Impact on facial rejuvenation with dermatological preparations

References

• Mintel report 2007: Cosmetic Surgery – UK – November 2007 [cited 2008 Sept 26]. Available from: http://academic.mintel.com/sinatra/oxygen_academic/search_results/show&&type=RCItem&sort=a2z&mode=inaccessible&list=search_results/display/id=220142.
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons BAAPS Audit 2007 [cited 2008 Sept 24]. Available from: http://www.baaps.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• KligmanAMTopical retinoic acid for photo aging: conceptions and misperceptionsCosmet Dermatol200316SupplS3S6
   Google Scholar
• DitreCMExfoliants: AHAs and BHAsDraelosZDCosmeceuticals1st editionPhilidelphia, PAElsevier Saunders2005111118
   Google Scholar
• DitreCMGriffinTDMurphyGFEffects of alpha hydroxy acids on photoaged skin: a pilot clinical, histologic and ultrasound studyJ Am Acad Dermatol1996341871958642081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KligmanAMThe compatibility of combinations of GA and tretinoin in acne and photoaged facial skinJ Geriatr Dermatol1995325A28A
   Google Scholar
• GilchrestBARetinoids and photodamageBr J Dermatol1992127Suppl 4114201390181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KangSLeydenJJLoweNJTazarotene cream for treatment of facial photodamageArch Dermatol200111371597160411735710
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PerriconeNVThe photoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of topical ascorbyl palmitateJ Ger Dermatol19931510
   Google Scholar
• FarrisPKTopical vitamin C: a useful agent for treating photoaging and other dermatologic conditionsDermatol Surg20053181481716029672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TraikovichSSUse of topical ascorbic acid and its effects on photodamaged skin topographyArch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg19991251091109810522500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MaaloofSEl-SabbanMDarwicheNGali-MuhtasibHProtective effect of vitamin E on UVB light induced damage to in keratinocytesMol Carcinog20023412113012112306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDanielDHNeudeckerBADiNardoJCLewisJAMaibachHIIdebenone: a new antioxidant of oxidative stress protection capacity compared to commonly known antioxidantsJ Cosmet Dermatol20054101717134415
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDanielDNeudeckerBADiNardoJCLewisJAMaibachHIClinical efficacy assessment in photodamged skin of 0.5% and 1.0% idebeneoneJ Cosmet Dermatol2005416717317129261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BalinaLMGraupeKThe treatment of melasma. 20% azelaic acid versus 4% hydroquinoneInt J Dermatol1991308938951816137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrincatMPOestrogens and the skinJ Cosmetic Dermatol200434149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ClarkEScerriLSuperficial and medium-depth chemical peelsClin Dermatol20082620921818472062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LandauMChemical peelsClin Dermatol20082620020818472061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BhallaMThamiGPMicrodermabrasion: Reappraisal and brief review of literatureDermatol Surg20063280981416792646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeSYParkKHChoiJWA prospective, randomized, placebo controlled, double blinded, split face study on LED phototherapy for skin rejuvenation: Clinical, profilometric, histologic, ultrastructural and biochemical evaluations and comparison of three different treatment settingsJ Photochem Photobiol B200788516717566756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlyuminMLKaufmanJDermatologic applications of photodynamic therapyCosmetic Dermatol2008215:290296
   Google Scholar
• Alexiades-ArmenakasMRDoverJSArndtKAThe spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacingJ Am Acad Dermatol20085871973718423256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SadickNBipolar radiofrequency for facial rejuvenationFacial Plast Surg Clin North Am20071516116717544931
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PrestonPWLaniganSWPatient satisfaction with laser hair removalJ Cosmet Dermatol20032687217156059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BarbucciRLamponiSMagnaniAThe influence of molecular weight on the biological activity of heparin like sulfated Hyaluronic acidsBiomaterials1998198018069663756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NairnsRSBrandtFLeydenJA randomised, double-blind multicentre comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial foldsDermatol Surg20032958859512786700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangIn vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skinArch Dermatol200714315516317309996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PinskyMAThomasJAMurphyDKWalkerPSJuvéderm injectable gel: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of safety and effectivenessAesthetic Surg2008281723
   Google Scholar
• EdwardsPCFantasiaJEReview of long-term adverse effects associated with the use of chemically-modified animal and non animal source hyaluronic acid dermal fillersClin Interv Aging2007250951918225451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BorelliCKunteCWeisenseelPDeep subcutaneous application of poly lactic acid as a filler for facial lipoatrophy I HIV-infected patientsSkin Pharmacol Physiol20051827328816113597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShermanRNSculptra: the new three dimensional fillerClini Plast Surg200633539550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VleggaarDPoly-L-lactic acid: consultation on the injection techniquesJ Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol200620Suppl 1172116643420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarruthersJALoweNJMenterMABOTOX Glabellar lines Study GroupA multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar linesJ Am Acad Dermatol20024684084912063480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarruthersACarruthersJCohenJA prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-ranging study of botulinum toxin type A in female subjects with horizontal forehead rhytidesDermatol Surg20032946146712752512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NiamtuJIIIBotulinum toxin A: a review of 1,085 oral and maxillofacial patient treatmentsJ Oral Maxillofac Surg20036131732412618971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarruthersACarruthersJLoweNJfor the BOTOX¨* Glabellar Lines I and IIOne-year, randomised, multicenter, two period study of the safety and efficacy of repeated treatments with botulinum toxin type A in patients with glabellar linesJ Clin Res20047120
   Google Scholar
• BowlerPJA retrospective study in the use of botulinum toxin type A in a UL multidisciplinary cosmetic practiceJ Cosmet Dermatol20054899217166205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CliffSHJudodihardjoHEltringhamEDifferent formulations of botulinum toxin type A have different migration characteristics: a double-blind, randomized studyJ Cosmet Dermatol20087505418254812
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De BoulleK2008Patient satisfaction with different botulinum toxin type A formulations in the treatment of moderate to severe upper facial rhytidsJ Cosmet Laser Ther200810879218569261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PalmerMCurranJBowlerPClinical experience and safety in using phosphatidylcholine injections for localised reduction of subcutaneous fat:a multicentre retrospective UK studyJ Cosmet Dermatol2006521822617177743
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HasengschwandtnerFPhosphatidylcholine treatment to induce lipolysisJ Cosmet Dermatol2005430831317168882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CarruthersJCarruthersAA prospective, randomized, parallel group study analyzing the effect of BTX-A (Botox) and nonanimal sourced hyaluronic acid (NASHA, Restylane) in combination compared with NASHA (Restylane) alone in severe glabellar rhytides in adult female subjects: treatment of severe glabellar rhytides with a hyaluronic acid derivative compared with the derivative and BTX-ADermatol Surg20032980280912859378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar