Beadchip Technology to Detect DNA Methylation in Mouse Faithfully Recapitulates Whole-Genome Bisulfite Sequencing

References

• Jin Z , LiuY. DNA methylation in human diseases. Genes Dis.5(1), 1–8 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salameh Y , BejaouiY , ElHajj N. DNA methylation biomarkers in aging and age-related diseases. Front. Genet.11, 171 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanicolau-Sengos A , AldapeK. DNA methylation profiling: an emerging paradigm for cancer diagnosis. Annu. Rev. Pathol.17, 295–321 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi PD , SudermanM , LangdonR , WhitehurstO , DaveySmith G , ReltonCL. DNA methylation-based predictors of health: applications and statistical considerations. Nat. Rev. Genet.23(6), 369–383 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky DW , CaspiA , CorcoranDLet al. DunedinPACE, a DNA methylation biomarker of the pace of aging. Elife11, e73420 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin EM , FryRC. Environmental influences on the epigenome: exposure-associated DNA methylation in human populations. Annu. Rev. Public Health39, 309–333 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwanaji-Enwerem JC , ColicinoE. DNA methylation-based biomarkers of environmental exposures for human population studies. Curr. Environ. Health Rep.7(2), 121–128 (2020).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu AT , QuachA , WilsonJGet al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany)11(2), 303–327 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim H , WangX , JinP. Developing DNA methylation-based diagnostic biomarkers. J. Genet. Genomics45(2), 87–97 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taryma-Lesniak O , SokolowskaKE , WojdaczTK. Current status of development of methylation biomarkers for in vitro diagnostic IVD applications. Clin. Epigenetics12(1), 100 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson VV . DNA methylation as a universal biomarker. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.10(4), 481–488 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikeska T , CraigJM. DNA methylation biomarkers: cancer and beyond. Genes (Basel)5(3), 821–864 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dor Y , CedarH. Principles of DNA methylation and their implications for biology and medicine. Lancet392(10149), 777–786 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R , JonesMJ , ChenEet al. Discordance of DNA methylation variance between two accessible human tissues. Sci. Rep.5, 8257 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam LL , EmberlyE , FraserHBet al. Factors underlying variable DNA methylation in a human community cohort. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA109(Suppl. 2), 17253–17260 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blewitt M , WhitelawE. The use of mouse models to study epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.5(11), a017939 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki M , LiaoW , WosFet al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing with improved accuracy and cost. Genome Res.28(9), 1364–1371 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W , HinoueT , BarnesBet al. DNA methylation dynamics and dysregulation delineated by high-throughput profiling in the mouse. Cell Genom.2(7), 100153 (2022).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia-Prieto CA , Alvarez-ErricoD , MusulenEet al. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 285,000 CpG sites in the mouse genome. Epigenetics17(12), 1677–1685 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell LJ , HartelG , MckeoneDMet al. Comparative analysis of Illumina Mouse Methylation BeadChip and reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing for routine DNA methylation analysis. Cell Rep. Methods2(11), 100323 (2022).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duge De Bernonville T , DaviaudC , ChaparroC , TostJ , MauryS. From methylome to integrative analysis of tissue specificity. Methods Mol. Biol.2505, 223–240 (2022).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimm SA , ShimboT , TakakuMet al. DNA methylation in mice is influenced by genetics as well as sex and life experience. Nat. Commun.10(1), 305 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan CG , GrimmSA , MorganDLet al. Dosage compensation and DNA methylation landscape of the X chromosome in mouse liver. Sci. Rep.8(1), 10138 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th Edition. Washington, DC, USA (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Xu Z , NiuL , LiL , TaylorJA. ENmix: a novel background correction method for Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. Nucleic Acids Res.44(3), e20 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie ME , PhipsonB , WuDet al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res.43(7), e47 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibikova M , BarnesB , TsanCet al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics98(4), 288–295 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhling F , KretzmerH , BernhartSH , OttoC , StadlerPF , HoffmannS. Metilene: fast and sensitive calling of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Res.26(2), 256–262 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houseman EA , MolitorJ , MarsitCJ. Reference-free cell mixture adjustments in analysis of DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics30(10), 1431–1439 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H , XuT , FengHet al. Detection of differentially methylated regions from whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data without replicates. Nucleic Acids Res.43(21), e141 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclean CY , BristorD , HillerMet al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol.28(5), 495–501 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z , TaylorJA. Reliability of DNA methylation measures using Illumina methylation BeadChip. Epigenetics16(5), 495–502 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvetsov YB , SongMA , CaiQet al. Intraindividual variation and short-term temporal trend in DNA methylation of human blood. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.24(3), 490–497 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T , GuanW , LinJet al. A systematic study of normalization methods for Infinium 450K methylation data using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data. Epigenetics10(7), 662–669 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidsley R , ZotenkoE , PetersTJet al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol.17(1), 208 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss JA , BrennanKJ , BaccarelliAAet al. Battle of epigenetic proportions: comparing Illumina’s EPIC methylation microarrays and TruSeq targeted bisulfite sequencing. Epigenetics15(1-2), 174–182 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu C , ZhangX , AouizeratBE , XuK. Comparison of methylation capture sequencing and Infinium MethylationEPIC array in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Epigenetics Chromatin13(1), 51 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi P , HuenK , DaveV , BarcellosL , EskenaziB , HollandN. Sex differences in DNA methylation assessed by 450 K BeadChip in newborns. BMC Genomics16, 911 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin E , SmeesterL , BommaritoPAet al. Sexual epigenetic dimorphism in the human placenta: implications for susceptibility during the prenatal period. Epigenomics9(3), 267–278 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon O , HuenK , YousefiPet al. Meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies in newborns and children show widespread sex differences in blood DNA methylation. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res.789, 108415 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant OA , WangY , KumariM , ZabetNR , SchalkwykL. Characterising sex differences of autosomal DNA methylation in whole blood using the Illumina EPIC array. Clin. Epigenetics14(1), 62 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon O , MacisaacJ , QuachHet al. Comparison of DNA methylation measured by Illumina 450K and EPIC BeadChips in blood of newborns and 14-year-old children. Epigenetics13(6), 655–664 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YA , LemireM , ChoufaniSet al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics8(2), 203–209 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labarre BA , GoncearencoA , PetrykowskaHMet al. MethylToSNP: identifying SNPs in Illumina DNA methylation array data. Epigenetics Chromatin12(1), 79 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi P , HuenK , AguilarSchall Ret al. Considerations for normalization of DNA methylation data by Illumina 450K BeadChip assay in population studies. Epigenetics8(11), 1141–1152 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villicana S , BellJT. Genetic impacts on DNA methylation: research findings and future perspectives. Genome Biol.22(1), 127 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell G , Gorrie-StoneTJ , BaoYet al. Guidance for DNA methylation studies: statistical insights from the Illumina EPIC array. BMC Genomics20(1), 366 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crabbe JC , WahlstenD , DudekBC. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science284(5420), 1670–1672 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y , InabaH , IwakuraYet al. Inter-breeder differences in prepulse inhibition deficits of C57BL/6J mice in a maternal immune activation model. Neuropsychopharmacol. Rep.41(3), 416–421 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Kortzfleisch VT , KarpNA , PalmeR , KaiserS , SachserN , RichterSH. Improving reproducibility in animal research by splitting the study population into several ‘mini-experiments’. Sci. Rep.10(1), 16579 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffari A , SilverMJ , ZavattariPet al. Estimation of a significance threshold for epigenome-wide association studies. Genet. Epidemiol.42(1), 20–33 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessely F , EmesRD. Identification of DNA methylation biomarkers from Infinium arrays. Front. Genet.3, 161 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar