References
- AulhornEKarmeyerHFrequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defectsDocumenta Ophthalmologica1977147583
- HartWMJrBeckerBThe onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defectsOphthalmology19828932682797088510
- ÅsmanPHejlAEvaluation of methods for automated hemifield analysis in perimetryArch Ophthalmol199211068208261596231
- ÅsmanPHeijlAGlaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluationArch Ophthalmol199211068128191596230
- ChenYWyattHJSwansonWHPupillary evaluation of retinal asymmetry: development and initial testing of a techniqueVision Res200545192549256315907969
- ChenYWyattHJSwansonWHDulMWRapid Pupil-Based Assessment of Glautomatous DamageOptom Vis Sci200885647148118521026
- BurrJMMowattGHernandezRThe clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluationHealth Technol Assess200711414183
- BurrJMMowattGHernandezRThe clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluationHealth Technol Assess2007114163
- SpryPGHussinHMSparrowJMClinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphery Matrix 24–2 threshold strategyBr J Ophthalmol20058981031103516024860
- TuckMWCrickRPScreening for glaucoma: the time taken by primary examiners to conduct visual field tests in practiceOphthalmic Physiol Opt19941443513557845691
- VernonSAGhoshGDo locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence local practice?Eye20011545846311767019
- TuckMWCrickRPRelative effectiveness of different modes of glaucoma screening in optometric practiceOpthalmic Phyisol Opt1993133227232