Advances in labor analgesia

References

• von SteinbüchelRVorläufige Mitteilung über die Anwendung des Skopolamin-Morphium-Injektionen in der GeburtshilfeZentrallblatt Gyn19023013041306
   Google Scholar
• CatonDThe history of obstetric anesthesiaChestnutDHPolleyLSTsenLCWongCAObstetric Anesthesia Principles and Practice4th edPhiladelphiaElsevier Mosby2009313
   Google Scholar
• HingsonRAEdwardsWBContinuous caudal analgesia: An analysis of the first ten thousand confinements thus managed with the report of the authors’ first thousand casesJAMA1943123538546
   Google Scholar
• MelzackRThe myth of painless childbirth (the John J. Bonica lecture)Pain19841943213376384895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WongCAObstetric PainBallantyneJCRathmellJPFishmanSMBonica’s Management of Pain4th edPhiladelphiaLippincott Williams & WilkinsIn press
   Google Scholar
• PanPEisenachJCThe pain of childbirth and its effect on the mother and the fetusChestnutDHPolleyLSTsenLCWongCAObstetric Anesthesia Principles and Practice4th edPhiladelphiaElsevier Mosby2009387404
   Google Scholar
• SheinerESheinerEKShoham-VardiIThe relationship between parity and labor painInt J Gynaecol Obstet19986332872889989900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HessPEPrattSDSoniAKSarnaMCOriolNEAn association between severe labor pain and cesarean deliveryAnesth Analg200090488188610735793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlexanderJMSharmaSKMcIntireDDWileyJLevenoKJIntensity of labor pain and cesarean deliveryAnesth Analg20019261524152811375838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LangAJSorrellJTRodgersCSLebeckMMAnxiety sensitivity as a predictor of labor painEur J Pain200610326327015987671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HennebornWJCoganRThe effect of husband participation on reported pain and probability of medication during labor and birthJ Psychosom Res19751932152221104819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KennellJKlausMMcGrathSRobertsonSHinkleyCContinuous emotional support during labor in a US hospital: a randomized controlled trialJAMA199126517219722012013951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BonicaJJPrinciples and Practice of Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia2PhiladelphiaFA Davis1969
   Google Scholar
• LedermanRPMcCannDSWorkBJrHuberMJEndogenous plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine in last-trimester pregnancy and laborAm J Obstet Gynecol1977129158900169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShniderSMAbboudTArtalRHenriksenEHStefaniSJLevinsonGMaternal catecholamines decrease during labor after lumbar epidural analgesiaAm J Obstet Gynecol198314713156614080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LedermanRPLedermanEWorkBMcCannDSAnxiety and epinephrine in multiparous labor: Relationship to duration of labor and fetal heart rate patternAm J Obstet Gynecol198515388708774073158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoirDDWillocksJManagement of incoordinate uterine action under continuous epidural analgesiaBr Med J1967339640020791300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BallardCGStanleyAKBrockingtonIFPost-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after childbirthBr J Psychiatry199516645255287795928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimkinPBoldingAUpdate on nonpharmacologic approaches to relieve labor pain and prevent sufferingJ Midwifery Womens Health200449648950415544978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FieldTPregnancy and labor alternative therapy researchAltern Ther Health Med2008145283418780582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TournaireMTheau-YonneauAComplementary and alternative approaches to pain relief during laborEvid Based Complement Alternat Med20074440941718227907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HetheringtonSEA controlled study of the effect of prepared childbirth classes on obstetric outcomesBirth199017286902363771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScottJRRoseNBEffect of psychoprophylaxis (Lamaze preparation) on labor and delivery in primiparasN Engl J Med19762942212051207772428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PattonLLEnglishECHambletonJDChildbirth preparation and outcomes of labor and delivery in primiparous womenJ Fam Pract19852043753783981097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FabianHMRadestadIJWaldenstromUChildbirth and parenthood education classes in Sweden. Women’s opinion and possible outcomesActa Obstet Gynecol Scand200584543644315842207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimkinPPO’HaraMNonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methodsAm J Obstet Gynecol20021865 Suppl NatureS131S15912011879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HodnettEDGatesSHofmeyrGJSakalaCContinuous support for women during childbirthCochrane Database Syst Rev20073CD00376617636733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrathSKKennellJHA randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery ratesBirth2008352929718507579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DowswellTBedwellCLavenderTNeilsonJPTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labourCochrane Database Syst Rev20092CD00721419370680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CluettERNikodemVCMcCandlishREBurnsEEImmersion in water in pregnancy, labour and birthCochrane Database Syst Rev20042CD00011115106143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HuntleyALCoonJTErnstEComplementary and alternative medicine for labor pain: a systematic reviewAm J Obstet Gynecol20041911364415295342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithCACollinsCTCynaAMCrowtherCAComplementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labourCochrane Database Syst Rev20064CD00352117054175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SkilnandEFossenDHeibergEAcupuncture in the management of pain in laborActa Obstet Gynecol Scand2002811094394812366485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamneroAHansonUKihlgrenMAcupuncture treatment during labour – a randomised controlled trialBJOG2002109663764412118641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BorupLWurlitzerWHedegaardMKesmodelUSHvidmanLAcupuncture as pain relief during delivery: a randomized controlled trialBirth200936151219278378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NesheimBIKingeRBergBAcupuncture during labor can reduce the use of meperidine: a controlled clinical studyClin J Pain200319318719112792557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HantoushzadehSAlhusseiniNLebaschiAHThe effects of acupuncture during labour on nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trialAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol2007471263017261096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YentisSThe use of Entonox® for labour pain should be abandonedInt J Obstet Anesth2001102528
   Google Scholar
• RosenMRecent advances in pain relief in childbirth. I. Inhalation and systemic analgesiaBr J Anaesth19714398378484941920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RooksJPNitrous oxide for pain in labor – why not in the United States?Birth20073413517324171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeckardtRFembacherPMSchneiderKTGraeffHMaternal arterial oxygen saturation during labor and delivery: pain-dependent alterations and effects on the newbornObstet Gynecol198770121253601266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReedPNColquhounADHanningCDMaternal oxygenation during normal labourBr J Anaesth19896233163182930673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YeoSTHoldcroftAYentisSMStewartABassettPAnalgesia with sevoflurane during labour: ii. Sevoflurane compared with Entonox for labour analgesiaBr J Anaesth200798111011517158129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlofssonCEkblomAEkman-OrdebergGHjelmAIrestedtLLack of analgesic effect of systemically administered morphine or pethidine on labour painBr J Obstet Gynaecol1996103109689728863693
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BrickerLLavenderTParenteral opioids for labor pain relief: a systematic reviewAm J Obstet Gynecol20021865 Suppl NatureS94S10912011876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NelsonKEEisenachJCIntravenous butorphanol, meperidine, and their combination relieve pain and distress in women in laborAnesthesiology200510251008101315851889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillJBAlexanderJMSharmaSKMcIntireDDLevenoKJA comparison of the effects of epidural and meperidine analgesia during labor on fetal heart rateObstet Gynecol2003102233333712907109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaldwellJWakileLANotarianniLJMaternal and neonatal disposition of pethidine in childbirth – a study using quantitative gas chromatography-mass spectrometryLife Sci1978227589596625200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RayburnWLeushcenMPEarlRWoodsMLorkovicMGaston-JohanssonFIntravenous meperidine during labor: A randomized comparison between nursing and patient-controlled administrationObstet Gynecol19897457027042682412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PodlasJBrelandBDPatient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine during laborObstet Gynecol19877022022043601283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NikkolaEMEkbladUUKernoPOAlihankaJMSalonenMAOIntravenous fentanyl PCA during labourCan J Anaesth19974412124812559429041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BalkiMKasodekarSDhumneSBernsteinPCarvalhoJCRemifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimensCan J Anaesth200754862663317666715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlairJMDobsonGTHillDAMcCrackenGRFeeJPPatient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidineAnaesthesia2005601222715601268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VolikasIMaleDA comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labourInt J Obstet Anesth2001102869015321621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScottLJPerryCMRemifentanil: a review of its use during the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesiaDrugs200565131793182316114980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlufolabiAJBoothJVWakelingHGGlassPSPenningDHReynoldsJDA preliminary investigation of remifentanil as a labor analgesicAnesth Analg200091360660810960385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VolmanenPAkuralEIRaudaskoskiTAlahuhtaSRemifentanil in obstetric analgesia: a dose-finding studyAnesth Analg200294491391711916796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BucklinBAHawkinsJLAndersonJRUllrichFAObstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year updateAnesthesiology2005103364565316129992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health Service Maternity Statistics 2005–062007 http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/hospital-care/maternity/nhs-maternity-statistics-2005-06. Accessed June 11, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• HawkinsJLKooninLMPalmerSKGibbsCPAnesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979–1990Anesthesiology19978622772849054245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaechMJThe King Edward Memorial Hospital 1,000 mother survey of methods of pain relief in labourAnaesth Intensive Care19911933933991767909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WongCAScavoneBMPeacemanAMThe risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in laborN Engl J Med2005352765566515716559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlbrightGACardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaineAnesthesiology1979514285287484889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’AngeloRDAndersonMTPhillipJEisenachJCIntrathecal sufentanil compared to epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesiaAnesthesiology1994806120912158010467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PanPHBogardTDOwenMDIncidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveriesInt J Obstet Anesth200413422723315477051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NorrisMCFogelSTConway-LongCCombined spinal-epidural versus epidural labor analgesiaAnesthesiology200195491392011605932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NageotteMPLarsonDRumneyPJSidhuMHollenbachKEpidural analgesia compared with combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labor in nulliparous womenN Engl J Med199733724171517199392696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PertCBKuharMJSnyderSHOpiate receptor: autoradiographic localization in rat brainProc Natl Acad Sci U S A1976731037293733185626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VercauterenMMeertTFIsobolographic analysis of the interaction between epidural sufentanil and bupivacaine in ratsPharmacol Biochem Behav19975812372429264097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PolleyLSColumbMOWagnerDSNaughtonNNDose-dependent reduction of the minimum local analgesic concentration of bupivacaine by sufentanil for epidural analgesia in laborAnesthesiology19988936266329743398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LyonsGColumbMHawthorneLDresnerMExtradural pain relief in labour: bupivacaine sparing by extradural fentanyl is dose dependentBr J Anaesth19977854934979175960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JustinsDMFrancisDHoultonPGReynoldsFA controlled trial of extradural fentanyl in labourBr J Anaesth19825444094147039646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KennedyRLBellJUMillerRPUptake and distribution of lidocaine in fetal lambsAnesthesiology19907234834892310029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KatzJABridenbaughPOKnarrDCHeltonSHDensonDDPharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of epidural ropivacaine in humansAnesth Analg199070116212297100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PolleyLSColumbMONaughtonNNWagnerDSvan de VenCJRelative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexesAnesthesiology199990494495010201661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeilinYGuinnNRBernsteinHHZahnJHossainSBodianCALocal anesthetics and mode of delivery: bupivacaine versus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaineAnesth Analg2007105375676317717236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeBBNgan KeeWDNgFFLauTKWongELEpidural infusions of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for labor analgesia: a randomized, double-blind study of obstetric outcomeAnesth Analg20049841145115215041615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LacassieHJHabibASLacassieHPColumbMOMotor blocking minimum local anesthetic concentrations of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in laborReg Anesth Pain Med200732432332917720117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de VeldeMDreelinckRDuboisJDetermination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesiaAnesthesiology2007106114915617197857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinbergRBPowellGHuXHDunnSMEpidural sufentanil for analgesia for labor and deliveryReg Anesth19891452252282577252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BaderAMFragnetoRTeruiKArthurGRLoferskiBDattaSMaternal and neonatal fentanyl and bupivacaine concentrations after epidural infusion during laborAnesth Analg19958148298327574018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PorterJSBonelloEReynoldsFThe effect of epidural opioids on maternal oxygenation during labour and deliveryAnaesthesia199651108999038984859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SinatraRSSevarinoFBChungJHComparison of epidurally administered sufentanil, morphine, and sufentanil-morphine combination for postoperative analgesiaAnesth Analg19917245225271826073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MintyRGKellyLMintyAHammettDCSingle-dose intrathecal analgesia to control labour pain: is it a useful alternative to epidural analgesia?Can Fam Physician200753343744217872679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VasudevanASnowmanCESundarSSargeTWHessPEIntrathecal morphine reduces breakthrough pain during labour epidural analgesiaBr J Anaesth200798224124517210732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HessPEVasudevanASnowmanCPrattSDSmall dose bupivacainefentanyl spinal analgesia combined with morphine for laborAnesth Analg200397124725212818975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CuratoloMPetersen-FelixSArendt-NielsenLZbindenAMEpidural epinephrine and clonidine: segmental analgesia and effects on different pain modalitiesAnesthesiology19978747857949357879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalinasFVPharmacology of drugs used for spinal and epidural anesthesia and analgesiaWongCASpinal and Epidural AnesthesiaNew YorkMcGraw-Hill200776109
   Google Scholar
• BogodDGRosenMReesGAExtradural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at 10 mL/hr to women during laborBr J Anaesth19875933253303828182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HicksJAJenkinsJGNewtonMCFindleyILContinuous epidural infusion of 0.075% bupivacaine for pain relief in labourAnaesthesia19884342892923377149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GamblingDRMcMorlandGJYuPLaszloCComparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia and conventional intermittent “top-up” injections during laborAnesth Analg19907032562612305976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CurryPDPacsooCHeapDGPatient-controlled epidural analgesia in obstetric anaesthetic practicePain19945711251288065789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GamblingDRYuPColeCMcMorlandGHPalmerLA comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labourCan J Anaesth19883532492543289769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der VyverMHalpernSJosephGPatient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysisBr J Anaesth200289345946512402726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VallejoMCRameshVPhelpsALSahNEpidural labor analgesia: continuous infusion versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia with background infusion versus without a background infusionJ Pain200781297097517686658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalpernSHCarvalhoBPatient-controlled epidural analgesia for laborAnesth Analg2009108392192819224805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CollisREBaxandallMLSrikantharajahIDEdgeGKadimMYMorganBMCombined spinal epidural analgesia with ability to walk throughout labourLancet199334188477677688095677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParryMGFernandoRBawaGPSPoultonBBDorsal column function after epidural and spinal blockade: implications for the safety of walking following low-dose regional analgesia for labourAnaesthesia1998533823879613305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WongCAScavoneBMLoffrediMWangWYPeacemanAMGanchiffJNThe dose-response of intrathecal sufentanil added to bupivacaine for labor analgesiaAnesthesiology20009261553155810839903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HermanNLChoiKCAffleckPJAnalgesia, pruritus, and ventilation exhibit a dose-response relationship in parturients receiving intrathecal fentanyl during laborAnesth Analg199989237838310439751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AsokumarBNewmanLMMcCarthyRJIvankovichADTumanKJIntrathecal bupivacaine reduces pruritus and prolongs duration of fentanyl analgesia during labor: a prospective, randomized controlled trialAnesth Analg1998876130913159842818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShniderSMAbboudTKArtalRHenriksenEHStefaniSJLevinsonGMaternal catecholamines decrease during labor after lumbar epidural anesthesiaAm J Obstet Gynecol1983147113156614080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClarkeVTSmileyRMFinsterMUterine hyperactivity after intrathecal injection of fentanyl for analgesia during labor: a cause of fetal bradycardia?Anesthesiology199481410837943823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NielsenPEEricksonJRAbouleishEIPerriattSSheppardCFetal heart rate changes after intrathecal sufentanil or epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesia: incidence and clinical significanceAnesth Analg19968347427468831313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MardirosoffCDumontLBoulvainMTramerMRFetal bradycardia due to intrathecal opioids for labour analgesia: a systematic reviewBr J Obstet Gynaecol20021093274281
   Google Scholar
• AlbrightGAForsterRMDoes combined spinal-epidural analgesia with subarachnoid sufentanil increase the incidence of emergency cesarean delivery?Reg Anesth19972254004059338900
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van de VeldeMTeunkensAHanssensMVandermeerschEVerhaegheJIntrathecal sufentanil and fetal heart rate abnormalities: a double-blind, double placebo-controlled trial comparing two forms of combined spinal epidural analgesia with epidural analgesia in laborAnesth Analg20049841153115915041616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MercierFJDounasMBouazizHLhuissierCBenhamouDIntravenous nitroglycerin to relieve intrapartum fetal distress related to uterine hyperactivity: a prospective observational studyAnesth Analg1997845111711209141942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CamannWRHortvetLAHughesNBaderAMDattaSMaternal temperature regulation during extradural analgesia for labourBr J Anaesth19916755655681751270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiebermanELangJMFrigolettoFJrRichardsonDKRingerSACohenAEpidural analgesia, intrapartum fever, and neonatal sepsis evaluationPediatrics19979934154199041298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KapustaLConfinoEIsmajovichBRosenblumYDavidMPThe effect of epidural analgesia on maternal thermoregulation in laborInt J Gynaecol Obstet19852331851892865179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PanzerOGhazanfariNSesslerDIShivering and shivering-like tremor during labor with and without epidural analgesiaAnesthesiology19999061609161610360859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeinigerCFWandSNadjariMPost-void residual volume in labor: a prospective study comparing parturients with and without epidural analgesiaActa Anaesthesiol Scand200650101297130316978160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlofssonCIEkblomAOEkman-OrdebergGEIrestedtLEPost-partum urinary retention: a comparison between two methods of epidural analgesiaEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol199771131349031957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChoiPTGalinskiSETakeuchiLLucasSTamayoCJadadARPDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studiesCan J Anaesth200350546046912734154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoughnanBACarliFRomneyMDoreCJGordonHEpidural analgesia and backache: a randomized controlled comparison with intramuscular meperidine for analgesia during labourBr J Anaesth200289346647212402727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RussellRDundasRReynoldsFLong term backache after childbirth: prospective search for causative factorsBMJ19963127043138413888646094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BreenTWRansilBJGrovesPAOriolNEFactors associated with back pain after childbirthAnesthesiology199481129348042807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HowellCJKiddCRobertsWA randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia in labourBJOG20011081273311213000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HessPEPrattSDLucasTPPredictors of breakthrough pain during labor epidural analgesiaAnesth Analg200193241441811473872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaminSMGamblingDRLucasMJSharmaSKSidawiJELevenoKJRandomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during laborObstet Gynecol19958657837897566849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FerouzFNorrisMCLeightonBLRisk of respiratory arrest after intrathecal sufentanilAnesth Analg1997855108810909356104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’MearaOPBrazieJVNeonatal intoxication after paracervical block [letter]N Engl J Med19682782011271128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeightonBLHalpernSHWilsonDBLumbar sympathetic blocks speed early and second stage induced labor in nulliparous womenAnesthesiology19999041039104610201675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScudamoreJHYatesMJPudendal block – a misnomer?Lancet19661742723244159157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChaseDBradyJPVentricular tachycardia in a neonate with mepivacaine toxicityJ Pediatr1977901127129830877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClimieCRThe place of continuous lumbar epidural analgesia in the management of abnormally prolonged labourMed J Aust1964244745014201723
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ReichAMParavertebral lumbar sympathetic block in labor: a report on 500 deliveries by a fractional procedure producing continuous conduction anesthesiaAm J Obstet Gynecol19516161263127614838024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeightonBLHalpernSHThe effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic reviewAm J Obstet Gynecol20021865 Suppl NatureS69S7712011873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharmaSKMcIntireDDWileyJLevenoKJLabor analgesia and cesarean delivery: an individual patient meta-analysis of nulliparous womenAnesthesiology2004100114214814695735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PanniMKSegalSLocal anesthetic requirements are greater in dystocia than in normal laborAnesthesiology200398495796312657859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChestnutDHVincentRDMcGrathJMChoiWWBatesJNDoes early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are receiving intravenous oxytocin?Anesthesiology1994906119312008010465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChestnutDHMcGrathJMVincentRDDoes early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are in spontaneous labor?Anesthesiology1994806120112088010466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhelGGonenRVaidaSBarakSGaitiniLEarly versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trialAm J Obstet Gynecol2006194360060516522386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial Study Group UKEffect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trialLancet20013589275192311454372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EltzschigHKLiebermanESCamannWRRegional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and deliveryN Eng J Med20033484319332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirnbachDJOjeaLSCombined spinal-epidural (CSE) for labor and deliveryInt Anesthesiol Clin2002404274812409932
   PubMedGoogle Scholar