Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease: technology and clinical update

References

• PijlsNHvan SchaardenburghPManoharanGPercutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the defer studyJ Am Coll Cardiol2007492105211117531660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PijlsNHFearonWFToninoPAFractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the fame (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) studyJ Am Coll Cardiol20105617718420537493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De BruyneBPijlsNHKalesanBFractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary diseaseN Engl J Med2012367991100122924638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De BruyneBFearonWFPijlsNHFAME 2 Trial InvestigatorsFractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery diseaseN Engl J Med20143711208121725176289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WindeckerSKolhPAlfonsoF2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS)developed with the special contribution of the European association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI)Eur Heart J2014352541261925173339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LevineGNBatesERBlankenshipJC2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventionsCirculation2011124e574e65122064601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontalescotGSechtemUAchenbachS2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European society of cardiologyEur Heart J2013342949300323996286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatelMRDaiDHernandezAFPrevalence and predictors of nonobstructive coronary artery disease identified with coronary angiography in contemporary clinical practiceAm Heart J2014167846.e2.852.e224890534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NegliaDRovaiDCaselliCEVINCI Study InvestigatorsDetection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imagingCirc Cardiovasc Imaging20158e00217925711274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BudoffMJDoweDJollisJGDiagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter accuracy (assessment by coronary computed tomographic angiography of individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography) trialJ Am Coll Cardiol2008521724173219007693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MeijboomWBMeijsMFSchuijfJDDiagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multi-center, multivendor studyJ Am Coll Cardiol2008522135214419095130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MillerJMRochitteCEDeweyMDiagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row ctN Engl J Med20083592324233619038879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ToninoPAFearonWFDe BruyneBAngiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the fame study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluationJ Am Coll Cardiol2010552816282120579537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MeijboomWBVan MieghemCAvan PeltNComprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable anginaJ Am Coll Cardiol20085263664318702967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TothGHamilosMPyxarasSEvolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenosesEur Heart J2014352831283824644308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RossiAPapadopoulouSLPuglieseFQuantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?Circ Cardiovasc Imaging20147435124280729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MinJKShawLJDevereuxRBPrognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortalityJ Am Coll Cardiol2007501161117017868808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MinJKDunningALinFYAge- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the international multicenter confirm (coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery diseaseJ Am Coll Cardiol20115884986021835321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SarnoGDecraemerIVanhoenackerPKOn the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiographyJACC Cardiovasc Interv2009255055719539260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaylorCAFonteTAMinJKComputational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basisJ Am Coll Cardiol2013612233224123562923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StergiopulosNYoungDFRoggeTRComputer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenosesJ Biomech199225147714881491023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ItuLSharmaPMihalefVA patient-specific reduced-order model for coronary circulationProc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging2012832835
   Google Scholar
• ChoyJSKassabGSScaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteriesJ Appl Physiol1985200810412811286
   Google Scholar
• CoenenALubbersMMKurataAFractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithmRadiology201527467468325322342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlufsenMSStructured tree outflow condition for blood flow in larger systemic arteriesAm J Physiol1999276H257H2689887040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithNPPullanAJHunterPJGeneration of an anatomically based geometric coronary modelAnn Biomed Eng200028142510645784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SeilerCKirkeeideRLGouldKLMeasurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for assessing anatomic area at riskJ Am Coll Cardiol1993217837978436762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharmaPItuLZhengXA framework for personalization of coronary flow computations during rest and hyperemiaConf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc201220126665666823367458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KooBKErglisADohJHDiagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter discover-flow (diagnosis of ischemia-causing stenoses obtained via noninvasive fractional flow reserve) studyJ Am Coll Cardiol2011581989199722032711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MinJKLeipsicJPencinaMJDiagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiographyJAMA20123081237124522922562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NørgaardBLLeipsicJGaurSNXT Trial Study GroupDiagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps)J Am Coll Cardiol2014631145115524486266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RenkerMSchoepfUJWangRComparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserveAm J Cardiol20141141303130825205628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaumannSWangRSchoepfUJCoronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements – initial experience with a novel physician-driven algorithmEur Radiol2015251201120725403173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangRRenkerMSchoepfUJDiagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserveEur J Radiol2015841509151526022519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeipsicJAbbaraSAchenbachSSCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography guidelines committeeJ Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr2014834235825301040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GaurSAchenbachSLeipsicJRationale and design of the heartflownxt (heartflow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps) studyJ Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr2013727928824268114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JeremiasAMaeharaAGénéreuxPMulticenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting pd/pa with fractional flow reserve: the resolve studyJ Am Coll Cardiol2014631253126124211503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MinJKKooBKErglisAUsefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms for intermediate stenoses confirmed by quantitative coronary angiographyAm J Cardiol201211097197622749390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakazatoRParkHBBermanDSNoninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the defacto studyCirc Cardiovasc Imaging2013688188924081777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteignerMLMitsourasDWhitmoreAGIodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomographyCirc Cardiovasc Imaging2010317918620044512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoonYEChoiJHKimJHNoninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserveJACC Cardiovasc Imaging201251088109623153908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakanishiRMatsumotoSAlaniADiagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFRCT) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the discover-flow and defacto studiesInt J Cardiovasc Imaging2015311251125925904402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PuchnerSBLiuTMayrhoferTHigh-risk plaque detected on coronary CT angiography predicts acute coronary syndromes independent of significant stenosis in acute chest pain: results from the Romicat-II trialJ Am Coll Cardiol20146468469225125300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamonMBiondi-ZoccaiGGMalaguttiPDiagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysisJ Am Coll Cardiol2006481896191017084268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeipsicJYangTHThompsonACT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the determination of fractional flow reserve by anatomic CTA (defacto) studyAJR Am J Roentgenol201420298999424758651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MinJKKooBKErglisAEffect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the prospective multicenter international discover-flow studyJ Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr2012619119922682261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab-ZadehAMillerJMRochitteCEDiagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. the core-64 (coronary artery evaluation using 64-row multidetector computed tomography angiography) international multi-center studyJ Am Coll Cardiol20125937938722261160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbdullaJPedersenKSBudoffMKofoedKFInfluence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysisInt J Cardiovasc Imaging20122894395321667273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NørgaardBLGaurSLeipsicJInfluence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic performance of CT angiography derived FFR in coronary artery disease: a substudy of the NXT trialJACC Cardiovasc Imaging201591045105526298072
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KimKHDohJHKooBKA novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserveJACC Cardiovasc Interv20147727824332418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DouglasPSPontoneGHlatkyMAClinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. Usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRCT: outcome and resource impacts studyEur Heart J2015363359336726330417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatelMRPetersonEDDaiDLow diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiographyN Engl J Med201036288689520220183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetracoRSenSNijjerSFractional flow reserve-guided revascularization: practical implications of a diagnostic gray zone and measurement variability on clinical decisionsJACC Cardiovasc Interv2013622222523517831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HlatkyMASaxenaAKooBKErglisAZarinsCKMinJKProjected costs and consequences of computed tomography-determined fractional flow reserveClinical Cardiol201336743748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimuraTShiomiHKuribayashiSCost analysis of non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomographic angiography in JapanCardiovasc Interv Ther201530384425030180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HlatkyMADe BruyneBPontoneGPLATFORM InvestigatorsQuality-of-life and economic outcomes of assessing fractional flow reserve with computed tomography angiography: platformJ Am Coll Cardiol2015662315232326475205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar