Advanced search
Publication Cover
Epigenomics Volume 15, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,272
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Performance Comparisons of Methylation and Structural Variants From Low-Input Whole-Genome Methylation Sequencing

Zhifu Sun1 Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN55905, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8461-7523View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Saurabh Behati1 Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN55905, USAView further author information
,
Panwen Wang1 Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN55905, USAView further author information
,
Aditya Bhagwate1 Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN55905, USAView further author information
,
Samantha McDonough2 Medical Genome Facility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN55905, USAView further author information
,
Vivian Wang2 Medical Genome Facility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN55905, USAView further author information
,
William Taylor3 Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic,Rochester, MN55905, USAView further author information
,
Julie Cunningham2 Medical Genome Facility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN55905, USAView further author information
&
John Kisiel3 Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic,Rochester, MN55905, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
 show all
Pages 11-19 | Received 17 Dec 2022, Accepted 24 Feb 2023, Published online: 15 Mar 2023

References

  • Vaisvila R , PonnaluriVKC , SunZet al. Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA. Genome Res. doi:10.1101/gr.266551.120 (2021).
  • Han Y , ZheleznyakovaGY , Marincevic-ZunigaYet al. Comparison of EM-seq and PBAT methylome library methods for low-input DNA. Epigenetics doi:10.1080/15592294.2021.19974061–10 (2021).
  • Morrison J , KoemanJM , JohnsonBKet al. Evaluation of whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing library preparation protocols. Epigenetics Chromatin14(1), 28 (2021).
  • Feng S , ZhongZ , WangM , JacobsenSE. Efficient and accurate determination of genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana with enzymatic methyl sequencing. Epigenetics Chromatin13(1), 42 (2020).
  • Sun Z , BahetiS , MiddhaSet al. SAAP-RRBS: streamlined analysis and annotation pipeline for reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Bioinformatics28(16), 2180–2181 (2012).
  • Krueger F , AndrewsSR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for bisulfite-seq applications. Bioinformatics27(11), 1571–1572 (2011).
  • Xi Y , LiW. BSMAP: whole genome bisulfite sequence MAPping program. BMC Bioinformatics10, 232 (2009).
  • Li H , HandsakerB , WysokerAet al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics25(16), 2078–2079 (2009).
  • Langmead B , SalzbergSL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods9(4), 357–359 (2012).
  • Asmann YW , MiddhaS , HossainAet al. TREAT: a bioinformatics tool for variant annotations and visualizations in targeted and exome sequencing data. Bioinformatics28(2), 277–278 (2012).
  • Li H , DurbinR. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics26(5), 589–595 (2010).
  • Mckenna A , HannaM , BanksEet al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res.20(9), 1297–1303 (2010).
  • Liu Y , SiegmundKD , LairdPW , BermanBP. Bis-SNP: combined DNA methylation and SNP calling for bisulfite-seq data. Genome Biol.13(7), R61 (2012).
  • Gao S , ZouD , MaoLet al. BS-SNPer: SNP calling in bisulfite-seq data. Bioinformatics31(24), 4006–4008 (2015).
  • Suvakov M , PandaA , DieshC , HolmesI , AbyzovA. CNVpytor: a tool for copy number variation detection and analysis from read depth and allele imbalance in whole-genome sequencing. Gigascience10(11), 1–9 (2021).
  • Abyzov A , UrbanAE , SnyderM , GersteinM. CNVnator: an approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res.21(6), 974–984 (2011).
  • Sudmant PH , RauschT , GardnerEJet al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature526(7571), 75–81 (2015).
  • Haraksingh RR , AbyzovA , UrbanAE. Comprehensive performance comparison of high-resolution array platforms for genome-wide copy number variation (CNV) analysis in humans. BMC Genomics18(1), 321 (2017).
  • Layer RM , ChiangC , QuinlanAR , HallIM. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol.15(6), R84 (2014).
  • English AC , MenonVK , GibbsRA , MetcalfGA , SedlazeckFJ. Truvari: refined structural variant comparison preserves allelic diversity. Genome Biol.23(1), 271 (2022).
  • Lindner M , GawehnsF , TeMolder S , VisserME , Van OersK , LaineVN. Performance of methods to detect genetic variants from bisulphite sequencing data in a non-model species. Mol. Ecol. Resour.22(2), 834–846 (2022).

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.