65
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Block of Motor Nerve Conduction Via Transcutaneous Application of Direct Current

, , , , &
Pages 107-116 | Received 06 Nov 2017, Accepted 09 Jan 2018, Published online: 25 May 2018

References

  • Gaunt RA , ProchazkaA . Transcutaneously coupled, high-frequency electrical stimulation of the pudendal nerve blocks external urethral sphincter contractions . Neurorehabil. Neural Repair23 (6), 615 – 626 (2009).
  • Boger AS , BhadraN, GustafsonKJ . High frequency sacral root nerve block allows bladder voiding . Neurourol. Urodyn.31 (5), 677 – 682 (2012).
  • Sarr MG , BillingtonCJ, BrancatisanoRet al. The EMPOWER study: randomized, prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial of vagal blockade to induce weight loss in morbid obesity . Obes. Surg.22 (11), 1771 – 1782 (2012).
  • Soin A , FangZP, VelascoJ . Peripheral neuromodulation to treat postamputation pain . Prog. Neurol. Surg.29, 158 – 167 (2015).
  • Bhadra N , KilgoreKL . High-frequency electrical conduction block of mammalian peripheral motor nerve . Muscle Nerve32 (6), 782 – 790 (2005).
  • Kilgore KL , BhadraN . Reversible nerve conduction block using kilohertz frequency alternating current . Neuromodulation17 (3), 242 – 254 (2014).
  • Cattell M , GerardRW . The “inhibitory” effect of high-frequency stimulation and the excitation state of nerve . J. Physiol.83 (4), 407 – 415 (1935).
  • Bhadra N , KilgoreKL . Direct current electrical conduction block of peripheral nerve . IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.12 (3), 313 – 324 (2004).
  • Manfredi M . Differential block of conduction of larger fibers in peripheral nerve by direct current . Arch. Ital. Biol.108 (1), 52 – 71 (1970).
  • Petruska JC , HubscherCH, JohnsonRD . Anodally focused polarization of peripheral nerve allows discrimination of myelinated and unmyelinated fiber input to brainstem nuclei . Exp. Brain. Res.121 (4), 379 – 390 (1998).
  • Treede RD . Gain control mechanisms in the nociceptive system . Pain157 (6), 1199 – 1204 (2016).
  • Foldes EL , AckermannDM, BhadraN, KilgoreKL, BhadraN . Design, fabrication and evaluation of a conforming circumpolar peripheral nerve cuff electrode for acute experimental use . J. Neurosci. Methods196 (1), 31 – 37 (2011).
  • Brunoni AR , NitscheMA, BologniniNet al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions . Brain. Stimul.5 (3), 175 – 195 (2012).
  • Vrabec T , WainrightJ, BhadraN, BhadraN, KilgoreK . Use of high surface area electrodes for safe delivery of direct current for nerve conduction block . ECS Trans.50 (28), 31 – 37 (2013).
  • Minhas P , BansalV, PatelJet al. Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS . J. Neurosci. Methods190 (2), 188 – 197 (2010).
  • Schabrun SM , JonesE, Elgueta CancinoEL, HodgesPW . Targeting chronic recurrent low back pain from the top-down and the bottom-up: a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral electrical stimulation intervention . Brain. Stimul.7 (3), 451 – 459 (2014).
  • Fregni F , BoggioPS, LimaMCet al. A sham-controlled, Phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury . Pain122 (1–2), 197 – 209 (2006).
  • Mariano TY , Van't WoutM, GarnaatSL, RasmussenSA, GreenbergBD . Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates task-induced acute pain in healthy volunteers . Pain Med. doi:10.1093/pm/pnv042 (2015) ( Epub ahead of print).
  • Mariano TY , Van't WoutM, JacobsonBLet al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on Pain Distress Tolerance: A Preliminary Study . Pain Med.16 (8), 1580 – 1588 (2015).
  • Truini A , VergariM, BiasiottaAet al. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation inhibits nociceptive spinal pathway conduction and increases pain tolerance in humans . Eur. J. Pain15 (10), 1023 – 1027 (2011).
  • Cogiamanian F , VergariM, SchiaffiEet al. Transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation inhibits the lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human beings . Pain152 (2), 370 – 375 (2011).
  • Iyer MB , MattuU, GrafmanJ, LomarevM, SatoS, WassermannEM . Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals . Neurology64 (5), 872 – 875 (2005).
  • Poreisz C , BorosK, AntalA, PaulusW . Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients . Brain Res. Bull.72 (4–6), 208 – 214 (2007).
  • Ferrucci R , MarcegliaS, VergariMet al. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory . J. Cogn. Neurosci.20 (9), 1687 – 1697 (2008).
  • Boehringer A , MacherK, DukartJ, VillringerA, PlegerB . Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates verbal working memory . Brain Stimul.6 (4), 649 – 653 (2013).
  • Pope PA , MiallRC . Task-specific facilitation of cognition by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the cerebellum . Brain Stimul.5 (2), 84 – 94 (2012).
  • Ferrucci R , BrunoniAR, ParazziniMet al. Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation . Cerebellum12 (4), 485 – 492 (2013).
  • Ferrucci R , PrioriA . Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation (tcDCS): motor control, cognition, learning and emotions . Neuroimage85 (Pt 3), 918 – 923 (2014).
  • Macher K , BohringerA, VillringerA, PlegerB . Cerebellar-parietal connections underpin phonological storage . J. Neurosci.34 (14), 5029 – 5037 (2014).
  • Galea JM , JayaramG, AjagbeL, CelnikP . Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation . J. Neurosci.29 (28), 9115 – 9122 (2009).
  • Jayaram G , TangB, PallegaddaR, VasudevanEV, CelnikP, BastianA . Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation . J. Neurophysiol.107 (11), 2950 – 2957 (2012).
  • Galea JM , VazquezA, PasrichaN, De XivryJJ, CelnikP . Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns . Cerebral cortex21 (8), 1761 – 1770 (2011).
  • Shah B , NguyenTT, MadhavanS . Polarity independent effects of cerebellar tDCS on short term ankle visuomotor learning . Brain Stimul.6 (6), 966 – 968 (2013).
  • Grimaldi G , MantoM . Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) decreases the amplitudes of long-latency stretch reflexes in cerebellar ataxia . Ann. Biomed. Eng.41 (11), 2437 – 2447 (2013).
  • Chen JC , HammererD, D'ostilioKet al. Bi-directional modulation of somatosensory mismatch negativity with transcranial direct current stimulation: an event related potential study . J. Physiol.592 (Pt 4), 745 – 757 (2014).
  • Dutta A , PaulusW, NitscheMA . Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans . J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.11, 13 (2014).
  • Grimaldi G , Oulad Ben TaibN, MantoM, BodranghienF . Marked reduction of cerebellar deficits in upper limbs following transcranial cerebello-cerebral DC stimulation: tremor reduction and re-programming of the timing of antagonist commands . Front Syst. Neurosci.8, 9 (2014).
  • Hardwick RM , CelnikPA . Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in older adults . Neurobiol. Aging35 (10), 2217 – 2221 (2014).
  • Zuchowski ML , TimmannD, GerwigM . Acquisition of conditioned eyeblink responses is modulated by cerebellar tDCS . Brain Stimul. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.010 (2014) ( Epub ahead of print).
  • Herzfeld DJ , PastorD, HaithAM, RossettiY, ShadmehrR, O'sheaJ . Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories . Neuroimage98C147 – 158 (2014).
  • Bocci T , VanniniB, TorziniAet al. Cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) improves motor unit recruitment in healthy subjects . Neurosci. Lett.578C75 – 79 (2014).
  • Cogiamanian F , ArdolinoG, VergariMet al. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation . Front Psychiatry363 (2012).
  • Cogiamanian F , VergariM, PulecchiF, MarcegliaS, PrioriA . Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans . Clin. Neurophysiol.119 (11), 2636 – 2640 (2008).
  • Lim CY , ShinHI . Noninvasive DC stimulation on neck changes MEP . Neuroreport22 (16), 819 – 823 (2011).
  • Winkler T , HeringP, StraubeA . Spinal DC stimulation in humans modulates post-activation depression of the H-reflex depending on current polarity . Clin. Neurophysiol121 (6), 957 – 961 (2010).
  • Lamy JC , HoC, BadelA, ArrigoRT, BoakyeM . Modulation of soleus H reflex by spinal DC stimulation in humans . J. Neurophysiol.108 (3), 906 – 914 (2012).
  • Lamy JC , BoakyeM . BDNF Val66Met polymorphism alters spinal DC stimulation-induced plasticity in humans . J. Neurophysiol.110 (1), 109 – 116 (2013).
  • Hubli M , DietzV, Schrafl-AltermattM, BolligerM . Modulation of spinal neuronal excitability by spinal direct currents and locomotion after spinal cord injury . Clin. Neurophysiol.124 (6), 1187 – 1195 (2013).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.