Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Stroke: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke (4th Edition). Royal College of Physicians, London, UK (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Pinter M , BraininM. Rehabilitation after stroke in older people. Maturitas71(2), 104–108(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkka I , KononenM. Methods to improve constraint-induced movement therapy. NeuroRehabilitation25(1), 59–68(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence ES , CoshallC, DundasRet al. Estimates of the prevalance of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 32, 1279–1284(2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoykov M , CorcosD. A review of bilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis. Occup. Ther. Int.16(3–4), 190–203(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S , BragoniM, CoiroPet al. Quantification of the probability of reaching mobility independence at discharge from a rehabilitation hospital in nonwalking early ischemic stroke patients: a multivariate study. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 26, 16–22(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Delden A , PeperC, HarlaarJet al. Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: the ULTRA stroke program design. BMC Neurol. 9, 57 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbunt J , SeelenH, RamosF, MichielsenB, WetzelaerW, MoennekensM. Mental practice-based rehabiliation training to improve arm function and daily activity performance in stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol.8, 7 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong K , ChuaK, LeeJ. Recovery of upper limb dexterity in patients more than 1 year after stroke: frequency, clinical correlates and predictors. NeuroRehabilitation28(2), 105–111(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G , KollenB, van der Grond J, Prevo A. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb. Stroke34, 2181–2186(2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell L , LincolnN, RadfordK. Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery. Clin. Rehab.22(8), 758–767(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman L , RatmanskyM. Underlying pathology and associated factors in hemiplegic shoulder pain. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.90, 768–780(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koog Y , YoonK, MinB. Interventions for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Disabil. Rehabil.32(4), 282–291(2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burridge JH , TurkR, NotleySV, PickeringRM, SimpsonDM. The relationship between upper limb activity and impairment in post-stroke hemiplegia. Disabil. Rehabil.31(2), 109–117(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear C , BarberP, PetoeM, AnwarS, ByblowW. The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain135, 2527–2535(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupar F , PollockA, RoweP, WeirC, LanghorneP. Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Rehabil.26(4), 291–313(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morone G , BragoniM, IosaMet al. Who may benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomised clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 25(7), 636–644(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignolo L . Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. J. Rehab. Med.41, 955–960(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houwink A , NijlandRH, GeurtsAC, KwakkelG. Functional recovery of the paretic upper limb after stroke: who regains hand capacity? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.94(5), 839–844(2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton FN , RedingMJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb recovery after stroke. Stroke32, 107–112(2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radlinska B , GhinaniS, LeppertIR, MinukJ, PikeGB, ThielA. Diffusion tensor imaging, permanent pyramidal tract damage, and outcome in subcortical stroke. Neurology75, 1048–1054(2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JE , EngJJ, MillerWC, DawsonAS. The role of caregiver involvement in upper-limb treatment in individuals with subacute stroke. Phys. Ther.90(9), 1302–1310(2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley N , SalterK, TeasellR. Specialised stroke services: a meta-analysis comparing three models of care. Cerebrovasc. Dis.23, 194–202(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J , ThuyM, CollierJ, LeggL. Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD006187 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Schweickert W , PohlmanM, PohlmanAet al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373, 1874–1882(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English C , HillierS. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.7, CD007513 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Hillier S , StillerK, Warden-FloodA. Cicuit class therapy versus individual physiotherapy sessions during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.88(8), 955–963(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach-Waelen A , SeelenH. Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.9, 52 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siekierka E , EngK, BassettiCet al. New technologies and concepts for rehabilitation in the acute phase of stroke: a collaborative matrix. Neurodegener. Dis. 4(1), 57–69(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iosa M , MoroneG, FuscoAet al. Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res. Treat. 2012, 187965 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yekutiel M . Sensory Re-Education of the Hand After Stroke. Whurr publishers, London, UK (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Eng K , SiekierkaE, PukPet al. Interactice visuo-motor therapy system for stroke rehabilitation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 45(9), 901–907(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell R , BayonaN, SalterK, HellingsC, BitenskyJ. Progress in clinical neurosciences: stroke recovery and rehabilitation. Can. J. Neurol. Sci.33(4), 357–364(2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaechter J , ConnellB, StasonWet al. Correlated change in upper limb function and motor cortex activation after verum and sham acupuncture in patients with chronic stroke. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 13(5), 527–532(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi N , IzumiS. Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with focus on neural plasticity. Stroke Res. Treat.2013, 128641 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu D , QianL, ZorowitzR, ZhangL, QuY, YuanY. Effects of decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomised sham-controlled study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab.94(1), 1–8(2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey R , StinearJ. Cortical stimulation as an adjuvant to upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. PM R2(12 Suppl. 2), S269–S278 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langhorne P , CouparF, PollockA. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol.8, 741–754(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard I , ParsonsM, NeilsonC, CareyL. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup. Ther. Int.16(3–4), 175–189(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya K , BermaR, GargR, SharmaV, AgarwalM, AggarwalG. Meaningful task-specific training for stroke rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial. Top. Stroke Rehabil.19, 193–211(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPeppen R , KwakkelG, Wood-DauphineeS, HendriksH, Van der Wees, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what‘s the evidence? Clin. Rehabil.18(8), 833–862(2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French B , ThomasLH, LeathleyMJet al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4, CD006073 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleimen-Malkoun R , TempradoJ, ThefenneL, BertonE. Bimanual training in stroke: how do coupling and symmetry-breaking matter? BMC Neurol.11, 11 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudie MH , MatyasTA. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? Disabil. Rehabil.22(1–2), 23–37(2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausenda C , CarnovaliM. Transfer of motor skill learning from the healthy hand to the paretic hand in stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med.47(3), 417–425(2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mudie MH , MatyasTA. Upper extremity retraining following stroke: effects of bilateral practice. J. Neural. Rehabil.10, 167–184(1996).
   Google Scholar
• Cauraugh J , LodhaN, NaikS, SummersJ. Bilateral movmement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis. Hum. Movt. Sci.29(5), 853–870(2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupar F , PollockA, van Wijck F, Morris J, Langhorne P. Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4, CD006432 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• van Delden A , PeperC, BeekP, KwakkelG. Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb exercise therapy after stroke: a systematic review. J. Rehab. Med.44, 106–117(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimer CP , KeelingJ, LinB, HendersonM, HaleLA. The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil32(15), 1221–1231(2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombe Waller S , WhitallJ. Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits? NeuroRehabilitation23(1), 29–41(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E , MillerNE, NovackTAet al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74, 347–354(1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A , TukeA. Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol. Rehabil.15(2), 81–96(2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitago T , LiangJ, HuangVSet al. Improvement after contraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27(2), 99–109(2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S . Revisiting constraint-induced movement threapy: are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse ‘learned’ and other quandries. Phys. Ther.87(9), 1212–1223(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S , WinsteinC, MillerJet al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomised clinical trial. JAMA 296(7), 2095–2104(2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nijland R , van Wegen E, van der Krogt H et al. Characterising the protocol for early modified constraint-induced movement therapy in the EXPLICIT-stroke trial. Physiother. Res. Int.18(1), 1–15(2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberson WT , HolmquestHJ, ScotD, DowM. Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the common peroneal nerve synchronised with the swing phase of gait of hemiplegic subjects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.42, 101–205(1961).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimberley T , LewisS, AuerbachE, DorseyL, LojovichJ, CareyJ. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp. Brain Res.154(4), 450–460(2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy V , KingL, PollockA, Baily-HallamA, LanghorneP. Electrical stimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2, CD003241 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kroon J , IjzermanM, ChaeJ, LankhorstG, ZilvoldG. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J. Rehabil. Med.37(2), 65–74(2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadmore K , HughesA, FreemanCet al. Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 9, 32 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S , MalhotraS, RoffeC, JonesP, PandyanA. Can surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the wrist and hand combined with routine therapy facilitate recovery of arm function in patients with stroke? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.93(10), 1715–1721(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin N , UgurluH, AlbayrakI. The efficacy of electrical stimulation in reducing the post-stroke spasticity: a randomised controlled trial. Disabil. Rehabil.34(2), 151–156(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffler L , ChaeJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve35, 562–590(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro R , HarwinW, NagaiK, JohnsonM. Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilition: a technology push. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.49(10), 1103–1118(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J , HadrichA, PlatzT, KuglerJ, PohlM. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.6, CD006876 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G , KollenB, KrebsH. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair22(2), 111–121(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norouzi-Gheidari N , ArchambaultP, FungJ. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.49(4), 479–496(2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liao W , WuC, HsiehY, ChangW. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil.26(2), 111–120(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisoli A , ProcopioC, ChisariC. Positive effects of robotic exoskeleton training of upper limb reaching movements after stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.9, 36 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovolenta F , SaleP, Dall‘armiV, CericiP, FranceschiniM. Robot-aided therapy for upper limbs in patients with stroke-related lesions. Brief report of clinical experience. J. Neuroengin. Rehabil.8, 18 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson A , Korner-BitenskyN, LevinM. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top. Stroke Rehabil.14(2), 52–61(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M , HaleL, PekkariA, PerssonM, GregorssonM. An affordable, computerised, table-based excercise system for stroke survivors. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol.5(4), 288–293(2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson B . Current trends in stroke rehabiliation: a review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurol. Scand.123(3), 147–159(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holper L , MuehlemannT, ScholkmannF, EngK, KiperD, WolfM. Testing the potential of a virtual reality neurorehabilitation system during performance of observation, imagery and imitation of motor actions recorded by wireless functional near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Neuroengin. Rehabil.7, 57 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE , GeorgeS, ThomasS, DeutschJE, CrottyM. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.9, CD008349 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver K , RatcliffeJ, GeorgeS, BurgessL, CrottyM. Is the Nintendo Wii Fit really acceptable to older people? A discrete choice experiment. BMC Geriatr.11, 64 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale L , SatherleyJ, McMillanN, MilosavljevicS, HijmansJ, KingM. Participant perceptions of use of CyWee Z as adjunct to rehabilitation of upper limb function following stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.49(4), 623–634(2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis GN , WoodsC, RosieJA, McPhersonKM. Virtual reality games for rehabilitation of people with stroke: perspectives from the users. Disabil. Rehabil.6(5), 453–463(2011).
   Google Scholar
• Stinear C , BarberP, CoxonJ, FlemingM, ByblowW. Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke. Brain131(5), 1381–1390(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini N , Pascual-LeoneA, FregniF. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. J. Neuroengin. Rehabil.6, 8 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi N , TadaT, ToshimaM, ChumaT, MatsuoY, IkomaK. Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke. J. Rehabil. Med.40(4), 2988–2303(2008).
   Google Scholar
• Marquez J , van Vliet P, McElduff P, Lagopoulos J, Parsons M. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): is it effective as a stroke therapy. Presentated at: Stroke 2013 Conference. Darwin, Australia, 31 July–2 August 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reis J , FritschB. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Curr. Opin. Neurol.24(6), 590–596(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S , WaldnerA, MehrholzJ, TomelleriC, PohlM, WernerC. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomised multicenter trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair25(9), 838–846(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayache SS , FarhatWH, ZouariHG, HosseiniH, MyliusV, LefaucheurJP. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: motor deficit. Expert Rev. Neurother.12(8), 949–972(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi N , TadaT, MatsuoY, IkomaK. Low-frequency repetitive TMS plus anodal transcranial DCS prevents transient decline in bimanual movement induced by contralesional inhibitory rTMS after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair26(8), 988–998(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwardson MA , LucasTH, CareyJR, FetzEE. New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Exp. Brain Res.224(3), 335–358(2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adie K , JamesM. Does telephone follow-up improve blood pressure after minor stroke or TIA? Age Ageing39, 598–603(2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith G , EgbertN, PalmieriP, Dellman-JenkinsM, NannaK. Reducing depression in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: a randomised clinical trial of a web-based intervention. Rehabil. Psychol.57(3), 196–206(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbregts M , CameronJ, TaylorD, McEwenS, KaganA, StreinerD. Videoconference delivery of a stroke self-management program: a mixed methods waiting list randomised controlled trial. Stroke41, e357 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piron L , TurollaA, ToninP, PiccioneF, LainL, DamM. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J. Telemed. Telecare14, 257–260(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piron L , TurollaA, AgostiniMet al. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual reality and telemedicine approach. J. Rehab. Med. 41, 1016–1020(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forducey PG , GlueckaufRL, BergquistTF, MaheuMM, YutsisM. Telehealth for persons with severe functional disabilities and their caregivers: facilitating self-care management in the home setting. Psychol. Serv.9(2), 144–162(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kairy D , LehouxP, VincentC, VisintinM. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilisation and costs associated wtih telerehabilitation. Disabil. Rehabil.31, 427–447(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson T , WildC. Telerehabilitation in stroke care – a systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare17, 1–6(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L , YatesK. Are we applying interventions with research evidence when targeting secondary complications of the stroke-affected upper limb. Aust. Occup. Ther. J.56, 428–438(2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welmer A , WidenH, SommerfeldD. Location and severity of spasticity in the first 1–2 weeks and at 3 and 18 months after stroke. Eur. J. Neurol.17, 720–725(2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom E , TerentA, BorgJ. Prevalence of disabling spasticity 1 year after first-ever stroke. Eur. J. Neurol.15(6), 533–539(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissel J , ScheloskyL, ChristieW, FaissJ, MuellerJ. Early development of spasticity following stroke: a prospective, observational trial. J. Neurol.257(7), 1067–1072(2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katalinic O , HarveryL, HerbertR, MoseleyA, LanninN, SchurrK. Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.9, CD007455 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Yablon S , BrinM, VandenburghAet al. Dose response with botulinum toxin A for post-stroke spasticity: a pooled data analysis. Mov. Disord. 26, 209–215(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw L , PriceC, van Wijck F et al. Botulinum toxin for the upper limb after stroke (BoTULS) trial: effect on impairment, activity limitation, and pain. Stroke42(5), 1371–1379(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley N , PereiraS, SalterKet al. Treatment with botulinum toxin improves upper-extremity function post stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 94, 977–989(2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetrios M , KhanF, Turner-StokesL, BrandC, McSweeneyS. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for poststroke spasticity. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.6, CD009689 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg D , SiuG, CruzE. Current and future interventions for glenohumeral subluxation in hemiplegica secondary to stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil.19(5), 444–456(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murie-Fernandez M , IraguiM, GnanakumarV, MeyerM, FoleyN, TeasellR. Painful hemiplegic shoulder in shtroke patients: causes and management. Neurologia27(4), 234–244(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren I , JonssonA, NorrvingB, LindgrenA. Shoulder pain after stroke: a population based study. Stroke38, 343–348(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria-Fortini M , CassianoJ, Teixeira-SalmelaL. Upper extremity function in stroke subjects: relationships between the international classification of functioning, disability and health domains. J. Hand Ther.24(3), 257–264(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca S , WolfS, FasoliS, BohannonR. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair17(4), 220–226(2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh J , FitzgeraldP. Botulinum toxin for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD008271 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Price CI , PandyanAD. Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic Cochrane review. Clin. Rehabil.15(1), 5–19(2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adey-Wakeling Z , CrottyM, ShanahanE. Suprascapular nerve block for shoulder pain in the first year after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Stroke44(11), 3136–3141(2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovitz A , BaumoehlY, RoginskyYet al. Edema of the paretic hand in elderly poststroke nursing patients. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 44, 37–42(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijs V , PeetersA, DewindtAet al.; Belgian Stroke Council. Organisation of inhospital acute stroke care and minimum criteria for stroke care units. Recommendations of the Belgian Stroke Council. Acta Neurol. Belg.109, 247–251(2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinohara Y , YanagiharaT, AbeKet al. Japanese Guidelines for the Managemnet of Stroke. VII – Rehabilitation. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 20(4 Suppl.), S145–S180 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackett D , RosenbergW, GrayJ, HaynesR, RichardsonW. Evidence based medicine: what is it and what isn‘t it. BMJ312, 71–72(1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrand A , SaxinC, CummingTet al. Slightly more active, just as alone: a comparative observational study of stroke rehabilitation and acute stroke care in Sweden. Presented at: Stroke 2013 Conference. Darwin, Australia, 31 July–2 August 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Teasell R . Challenges in the implementation of evidence in stroke rehabilitation. Top. Stroke Rehabil.19(2), 93–95(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley M , HurdowarA, RichardsCet al. Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: findings from a multisite pilot project. Disabil Rehabil. 34(19), 1633–1638(2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimberley T , SamargiaS, MooreL, ShakyaJ, LangC. Comparison of amounts and types of practice during rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury and stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.47(9), 851–862(2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page S , LevineP. Modified contraint-induced therapy extension: using remote technologies to improve function. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.88(7), 922–927(2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melenhorst A , RogersW, BouwhiusD. Older adults motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit drive selectivity. Psychol. Aging21(1), 190–195(2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkowska W , ZiefleM, ArningK. Which factors form older adults’ acceptance of mobile information and communication technologies? In: Human–Computer Interaction for eInclusion. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 81–101(2009).
   Google Scholar
• Divani A , MajidiS, BarrettA, NoorbaloochiS, LuftA. Consequences of stroke in community dwelling elderly. The Health and Retirement Study, 1998 to 2008. Stroke42, 1821–1825(2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Websites

• National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. NINDS Stroke Information Page (2013). www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/stroke/stroke.htm (Accessed 8July2013)
   Google Scholar
• The Evidence-Based Review of Stroke.Rehabilitation Upper Extremity Interventions. www.ebrsr.com/uploads/Module-10_upper-extremity.pdf (Accessed 13May2013)
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation (Melbourne, Australia). Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2010. http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/clinical_guidelines_stroke_managment_2010_interactive.pdf (Accessed 8July2013)
   Google Scholar
• The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline. Management of Stroke Rehabilitation (2010). www.healthquality.va.gov/stroke/stroke_full_221.pdf (Accessed 19August2013)
   Google Scholar
• American Telemedicine Association 2013. www.americantelemed.org/practice/standards/ata-standards-guidelines/blueprint-for-telerehabilitation-guidelines (Accessed 9September2013)
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care (4th Edition). Stroke rehabilitation update 2013. http://strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/SBP2013_Stroke-Rehabilitation-Update_July-10_FINAL.pdf (Accessed 9September2013)
   Google Scholar
• NICE. Stroke rehabilitation: longterm rehabilitation after stroke. Clinical guidelines CG162 (2013). http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG162 (Accessed 8July2013)
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Inventory of International Stroke-Related Best Practice Guidelines 2012. www.world-stroke.org/images/WSO_International%20Stroke%20Guildelines%202012.pdf (Accessed 9September2013)
   Google Scholar
• European Stroke Organization. Stroke guidelines. www.eso-stroke.org/pdf/ESO08_Guidelines_Original_english.pdf (Accessed 9September2013)
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Society of the Philippines. Guidelines for the Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation of Stroke (5th Edition) 2010. www.strokesocietyphil.org/files/2011.pdf (Accessed 9September2013)
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National Stroke Audit – Rehabilitation Services Report 2012 (Melbourne, Australia). http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/NSF_Audit-Report_2012_web.pdf (Accessed 30October2013)
   Google Scholar