Recognition of Rubrointrusa membranacea gen. et comb. nov., Rhodonematella subimmersa gen. et comb. nov. (with a reinterpretation of the life history) and the Meiodiscaceae fam. nov. within the Palmariales (Rhodophyta)

REFERENCES

• Cabioch J. & Guiry M.D. 1976. Halosacciocolax kjellmanii Lund, Rhodophycée parasite nouvelle sur les côtes de France. Travaux Station Biologique de Roscoff Nouvelle Série 23: 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Clayden S.L. & Saunders G.W. 2008. Resurrecting the red algal genus Grania within the order Acrochaetiales (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta). European Journal of Phycology 43: 151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decew T.C. & West J.A. 1982. A sexual life history in Rhodophysema (Rhodophyceae): a re-interpretation. Phycologia 21: 67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon P.S. & Irvine L.M. 1977. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Vol. 1 Rhodophyta. Part 1, Introduction, Nemaliales, Gigartinales. British Museum (Natural History), London. 252 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Drew K.M. 1928. A revision of the genera Chantransia, Rhodochorton and Acrochaetium. University of California Publications in Botany 14: 139–224.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein T. 1972. Halosacciocolax lundii, sp. nov., a new red alga parasitic on Rhodymenia palmata (L.) Grev. British Phycological Journal 7: 249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401–410.
   Google Scholar
• Freshwater D.W., Fredericq S. & Bailey J.C. 1999. Characteristics and utility of nuclear-encoded large-subunit ribosomal gene sequences in phylogenetic studies of red algae. Phycological Research 47: 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fujii M.T. & Guerra M. 1998. Improved haematoxylin staining for algal cytogenetics. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 73: 78–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielson P.W., Widdowson T.B., Lindstrom S.C., Hawkes M.W. & Scagel R.F. 2000. Keys to the benthic marine algae and seagrasses of British Columbia, southeast Alaska, Washington and Oregon. Phycological Contribution 5: iv + 189.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielson P.W., Widdowson T.B. & Lindstrom S.C. 2004. Keys to the seaweeds and seagrasses of Oregon and California, north of Point Conception. Phycological Contribution 6: iv + 1–181.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielson P.W., Widdowson T.B. & Lindstrom S.C. 2006. Keys to the seaweeds and seagrasses of southeast Alaska, British Columbia, Washington and Oregon. Phycological Contribution 7: iv + 1–209.
   Google Scholar
• Garbary D. & Rueness J. 1980. Audouinella tetraspora, a new member of the Acrochaetiaceae (Rhodophyta) from Norway. Norwegian Journal of Botany 27: 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Garbary D., Hansen G.I. & Scagel R. 1982. The marine algae of British Columbia and northern Washington: division Rhodophyta (red algae), class Florideophyceae, orders Acrochaetiales and Nemaliales. Syesis 15, supplement 1: 1–102.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer A.N., West J.A. & Chan C. 1982. Phycoerythrins as chemotaxonomic markers in red algae: a survey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 10: 203–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. 1974. The occurrence of the red algal parasite Halosacciocolax lundii Edelstein in Britain. British Phycological Journal 9: 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. 1975. Halosacciocolax kjellmanii Lund parasitic on Palmaria palmata forma mollis (S. et G.) Guiry in the eastern North Pacific. Syesis 8: 113–117.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. 1990. Sporangia and spores. In: Biology of the red algae (Ed. by K.M. Cole & R.G. Sheath), pp. 347–376. Cambridge University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Cunningham E.M. 1984. Photoperiodic and temperature responses in the reproduction of north-eastern Atlantic Gigartina acicularis (Rhodophyta: Gigartinales). Phycologia 23: 357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2009. AlgaeBase. Worldwide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. Available at: http://www.algaebase.org. Accessed 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Harper J.T. & Saunders G.W. 2001. Molecular systematics of the florideophyte red algae (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta) using nuclear large and small subunit rDNA sequence data. Journal of Phycology 37: 1073–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper J.T. & Saunders G.W. 2002. A re-classification of the Acrochaetiales based on molecular and morphological data, and establishment of the Colaconematales ord. nov. (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta). European Journal of Phycology 37: 463–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck F. 1883–1885. Die Meeresalgen. In: Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst), pp. 1–575, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert P.D.N. & Gregory T.R. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoef-Emden K. 2008. Molecular phylogeny of phycocyanin-containing cryptophytes: evolution of biliproteins and geographical distribution: Journal of Phycology 44: 985–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman J.M., Abbott I.A. & Sherwood A.R. 2004a. Large subunit rDNA gene sequences and reproductive morphology reveal Stenopeltis to be a member of the Liagoraceae (Nemaliales, Rhodophyta), with a description of Akalaphycus gen. nov. European Journal of Phycology 39: 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman J.M., Harper J.T. & Saunders G.W. 2004b. Phylogenetic study of the Nemaliales (Rhodophyta) based on large-subunit ribosomal DNA sequences supports segregation of the Scinaiaceae fam. nov. and resurrection of Dichotomaria Lamarck. Phycological Research 52: 224–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoh S. 1947. Kaiso no hassei (Development of algae). Hokuryukan, Tokyo (in Japanese). 255 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kucera H. & Saunders G.W. 2008. Assigning morphological variants of Fucus (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in Canadian waters to recognised species using DNA barcoding. Botany 86: 1065–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y.P. & Kurogi M. 1978. Sexual reproductive structures and postfertilization in Rhodochorton subimmersum Setchell et Gardner. Japanese Journal of Phycology 26: 115–119.
   Google Scholar
• Le Gall L. & Saunders G.W. 2007. A nuclear phylogeny of the Florideophyceae (Rhodophyta) inferred from combined EF2, small subunit and large subunit ribosomal DNA: establishing the new red algal subclass Corallinophycidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 1118–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gall L. & Saunders G.W. DNA barcoding is a powerful tool to uncover algal diversity: a case study of the Phyllophoraceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) in the Canadian flora. Journal of Phycology. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Lund S. 1959. The marine algae of East Greenland. I. Taxonomic part. Meddelelser om Grønland 156: 1–247.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus P. 1874. Die botanische Ergebnisse der Nordseefahrt vom 21 Juli bis 9 September 1872. Separatabdruck aus dem II. Jahresberichte der Kommission zur Untersuchung der deutschen Meere in Kiel 2: 67, pl. 2, fig. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Masuda M. 1976. Taxonomic notes on Rhodophysemopsis gen. nov. (Rhodophyta). Journal of Japanese Botany 51: 175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y. 1941. The species of Rhodochorton from Japan. I. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Algological Research, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido Imperial University 2: 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y. 1944. The species of Rhodochorton from Japan. II. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Algological Research, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido Imperial University 3: 99–119.
   Google Scholar
• Papenfuss G.F. 1945. Review of the Acrochaetium-Rhodochorton complex of the red algae. University of California Publications in Botany 18: 229–334.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen H.E. 1905. Contributions à la connaisance des phycomycètes marins (Chytridineae Fischer). Oversigt over det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger 5: 439–488, 11 figs.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. & Crandall K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pueschel C.M. & Cole K.M. 1982. Ultrastructure of pit plugs: a new character for the taxonomy of red algae. British Phycological Journal 17: 238.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. & Van der Mark P. 2005. Mr. Bayes 3.1 manual. Available at: http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenvinge L.K. 1911. Remarks on the hyaline unicellular hairs of the Florideae. In: Biologogiske Arbejder Tilegnede Eug. Warming. København.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. 1993. Gel purification of red algal genomic DNA: an inexpensive and rapid method for the isolation of polymerase chain reaction-friendly DNA. Journal of Phycology 29: 251–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. 2005. Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: a preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 1879–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. 2008. A DNA barcode examination of the red algal family Dumontiaceae (Gigartinales, Florideophyceae) in Canadian waters reveals substantial cryptic (overlooked) species diversity. 1. The foliose Dilsea-Neodilsea complex and Weeksia. Botany 86: 773–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. 2009. Routine DNA barcoding of Canadian Gracilariales (Rhodophyta) reveals the invasive species Gracilaria vermiculophylla in British Columbia. Molecular Ecology Resources 9, supplement 1: 140–150.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. & Hommersand M.H. 2004. Assessing red algal supraordinal diversity and taxonomy in the context of contemporary systematic data. American Journal of Botany 91: 1494–1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. & Lehmkuhl K.V. 2005. Molecular divergence and morphological diversity among four cryptic species of Plocamium (Plocamiales, Florideophyceae) in northern Europe. European Journal of Phycology 40: 293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. & McLachlan J.L. 1989. Taxonomic considerations of the genus Rhodophysema and the Rhodophysemataceae fam. nov. (Rhodophyta, Florideophycidae). Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science 39: 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. & McLachlan J.L. 1991. Morphology and reproduction of Meiodiscus spetsbergensis (Kjellman) gen. et comb. nov., a new genus of Rhodophysemataceae (Rhodophyta). Phycologia 30: 272–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. & Necchi O. Jr. 2002. Nuclear rDNA sequences from Ballia prieurii support recognition of Balliopsis gen. nov. in the Batrachospermales. (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 41: 61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W., Maggs C.A. & McLachlan J.L. 1989. Life history variation in Rhodophysema elegans (Palmariales, Rhodophyta) from the North Atlantic and crustose Rhodophysema spp. from the North Pacific. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 2857–2872.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W., Bird C.J., Ragan M.A. & Rice E.L. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of species of uncertain taxonomic position within the Acrochaetiales-Palmariales complex (Rhodophyta): inferences from phenotypic and 18S rDNA sequence data. Journal of Phycology 31: 601–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setchell W.A. & Gardner N.L. 1903. Algae of northwestern America. University of California Publications in Botany 1: 165–418, pls 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow F.K. Jr. 1960. Aquatic phycomycetes, 819 pp. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 1187 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Stegenga H. 1978. The life histories of Rhodochorton purpureum and Rhodochorton floridulum (Rhodophyta, Nemaliales) in culture. British Phycological Journal 13: 279–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegenga H. 1985. The marine Acrochaetiaceae (Rhodophyta) of southern Africa. South African Journal of Botany 51: 291–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegenga H. & Van Wissen M.J. 1979. Remarks on the life histories of three acrochaetioid algae (Rhodophyta, Nemaliales). Acta Botanica Neerlandica 28: 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Stein J.R. 1973. Handbook of phycological methods. Cambridge University Press, London. 448 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford D.L. 2003. PAUP^*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (^*and other methods), version 4.0b10 PPC. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Auwera G., Hofmann C.J.B., De Rijk P. & De Wachter R. 1998. The origin of red algae and cryptomonad nucleomorphs: A comparative phylogeny based on small and large subunit rRNA sequences of Palmaria palmata, Gracilaria verrucosa, and the Guillardia theta nucleomorph. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 333–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer J.P. & Todd E.R. 1980. The life history of Palmaria palmata in culture: a new type for the Rhodophyta. Canadian Journal of Botany 58: 1250–1256.
   Google Scholar
• West J.A. 1970. The life history of Rhodochorton concrescens in culture. British Phycological Journal 5: 179–186.
   Google Scholar
• West J.A. 1979. The life history of Rhodochorton membranaceum, an endozoic red alga. Botanica Marina 22: 111–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann W. 1965. Aceto-iron-haematoxylin-chloral hydrate for chromosome staining. Stain Technology, 161–164.
   Google Scholar
• Woelkerling W.J. 1973. The morphology and systematics of the Audouinella complex (Achrochaetiaceae, Rhodophyta) in Northeastern United States. Rhodora 75: 529–621.
   Google Scholar