On the misuse of lectotypification in diatom taxonomy

REFERENCES

• Ariyawansa H.A., Hawksworth D.L., Hyde K.D., Jones E.G., Maharachchikumbura S.S., Manamgoda D.S., Thambugala K.M., Udayanga D., Camporesi E., Daranagama A., Jayawardena R., Liu J.-K., Mckenzie E.H.C., Phookamsak R., Senanayake I.C., Shivas R.G., Tian Q. & Xu J.-C. 2014. Epitypification and neotypification: guidelines with appropriate and inappropriate examples. Fungal Diversity 69: 57–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo C. & van den Berg C. 2007. Lectotypifications in Prescottia (Orchidaceae-Orchidoideae). Kew Bulletin 62: 651–655.
   Google Scholar
• Bacigalupo N.M. & Cabral E. 1998. Nota sobre dos especies de Borreria (Rubiaceae-Spermacoceae). Hickenia 2: 261–266.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco S. & Ector L. 2013. On the nomenclatural validity of Achnanthidium subatomoides (Bacillariophyta). Acta Nova 6: 161–162.
   Google Scholar
• Cheek M. 1989. On typifying names validated by plates unaccompanied by text. Taxon 38: 636–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocquyt C. & Jahn R. 2007. Surirella fuellebornii (Bacillariophyta) and related taxa: lectotypification and distribution. Systematics and Biogeography of Plants 77: 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Danielidis D.B. & Mann D.G. 2003. New species and new combinations in the genus Seminavis (Bacillariophyta). Diatom Research 18: 21–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva W.J., Jahn R., Ludwig T.A.V., Hinz F. & Menezes M. 2015. Typification and taxonomic status re-evaluation of 15 taxon names within the species complex Cymbella affinis/tumidula/turgidula (Cymbellaceae Bacillariophyta). PhytoKeys 53: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange P.J. 2014. A revision of the New Zealand Kunzea ericoides (Myrtaceae) complex. PhytoKeys 40: 1–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delprete P.G. & Kirkbride J.H.J. 2008. Clarification of Borreria gymnocephala, Diodia gymnocephala, Diodia schumannii, Borreria flavovirens and Spermacoce schumannii (Rubiaceae). Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 2: 305–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1843. Verbreitung und Einfluss mikroskopischen Lebens in Süd- und Nord-Amerika: Erster Theil. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1841: 291–466.
   Google Scholar
• Grunow A. 1880. Bemerkungen zu den Diatomeen von Finnmark dem Karischen Meere und vom Jenissey nebst Vorarbeiten fur Monographie der Gattungen Nitzschia Achnanthes Pleurosigma Amphiprora Plagiotropis Hyalodiscus Podosira und einiger Navicula-Gruppen. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens handlingar, Series 4 17: 16–121.
   Google Scholar
• Heath P.V. 1990. On typifying names validated by text accompanied by a plate. Taxon 39: 492–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde K.D. & Zhang Y. 2008. Epitypification: should we epitypify? Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 9: 842–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn R. & Schmid A.-M.M. 2007. Revision of the brackish-freshwater diatom genus Bacillaria Gmelin (Bacillariophyta) with the description of a new variety and two new species. European Journal of Phycology 42: 295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisselev I. 1935. Sostav i periodichnost fitoplanktona bukhty Patrokl Yaponskogo Morya. Issledovaniya Morei SSSR 2: 82–114.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. 2002. Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats, vol. 3. Cymbella, ARG Gantner Verlag KG, Ruggell, Liechtenstein. 584 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1988. Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae Epithemiaceae Surirellaceae. In: Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer), vol. 2/2. G. Fischer, Stuttgart & New York. 596 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1844. Die kieselschaligen Bacillarien oder Diatomeen. W. Köhne, Nordhausen, Germany. 152 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1846. Kurze Mittheilung uber einege kieselschalige Diatomeen. Botanischen Zeitung 4: 247–248.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H., Bak M., Witkowski A. & Tagliaventi N. 2011. Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. Vol. 6: Eunotia and some related genera. ARG Gantner Verlag KG, Ruggell, Liechtenstein. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Matos F.B., Prado J. & Moran R.C. 2015. (042–043) Proposal to modify Article 9 Note 1 and the Glossary of the Melbourne Code. Taxon 64: 649–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill J. 2014. Holotype specimens and type citations: General issues. Taxon 63: 1112–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill J. & Turland N. 2011. Synopsis of proposals on botanical nomenclature – Melbourne 2011: A review of the proposals concerning the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature submitted to the XVIII International Botanical Congress. Taxon 60: 243–286.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill J., Barrie F.R., Buck W.R., Demoulin V., Greuter W., Hawksworth D.L., Herendeen P.S., Knapp S., Marhold K., Prado J., Prud'homme Van Reine W.F., Smith G.F., Wiersema J.H. & Turland N.J. (eds.) 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae fungi and plants (Melbourne Code): Adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne Australia July 2011. Regnum Vegetabile 154. Koeltz Scientific Books, Konigstein, Germany. 208 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Möller M. 1967. The marking of diatoms on slides. Hydrobiologia 30: 177–182.
   Google Scholar
• Moran R.C., Prado J., Lendemer J. & Reveal J.L. 2010. (159–162) Proposals to amend Articles 9.1 and 9.2 to take into account a single specimen used but not indicated as ‘type’ by a describing author(s) with examples. Taxon 59: 1292–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Pabst G.F.J. 1979. Orchidaceae extra Brasilianae novae vel criticae. Bradea 3 (3): 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pabst G.F.J. 1980. Noticias orquidiologicas – XX. Bradea 3 (7): 50.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson P.B. 1986. Lectotypification of Monopsis Salisb. (Lobeliaceae). Taxon 35: 361–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post A.R., Krings A., Xiang Q.-Y., Sosinski B.R. & Neal J.C. 2009. Lectotypification of Cardamine flexuosa (Brassicaceae). Journal of The Botanical Research Institute of Texas 3: 227–230.
   Google Scholar
• Proshkina-Lavrenko A. (Ed.) 1949. Diatomovyi Analis. Kniga 2. Opredelitel'Iskopaemykh i Sovremennykh Diatomovykh Vodorosle, Poryadok Centrales i Mediales. Botanicheskii Institut im V.L. Komarova Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R. Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelystvo Geologicheskoi Literatury, Moskva, Leningrad. 238 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner-Drehwald M.E. & Weis G. 2001. On Cephalantholejeunea (Lejeuneaceae Hepaticae) from South America, and its placement in the subfamily Ptychanthoideae, tribe Ptychantheae. Systematic Botany 26: 699–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross R. 2002. Which illustrations are original material? Taxon 51: 523–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., Schmidt M., Fricke F., Heiden H., Muller O. & Hustedt F. [Eds] 1874–1959. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. R. Reisland, Leipzig, Germany. 480 plates.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster R.M. 1963. An annotated synopsis of the genera and subgenera of Lejeuneaceae. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 9: 1–203.
   Google Scholar
• Smith G.F. & van Wyk A.E. 1995. Is inclusion of an uncited plate along with text definite expression of typification? Taxon 44: 217–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterrenburg F.A.S., Hamilton P. & Williams D. 2012. Universal coordinate method for locating light-microscope specimens. Diatom Research 27: 91–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trobajo R., Mann D.G., Chepurnov V.A., Clavero E. & Cox E.J. 2006. Taxonomy, life cycle, and auxosporulation of Nitzschia fonticola (Bacillariophyta). Journal of Phycology 42: 1353–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckerman, E. 1866. Lichens of California, Oregon, and the Rocky Mountains: so far as yet known. JS & C. Adams, Amherst, Massachusetts. 35 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tuji A. 2007. Type examination and typification of Cymbella affinis Kütz., C. turgidula Grunow and C. uenoi Skvortsov. Diatom 23: 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Tuji A. & Williams D.M. 2006. Typification of Conferva pectinalis O.F.Müll. (Bacillariophyceae) and the identity of the type of an alleged synonym Fragilaria capucina Desm. Taxon 55: 193–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuji A. & Williams D.M. 2013. Examination of types in the Fragilaria vaucheriae-intermedia species complex. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science Series B, Botany 39: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tynni R. 1978. Über Finnlands rezente und subfossile Diatomeen. X. Geological Survey of Finland Bulletin 296: 1–92.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam H. & Mertens A. 1993. Diatoms on herbarium macrophytes as indicators for water quality. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by H. Van Dam), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 437–445.
   Google Scholar
• van de Vijver B., Wetzel C., Kopalova K., Zidarova R. & Ector L. 2013. Analysis of the type material of Achnanthidium lanceolatum Brebisson ex Kützing (Bacillariophyta) with the description of two new Planothidium species from the Antarctic Region. Fottea 13: 105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1880. Synopsis des Diatomees de Belgique. Antwerp, Belgium. 235 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel C., Ector L., Van de Vijver B., Compère P. & Mann D. 2015. Morphology typification and critical analysis of some ecologically important small naviculoid species (Bacillariophyta). Fottea 15: 203–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelkerling W.J., Harvey A.S. & de Reviers B. 2015. Jania verrucosa and Jania crassa (Rhodophyta: Corallinaceae): typification nomenclature and taxonomic implications. Taxon 64: 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar