Small coronary vessel angioplasty: outcomes and technical considerations

References

• MackayJMenashGThe Atlas of Heart Disease and StrokeGeneva, SwitzerlandWorld Health Organisation, Centers for disease control and prevention2004
   Google Scholar
• WongPLauKWLimYLOestereleSNStent placement for non-STRESS/BENESTENT lesions: a critical reviewCatheter Cardiovasc Interv20005122323311025583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ConnorNJMortonJRBirmeyerJDOlmsteadEMO’ConnorGTNorthern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study GroupEffect of coronary artery diameter in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgeryCirculation1996936526558640991
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BautersCHubertEPratAPredictors of restenosis after coronary stent implantationJ Am Coll Cardiol199831129112989581723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SerruysPWKayIPDiscoCPeriprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta analysis of the Belgian Netherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter ultrasound stent in coronariesJ Am Coll Cardiol1999341067107410520792
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SerruysPWde JaegerePKiemeneijFA comparison of balloon- expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study GroupN Engl J Med19943314894958041413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FischmanDLLeonMBBaimDSA randomised comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study InvestigatorsN Eng J Med1994331496501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacayaCSerruysPWRuygrokPContinued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: one year clinical follow up of Benestent Study GroupJ Am Coll Cardiol1996272552618557891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BetriuAMasottiMSeraARandomised comparison of coronary stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions (START): a four-year follow-upJ Am Coll Cardiol1999341498150610551699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeimeneijFSerruysPWMacayaCContinued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow up of Benestent-I trialJ Am Coll Cardiol2001371598160311345371
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KastratiASchomigADirschingerJA randomised trial comparing stenting with balloon angioplasty in small vessels in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. ISAR-SMART Study Investigators. Intracoronary stenting or angioplasty for restenosis reduction in small arteriesCirculation20001022593259811085962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkSWLeeCWHongMKRandomized comparison of coronary stenting with optimal balloon angioplasty for treatment of lesions in small coronary arteriesEur Heart J2000211785178911052843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KoningREltchaninoffHCommeauPStent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for small coronary arteries: in-hospital and 6-month clinical and angiographic resultsCirculation20011041604160811581136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoerRMyrengYMolstadPStenting in small coronary arteries (SISCA) trialA randomised comparison between balloon angioplasty and the heparin-coated stentJ Am Coll Cardiol2001381598160311704369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MauriLOravEJKuntzRELate loss in lumen diameter and binary restenosis for drug-eluting stent comparisonCirculation20051113435344215967844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MeirBSousaEGuagliumiGSirolimus-eluting coronary stents in small vesselsAm Heart J20061511017el1019e1
   Google Scholar
• EllisSGPopmaJJLasalaJMRelationship between angiographic late loss and target lesion revascularization after coronary stent implantation: analysis from the TAXUS-IV trialJ Am Coll Cardiol2005451193120015837248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AgostoniPBiondi-ZoccaiGLGasparaniGLIs bare-metal stenting superior to balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease? Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomised trialsEur Heart J20052688188915681573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoucetCSchalijMJVrolixMCStent placement to prevent restenosis after angioplasty in small coronary arteriesCirculation20011042029203311673341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaudeMKonorzaTFKalninsUErglisAHeparin-coated stent placement for the treatment of stenosis in small coronary arteries of symptomatic patientsCirculation20031071265127012628946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KinsaraAJNiaziKPatelIAmoudiOEffectiveness of stents in small coronary arteriesAm J Cardiol20039258458712943880
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HanekampCKoolenJBonnierHRandomised comparison of balloon angioplasty versus silicon carbon-coated stent implantation for de novo lesions in small coronary arteriesAm J Cardiol2004931233123715135695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarciaEGomez-ReicoMMorenoRStent reduces restenosis in small vessels. Results of the RAP study [abstract]J Am Coll Cardiol20013717A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MuramatsuTIwasakiKInouNEfficacy of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in vessels of diameter less than 3.0 mm and less than 2.5 mm: CHIVAS investigators [abstract]Am J Cardiol20029096H
   Google Scholar
• HausleiterJKastratiAMehelliJA randomised trial comparing phosphorylcholine-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. The ISAR-SMART 2 Trial [abstract]Circulation2003108IV-569
   Google Scholar
• RodriguezAERodriguez-AlemparteMJPereiraCFFinal angiographic and clinical results of the Latin America small vessel randomised study (LASMAL trial) [abstract]J AM Coll Cardiol20034126A12570940
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RodriguezALASMAL-II: a prospective randomised trial of phosphorylcholine- coated stenting vs balloon angioplasty in small vessels in the diabetic patient (featured lecture)TCT2003 Available from: http://www.tctmd.com/expert-presentationsAccessed 2004 Jun 27
   Google Scholar
• StoneGWEllisSGCoxDAOne-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-IV trialCirculation20041091942194715078803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneGWEllisSGCanonLComparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trialJAMA20052941215122316160130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DawkinsKDGrubeEGuagliumiGClinical efficacy of polymer- based paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of complex, long coronary artery lesions from a multicenter, randomised trial: support for the use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practiceCirculation20051123306331316286586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolmesDRJrLeonMBMosesJWAnalysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomised trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosisCirculation200410963464014769686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PopmaJJLeonMBMosesJWQuantitative assessment of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in native coronary arteriesCirculation20041103773378015596568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArdissinoDCavalliniCBramucciESirolimus-eluting vs uncoated stents for prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries: a randomised trialJAMA20042922727273415585732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeCWSuhJLeeSWFactors predictive of cardiac events and restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in small coronary arteriesCatheter Cardiovasc Interv20076982182517191211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FajadetJWijnsWLaarmanGJRandomised, double-blind, multicenter study of the Endeavor zotralimus-eluting phosphorylcholine- encapsulated stent for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions: clinical and angiographic results of the ENDEAVOR II TrialCirculation200611479880616908773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MehilliJDibraAKastratiARandomised trial of paclitaxeland sirolimus-eluting stents in small coronary vesselsEur Heart J20062726026616401670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TogniMEberSWidmerJImpact of vessel size on outcome after implantation of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a sub-group analysis of the SIRTAX TrialJ Am Coll Cardiol2007501123113117868802
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ParkKHParkSWHongMKComparison of the effectiveness of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for small coronary artery lesionsCatheter Cardiovasc Interv20066758959416547937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-GranilloGAValgimigliMGarcia-GarciaHMOne-year clinical outcome after coronary stenting of very small vessels using 2.25 mm sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a comparison between the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registriesJ Invasive Cardiol20051740941216079445
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TanimotoSDaemenJTsuchidaKTwo-year clinical outcome after coronary stenting of small vessels using 2.25 mm sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: insight into the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registriesCatheter Cardiovasc Interv2007699410317139687
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeonMBMauriLPopmaJJA randomised comparison of the Endeavor zotrolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions: 12 month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trialJ Am Coll Cardiol20105554355420152559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneGWRizveANewmanWEverolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery diseaseN Engl J Med20101621663166420445180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WykrzykowskaJJSerruysPWOnumaYImpact of vessel size on angiographic and clinical outcomes of revascularization with biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer and sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer the LEADERS trial substudyJACC Cardiovasc Interv2009286187019778775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneGWMideiMNewmanWRandomised comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimuseluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions SPIRIT III trialCirculation200911968068619171853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KandzariDLeonMBPopmaJJComparison of zotralimus- eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial. ENDEAVOR III trialJ Am Coll Cardiol2006482440244717174180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MauriLOravEJCandiaSCRobustness of late lumen loss in discriminating drug-eluting stents across variable observational and randomised trialsCirculation20051122833283916267256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BriguoriCSaraisCPagnottaPIn-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries: impact of strut thicknessJ Am Coll Cardiol20024040340912142103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrambillaNMoriciNBedogniFThin strut chrome-cobalt stent implantation for treatment of de-novo lesions in small coronary vessels: results of the RISCO Italian registry utilizing the Mini VISION coronary stent platformJ Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)20091085285819550353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TurcoMAOrmistonJAPomaJJReduced risk of restenosis in small vessels and reduced risk of myocardial infarction in long lesions with the new thin-strut TAXUS Liberte stent: 1-year results from the TAXUS ATLAS programJACC Cardiovasc Interv2008169970919463387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KarrillonGJMoriceMCBenvenisteEIntracoronary stent implantation without ultrasound guidance and with replacement of conventional anticoagulation by antiplatelet therapy. 30-day clinical outcome of the French multicenter registryCirculation199694151915278840839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MakKHBelliGEllisSGSubacute stent thrombosis: evolving issues and current conceptsJ Am Coll Cardiol1996274945038557927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoussaIDi MarioCReimersBSubacute stent thrombosis in the era of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stenting without antocoagulation: frequency, predictors and clinical outcomeJ Am Coll Cardiol1997296128996288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AkiyamaTMoussaIReimersBAngiographic and clinical outcome following coronary stenting of small vessels: a comparison with coronary stenting of large vesselsJ Am Coll Cardiol199832161016189822086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LauKWDingZPSimLLClinical and angiographic outcome after angiography-guided stent placement in small coronary vesselsAm Heart J200013983083910783217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KastratiADirschingerJBoekstegersPInfluence of stent design on 1-year outcome after coronary stent placement: a randomised comparison of five stent types in 1,147 unselected patientsCatheter Cardiovasc Interv20005029029710878624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar