A Transdisciplinary Approach to Understand the Epigenetic Basis of Race/Ethnicity Health Disparities

References

• Murrell A , RakyanVK , BeckS. From genome to epigenome. Hum. Mol. Genet.14 Spec No(SPEC. ISS. 1), R3–R10 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Teschendorff AE , ReltonCL. Statistical and integrative system-level analysis of DNA methylation data. Nat. Rev. Genet.19(3), 129–147 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spainhour JC , LimHS , YiSV , QiuP. Correlation patterns between DNA methylation and gene expression in the Cancer Genome Atlas. Cancer Inform.18, page identifier: 1176935119828776 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray SC , HaenniS , HoweFSet al. Sense and antisense transcription are associated with distinct chromatin architectures across genes. Nucleic Acids Res.43(16), 7823–7837 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley KE , GertzJ , BowlingKMet al. Dynamic DNA methylation across diverse human cell lines and tissues. Genome Res.23(3), 555–567 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacchierotti F , SpanòM. Environmental impact on DNA methylation in the germline: state of the art and gaps of knowledge. Biomed Res. Int.2015(7), 123484 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cortessis VK , ThomasDC , JoanLevine Aet al. Environmental epigenetics: prospects for studying epigenetic mediation of exposure-response relationships. Hum. Genet.131(10), 1565–1589 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herceg Z . Epigenetics and cancer: towards an evaluation of the impact of environmental and dietary factors. Mutagenesis22(2), 91–103 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersha TB , AbebeT. Self-reported race/ethnicity in the age of genomic research: its potential impact on understanding health disparities. Hum. Genomics.9(1), 1 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuentes A , AckermannRR , AthreyaSet al. AAPA Statement on Race and Racism. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.169(3), 400–402 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDade TW , RyanC , JonesMJet al. Social and physical environments early in development predict DNA methylation of inflammatory genes in young adulthood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA114(29), 7611–7616 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Non AL , HollisterBM , HumphreysKLet al. DNA methylation at stress-related genes is associated with exposure to early life institutionalization. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.161(1), 84–93 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan CJ , D’ErricoNC , SteesJ , HughesDA. Methylation changes at NR3C1 in newborns associate with maternal prenatal stress exposure and newborn birth weight. Epigenetics7(8), 853–857 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher MJ , SchanfieldMS. Epigenetic mechanisms as an archive of ancestral dietary history of populations: the premise, proposal and pilot. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep.5, 689–699 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Mosher MJ , MeltonPE , StapletonP , SchanfieldMS , CrawfordMH. Patterns of DNA methylation across the leptin core promoter in four diverse Asian and North American populations. Hum. Biol.88(2), 121–135 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckman PD , HansonMA , CooperC , ThornburgKL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med.359(1), 61–73 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker DJP . Sir Richard Doll lecture. developmental origins of chronic disease. Public Health126(3), 185–189 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joubert BR , FelixJF , YousefiPet al. DNA methylation in newborns and maternal smoking in pregnancy: genome-wide consortium meta-analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet.98(4), 680–696 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp GC , SalasLA , MonnereauCet al. Maternal BMI at the start of pregnancy and offspring epigenome-wide DNA methylation: findings from the pregnancy and childhood epigenetics (PACE) consortium. Hum. Mol. Genet.26(20), 4067–4085 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilahur N , BustamanteM , MoralesEet al. Prenatal exposure to mixtures of xenoestrogens and genome-wide DNA methylation in human placenta. Epigenomics8(1), 43–54 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales E , VilahurN , SalasLAet al. Genome-wide DNA methylation study in human placenta identifies novel loci associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy. Int. J. Epidemiol.45(5), 1644–1655 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson S . Maternal bodies in the postgenomic order: gender and the explanatory landscape of epigenetics. In: Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome. RichardsonSS, StevensH ( Eds). Duke University Press, Durham, London, UK, 210–231 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Soubry A , MurphySK , WangFet al. Newborns of obese parents have altered DNA methylation patterns at imprinted genes. Int. J. Obes. (Lond).39(4), 650–657 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gone JP , HartmannWE , PomervilleA , WendtDC , KlemSH , BurrageRL. The impact of historical trauma on health outcomes for indigenous populations in the USA and Canada: a systematic review. Am. Psychol.74(1), 20–35 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrner A , YehudaR. Cultural trauma and epigenetic inheritance. Dev. Psychopathol.30(5), 1763–1777 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yehuda R , LehrnerA. Intergenerational transmission of trauma effects: putative role of epigenetic mechanisms. World Psychiatry17(3), 243–257 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conching AKS , ThayerZ. Biological pathways for historical trauma to affect health: a conceptual model focusing on epigenetic modifications. Soc. Sci. Med.230(March), 74–82 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Otterdijk SD , MichelsKB. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in mammals: how good is the evidence?FASEB J.30(19), 1–9 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aristizabal MJ , AnreiterI , HalldorsdottirTet al. Biological embedding of experience: a primer on epigenetics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA117(38), 23261–23269 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argentieri MA , NagarajanS , SeddighzadehB , BaccarelliAA , ShieldsAE. Epigenetic pathways in human disease: the impact of DNA methylation on stress-related pathogenesis and current challenges in biomarker development. EBioMedicine18, 327–350 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer ZM , KuzawaCW. Biological memories of past environments: epigenetic pathways to health disparities. Epigenetics6(7), 798–803 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner L , WinnR , HulbertA. Lung cancer early detection and health disparities: the intersection of epigenetics and ethnicity. J. Thorac. Dis.10(4), 2498–2507 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du P , ZhangX , HuangC-Cet al. Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics11, 587 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teschendorff AE , WidschwendterM. Differential variability improves the identification of cancer risk markers in DNA methylation studies profiling precursor cancer lesions. Bioinformatics28(11), 1487–1494 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipson B , MaksimovicJ , OshlackA. missMethyl: an R package for analyzing data from Illumina’s HumanMethylation450 platform. Bioinformatics32(2), 286–288 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré G , CookNR , RidkerPM , ChasmanDI. On the use of variance per genotype as a tool to identify quantitative trait interaction effects: a report from the Women’s Genome Health Study. PLoS Genet.6(6), e1000981 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H , HolbrookJD , KarnaniN , KwohCK. Gene, Environment and Methylation (GEM): a tool suite to efficiently navigate large scale epigenome wide association studies and integrate genotype and interaction between genotype and environment. BMC Bioinformatics17(1), 299 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van ‘t Veer LJ , DaiH , vande Vijver MJet al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature415(6871), 530–536 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters TJ , BuckleyMJ , StathamALet al. De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin.8(6), 6 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaffe AE , MurakamiP , LeeHet al. Bump hunting to identify differentially methylated regions in epigenetic epidemiology studies. Int. J. Epidemiol.41(1), 200–209 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofer T , SchifanoED , HoppinJa , HouL , BaccarelliAA. A-clustering: a novel method for the detection of co-regulated methylation regions, and regions associated with exposure. Bioinformatics29(22), 2884–2891 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langfelder P , HorvathS. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics9, 559 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill J , HeijmansBT. From promises to practical strategies in epigenetic epidemiology. Nat. Rev. Genet.14(8), 585–594 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman DS , GatesL , FlandersWDet al. Black/white differences in leukocyte subpopulations in men. Int. J. Epidemiol.26(4), 757–764 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird PW . Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet.11(3), 191–203 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houseman EA , AccomandoWP , KoestlerDCet al. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformatics13(1), 86 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houseman EA , MolitorJ , MarsitCJ. Reference-free cell mixture adjustments in analysis of DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics30(10), 1431–1439 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houseman EA , KileML , ChristianiDC , InceTA , KelseyKT , MarsitCJ. Reference-free deconvolution of DNA methylation data and mediation by cell composition effects. BMC Bioinformatics17(1), 259 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Onuchic V , HartmaierRJ , BooneDNet al. Epigenomic deconvolution of breast tumors reveals metabolic coupling between constituent cell types. Cell Rep.17(8), 2075–2086 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutsik P , SlawskiM , GasparoniG , VedeneevN , HeinM , WalterJ. MeDeCom: discovery and quantification of latent components of heterogeneous methylomes. Genome Biol.18(1), 55 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahmani E , SchweigerR , ShenhavLet al. BayesCCE: a Bayesian framework for estimating cell-type composition from DNA methylation without the need for methylation reference. Genome Biol.19(1), 141 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salas LA , KoestlerDC , ButlerRAet al. An optimized library for reference-based deconvolution of whole-blood biospecimens assayed using the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC BeadArray. Genome Biol.19(1), 64 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervin K , SalasLA , BakulskiKMet al. Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data. Clin. Epigenetics11(1), 125 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng SC , WebsterAP , DongDet al. A novel cell-type deconvolution algorithm reveals substantial contamination by immune cells in saliva, buccal and cervix. Epigenomics10(7), 925–940 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leek JT , StoreyJD. Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis. PLoS Genet.3(9), 1724–1735 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teschendorff AE , ZhuangJ , WidschwendterM. Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies. Bioinformatics27(11), 1496–1505 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J , BehnamE , HuangJet al. Fast and robust adjustment of cell mixtures in epigenome-wide association studies with SmartSVA. BMC Genomics18(1), 1–13 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gagnon-Bartsch JA , SpeedTP. Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data. Biostatistics13(3), 539–552 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maksimovic J , Gagnon-BartschJA , SpeedTP , OshlackA. Removing unwanted variation in a differential methylation analysis of Illumina HumanMethylation450 array data. Nucleic Acids Res.43(16), e106 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese SE , ArcherKJ , TherneauTMet al. A new statistic for identifying batch effects in high-throughput genomic data that uses guided principal component analysis. Bioinformatics29(22), 2877–2883 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brägelmann J , LorenzoBermejo J. A comparative analysis of cell-type adjustment methods for epigenome-wide association studies based on simulated and real data sets. Brief. Bioinform.20(6), 2055–2065 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Iterson M , van ZwetEW , BIOSConsortium , HeijmansBT. Controlling bias and inflation in epigenome- and transcriptome-wide association studies using the empirical null distribution. Genome Biol.18(1), 19 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horvath S . DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol.14(10), R115 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson J , RussTC , ClarkeT-Ket al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of epigenetic age acceleration. PLoS Genet.15(11), e1008104 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas LA , WienckeJK , KoestlerDC , ZhangZ , ChristensenBC , KelseyKT. Tracing human stem cell lineage during development using DNA methylation. Genome Res.28(9), 1285–1295 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y , JoyceBT , LiuLet al. Prediction of genome-wide DNA methylation in repetitive elements. Nucleic Acids Res.45(15), 8697–8711 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas LA , JohnsonKC , KoestlerDC , O’SullivanDE , ChristensenBC. Integrative epigenetic and genetic pan-cancer somatic alteration portraits. Epigenetics12(7), 561–574 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vick AD , BurrisHH. Epigenetics and health disparities. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep.4(1), 31–37 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmad A , AzimS , ZubairHet al. Epigenetic basis of cancer health disparities: looking beyond genetic differences. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer1868(1), 16–28 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini G , OgdenA , McCulloughLE , TorresM , RidaP , AnejaR. Disadvantaged neighborhoods and racial disparity in breast cancer outcomes: the biological link. Cancer Causes Control30(7), 677–686 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kader F , GhaiM. DNA methylation-based variation between human populations. Mol. Genet. Genomics292(1), 5–35 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel RL , MillerKD , JemalA. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin.69(1), 7–34 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller KD , GodingSauer A , OrtizAPet al. Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin.68(6), 425–445 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh GK , JemalA. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival in the United States, 1950–2014: over six decades of changing patterns and widening inequalities. J. Environ. Public Health2017, 2819372 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir BC , DottoG-P. Racial differences in cancer susceptibility and survival: more than the color of the skin?Trends Cancer3(3), 181–197 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves M . Was skin cancer a selective force for black pigmentation in early hominin evolution?Proc. Biol. Sci.281(1781), 20132955 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valles SA . The challenges of choosing and explaining a phenomenon in epidemiological research on the “Hispanic Paradox”. Theor. Med. Bioeth.37(2), 129–148 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis L , CancholaAJ , SpiegelD , LadabaumU , HaileR , GomezSL. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer survival: the contribution of tumor, sociodemographic, institutional, and neighborhood characteristics. J. Clin. Oncol.36(1), 25–33 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinal AC , BuasMF , WangDet al. FOXA1 hypermethylation: link between parity and ER-negative breast cancer in African American women? Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 166(2), 559–568 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo D , HuH , RhieSKet al. Comparison of breast cancer molecular features and survival by African and European ancestry in the Cancer Genome Atlas. JAMA Oncol.3(12), 1654–1662 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway K , EdmistonSN , TseC-Ket al. Racial variation in breast tumor promoter methylation in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.24(6), 921–930 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosone CB , YoungAC , SuchestonLEet al. Genome-wide methylation patterns provide insight into differences in breast tumor biology between American women of African and European ancestry. Oncotarget5(1), 237–248 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrotra J , GanpatMM , KanaanYet al. Estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancers of young African-American women have a higher frequency of methylation of multiple genes than those of Caucasian women. Clin. Cancer Res.10(6), 2052–2057 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S , DorseyTH , TerunumaA , KittlesRA , AmbsS , Kwabi-AddoB. Relationship between tumor DNA methylation status and patient characteristics in African-American and European-American women with breast cancer. PLoS ONE7(5), e37928 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji SL , FacklerMJ , WeiWTet al. Quantitative promoter hypermethylation profiles of ductal carcinoma in situ in north american and korean women: potential applications for diagnosis. Cancer Biol. Ther.7(9), 1400–1408 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enokida H , ShiinaH , UrakamiSet al. Ethnic group-related differences in CpG hypermethylation of the GSTP1 gene promoter among African-American, Caucasian and Asian patients with prostate cancer. Int. J. Cancer116(2), 174–181 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodson K , HayesR , WideroffL , VillaruzL , TangreaJ. Hypermethylation of GSTP1, CD44, and E-cadherin genes in prostate cancer among US Blacks and Whites. Prostate55(3), 199–205 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaney JM , WangS , Furbert-HarrisPet al. Genome-wide differentially methylated genes in prostate cancer tissues from African-American and Caucasian men. Epigenetics10(4), 319–328 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das PM , RamachandranK , VanwertJet al. Methylation mediated silencing of TMS1/ASC gene in prostate cancer. Mol. Cancer5, 28 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodson K , HansonJ , TangreaJ. A survey of gene-specific methylation in human prostate cancer among black and white men. Cancer Lett.205(2), 181–188 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch EL , GalankoJA , SandlerRS , GoelA , KekuTO. Lifestyle factors, colorectal tumor methylation, and survival among African Americans and European Americans. Sci. Rep.8(1), 1–7 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang X , JiP , ZhangYet al. Aberrant DNA Methylation: implications in racial health disparity. PLoS ONE11(4), e0153125 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Preston R , LawsonF , Rodriguez-TorresSet al. JAK3 variant, immune signatures, DNA methylation, and social determinants linked to survival racial disparities in head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Prev. Res.12(4), 255–270 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S , ZhouK , YangL , DingG , LiH. Racial differences in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: incidence and molecular features. Biomed Res. Int.2017, 1204082 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng X , PuW , TanYet al. Quantitative assessment of the diagnostic role of FHIT promoter methylation in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget8(4), 6845–6856 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piyathilake CJ , HenaoO , FrostARet al. Race- and age-dependent alterations in global methylation of DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (United States). Cancer Causes Control14(1), 37–42 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G , LiuY , YinHet al. E-cadherin gene promoter hypermethylation may contribute to the risk of bladder cancer among Asian populations. Gene534(1), 48–53 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantaku V , AmaraC , PiyarathnaDet al. DNA methylation patterns in bladder tumors of African American patients point to distinct alterations in xenobiotic metabolism. Carcinogenesis40(11), 1332–1340 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton E , ReltonCL , CaramaschiD. Using openly accessible resources to strengthen causal inference in epigenetic epidemiology of neurodevelopment and mental health. Genes (Basel).10(3), e193 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relton CL , DaveySmith G. Two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization: a strategy for establishing the causal role of epigenetic processes in pathways to disease. Int. J. Epidemiol.41(1), 161–176 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J , ZhuX , YuKet al. Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and accelerated DNA methylation aging. Environ. Health Perspect.126(6), 067005 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath S , GurvenM , LevineMEet al. An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease. Genome Biol.17(1), 171 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramazzotti D , LalA , WangB , BatzoglouS , SidowA. Multi-omic tumor data reveal diversity of molecular mechanisms that correlate with survival. Nat. Commun.9(1), 4453 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu FB . Metabolic profiling of diabetes: from black-box epidemiology to systems epidemiology. Clin. Chem.57(9), 1224–1226 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy JJ , TitusAJ , SalasLA , ChristensenBC. PyMethylProcess – convenient high-throughput preprocessing workflow for DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics35(24), 5379–5381 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson KS , HulbertA , HendersonVet al. Lung cancer screening and epigenetics in African Americans: the role of the socioecological framework. Front. Oncol.9(MAR), 87 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• All of Us Research Program Investigators , DennyJC , RutterJLet al.The “All of Us” research program. N. Engl. J. Med.381(7), 668–676 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J , HuZ , MahalBAet al. Integrated analysis of genetic ancestry and genomic alterations across cancers. Cancer Cell34(4), 549–560.e9 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanger J Computational approaches for the study of gene expression, genetic and epigenetic variation in human. PhD Thesis. McGill UniversityQuebec, Canada(2014).
   Google Scholar