Marine diatoms from Buenos Aires coastal waters (Argentina). IV. Rhizosolenia s. str., Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Proboscia

REFERENCES

• Balech E. 1964. El plancton de Mar del Plata durante el período 1961–62 (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Boletín del Instituto de Biología Marina, Mar del Plata 7: 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Balech E. 1971. Microplancton de la campaña oceanográfica Productividad III. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’ e Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales, Hidrobiología 3: 1–202.
   Google Scholar
• Balech E. 1979. Dinoflagelados. Campaña Oceanográfica Argentina Islas Orcadas, 06/75. Servicio de Hidrografía Naval (Buenos Aires) H 655: 1–76.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Pérez J. 2001. Episodios nocivos por fitoplancton. In: Los Moluscos Pectínidos de Iberoamérica: Ciencia y Acuicultura (Ed. by A.N. Maeda-Martínez), pp. 285–324. Editorial Limusa, México.
   Google Scholar
• Boltovskoy D., Gibbons M.J., Hutchings L. & Binet D. 1999. General biological features of the South Atlantic. In: South Atlantic zooplankton (Ed. by D. Boltovskoy), pp. 1–42. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Brightwell T. 1858. Remarks on the genus ‘Rhizosolenia’ of Ehrenberg. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 6: 93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Brunel J. 1962. Le phytoplancton de la Baie des Chaleurs. Contributions du Ministère de la Chasse et des Pecheries 91: 1–365.
   Google Scholar
• Cupp E. 1943. Marine plankton diatoms of the West coast of North America. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography of the University of California 5: 1–238.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1843. Verbreitung und Einfluss des mikroskopischen Lebens in Süd-und Nord-Amerika. Abhandlungen der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1841: 291–445.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrario M.E. & Galván N.M. 1989. Catálogo de las diatomeas marinas citadas entre los 36° y los 60° S con especial referencia al Mar Argentino. Instituto Antártico Argentino, Publicación 20: 1–327.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrario M.E., Sar E.A. & Codina R.G. 1986. Diatomeas marinas de la Provincia de Chubut (República Argentina). Centrales I. Darwiniana 27: 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrario M.E., Sar E.A. & Sala S.E. 1995. Metodología básica para el estudio del fitoplancton con especial referencia a las diatomeas. In: Manual de Métodos Ficológicos (Ed. by K. Alveal, M.E. Ferrario, E.C. Oliveira & E. Sar), pp. 1–23. Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Fourtanier E. & Kociolek P. 1999. Catalogue of the diatom genera. Diatom Research 14: 1–190.
   Google Scholar
• Frenguelli J. 1960. Diatomeas y silicoflagelados recogidos en Tierra del Adélie durante las Expediciones Polares Francesas de Paul-Emilie Victor (1950–1952). Revue Algologique 5: 3–48.
   Google Scholar
• Frenguelli J. & Orlando H.A. 1958. Diatomeas y Silicoflagelados del sector Antártico Sudamericano. Instituto Antártico Argentino, Publicacioén 5: 1–189.
   Google Scholar
• Fryxell G.A. & Hasle G.R. 2004. Taxonomy of harmful diatoms. In: Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae (Ed. by G.M. Hallegraeff, D.M. Anderson & A.D. Cembella), pp. 465–509. Monographs on oceanographic Methodology 11, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Gárate-Lizárraga I., Siqueiras-Beltrones D.A. & Maldonado-López V. 2003. First record of a Rhizosolenia debyana bloom in the Gulf of California, México. Pacific Science 57: 141–145.
   Google Scholar
• Gaul U., Geissler U., Henderson M., Mahoney R. & Reimer C. W. 1993. Bibliography on the fine-structure of diatom frustules (Bacillariophyceae). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 144: 69–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greuter W., Barrie F.R., Burdet H.M., Chaloner W.G., Demoulin V., Hawksworth D.L., Jørgensen P.M., Nicolson D. H., Silva P.C., Trehane P. & McNeill J. 1994. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code). Adopted by the Fifteenth International Botanical Congress, Yokohama, 1993. Regnum Vegetabile 131: 1–389.
   Google Scholar
• Hargraves P.E. 1976. Studies on marine plankton diatoms. II. Resting spore morphology. Journal of Phycology 12: 118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. 1975. Some living marine species of the diatom family Rhizosoleniaceae. In: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Recent and fossil marine Diatoms (Ed. by R. Simonsen), Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 53, pp. 99–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Fryxell G.A. 1970. Diatoms: cleaning and mounting for light and electron microscopy. Transactions of the American Microscopic Society 89: 469–474.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1996. Marine Diatoms. In: Identifying Marine Phytoplankton (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5–385. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson M.V. & Reimer C.W. 2003. Bibliography on the fine structure of diatom frustules (Bacillariophyceae). II. (+ Deletions, Addenda and Corrigenda for Bibliography I.). Diatom Monographs 3: 1–377.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1937. The plankton diatoms of the Southern Seas. Discovery Reports 16: 151–364.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part 5: Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms). Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 317 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1995. Planktonic diatoms from the Gulf of California and coasts off Baja California: the genera Rhizosolenia, Proboscia, Pseudosolenia, and former Rhizosolenia species. Diatom Research 10: 251–267.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Meave del Castillo M.E. 1996. The marine planktonic diatom Rhizosolenia robusta (Bacillariophyta): morphological studies support its transfer to a new genus, Calyptrella gen. nov. Phycologia 35: 198–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Meave del Castillo M.E. 1997. Neocalyptrella, gen. nov., a new name to replace Calyptrella Hernández-Becerril & Meave. Phycologia 36: 329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner R.A., Garrison D.L. & Plumley F.G. 1997. Harmful algal blooms and red tide problems on the U.S. west coast. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 1076–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1920. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde, pls. 317–320. In: Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde (Ed. by A. Schmidt 1874–1959), R. Reisland, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1929. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österrreichs und der Schweiz. Dr. L. Rabenhorsts Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österrreich und der Schweiz 7(3): 465–608.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W. & Ito R. 2002. Observations on Proboscia species from Late Cretaceous sediments, and their possible evolution from Kreagra. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by J. John), pp. 313–329. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G, Ruggell.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W. & Ligowski R. 2004. New observations on Proboscia auxospores, and validation of the family Probosciaceae fam. nov. Vie et Milieu 54(2–3): 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W. & Ligowski R. 2006. Observations on the auxospores, initial cells and vegetative cells of Proboscia truncata (Bacillariophyta). Nova Hedwigia. Beiheft 130: 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W. & Priddle J. 1991. Fossil members of the diatom genus Proboscia. Diatom Research 6: 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W. & Saito M. 1999. The genus Proboscia from the Thalassiosira yabei Zone (Middle-Late Miocene) sediments of Hokkaido, Japan. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by S. Mayama, M. Idei & I. Koizumi), pp. 565–580. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W., Ligoswski R., Nöthig E.-M. & Priddle J. 1991. The diatom genus Proboscia in Antarctic waters. Diatom Research 6: 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Koray T. 2004. Potentially toxic and harmful phytoplankton species along the coast of the Turkish seas. In: Harmful Algae 2002 (Ed. by K.A. Steidinger, J.H. Landsberg, C.R. Tomas & G.A. Vargo), pp. 335–337. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida institute of oceanography, and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Lange C. 1985. Spatial and seasonal variations of the diatom assemblages off the Argentinian coast (South Western Atlantic). Oceanologica Acta 8: 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Lanjouw J., Baehni C., Robyns W., Rollins R.C., Ross R., Rousseau J., Schulze G.M., Smith A.C., De Vilmorin R. & Stafleu F.A. 1956. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, adopted by the Eighth international Botanical Congress, Paris, July 1954. Regnum Vegetabile 8: 1–338.
   Google Scholar
• Marques Da Cunha A. & Da Fonseca O. 1917. O microplancton do Atlantico nas imediações de Mar del Plata. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 9: 140–142.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2006. Another cryptic species complex: Rhizosolenia setigera. Abstract book, 19th Int. Diatom Symp. Listvyanka, Russia, 28 August to 3 September, 2006: 100.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. & Kaczmarska I. 2004. Evolution of the diatoms: V. Morphological and cytological support for the major clades and a taxonomic revision. Phycologia 43(3): 245–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira Filho H., Eskinazi-Leça E., Valente-Moreira I.M. & Cunha J.A. 1999. Avaliação taxonômica e ecológica das Diatomáceas (Chrysophyta-Bacillariophyceae) marinhas e estuarinas nos estados de Pernambuco, Pariba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará, Piauí, Maranhã, Pará e Amapé, Brasil. Trabalhos Oceanográficos da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 27: 55–90.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno J.L., Licea S. & Santoyo H. 1996. Diatomeas del Golfo de California. Universidad Autonóma de Baja California Sur, México, 275 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Melchers F.C. 1955. Las diatomeas del plancton marino de las costas del Brasil. Boletim do Instituto Oceanografico (São Paulo) 6: 93–138.
   Google Scholar
• Negri R.M., Benavides H.R. & Carreto J.I. 1988. Algunas características del florecimiento del fitoplancton en el frente del Río de la Plata II: las asociaciones fitoplanctónicas. Publicación de la Comisión Técnica Mixta del Frente Marítimo 4: 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. 1892. Monographie du Genre Rhizosolenia et de quelques genres voisins. Le Diatomiste (Extrait du vol 1, 1892): 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Priddle J., Jordan R.W. & Medlin L.K. 1990. Family Rhizosoleniaceae. In: Polar Marine Diatoms (Ed. by L.K. Medlin & J. Priddle), pp. 115–127. British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Prygiel J. & Coste M. 2000. Guide Méthodologique pour la mise en ouvre de l'Indice Biologique Diatomées. Agences de l'Eau, Ministiére de l'Amnagement du Territoire et de l'Environment, Direction de l'Eau & CEMAGREF, France, 134 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Romero O. & Hensen C. 2002. Oceanographic control of biogenic opal and diatoms in surface sediments of the Southern Atlantic. Marine Geology 186: 263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa Z.M. 1982. Diatomáceas marinhas e estuarinas de Tramandaí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Botânica 29: 49–145.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R., Cox E.J., Karayeva N.I., Mann D.G., Paddock T.B.B., Simonsen R. & Sims P.A. 1979. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 64: 513–533.
   Google Scholar
• Rott E., Kling H. & McGregor G. 2006. Studies on the diatom Urosolenia Round & Crawford (Rhizosoleniophycidae) part 1. New and reclassified species from subtropical and tropical freshwaters. Diatom Research 21(1): 105–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R. & Mann D.G. 1990. The Diatoms. Morphology and Biology of the Genera. Cambridge University Press, London, 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sar E.A. 1996. Flora diatomológica de Bahía San Antonio (Prov. de Río Negro, Argentina) O. Centrales I. Revista del Museo de La Plata (n. s.) 14 Botánica 106: 365–400.
   Google Scholar
• Shipe R.F., Brzezinski M.A., Pilskaln C. & Villareal T.A. 1999. Rhizosolenia mats: An overlooked source of silica production in the open sea. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 1282–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundström B.G. 1986. The marine diatom genus Rhizosolenia. A new approach to the taxonomy. Doctoral Dissertation. Lund University, Sweden: 197.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi K., Jordan R. & Priddle J. 1994. The diatom genus Proboscia in subarctic waters. Diatom Research 9: 411–428.
   Google Scholar
• Takano H. 1990. Diatoms. In: Red tide organisms in Japan— an illustrated taxonomic guide (Ed. by Y. Fukuyo, H. Takano, M. Chiharam & K. Matsouka), pp. 162–331. Uchida Rokakuho, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Throndsen J., Hasle G.R. & Tangen K. 2003. Norsk Kystplankton Flora. Almater Forlag AS, Oslo, 341 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Torgan L.C., Becker V. & Prates H.M. 1999. Checklist das diatomáceas (Bacillariophyceae) de ambientes de águas continentais e costeiros do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Iheringia, Série Botânica 52: 89–144.
   Google Scholar
• Vouilloud A.A. 2003. Catálogo de diatomeas continentales y marinas de Argentina. Versión 1.0. Asociación Argentina de Ficología, La Plata, 304 pp. Formato digital. ISBN 987–21041-0-7.
   Google Scholar