Medical databases in studies of drug teratogenicity: methodological issues

References

• BonatiMBortolusRMarchettiFRomeroMTognoniGDrug use in pregnancy: an overview of epidemiological (drug utilization) studiesEur J Clin Pharmacol19903843253282140553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarchettiFRomeroMBonatiMTognoniGUse of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy: a report of the international co-operative drug use in pregnancy (DUP) study. Collaborative Group on Drug Use in Pregnancy (CGDUP)Eur J Clin Pharmacol19934564955017908878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlesenCSørensenHTde Jong-van den BergLOlsenJSteffensenFHPrescribing during pregnancy and lactation with reference to the Swedish classification system: a population-based study among Danish women. The Euromap GroupActa Obstet Gynecol Scand199978868669210468060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay BjørnAMEhrensteinVHundborgHNoergaardMSørensenHTMedication use during pregnancy: a Danish population-based study [Abstract]. Presented at the 24th International Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management, August 2008, Copenhagen, DenmarkPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf200817S1S76
   Google Scholar
• WardRMMaternal-placental-fetal unit: unique problems of pharmacologic studyPediatr Clin North Am1989365107510882677936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LenzWThalidomide and congenital abnormalitiesLancet1962I45
   Google Scholar
• SørensenHTLashTLRothmanKJBeyond randomized controlled trials: a critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studiesHepatology20064451075108217058242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SørensenHTBaronJARegistries and medical databasesOlsenJSaracciRTrichopoulosDTeaching epidemiology: a guide for teachers in epidemiology, public health and clinical medicine3rd edOxfordOxford University Press2009
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Institute of Public Health2009 Available from: http://www.fhi.no/eway/default.aspx?pid=238&trg=MainArea_5811&MainArea_5811=5895:0:15,2825:1:0:0:::0:0. Accessed on December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• FrankLWhen an entire country is a cohortScience200028754622398239910766613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RockenbauerMOlsenJCzeizelAEPedersenLSørensenHTRecall bias in a case-control surveillance system on the use of medicine during pregnancyEpidemiology200112446146611416783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneeweissSAvornJA review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeuticsJ Clin Epidemiol200558432333715862718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The General Practice Research Database2009 Available from: http://www.gprd.com/. Accessed on December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• CharltonRACunningtonMCde VriesCSWeilJGData resources for investigating drug exposure during pregnancy and associated outcomes: the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) as an alternative to pregnancy registriesDrug Saf2008311395118095745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WurstKEEphrossSALoehrJClarkDWGuessHAThe utility of the general practice research database to examine selected congenital heart defects: a validation studyPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf200716886787717563909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Department of Health and Human ServicesMedicaid at-a-glance; 2005. A Medicaid Information Source Available from: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicaidGenInfo/Downloads/MedicaidAtAGlance2005.pdf. Accessed on December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesMedicaid Available from: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/home/medicaid.asp. Accessed on December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs) http://www.certs.hhs.gov/index.html. Accessed on December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Saskatchewan Ministry of HealthHealth services databases: information document Available from: http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=2103410e-ad99-4bf5-ba42-dc07b16f45a6. Accessed November 9, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and PreventionHealth care in Denmark 2008 Available from: http://www.sum.dk/publikationer/healthcare_in_dk_2008/index.htm. Accessed November 9, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• FuruKWettermarkBAndersenMMartikainenJEAlmarsdottirABSorensenHTThe Nordic countries as a cohort of pharmacoepidemiological researchBasic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol20101062869419961477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Prescription Database2009 Available from: http://www.norpd.no/. Accessed December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• The Register of Medicinal Product Statistics Available from: http://www.dkma.dk/1024/visUKLSArtikel.asp?artikelID=10895. Accessed December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for EpidemiologyNational Board of Health and Welfare. The Swedish medical birth register – a summary of content and quality2003 Article no: 2003-112-3. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/10655/2003-112-3_20031123.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• KnudsenLBOlsenJThe Danish medical birth registryDan Med Bull19984533203239675544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SørensenHTChristensenTSchlosserHKPedersenLUse of medical databases in clinical epidemiology2nd editionAarhus University, AarhusDenmark2009
   Google Scholar
• KallenBWinbergJA Swedish register of congenital malformations. Experience with continuous registration during 2 years with special reference to multiple malformationsPediatrics19684147657765689407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AminiHAxelssonOOllarsBAnnerenGThe Swedish Birth Defects Registry: ascertainment and incidence of spina bifida and cleft lip/palateActa Obstet Gynecol Scand200988665465919412801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PedersenCBGotzscheHMollerJOMortensenPBThe Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million personsDan Med Bull200653444144917150149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Network Teratology Information Services Available from: http://www.entis-org.com/. Accessed on December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Organization of Teratology Information Specialists Available from: http://www.otispregnancy.org/hm/. Accessed on December 10, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• JickSSTerrisBZAnticonvulsants and congenital malformationsPharmacotherapy19971735615649165559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooperWOHernandez-DiazSArbogastPGMajor congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitorsN Engl J Med2006354232443245116760444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorettiMECapraraDCoutinhoCJFetal safety of loratadine use in the first trimester of pregnancy: a multicenter studyJ Allergy Clin Immunol2003111347948312642825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavisRLRubanowiceDMcPhillipsHRisks of congenital malformations and perinatal events among infants exposed to antidepressant medications during pregnancyPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf200716101086109417729378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WenSWYangQGarnerPSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse pregnancy outcomesAm J Obstet Gynecol2006194496196616580283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EricsonAKallenBWiholmBDelivery outcome after the use of antidepressants in early pregnancyEur J Clin Pharmacol199955750350810501819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WogeliusPNorgaardMGislumMMaternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of congenital malformationsEpidemiology200617670170417028507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EinarsonTREinarsonANewer antidepressants in pregnancy and rates of major malformations: a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studiesPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf2005141282382715742359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RothmanKJEpidemiology : an introductionNew York, NYOxford University Press2002
   Google Scholar
• StraussLTGambleSBParkerWYCookDAZaneSBHamdanSAbortion surveillance – United States, 2003MMWR Surveill Summ2006551113217119534
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BankoleASinghSHaasTReasons why women have induced abortions: evidence from 27 CountriesInternational Family Planning Perspectives1998243117127
   Google Scholar
• GarneELoaneMDolkHPrenatal diagnosis of severe structural congenital malformations in EuropeUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200525161115619321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUROCATSpecial report: prenatal screening policies in Europe2005 Available from: http://www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk/pdf/Special-Report-Prenatal-Diagnosis.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• PellerAJWestgateMNHolmesLBTrends in congenital malformations, 1974–1999: effect of prenatal diagnosis and elective terminationObstet Gynecol20041045 Pt 195796415516385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CriderKSOlneyRSCraganJDTrisomies 13 and 18: population prevalences, characteristics, and prenatal diagnosis, metropolitan Atlanta, 1994–2003Am J Med Genet A2008146782082618348276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HernanMAHernandez-DiazSRobinsJMA structural approach to selection biasEpidemiology200415561562515308962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhouryMJFlandersWDJamesLMEricksonJDHuman teratogens, prenatal mortality, and selection biasAm J Epidemiol198913023613702750731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuissaSImmortal time bias in pharmacoepidemiologyAm J Epidemiol2008167449249918056625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SørensenHTSabroeSOlsenJA framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological researchInt J Epidemiol19962524354429119571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LarsenHNielsenGLBendsenJFlintCOlsenJSørensenHTPredictive value and completeness of the registration of congenital abnormalities in three Danish population-based registriesScand J Public Health2003311121612623519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangFLGabosSSibbaldBLowryRBCompleteness and accuracy of the birth registry data on congenital anomalies in Alberta, CanadaChronic Dis Can2001222576611525721
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RothmanKJGreenlandSPrecision and validity in epidemiologic studiesRothmanKJGreenlandSModern Epidemiology2nd edPhiladelphia, PALippincott-Raven1998
   Google Scholar
• StromBLData validity issues in using claims dataPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf200110538939211802582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoscoJLFSillimanRAThwinSSA most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studiesJ Clin Epidemiol2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SturmerTSchneeweissSAvornJGlynnRJAdjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibrationAm J Epidemiol2005162327928915987725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoxMPLashTLGreenlandSA method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variablesInt J Epidemiol20053461370137616172102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenlandSBasic methods for sensitivity analysis of biasesInt J Epidemiol1996256110711169027513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LashTLFinkAKSemi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational dataEpidemiology200314445145812843771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LashTLSillimanRAA sensitivity analysis to separate bias due to confounding from bias due to predicting misclassification by a variable that does bothEpidemiology200011554454910955407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SavitzDABaronAEEstimating and correcting for confounder misclassificationAm J Epidemiol19891295106210712705426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneeweissSSensitivity analysis and external adjustment for unmeasured confounders in epidemiologic database studies of therapeuticsPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf200615529130316447304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar