Molecular evidence for recognizing Antithamnion sparsum (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) at the species level

REFERENCES

• Agardh C.A. 1827. Aufzählung einiger in den östreichischen Ländern gefundenen neuen Gattungen und Arten von Algen, nebst ihrer Diagnostik und beigefügten Bemerkungen. Flora 10: 625–646.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen C.B. & Chase M.K. 2001. Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics. American Journal of Botany 88: 1103–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasiadis A. 1990. Evolutionary biogeography of the North Atlantic antithamnioid algae. In: Evolutionary biogeography of the marine algae of the North Atlantic (Ed. by D.J. Garbary & G.R. South), pp. 119–225. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiadis A. 1996. Morphology and classification of the Ceramioideae (Rhodophyta) based on phylogenetic principles. Opera Botanica 128: 5–217.
   Google Scholar
• Boo S.M. & Lee I.K. 1983. A life history and hybridization of Antithamnion sparsum Tokida (Rhodophyta, Ceramiaceae) in culture. Korean Journal of Botany 26: 141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Chase M.W., De Bruijn A.Y., Cox A.V., Reeves G., Rudall P.J., Johnson M.A.T. & Eguiarte L.E. 2000. Phylogenetic of Asphodelaceae (Asparagales): an analysis of plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Annals of Botany 86: 935–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H.-G. 1996. A Systematic study of the Dasyaceae (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). PhD thesis. Seoul National University. Seoul, Korea. 328 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cormaci M. & Furnari G. 1989. World distribution of the genus Antithamnion Naegeli (Rhodophyta, Ceramiaceae). Japanese Journal of Phycology (Sörui) 37: 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson T. 1998. AutoDecay version 4.0 (program distributed by the author). Department of Botany, Stockholm University. Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Farris J.S., Källersjö M., Kluge A.G. & Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsen T.M., Brochmann C. & Rueness J. 2003. Phylogeny and interfertility of North Atlantic populations of ‘Ceramium strictum’ (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta): how many species? European Journal of Phycology 38: 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giribet G. & Wheeler W.C. 1999. On gaps. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13: 132–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff L.J. & Coleman A.W. 1990. DNA: microspectrofluorometric studies. In: Biology of the red algae (Ed. by K.M. Cole & R.G. Sheath), pp. 43–71. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Goff L.J., Moon D.A. & Coleman A.W. 1994. Molecular delineation of species and species relationships in the red algal agarophytes Gracilariopsis and Gracilaria (Gracilariales). Journal of Phycology 30: 521–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornall R.J. 1997. Practical aspects of the species concept in plants. In: Species: the units of biodiversity (Ed. by M.F. Claridge, H.A. Dawah & M.R. Wilson), pp. 171–190. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Maggs C.A. 1991. Antithamnion densum (Suhr) Howe from Clare Island, Ireland: a marine red alga new to the British Isles. Cryptogamie, Algologie 12: 189–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis D.M. & Dixon M.T. 1991. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. The Quarterly Review of Biology 66: 411–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itono H. 1971. The genus Antithamnion (Ceramiaceae) in southern Japan and adjacent waters. II. Memoirs of the Faculty of Fisheries, Kagoshima University 20: 209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanmougin F., Thompson J.D., Gouy M., Higgins D.G. & Gibson T.J. 1998. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 23: 403–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya M., West J.A., King R.J., Zuccarello G.C., Tanaka J. & Hara Y. 1998. Evolutionary divergence in the red algae Caloglossa leprieurii and C. apomeiotica. Journal of Phycology 34: 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya M., Tanaka J., King R.J., West J.A., Zuccarello G.C. & Kawai H. 1999. Reproductive and genetic distinction between broad and narrow entities of Caloglossa continua (Delesseriaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 38: 356–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapraun D.F. 1993. Karyology and cytophotometric estimation of nuclear DNA content variation in Gracilaria, Gracilariopsis and Hydropuntia (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta). European Journal of Phycology 28: 253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai H., Muto H., Fuhii T. & Kato A. 1995. A linked 5S rRNA gene in Scytosiphon lomentaria (Scytosiphonales, Phaeophyceae). Journal of Phycology 31: 306–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim G.H., Chah O.-K. & Lee I.K. 1996. Antithamnion aglandum (Rhodophyta, Ceramiaceae): a new species from Korea. Nova Hedwigia 63: 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparable studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kylin H. 1925. The marine red algae in the vicinity of the biological station at Friday Harbor, Wash. Acta Universitatis Lundensis 21: 1–87.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S.-R., Oak J.H., Suh Y. & Lee I.K. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of rbcS sequences: an example from Antithamnion and related genera (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta). Journal of Phycology 37: 1083–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L'Hardy-Halos M.-T. 1968. Les Ceramiaceae (Rhodophyceae Florideae) des côtes de Bretagne: 1 — Le genre Antithamnion Nägeli. Revue Algologique, Nouvelle Serie 9: 152–183.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison D.R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious tree. Systematic Zoology 40: 315–328.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison W.P. & Maddison D.R. 1999. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.08. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Maggs C.A. & Hommersand M.H. 1993. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Volume 1. Rhodophyta. Part 3A. Ceramiales. The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 444 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Morell V. 1996. TreeBASE: the roots of phylogeny. Science 273: 569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nägeli C. 1847. Die neueren Algensysteme. Zürich. 275 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. & Crandall K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provasoli L. 1966. Media and prospects for the cultivation of marine algae. In: Cultures and collections of algae (Ed. by A. Watanabe & A. Hattori), pp. 63–75. Proceedings of the U.S.—Japan Conference, Hakone, September 1966. Japanese Society of Plant Physiology.
   Google Scholar
• Saitou N. & Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. & Kraft G.T. 1994. Small-subunit rRNA gene sequences from representatives of selected families of the Gigartinales and Rhodymeniales (Rhodophyta). I. Evidence for the Plocamiales ord. nov. Canadian Journal of Botany 72: 1250–1263.
   Google Scholar
• Steane D.A., McClure B.A., Clark A.E. & Kraft G.T. 1991. Amplification of the polymorphic 5.8S rRNA gene from selected Australian gigartinalean species (Rhodophyta) by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Phycology 27: 758–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford D.L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tokida J. 1932. On two new species of Antithamnion from Japan. Transactions of the Sapporo Natural History Society 12: 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Wollaston E.M. 1968. Morphology and taxonomy of southern Australian genera of Crouanieae Schmitz (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta). Australian Journal of Botany 16: 217–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollaston E.M. 1971. Antithamnion and related genera occurring on the Pacific Coast of North America. Syesis 4: 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida T. 1981. Note on Antithamnion sparsum Tokida (Rhodophyta, Ceramiaceae). Japanese Journal of Phycology (Sôrui) 29: 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida T., Yoshinaga K. & Nakajima Y. 1995. Check list of marine algae of Japan (revised in 1995). Japanese Journal of Phycology (Sôrui) 43: 115–171.
   Google Scholar
• Zuccarello G.C. & West J.A. 2003. Multiple cryptic species: molecular diversity and reproductive isolation in the Bostrychia radicans/B. moritziana complex (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) with focus on North American isolates. Journal of Phycology 39: 948–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccarello G.C., Sandercock B. & West J.A. 2002a. Diversity within red algal species: variation in world-wide samples of Spyridia filamentosa (Ceramiaceae) and Murrayella periclados (Rhodomelaceae) using DNA markers and breeding studies. European Journal of Phycology 37: 403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccarello G.C., West J.A. & Rueness J. 2002b. Phylogeography of the cosmopolitan red alga Caulacanthus ustulatus (Caulacanthaceae, Gigartinales). Phycological Research 50: 163–172.
   Google Scholar