Advanced search
Publication Cover
Epigenomics Volume 3, 2011 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
331
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Epigenome sequencing comes of age in development, differentiation and disease mechanism research

Qian Zhao1 School of Life Science & Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai200092, ChinaView further author information
&
Yong Zhang1 School of Life Science & Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai200092, China;1 School of Life Science & Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai200092, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 207-220 | Published online: 20 Apr 2011

Bibliography

  • Eilertsen KJ , FloydZ,Gimble JM: The epigenetics of adult (somatic) stem cells. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr.18(3) , 189–206 (2008).
  • Jones PA , BaylinSB: The epigenomics of cancer.Cell128(4) , 683–692 (2007).
  • Esteller M : Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps.Nat. Rev. Genet.8(4) , 286–298 (2007).
  • Jaenisch R ,Young R: Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell132(4) , 567–582 (2008).
  • Hanna J , CareyBW, JaenischR: Reprogramming of somatic cell identity.Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.73 , 147–155 (2008).
  • Goldberg AD , AllisCD, BernsteinE: Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape.Cell128(4) , 635–638 (2007).
  • Bernstein BE , MeissnerA, LanderES: The mammalian epigenome.Cell128(4) , 669–681 (2007).
  • Bird A : Perceptions of epigenetics.Nature447(7143) , 396–398 (2007).
  • Barski A , CuddapahS, CuiKet al.: High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome.Cell129(4) , 823–837 (2007).
  • Wang Z , ZangC, RosenfeldJAet al.: Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome.Nat. Genet.40(7) , 897–903 (2008).
  • Taverna SD , LiH, RuthenburgAJ, AllisCD, PatelDJ: How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.14(11) , 1025–1040 (2007).
  • Ballestar E ,Wolffe AP: Methyl-CpG-binding proteins. Targeting specific gene repression. Eur. J. Biochem.268(1) , 1–6 (2001).
  • Dekker J : Gene regulation in the third dimension.Science319(5871) , 1793–1794 (2008).
  • Schoenfelder S , ClayI, FraserP: The transcriptional interactome: gene expression in 3D.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.20(2) , 127–133 (2010).
  • Shivaswamy S , BhingeA, ZhaoY, JonesS, HirstM, IyerVR: Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation.PLoS Biol.6(3) , e65 (2008).
  • Schones DE , CuiK, CuddapahSet al.: Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome.Cell132(5) , 887–898 (2008).
  • Mavrich TN , IoshikhesIP, VentersBJet al.: A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome.Genome Res.18(7) , 1073–1083 (2008).
  • Yuan GC , LiuYJ, DionMFet al.: Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae.Science309(5734) , 626–630 (2005).
  • Ozsolak F , SongJS, LiuXS, FisherDE: High-throughput mapping of the chromatin structure of human promoters.Nat. Biotechnol.25(2) , 244–248 (2007).
  • Lee W , TilloD, BrayNet al.: A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast.Nat. Genet.39(10) , 1235–1244 (2007).
  • Sasaki S , MelloCC, ShimadaAet al.: Chromatin-associated periodicity in genetic variation downstream of transcriptional start sites.Science323(5912) , 401–404 (2009).
  • Kaplan N , MooreIK, Fondufe-MittendorfYet al.: The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome.Nature458(7236) , 362–366 (2009).
  • Valouev A , IchikawaJ, TonthatTet al.: A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning.Genome Res.18(7) , 1051–1063 (2008).
  • Mikkelsen TS , KuM, JaffeDBet al.: Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells.Nature448(7153) , 553–560 (2007).
  • Bernstein BE , MikkelsenTS, XieXet al.: A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells.Cell125(2) , 315–326 (2006).
  • Koch CM , AndrewsRM, FlicekPet al.: The landscape of histone modifications across 1% of the human genome in five human cell lines.Genome Res.17(6) , 691–707 (2007).
  • Bernstein BE , HumphreyEL, ErlichRLet al.: Methylation of histone H3 Lys 4 in coding regions of active genes.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99(13) , 8695–8700 (2002).
  • Robyr D , SukaY, XenariosIet al.: Microarray deacetylation maps determine genome-wide functions for yeast histone deacetylases.Cell109(4) , 437–446 (2002).
  • Schubeler D , MacalpineDM, ScalzoDet al.: The histone modification pattern of active genes revealed through genome-wide chromatin analysis of a higher eukaryote.Genes Dev.18(11) , 1263–1271 (2004).
  • Liu CL , KaplanT, KimMet al.: Single-nucleosome mapping of histone modifications in S. cerevisiae.PLoS Biol.3(10) , e328 (2005).
  • Pokholok DK , HarbisonCT, LevineSet al.: Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast.Cell122(4) , 517–527 (2005).
  • Bernstein BE , KamalM, Lindblad-TohKet al.: Genomic maps and comparative analysis of histone modifications in human and mouse.Cell120(2) , 169–181 (2005).
  • Heintzman ND , StuartRK, HonGet al.: Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.Nat. Genet.39(3) , 311–318 (2007).
  • Roh TY , NgauWC, CuiK, LandsmanD, ZhaoK: High-resolution genome-wide mapping of histone modifications.Nat. Biotechnol.22(8) , 1013–1016 (2004).
  • Guttman M , AmitI, GarberMet al.: Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals.Nature458(7235) , 223–227 (2009).
  • Yu H , ZhuS, ZhouB, XueH,Han JD: Inferring causal relationships among different histone modifications and gene expression. Genome Res.18(8) , 1314–1324 (2008).
  • Karlic R , ChungHR, LasserreJ, VlahovicekK, VingronM: Histone modification levels are predictive for gene expression.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107(7) , 2926–2931 (2010).
  • Bernstein BE , StamatoyannopoulosJA, CostelloJFet al.: The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium.Nat. Biotechnol.28(10) , 1045–1048 (2010).
  • He HH , MeyerCA, ShinHet al.: Nucleosome dynamics define transcriptional enhancers.Nat. Genet.42(4) , 343–347 (2010).
  • Cui K , ZangC, RohTYet al.: Chromatin signatures in multipotent human hematopoietic stem cells indicate the fate of bivalent genes during differentiation.Cell Stem Cell4(1) , 80–93 (2009).
  • Albert I , MavrichTN, TomshoLPet al.: Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.Nature446(7135) , 572–576 (2007).
  • Mavrich TN , JiangC, IoshikhesIPet al.: Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome.Nature453(7193) , 358–362 (2008).
  • Zhang Y , ShinH, SongJS, LeiY, LiuXS: Identifying positioned nucleosomes with epigenetic marks in human from ChIP-Seq.BMC Genomics9 , 537 (2008).
  • Schmid CD , BucherP: ChIP-Seq data reveal nucleosome architecture of human promoters.Cell131(5) , 831–832; author reply 832–833 (2007).
  • Laird PW : Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis.Nat. Rev. Genet.11(3) , 191–203 (2010).
  • Brunner AL , JohnsonDS, KimSWet al.: Distinct DNA methylation patterns characterize differentiated human embryonic stem cells and developing human fetal liver.Genome Res.19(6) , 1044–1056 (2009).
  • Ball MP , LiJB, GaoYet al.: Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells.Nat. Biotechnol.27(4) , 361–368 (2009).
  • Li J , GaoF, LiNet al.: An improved method for genome wide DNA methylation profiling correlated to transcription and genomic instability in two breast cancer cell lines.BMC Genomics10 , 223 (2009).
  • Jacinto FV , BallestarE, EstellerM: Methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP): hunting down the DNA methylome.Biotechniques44(1) , 35, 37, 39 passim (2008).
  • Fouse SD , ShenY, PellegriniMet al.: Promoter CpG methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation in parallel with Oct4/Nanog, PcG complex, and histone H3 K4/K27 trimethylation.Cell Stem Cell2(2) , 160–169 (2008).
  • Down TA , RakyanVK, TurnerDJet al.: A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis.Nat. Biotechnol.26(7) , 779–785 (2008).
  • Chavez L , JozefczukJ, GrimmCet al.: Computational analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation during the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells along the endodermal lineage.Genome Res.20(10) , 1441–1450 (2010).
  • Choy MK , MovassaghM, GohHG, BennettMR, DownTA, FooRS: Genome-wide conserved consensus transcription factor binding motifs are hyper-methylated.BMC Genomics11 , 519 (2010).
  • Ruike Y , ImanakaY, SatoF, ShimizuK, TsujimotoG: Genome-wide analysis of aberrant methylation in human breast cancer cells using methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing.BMC Genomics11 , 137 (2010).
  • Illingworth RS , Gruenewald-SchneiderU, WebbSet al.: Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome.PLoS Genet.6(9) , e1001134 (2010).
  • Cokus SJ , FengS, ZhangXet al.: Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning.Nature452(7184) , 215–219 (2008).
  • Lister R , O‘MalleyRC, Tonti-FilippiniJet al.: Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis.Cell133(3) , 523–536 (2008).
  • Lister R , PelizzolaM, DowenRHet al.: Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences.Nature462(7271) , 315–322 (2009).
  • Xiang H , ZhuJ, ChenQet al.: Single base-resolution methylome of the silkworm reveals a sparse epigenomic map.Nat. Biotechnol.28(5) , 516–520 (2010).
  • Popp C , DeanW, FengSet al.: Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency.Nature463(7284) , 1101–1105 (2010).
  • Meissner A , GnirkeA, BellGW, RamsahoyeB, LanderES, JaenischR: Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis.Nucleic Acids Res.33(18) , 5868–5877 (2005).
  • Meissner A , MikkelsenTS, GuHet al.: Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells.Nature454(7205) , 766–770 (2008).
  • Flusberg BA , WebsterDR, LeeJHet al.: Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing.Nat. Methods7(6) , 461–465 (2010).
  • Clarke J , WuHC, JayasingheL, PatelA, ReidS, BayleyH: Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing.Nat. Nanotechnol.4(4) , 265–270 (2009).
  • Li N , YeM, LiYet al.: Whole genome DNA methylation analysis based on high throughput sequencing technology.Methods (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
  • Robinson MD , StathamAL, SpeedTP, ClarkSJ: Protocol matters: which methylome are you actually studying?Epigenomics2(4) , 587–598 (2010).
  • Harris RA , WangT, CoarfaCet al.: Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications.Nat. Biotechnol.28(10) , 1097–1105 (2010).
  • Bock C , TomazouEM, BrinkmanABet al.: Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologies.Nat. Biotechnol.28(10) , 1106–1114 (2010).
  • Serre D , LeeBH, TingAH: MBD-isolated genome sequencing provides a high-throughput and comprehensive survey of DNA methylation in the human genome.Nucleic Acids Res.38(2) , 391–399 (2010).
  • Brinkman AB , SimmerF, MaK, KaanA, ZhuJ, StunnenbergHG: Whole-genome DNA methylation profiling using MethylCap-seq.Methods52(3) , 232–236 (2010).
  • Maunakea AK , NagarajanRP, BilenkyMet al.: Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters.Nature466(7303) , 253–257 (2010).
  • Bibikova M , LeJ, BarnesBet al.: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling using Infinium® assay.Epigenomics1(1) , 177–200 (2009).
  • Lieberman-Aiden E , Van Berkum NL, Williams L et al.: Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science326(5950) , 289–293 (2009).
  • Fullwood MJ , LiuMH, PanYFet al.: An oestrogen-receptor-alpha-bound human chromatin interactome.Nature462(7269) , 58–64 (2009).
  • Dekker J , RippeK, DekkerM, KlecknerN: Capturing chromosome conformation.Science295(5558) , 1306–1311 (2002).
  • Tanizawa H , IwasakiO, TanakaAet al.: Mapping of long-range associations throughout the fission yeast genome reveals global genome organization linked to transcriptional regulation.Nucleic Acids Res.38(22) , 8164–8177 (2010).
  • Duan Z , AndronescuM, SchutzKet al.: A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome.Nature465(7296) , 363–367 (2010).
  • Harris EY , PontsN, LevchukA, RochKL, LonardiS: BRAT: bisulfite-treated reads analysis tool.Bioinformatics26(4) , 572–573 (2010).
  • Xi Y , LiW: BSMAP: whole genome bisulfite sequence MAPping program.BMC Bioinformatics10 , 232 (2009).
  • Chen PY , CokusSJ, PellegriniM: BS Seeker: precise mapping for bisulfite sequencing.BMC Bioinformatics11 , 203 (2010).
  • Zang C , SchonesDE, ZengC, CuiK, ZhaoK, PengW: A clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data.Bioinformatics25(15) , 1952–1958 (2009).
  • Xu H , WeiCL, LinF, SungWK: An HMM approach to genome-wide identification of differential histone modification sites from ChIP-seq data.Bioinformatics24(20) , 2344–2349 (2008).
  • Hon G , RenB, WangW: ChromaSig: a probabilistic approach to finding common chromatin signatures in the human genome.PLoS Comput. Biol.4(10) , e1000201 (2008).
  • Gu H , BockC, MikkelsenTSet al.: Genome-scale DNA methylation mapping of clinical samples at single-nucleotide resolution.Nat. Methods7(2) , 133–136 (2010).
  • Langmead B , TrapnellC, PopM, SalzbergSL: Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.Genome Biol.10(3) , R25 (2009).
  • Li H , DurbinR: Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.Bioinformatics25(14) , 1754–1760 (2009).
  • Li H , DurbinR: Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.Bioinformatics26(5) , 589–595 (2010).
  • Li H , RuanJ, DurbinR: Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores.Genome Res.18(11) , 1851–1858 (2008).
  • Li R , YuC, LiYet al.: SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment.Bioinformatics25(15) , 1966–1967 (2009).
  • Pepke S , WoldB, MortazaviA: Computation for ChIP-seq and RNA-seq studies.Nat. Methods6(11 Suppl) , S22–32 (2009).
  • Ji H , JiangH, MaW, JohnsonDS, MyersRM, WongWH: An integrated software system for analyzing ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data.Nat. Biotechnol.26(11) , 1293–1300 (2008).
  • Johnson DS , MortazaviA, MyersRM, WoldB: Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions.Science316(5830) , 1497–1502 (2007).
  • Tuteja G , WhiteP, SchugJ, KaestnerKH: Extracting transcription factor targets from ChIP-Seq data.Nucleic Acids Res.37(17) , e113 (2009).
  • Zhang Y , LiuT, Meyer Ca et al.: Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol.9(9) , R137 (2008).
  • Rozowsky J , EuskirchenG, AuerbachRKet al.: PeakSeq enables systematic scoring of ChIP-seq experiments relative to controls.Nat. Biotechnol.27(1) , 66–75 (2009).
  • Valouev A , JohnsonDS, SundquistAet al.: Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP-Seq data.Nat. Methods5(9) , 829–834 (2008).
  • Jothi R , CuddapahS, BarskiA, CuiK, ZhaoK: Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data.Nucleic Acids Res.36(16) , 5221–5231 (2008).
  • Kharchenko PV , TolstorukovMY, ParkPJ: Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins.Nat. Biotechnol.26(12) , 1351–1359 (2008).
  • Nix DA , CourdySJ, BoucherKM: Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks.BMC Bioinformatics9 , 523 (2008).
  • Fejes AP , RobertsonG, BilenkyM, VarholR, BainbridgeM, JonesSJ: FindPeaks 3.1: a tool for identifying areas of enrichment from massively parallel short-read sequencing technology.Bioinformatics24(15) , 1729–1730 (2008).
  • Boyle AP , GuinneyJ, CrawfordGE, FureyTS: F-Seq: a feature density estimator for high-throughput sequence tags.Bioinformatics24(21) , 2537–2538 (2008).
  • Wilbanks EG , FacciottiMT: Evaluation of algorithm performance in ChIP-seq peak detection.PLoS One5(7) , e11471 (2010).
  • Munroe DJ , Harris Tjr: Third-generation sequencing fireworks at Marco Island. Nat. Biotech.28(5) , 426–428 (2010).

▪ Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.