A retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil^® settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsification

Ming Chen1 University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Henry W Sweeney2 Research Support Services, the Queens Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Becky Luke3 Surgical Suite, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Mindy Chen4 University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

Mathew Brown5 University of California, San Diego, CA, USA

References

PirazzoliBD’EliseoDZiosiMAcciarriREffects of phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium using phacofracture and phaco chop techniquesJ Cataract Refract Surg19962279679699041091
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KreislerKRMortensonSWMamalisNEndothelial cell loss following “modern” phacoemulsification by a senior residentOpthalmic Surg1992233158160
Google Scholar
ColvardDMKratzRPMazzoccoTRDavidsonBEndothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification in the pupillary planeAm Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J198174334336
Google Scholar
HayashiKHayashiHHakaoFKayashiFRisk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsificationJ Cataract Refract Surg1996228107910848915805
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LiuYZengMLiuXTorsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsificationJ Cataract Refract Surg200733228729217276271
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BadozaDFernández MendyJGanlyMPhacoemulsification using the burst modeJ Cataract Refract Surg20032961101110512842675
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MaloneyWFDillmanDMNichaminLDSupracapsular phacoemulsification: a capsule-free posterior chamber approachJ Cataract Refract Surg19972333233289159673
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar