The MGuard coronary stent: safety, efficacy, and clinical utility

References

• ClaussenPAAbdelnoorMKvakkestadKMEritslandJHalvorsenSPrevalence of risk factors at presentation and early mortality in patients aged 80 years or older with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionVasc Health Risk Manag20141068368925525366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van ‘t HofAWLiemASuryapranataHHoorntjeJCde BoerMJZijlstraFAngiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study GroupCirculation19989723230223069639373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NiccoliGKharbandaRKCreaFBanningAPNo-reflow: again prevention is better than treatmentEur Heart J201031202449245520837571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneGWWebbJCoxDADistal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trialJAMA200529391063107215741528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CohenDJMurphySABaimDSCost-effectiveness of distal embolic protection for patients undergoing percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein bypass grafts: results from the SAFER trialJ Am Coll Cardiol20044491801180815519010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-RodriguezDRegueiroABrugalettaSOptimization in stent implantation by manual thrombus aspiration in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the EXAMINATION trialCirc Cardiovasc Interv20147329430024867891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JollySSCairnsJAYusufSRandomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomyN Engl J Med2015372151389139825853743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StankovicGColomboAPresbiteroPRandomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: the Randomized Evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in Saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) TrialCirculation20031081374212821546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RomagueraRWaksmanRCovered stents for coronary perforations: is there enough evidence?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv201178224625321766425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CostaJRJrAbizaidADudekDSilberSLeonMBStoneGWRationale and design of the MGuard for acute ST elevation reperfusion MASTER trialCatheter Cardiovasc Interv201382218419023008177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DziewierzADudekDAdvantages of MGuard coronary stent systemMinerva Cardioangiol2012601334022322572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneGWAbizaidASilberSProspective, randomized, multicenter evaluation of a polyethylene terephthalate micronet mesh-covered stent (MGuard) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the MASTER trialJ Am Coll Cardiol Epub2012928
   Google Scholar
• RomagueraRGomez-HospitalJASanchez-ElviraGMGuard mesh-covered stent for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with high thrombus burden despite manual aspirationJ Interv Cardiol20132611723419104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneGWThe MASTER II trial. Comparison of the MGuard embolic protection stent with standard stent in acute myocardial infarctionPresented at: The International Conference for Innovations MeetingDecember; 2014Tel Aviv, Israel
   Google Scholar
• PiscioneFDanziGBCasseseSMulticentre experience with MGuard net protective stent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: safety, feasibility, and impact on myocardial reperfusionCatheter Cardiovasc Interv201075571572119937780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DudekDDziewierzARzeszutkoLMesh covered stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionEuroIntervention20106558258921044911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DudekDDziewierzAKleczynskiPLong-term follow-up of mesh-covered stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionKardiol Pol201472214014524142749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-CisnalACid-AlvarezBAlvarez-AlvarezBReal world comparison of the MGuard Stent versus the bare metal stent for ST elevation myocardial infarction (the REWARD-MI study)Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2015851E1E924905554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmorosoGVosNSVan der HeydenJAA prospective, post-market study with the Mguard Prime Embolic Protection Stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The International MGuard Prime Observational Study (IMOS Prime)Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Epub201537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CostaRAAbizaidALotanCImpact of thrombus burden on outcomes after standard versus mesh-covered stents in acute myocardial infarction (from the MGuard for acute ST elevation reperfusion trial)Am J Cardiol2015115216116625465924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DudekDBrenerSJRakowskiTEfficacy of an embolic protection stent as a function of delay to reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the MASTER Trial)Am J Cardiol2014114101485148925277335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DudekDDziewierzABrenerSJMesh-covered embolic protection stent implantation in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: final 1-year clinical and angiographic results from the MGUARD for acute ST elevation reperfusion trialCirc Cardiovasc Interv201582e00148425603802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LungHLHuangLHLinHCShyurSDAllergic contact dermatitis to polyethylene terephthalate meshJ Investig Allergol Clin Immunol2009192161162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneGWRogersCHermillerJRandomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass graftsCirculation2003108554855312874191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeMSParkSJKandzariDESaphenous vein graft interventionJACC Cardiovasc Interv20114883184321851895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaluskiEHauptmannKEMullerRTsaiSKlapholzMGrubeECoronary stenting with MGuard: first-in-man trialJ Invasive Cardiol2008201051151518829994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrubeEHauptmannKEMullerRUrielNKaluskiECoronary stenting with MGuard: extended follow-up of first human trialCardiovasc Revasc Med201112313814621640931
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MaiaFCostaJRJrAbizaidAPreliminary results of the INSPIRE trial with the novel MGuard stent system containing a protection net to prevent distal embolizationCatheter Cardiovasc Interv2010761869220578092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RomagueraRGomez-HospitalJACequierANovel use of the Mguard mesh-covered stent to treat coronary arterial perforationsCatheter Cardiovasc Interv2012801757822511569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatilPSethiAKaulUStent thrombosis with an aneurysm 7 years after a drug eluting stent implantationIndian Heart J201466221621924814120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DanziGBPomidossiGACasoloFCentolaMFerraresiRLotanCA new device to seal large coronary aneurysms: a case reportJ Med Case Rep2010423820682025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchoferJEvaluation of a PET mesh covered stent in patients with carotid artery disease: results of the first in man CARENET trialPresented at: the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics ConferenceSeptember; 2014Washington DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• LindefjeldDSGuardaEMéndezMMicrovascular coronary flow comparison in acute myocardial infarction angioplasty treated with a mesh covered stent (MGUARD stent) versus bare metal stent: MICAMI-MGUARDCardiovasc Revasc Med20131414823337378
   PubMedGoogle Scholar