VATE: VAlidation of high TEchnology based on large database analysis by learning machine

References

• Lambin P , van StiphoutRGPM, StarmansMHWet al. Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology – multifactorial decision support systems. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.10(1), 27–40 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin P , Rios-VelazquezE, LeijenaarRet al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur. J. Cancer48(4), 441–446 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamane LS , Scapulatempo-NetoC, AlvarengaLet al. KRAS and BRAF mutations and MSI status in precursor lesions of colorectal cancer detected by colonoscopy. Oncol. Rep. doi:10.3892/or.2014.3338 (2014) ( Epub ahead of print).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-C , LinJ-K, LinT-Cet al. The prognostic role of microsatellite instability, codon-specific KRAS, and BRAF mutations in colon cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. doi:10.1002/jso.23675 (2014) ( Epub ahead of print).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentzen SM . Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology. Nat. Rev. Cancer6(9), 702–713 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler JF . 21 years of biologically effective dose. Br. J. Radiol.83(991), 554–568 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynne-Jones R , HadakiM, HarrisonM. The status of targeted agents in the setting of neoadjuvant radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancers. J. Gastrointest. Oncol.4(3), 264–284 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonner JA , HarariPM, GiraltJet al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol.11(1), 21–2 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCI . NCI Dictionary of terms: personalized medicine. www.cancer.gov/dictionary?cdrid=561717
   Google Scholar
• Booth CM , TannockIF. Randomised controlled trials and population-based observational research: partners in the evolution of medical evidence. Br. J. Cancer110(3), 551–555 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietman AL . Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.87(2), 225–227 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyldesley S , Zhang-SalomonsJ, GroomePAet al. Association between age and the utilization of radiotherapy in Ontario. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.47(2), 469–480 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faivre J , LemmensVE, QuipourtV, BouvierAM. Management and survival of colorectal cancer in the elderly in population-based studies. Eur. J. Cancer43(15), 2279–2284 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach PB , CramerLD, WarrenJL, BeggCB. Racial differences in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.341(16), 1198–1205 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd C , Zhang-SalomonsJY, GroomePA, MackillopWJ. Associations between community income and cancer survival in Ontario, Canada, and the United States. J. Clin. Oncol.17(7), 2244–2255 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershman D , McBrideR, JacobsonJSet al. Racial disparities in treatment and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.23(27), 6639–6646 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearcey R , MiaoQ, KongW, Zhang-SalomonsJ, MackillopWJ. Impact of adoption of chemoradiotherapy on the outcome of cervical cancer in Ontario: results of a population-based cohort study. J. Clin. Oncol.25(17), 2383–8 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth CM . Evaluating patient-centered outcomes in the randomized controlled trial and beyond: informing the future with lessons from the past. Clin. Cancer Res.16(24), 5963–5971 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanoff HK , CarpenterWR, StürmerTet al. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival of patients with stage III colon cancer diagnosed after age 75 years. J. Clin. Oncol.30(21), 2624–2634 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung WY , ShiQ, O'ConnellMet al. The predictive and prognostic value of sex in early-stage colon cancer: a pooled analysis of 33,345 patients from the ACCENT database. Clin. Colorectal Cancer12(3), 179–187 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieu CH , RenfroLA, de GramontAet al. Association of age with survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis from the ARCAD Clinical Trials Program. J. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.54.9329 (2014) ( Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentini V , van StiphoutRGPM, LammeringGet al. Nomograms for predicting local recurrence, distant metastases, and overall survival for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on the basis of European randomized clinical trials. J. Clin. Oncol.29(23), 3163–3172 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentini V , AristeiC, GlimeliusBet al. Multidisciplinary rectal cancer management: 2nd European Rectal Cancer Consensus Conference (EURECA-CC2). Radiother. Oncol.92(2), 148–163 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haustermans K , DebucquoyA, LambrechtM. The ESTRO Breur Lecture 2010: toward a tailored patient approach in rectal cancer. Radiother. Oncol.100(1), 15–21 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bogaard J , JanssenMHM, JanssensGet al. Residual metabolic tumor activity after chemo-radiotherapy is mainly located in initially high FDG uptake areas in rectal cancer. Radiother. Oncol.99(2), 137–141 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin P , RoelofsE, ReymenBet al. “Rapid Learning health care in oncology” – an approach towards decision support systems enabling customised radiotherapy’. Radiother. Oncol.109(1), 159–164 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers AJ . Prediction models: revolutionary in principle, but do they do more good than harm?J. Clin. Oncol.29(22), 2951–2952 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (AJCC) AJC on C . AJCC 7th Edition - Colon and Rectum Cancer Staging (2007). https://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/quickreferences/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sobin L , ParkinDM. International Classifi cation of Diseases for Oncology. Third Edition. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2000/9241545348_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CTEP . Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) (2006). http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Services H . Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (2010). http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010–06–14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V , GuY, BasuSet al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn. Reson. Imaging30(9), 1234–1248 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentini V , SchmollHJ, Velde CJ VanDe. Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer.Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lewalle P , RodriguesJM, ZanstraPet al. A deployment and Research Roadmap for Semantic Interoperability: the EU semantic health project. Stud. Health Technol. Inform.136, 635–640 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roelofs E , DekkerA, MeldolesiE, van StiphoutRGPM, ValentiniV, LambinP. International data-sharing for radiotherapy research: an open-source based infrastructure for multicentric clinical data mining. Radiother. Oncol.110(2), 370–374 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maastricht Radiation Oncology. Validation of a predictive model after complete response in rectal cancer (Thunder). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT00969657. www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00969657
   Google Scholar
• Jayasurya K , FungG, YuSet al. Comparison of Bayesian network and support vector machine models for two-year survival prediction in lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Med. Phys.37(4), 1401–1407 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehing-Oberije C , YuS, De RuysscherDet al. Development and external validation of prognostic model for 2-year survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.74(2), 355–62 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAASTRO Clinic . MAASTRO prediction website. www.predictcancer.org
   Google Scholar
• Recommendation WWWC . Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification (1999). www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222
   Google Scholar
• Assélé Kama A , ChoquetR, MelsG, DanielC, CharletJ, JaulentM-C. An ontological approach for the exploitation of clinical data. Stud. Health Technol. Inform.192, 142–146 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meldolesi E , van SoestJ, DinapoliNet al. An umbrella protocol for standardized data collection (SDC) in rectal cancer: a prospective uniform naming and procedure convention to support personalized medicine. Radiother. Oncol.112(1), 59–62 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semantic Web platform. http://tinyurl.com/VateSPARQL1
   Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute: Comprehensive Cancer Information at the National Institute of Health. www.ncicb.nci.nih.gov
   Google Scholar
• Luta G , FordMB, BondyM, ShieldsPG, StameyJD. Bayesian sensitivity analysis methods to evaluate bias due to misclassification and missing data using informative priors and external validation data. Cancer Epidemiol.37(2), 121–126 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsolo K . Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies. Med. Care50(Suppl. 7), S77–S81 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd S . Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends Mach. Learn.3(1), 1–122 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Harrel F . Resampling, Validating, Describing, and Simplifying the Model.Springer-Verlag, NY, USA, 87–103 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Oh JH , CraftJ, Al LoziRet al. A Bayesian network approach for modeling local failure in lung cancer. Phys. Med. Biol.56(6), 1635–1651 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Stiphout RGPM , LammeringG, BuijsenJet al. Development and external validation of a predictive model for pathological complete response of rectal cancer patients including sequential PET-CT imaging. Radiother. Oncol.98(1), 126–133 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers AJ , CroninAM, ElkinEB, GonenM. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak.8, 53 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers AJ , ElkinEB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med. Decis. Making26(6), 565–574 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y , JiangX, KimJ, Ohno-MachadoL. Grid Binary LOgistic REgression (GLORE): building shared models without sharing data. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.19(5), 758–764 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K , KarguptaH, MemberS, RyanJ. Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.18(1), 92–106 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentini V , LambinP, MyersonRJ. Is it time for tailored treatment of rectal cancer? From prescribing by consensus to prescribing by numbers. Radiother. Oncol.102(1), 1–3 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar