibaultHRoubilleFPostconditioning attenuates no-reflow in STEMI patientsBasic Res Cardiol2013108638324022373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HigginsJPAltmanDGGøtzschePCCochrane Bias Methods GroupCochrane Statistical Methods GroupThe Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trialsBMJ2011343d592822008217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BellMLKenwardMGFaircloughDLHortonNJDifferential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may notBMJ2013346e866823338004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohansonPJernbergTGunnarssonGLindahlBWallentinLDellborgMPrognostic value of ST-segment resolution-when and what to measureEur Heart J200324433734512581681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonianRLairdNMeta-analysis in clinical trialsControl Clin Trials1986731771883802833
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJAltmanDGMeasuring inconsistency in meta-anlysesBMJ2003327741455756012958120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EggerMSmithGDAltmanDGSystematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in ContextLondonBMJ Publishing Group1995
   Google Scholar
• SterneJAEggerMSmithGDSystematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysisBMJ2001323730410110511451790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EggerMDavey SmithGSchneiderMMinderCBias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ199731571096296349310563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuvalSTweedieRTrim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysisBiometrics200056245546310877304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IdrisNRNPerformance of the trim and fill method adjusting for the publication bias in meta-analysis of continuous dataAm J Appl Sci20129915121517
   Google Scholar
• PetersJLSuttonAJJonesDRAbramsKRRushtonLPerformance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneityStat Med200726254544456217476644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuttonAJCooperNJJonesDRLambertPCThompsonJRAbramsKREvidence-based sample size calculations based upon updated meta-analysisStat Med200726122479250016981184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrowtherMJHinchliffeSRDonaldASuttonAJSimulation-based sample-size calculation for designing new clinical trials and diagnostic test accuracy studies to update an existing meta-analysisThe Stata Journal2013133451473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BorensteinMHeggesLVHigginsJPTRothsteinHRIntroduction to Meta-AnalysisChichesterJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd2011
   Google Scholar
• Stata.com [homepage on the Internet]Statacorp LP2014 Available from: http://www.stata.comAccessed July 8, 2014
   Google Scholar
• MoherDCookDJEastwoodSOlkinIRennieDStroupDFImproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysesLancet199935491931896190010584742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LønborgJHolmvangLKelbækHST-Segment resolution and clinical outcome with ischemic postconditioning and comparison to magnetic resonanceAm Heart J201016061085109121146662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IbrahimTBülowHPHacklTDiagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarctionJ Am Coll Cardiol200749220821617222732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeuschGReduction of infarct size by ischaemic post-conditioning in humans: fact or fiction?Eur Heart J2012331131521911342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EggerMJuniPBartlettCHolensteinFSterneJHow important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical studyHealth Technol Assess20037117612583822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchulzKFChalmersIHayesRJAltmanDGEmpirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA199527354084127823387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JüniPWitschiABlochREggerMThe hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysisJAMA1999282111054106010493204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoherDPhamBJonesADoes quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Lancet199835291286096139746022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HempelSMilesJSuttorpMJDetection of Associations between Trial Quality and Effect SizesRockville, MDAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality2012
   Google Scholar
• TurnerRMBirdSMHigginsJPThe impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviewsPLoS One201383e5920223544056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BerlinJASantannaJSchmidCHSzczechLAFeldmanHIAnti-Lymphocyte Antibody Induction Therapy Study GroupIndividual patient-versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly headStat Med200221337138711813224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HigginsJPTGreenSCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0The Cochrane Collaboration2011 [updated Mar 2011]. Available from whttp://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_9/9_6_4_meta_regression.htmAccessed July 8, 2014
   Google Scholar
• MorgensternHUses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic researchAm J Public Health19827212133613447137430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidCHStarkPCBerlinJALandaisPLauJMeta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factorsJ Clin Epidemiol200457768369715358396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoldmanLHashimotoBCookEFLoscalzoAComparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scaleCirculation1981646122712347296795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KleinbaumDGKupperLLMorgensternHEpidemiologic Research. Principles and Quantitative MethodsNew YorkJohn Wiley and Sons1982
   Google Scholar
• EitelIWöhrleJSuenkelHIntracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: cardiac magnetic resonance substudy of the AIDA STEMI trialJ Am Coll Cardiol201361131447145423466078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RigshospitaletDanish study of optimal acute treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial Infarction DANAMI-3) Available from: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01435408?term=NCT01435408%26rank=1. NLM identifier: NCT01435408Accessed July 8, 2014
   Google Scholar
• FlemingTRDeMetsDLSurrogate end point in clinical trials: are we being misled?Ann Intern Med199612576056138815760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BakerSGSurrogate endpoints: wishful thinking or reality?J Natl Cancer Inst200698850250316622112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De GruttolaVFlemingTLinDYCoombsRValidating surrogate markers – are we being naive?J Infect Dis199717522372469203643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoherDSchulzKFAltmanDGThe CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trialsLancet200135792631191119411323066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar