Molecular and morphological variation of the red alga Spyridia filamentosa (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) in the Hawaiian Archipelago

REFERENCES

• Abbott I.A. 1999. Marine red algae of the Hawaiian Islands. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, Hawaii. 477 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Abramoff M.D., Magelhaes P.J. & Ram S.J. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Blomster J., Maggs C.A. & Stanhope M.J. 1998. Molecular and morphological analysis of Enteromorpha intestinalis and E. compressa (Chlorophyta) in the British Isles. Journal of Phycology 34: 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børgesen, F. 1920. The marine algae of the Danish West Indies. II. Rhodophyceae. Bianco Luno, Copenhagen, Denmark. 498 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Carlton J.T. 1996. Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77: 1653–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement M., Posada D. & Crandall K.A. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9: 1657–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin K.Y. 2009. Restoration of a seagrass bed in Hawaii: understanding the phylogeography of the native red alga, Spyridia filamentosa, and its role in seagrass bed succession. Master's thesis. University of Hawaii, Honolulu. 214 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin K.Y., Kurihara A. & Sherwood A.R. 2009. A molecular method for identification of the morphologically plastic invasive algal genera Eucheuma and Kappaphycus (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales) in Hawaii. Journal of Applied Phycology 21: 691–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson M.N., Gupta A.S. & England H.M. 2005. Coupled biophysical global ocean model and molecular genetic analyses identify multiple introductions of cryptogenic species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 11968–11973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Mazoyer G. 1941. Recherches Sur Les Céramiacées De La Méditerranée Occidentale. Minerva, Alger. 510 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2011. AlgaeBase. Worldwide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Available at: http://www.algaebase.org (14 September 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Heesch S., Broom J.E.S., Neill K.F., Farr T.J., Dalen J.L. & Nelson W.A. 2009. Ulva, Umbraulva and Gemina: genetic survey of New Zealand taxa reveals diversity and introduced species. European Journal of Phycology 44: 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard R.J., Travis S.E. & Sikes B.A. 2008. Rapid growth of a Eurasian haplotype of Phragmites australis in a restored brackish marsh in Louisiana, USA. Biological Invasions 10: 369–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck J.P. & Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (Oxford) 17: 754–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itono H. 1977. Studies on the Ceramiaceous algae (Rhodophyta) from southern part of Japan. Bibliotheca Phycologica 35: 1–449.
   Google Scholar
• Knowlton N. 1993. Sibling species in the sea. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 189–216.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi D.R. 2006. Colonization of the Hawaiian Archipelago via Johnston Atoll: a characterization of oceanographic transport corridors for pelagic larvae using computer simulation. Coral Reefs 25: 407–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S., Lee I.K. & Suh Y. 2005. Molecular evidence for recognizing Antithamnion sparsum (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) at the species level. Phycologia 44: 530–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylander J.A. 2006. MrModeltest. Uppsala University, Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips R.W. 1924. On the structure of Spyridia filamentosa, (Wulf.) Harv., and the affinities of the genus. Annals of Botany XXXVIII: 547–561.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. & Buckley T.R. 2004. Model section and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53: 793–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posada D. & Crandall K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford) 14: 817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. & Lehmkuhl K.V. 2005. Molecular divergence and morphological diversity among four cryptic species of Plocamium (Plocamiales, Florideophyceae) in northern Europe. European Journal of Phycology 40: 293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford D.L. 1998. PAUP^*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (^*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M. & Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton A.R., Crandall K.A. & Sing C.F. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G. & Gibson T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignments through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Strate H.J., Boele-Bos S.A., Olsen J.L., van de Zande L. & Stam W.T. 2002. Phylogeographic studies in the tropical seaweed Cladophoropsis membranacea (Chlorophyta, Ulvophyceae) reveal a cryptic species complex. Journal of Phycology 38: 572–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen H., De Clerck O., Schils T., Kooistra W.H.C.F. & Coppejans E. 2005. Evolution and phylogeography of Halimeda section Halimeda (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 789–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams S.L. & Smith J.E. 2007. A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 327–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womersley H.B.S. 1998. The Marine Benthic Flora of Southern Australia: Rhodophyta-Part IIIC. State Herbarium of South Australia, Richmond, S. Australia. 535 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Won B.Y. 2007. Phylogenetic and systematic studies of Ceramiaceae (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) with a focus on three tribes: Ceramieae, Antithamnieae, and Spyridieae. Ph.D. thesis. University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette. 260 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Zuccarello G.C. & West J.A. 2003. Multiple cryptic species: molecular diversity and reproductive isolation in the Bostrychia radicans/B. moritziana complex (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) with focus on North American isolates. Journal of Phycology 39: 948–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccarello G.C., Sandercock B. & West J.A. 2002. Diversity within red algal species: variations in world-wide samples of Spyridia filamentosa (Ceramiaceae) and Murrayella periclados (Rhodomelaceae) using DNA markers and breeding studies. European Journal of Phycology 37: 403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccarello G.C., Prud'homme van Reine W.F. & Stegenga H. 2004. Recognition of Spyridia griffithsiana comb. nov. (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta): a taxon previously misidentified as Spyridia filamentosa from Europe. Botanica Marina 47: 481–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar