A method to enhance the hit ratio by a combination of structure-based drug screening and ligand-based screening

References

• AnzaliSBarnickelGKrugMDevillersJ1996Neural networks in QSAR and drug designLondonAcademic Press20922
   Google Scholar
• BurkardU2005GasteigerJEngelTChemoinfomaticsWeinheimWiley-VCH43581
   Google Scholar
• BissantzCBernardPHibertM2003Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors suitable targets?Proteins5052512471595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaseDADardenTACheathamTEIII2004AMBER8University of California, San Francisco
   Google Scholar
• CharifsonPSCorkeryJJMurckoMA1999Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteinsJ Med Chem425100910602695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClarkRDStrizhevALeonardJM2002Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactionsJ Mol Graph Model202819511858637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWeese-ScottCMoultJ2004Molecular modeling of protein function regionsProteins559426115146492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DillerDJLiR2003Kinases, homology models, and high throughput dockingJ Med Chem4646384714561083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYMikamiYNakamuraH2003The filling potential method: A method for estimating the free energy surface for protein-ligand dockingJ Phys Chem B1071320110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYMikamiYNakamuraH2005aSimilarities among receptor proteins and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screeningJ Mol Graph Model24344515950507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYMikamiYKubotaS2005bMultiple target screening method for robust and accurate in silico ligand screeningJ Mol Graph Model25617016376595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYMikamiYTakedomiK2006aClassification of chemical compounds by protein-compound docking for use in designing a focused libraryJ Med Chem495233316420039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYHojoSNakamuraH2006bAn efficient in silico screening method based on the protein-compound affinity matrix and its application to the design of a focused library for cytochrome P450 (CYP) ligandsJ Chem Inf Model4626102217125201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYKubotaSNakamuraH2006cNoise reduction method for molecular interaction energy: application to in silico drug screening and in silico target protein screeningJ Chem Inf Model4620718416995738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYKubotaSKanaiC2006dA virtual active compound produced from the negative image of a ligand-binding protein, and its application to in-silico drug screeningJ Comput Aided Mol Des202374816897580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYKubotaSNakamuraH2007Finding ligands for G protein-coupled receptors based on the protein-compound affinity matrixJ Mol Graph Model256334316777448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukunishiYNakamuraH2008Prediction of protein-ligand complex structure by docking software guided by other complex structuresJ Mol Graph Model261030317692546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GasteigerJMarsiliM1978A New Model for Calculating Atomic Charges in MoleculesTetrahedron Lett1931814
   Google Scholar
• GasteigerJMarsiliM1980Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity – A rapid access to atomic chargesTetrahedron36321928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreengardLRokhlinV1987A fast algorithm for particle simulationsJ Comp Phys7332548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HetényiCParagiGMaranU2006Combination of a modified scoring function with two-dimensional descriptors for calculation of binding affinities of bulky, flexible ligands to proteinsJ Am Chem Soc1281233916433540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IvanciucOLipkowitzKBCundariTR2007Reviews in Computational ChemistryWeinheimWiley-VCH23291400
   Google Scholar
• JorgensenWLChandrasekharJMaduraJ1983Comparison of simple potential. Functions for simulating liquid waterJ Chem Phys7992635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JorgensenWLMaduraJD1985Temperature and size dependence for Monte Carlo simulations of TIP4P waterMol Phys56138192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesGWillettPGlenRC1997Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible dockingJ Mol Biol267727489126849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlonAEGlickMDaviesJW2004aCombination of a naive Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking resultsJ Med Chem474356915317449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlonAEGlickMDaviesJW2004bApplication of machine learning to improve the results of high-throughput docking against the HIV-1 proteaseJ Chem Inf Comput Sci4422162415554692
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KlonAEGlickMThomaM2004cFinding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking resultsJ Med Chem472743915139752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KontoyianniMSokolGSMcClellanLM2005Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screeningJ Comput Chem26112215526325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LernerMGBowmanALCarlsonHA2007Incorporating dynamics in E. coli dihydrofolate reductase enhances structure-based drug discoveryJ Chem Inf Model4723586517877338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LivingstoneDDevillersJ1996. Neural networks in QSAR and drug designLondonAcademic Press15776
   Google Scholar
• McGovernSLShoichetBK2003Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymesJ Med Chem46289590712825931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NichollsA2008What do we know and when do we know it?J Comput Aided Mol Des222395518253702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NissinkJWMurrayCHartshornM2002A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interactionProteins494577112402356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OdaATsuchidaKTakakuraT2006Comparison of consensus scoring strategies for evaluating computational models of protein-ligand complexesJ Chem Inf Model463809116426072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OshiroCBradleyEKEksterowiczJ2004Performance of 3D-database molecular docking studies into homology modelsJ Med Chem47764714736258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PlewczynskiDSpieserSAKochU2006Assessing different classification methods for virtual screeningJ Chem Inf Model46109810616711730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RareyMKramerBLengauerT1996A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithmJ Mol Biol261470898780787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheridanRP2008Alternative global goodness metrics and sensitivity analysis: heuristics to check the robustness of conclusions from studies comparing virtual screening methodsJ Chem Inf Model484263318247505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TeramotoRFukunishiH2007Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screeningJ Chem Inf Model475263417295466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VigersGPRizziJP2004Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screeningJ Med Chem4780914695822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangJCieplakPKollmanPA2000How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules?J Comput Chem21104974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangRWangS2001How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experimentJ Chem Inf Comput Sci411422611604043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WangRLuYWangS2003Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular dockingJ Med Chem46228730312773034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WarrenGLAndrewsCWCapelliAM2006A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functionsJ Med Chem4959123117004707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangJMChenYFShenTW2005Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screeningJ Chem Inf Model4511344616045308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZupanJGasteigerJ1999Neural networks in chemistry and drug designWeinheimWiley-VCH
   Google Scholar