Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometry

Sarwat SalimHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA

Daniel J LinnHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA

James R Echols IIHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA

Peter A NetlandHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Pages 341-344 | Published online: 06 May 2009

Cite this article

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

ChiharaEAssessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical dataSurv Ophthalmol20085320321818501267
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ForbesMPicoGJrGrolmanBA noncontact applanation tonometer. Description and clinical evaluationArch Ophthalmol1974911341404810646
PubMedGoogle Scholar
AbbasogluOEBowmanRWCavanaghHDMcCulleyJPReliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomyOphthalmology1998105219321969855146
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VernonSANon-contact tonometry in the postoperative eyeBr J Ophthalmol1989732472492713301
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HansenMKClinicial comparison of the XPERT non-contact tonometer and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometerActa Ophthalmol Scand1995731761807656151
PubMedGoogle Scholar
MyersKJLallePLitwakAXPERT NCT – a clinical evaluationJ Am Optom Assoc1990618638692081831
PubMedGoogle Scholar
MuraseHSawadaAMochizukiKEffects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measured with three different tonometersJpn J Ophthalmol2009531619184301
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KakauCETWilkeKOn repeated tonometryActa Ophthalmol Scand197149611614
Google Scholar
SponselWETonometry in question: can visual screening tests play a more decisive role in glaucoma diagnosis and management?Surv Ophthalmol1989332913002655142
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MundorfTKZimmermanTJNardinGFKendallKSAutomated perimetry, tonometry, and questionnaire in glaucoma screeningAm J Ophthalmol19891085055082683793
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TuckMWCrickRPThe cost-effectiveness of various modes of screening for primary open angle glaucomaOphthalmic Epidemiol199743179145411
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Moreno-MontanesJGomez-DemmelELajara-BlesaJAliseda-PerezDComparative study of three non-contact tonometers and the Goldmann tonometerOphthalmologica19942081151188065693
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PopovichKSShieldsMBA comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometryJ Glaucoma1997644469075080
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JorgeJDiaz-ReyJAGonzalez-MeijomeJMClinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new non-contact tonometerOphthal Physiol Opt200222560564
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JorgeJGonzalez-MeijomeJMDiaz-ReyJAClinical performance of non-contact tonometry by Reichert AT550 in glaucomatous patientsOphthal Physiol Opt200323503506
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ShieldsMBThe non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitationsSurv Ophthalmol1980242112196987761
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BrittJMCliftonBCBarnebeyHSMillsRPMicroaerosol formation in noncontact “air-puff” tonometryArch Ophthalmol19911092252281993032
PubMedGoogle Scholar
BrandtJDCorneal thickness in glaucoma screening, diagnosis, and managementCurr Opin Ophthalmol200415858915021216
PubMedGoogle Scholar
KoYCLiyCJHsuWMVarying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometersEye20051932733215258603
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TonnuPAHoTNewsonTThe influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometryBr J Ophthalmol20058985185415965165
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometry

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometry

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date