Effectiveness of percutaneous laser revascularization therapy for refractory angina

References

• MannheimerCCamiciPChesterMRThe problem of chronic refractory angina; report from the ESC Joint Study Group on the treatment of refractory anginaEur Heart J20022335537011846493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BhattABStonePHCurrent strategies for the prevention of angina in patients with stable coronary artery diseaseCurr Opin Card200621492502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGillionML’AllierPArthurHRecommendations for advancing the care of Canadians living with refractory angina pectoris: A Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statementCan J Cardiol20092539940119584968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenryTDSatranDJohnsonRKNatural history of patients with refractory anginaJ Am Coll Cardiol200647231A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrorssonBBernsteinSJBrookRHWerkoLQuality of life of patients with chronic stable angina before and 4 years after coronary artery revascularization compared with a normal populationHeart20028714014511796552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErixsonGJerlockMDahlbergKExperiences of living with angina pectorisNurs Sci Res Nordic Countries1997173438
   Google Scholar
• AndrellPEkreOWahborgPEliassonTMannheimerCQuality of life in patients with refractory angina pectorisInternational Association for the Study of Pain 11th World Congress on Pain [abstract]2005 Aug 21–26Sydney, AustraliaIASP Press2005200
   Google Scholar
• McGillionMWatt-WatsonJLeFortSStevensBPositive shifts in the perceived meaning of cardiac pain following a psychoeducation for chronic stable anginaCan J Nurs Res200739486517679585
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChowC-MDonovanLManuelDRegional variation in self-reported heart disease prevalence in CanadaCan J Cardiol2005211265127116341294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThadaniURecurrent and refractory angina following revascularization procedures in patients with stable angina pectorisCoron Artery Dis200415Suppl 1S1S415179121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OesterleSNLaser percutaneous myocardial revascularizationAm J Cardiol1999834652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OesterleSNSanbornTAAliNPercutaneous transmyocardial laser revascularization for severe angina: The PACIFIC randomised trialLancet20003561705171011095257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalemMRotevatnSStavnesSUsefulness and safety of percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization for refractory angina pectorisAm J Cardiol2004931086109115110197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrionesELacalleJRMarinITransmyocardial laser revascularization versus medical therapy for refractory anginaCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews20091 Art. No.: CD003712. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003712.pub2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KohmotoTFisherPEGuAPhysiology, histology and 2-week morphology of acute transmyocardial laser channels made with a CO2 laserAnn Thorac Surg199763127512839146314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GasslerNWintzerHOStubbeHMTransmyocardial laser revascularization. Histological features in human nonresponder myocardiumCirculation1997953713759008451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurkoffDFisherPEApefelbaumMHistologic appearance of transmyocardial laser channels after 4½ weeksAnn Thorac Surg19966215011508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MuellerXMTevaearaiHHGentonCYTransmyocardial laser revascularization in acutely ischaemic myocardiumEur J Cardiothorac Surg1998131701759583823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MirhoseiniMFisherJClaytonMMyocardial revascularization by laser: a clinical reportLasers Surg Med198332412456608040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MukherjeeDBhattDLRoeMTPatelVEllisSGDirect myocardial revascularization and angiogenesis – how many patients might be eligible?Am J Cardiol19998458960010482161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeimerMButzTWeileppJFassbenderDBuchertWImprovement of myocardial perfusion detected by positron emission tomography in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization (abstr)Circulation2001104suppl II11445
   Google Scholar
• RimoldiOBurnsSMRosenSDMeasurement of myocardial blood flow with positron emission tomography before and after transmyocardial laser revascularizationCirculation199910021342138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurnsSMBrownSWhiteCAQuantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion changes with transmyocardial laser revascularizationAm J Cardiol20018786186711274941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuzettiSColomboAPiccalugaEAbsence of clinical signs of denervation after percutaneous myocardial laser revascularizationInt J Cardiol 203:9112913514559122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-SheikhTAllenKBStrakaSPCardiac sympathetic denervation after transmyocardial laser revascularizationCirculation199910013514010402442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MyersJOsterleSNJonesJDo transmyocardial and percuatneous laser revascularization induce silent ischemia? An assessment by exercise testingAm Heart J20021431052105712075263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeekJvan der SlootJAPHuikeshovenMCardiac denervation after clinical transmyocardial laser revasacularization: Short-term and long-term iodine 123-labeled meta-iodobenzylguanide scintigraphic evidenceJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg200412751752414762363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeonMBKornowskiRDowneyEA blinded-randomized, placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization to improve angina symptoms in patients with severe coronary diseaseJ Am Coll Cardiol2005461812181916286164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhitlowPlDeMaioSJPerinECOne-year results of percutaneous myocardial revascularization for refractory angina pectorisAm J Cardiol2003911342134612767430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrayTBurnsSMClarkeSCPercutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectorisAm J Cardiol20039166166612633794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalemMRotevatnSNordrehaugJELong-term results following percutaneous myocardial laser therapyCoron Artery Dis20061738539016707963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNabDKhanSNSharplesLDAn open label, single centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trialEur J Cardiol20062710481053
   Google Scholar
• HigginsJPTGreenSCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• HozoSPDjulbegovicBHozoIEstimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sampleBMC Medical Res Methodol2005513doi:10.1186/1471–2288–5–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TomlinsonGBeyeneJ[P148] Imputing summary statistics for meta-analysis of continuous data12th Cochrane ColloquiumOttawa2–6 Oct 2004
   Google Scholar
• CohenJStatistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences2nd edHillsdaleLawrence Earlbaum Associates1988
   Google Scholar
• JuniPAltmanDGEggerMSystematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsBMJ2001323424611440947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonianRLairdNMeta-analysis in clinical trialsControl Clin Trials198671771883802833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJAltmanDGMeasuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ200332755756012958120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RuckerGSchwarzerGCarpenterJRSchumacherMUndue reliance on I2 in assessing heterogeneity may misleadBMC Medical Res Methodol2008879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneGWTeirsteinPSRubensteinRA prospective, multicentre, randomized trial of percutaneous tranmyocardial laser revascularization in patients with nonrecanalizable chronic total occlusionsJ Am Coll Cardiol2002391581158712020483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpertusJAWinderJADewhurstTADevelopment and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery diseaseJ Am Coll Cardiol1995253333417829785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar