Advanced search
Publication Cover
Epigenomics Volume 5, 2013 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
346
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Combining Genomic and Proteomic Approaches for Epigenetics Research

Yumiao Han1 Epigenetics Program, Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1009C Stellar-Chance Laboratories, 422 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA19104, USAView further author information
&
Benjamin A Garcia1 Epigenetics Program, Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1009C Stellar-Chance Laboratories, 422 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA19104, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 439-452 | Published online: 29 Jul 2013

References

  • Esteller M . Epigenetics in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.358 , 1148–1159 (2008).
  • Berger SL , KouzaridesT, ShiekhattarR, ShilatifardA. An operational definition of epigenetics. Gene Dev.23 , 781–783 (2009).
  • Suzuki MM , BirdA. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat. Rev. Genet.9 , 465–476 (2008).
  • Goldberg AD , AllisCD, BernsteinE. Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell128 , 635 (2007).
  • Nakao M . Epigenetics: interaction of DNA methylation and chromatin. Gene278 , 25–31 (2001).
  • Sajan SA , HawkinsRD. Methods for identification of higher-order chromatin structure. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.13 , 59–82 (2012).
  • Kornberg RD . Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science184 , 868 (1974).
  • Grunstein M . Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription. Nature389 , 349–352 (1997).
  • Weinhold B . Epigenetics: the science of change. Environ. Health Persp.114 , A160 (2006).
  • Jones PA . Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet.13 , 484–492 (2012).
  • Bird AP , WolffeAP. Methylation-induced repression – belts, braces, and chromatin. Cell99 , 451–454 (1999).
  • Dodge JE , OkanoM, DickF et al. Inactivation of Dnmt3b in mouse embryonic fibroblasts results in DNA hypomethylation, chromosomal instability, and spontaneous immortalization. J. Biol. Chem. 280 , 17986–17991 (2005).
  • Hammoud SS , CairnsBR, CarrellDT. Analysis of gene-specific and genome-wide sperm DNA methylation. Methods Mol. Biol.927 , 451–458 (2013).
  • Surani MA . Imprinting and the initiation of gene silencing in the germ line. Cell93 , 309–312 (1998).
  • Ng HH , AdrianB. DNA methylation and chromatin modification. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.9 , 158–163 (1999).
  • Weber M , DaviesJJ, WittigD et al. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat. Genet. 37 , 853–862 (2005).
  • Chen Z , WangL, WangQ, LiW. Histone modifications and chromatin organization in prostate cancer. Epigenomics2 , 551–560 (2010).
  • Strahl BD , AllisCD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature403 , 41–45 (2000).
  • Ruthenburg AJ , LiH, PatelDJ, AllisCD. Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.8 , 983–994 (2007).
  • Tan M , LuoH, LeeS et al. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell 146 , 1016–1028 (2011).
  • Jenuwein T , AllisCD. Translating the histone code. Science293 , 1074–1080 (2001).
  • Turner BM . Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell111 , 285–291 (2002).
  • Bannister AJ , KouzaridesT. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res.21 , 381–395 (2011).
  • Cedar H , BergmanY. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat. Rev. Genet.10 , 295–304 (2009).
  • Bird A . DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Gene Dev.16 , 6–21 (2002).
  • Fuks F . DNA methylation and histone modifications: teaming up to silence genes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.15 , 490–495 (2005).
  • Esteller M . Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat. Rev. Genet.8 , 286–298 (2007).
  • Alelu-Paz R , AshourN, Gonzalez-CorpasA, RoperoS. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and signal transduction pathways: a close relationship in malignant gliomas pathophysiology. J. Signal. Trans.2012 , 956–958 (2012).
  • Harris RA , WangT, CoarfaC et al. Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 28 , 1097–1105 (2010).
  • Bock C , TomazouEM, BrinkmanAB et al. Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologies. Nat. Biotechnol. 28 , 1106–1114 (2010).
  • Laird PW . Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet.11 , 191–203 (2010).
  • Zilberman D , HenikoffS. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation patterns. Development134 , 3959–3965 (2007).
  • Brunner AL , JohnsonDS, KimSW et al. Distinct DNA methylation patterns characterize differentiated human embryonic stem cells and developing human fetal liver. Genome Res. 19 , 1044–1056 (2009).
  • Oda M , GlassJL, ThompsonRF et al. High-resolution genome-wide cytosine methylation profiling with simultaneous copy number analysis and optimization for limited cell numbers. Nucleic Acids Res. 37 , 3829–3839 (2009).
  • Down TA , RakyanVK, TurnerDJ et al. A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 26 , 779–785 (2008).
  • Coverdale LE , MartinCC. Epigenomics – genome wide modifications of cytosine and new dimensions in our understanding of differentiation and disease. Curr. Genomics6 , 491–500 (2005).
  • Brinkman AB , SimmerF, MaK, KaanA, ZhuJ, StunnenbergHG. Whole-genome DNA methylation profiling using methylCap-seq. Methods52 , 232–236 (2010).
  • Serre D , LeeBH, TingAH. MBD-isolated genome sequencing provides a high-throughput and comprehensive survey of DNA methylation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res.38 , 391–399 (2010).
  • Meissner A , MikkelsenTS, GuH et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454 , 766–770 (2008).
  • Eckhardt F , LewinJ, CorteseR et al. DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat. Genet. 38 , 1378–1385 (2006).
  • Laird PW . The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers. Nat. Rev. Cancer3 , 253–266 (2003).
  • Pomraning KR , SmithKM, FreitagM. Genome-wide high throughput analysis of DNA methylation in eukaryotes. Methods47 , 142–150 (2009).
  • S⊘rensen AL , CollasP. Immunoprecipitation of methylated DNA. Methods Mol. Biol.567 , 249–262 (2009).
  • Maunakea AK , NagarajanRP, BilenkyM et al. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 466 , 253–257 (2010).
  • Lister R , PelizzolaM, DowenRH et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 462 , 315–322 (2009).
  • Meissner A , GnirkeA, BellGW, RamsahoyeB, LanderES, JaenischR. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res.33 , 5868–5877 (2005).
  • Gu H , SmithZD, BockC, BoyleP, GnirkeA, MeissnerA. Preparation of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing libraries for genome-scale DNA methylation profiling. Nat. Protoc.6 , 468–481 (2011).
  • Cokus SJ , FengS, ZhangX et al. Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452 , 215–219 (2008).
  • Kouzarides T . Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell128 , 693 (2007).
  • Li B , CareyM, WorkmanJL. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell128 , 707–719 (2007).
  • Schones DE , ZhaoK. Genome-wide approaches to studying chromatin modifications. Nat. Rev. Genet.9 , 179–191 (2008).
  • Iyer VR , HorakCE, ScafeCS, BotsteinD, SnyderM, BrownPO. Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF. Nature409 , 533–538 (2001).
  • Ren B , RobertF, WyrickJJ et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290 , 2306–2309 (2000).
  • Zhang Z , PughBF. High-resolution genome-wide mapping of the primary structure of chromatin. Cell144 , 175–186 (2011).
  • Zhou VW , GorenA, BernsteinBE. Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet.12 , 7–18 (2011).
  • Wang Z , ZangC, RosenfeldJA et al. Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 40 , 897–903 (2008).
  • Vega VB , CheungE, PalanisamyN, SungWK. Inherent signals in sequencing-based chromatin-immunoprecipitation control libraries. PLoS One4 , e5241 (2009).
  • Roh T , ZhaoK. High-resolution, genome-wide mapping of chromatin modifications by GMAT. Methods Mol. Biol.387 , 95 (2008).
  • Ng P , TanJJ, OoiHS et al. Multiplex sequencing of paired-end ditags (MS-PET): a strategy for the ultra-high-throughput analysis of transcriptomes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 , e84–e84 (2006).
  • Buck MJ , LiebJD. ChIP-chip: considerations for the design, analysis, and application of genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. Genomics83 , 349–360 (2004).
  • Park PJ . ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat. Rev. Genet.10 , 669–680 (2009).
  • Li KK , LuoC, WangD, JiangH, ZhengYG. Chemical and biochemical approaches in the study of histone methylation and demethylation. Med. Res. Rev.32 , 815–867 (2012).
  • Heintzman ND , StuartRK, HonG et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39 , 311–318 (2007).
  • Kirmizis A , BartleySM, KuzmichevA et al. Silencing of human polycomb target genes is associated with methylation of histone H3 Lys 27. Gene Dev. 18 , 1592–1605 (2004).
  • Viré E , BrennerC, DeplusR et al. The polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature 439 , 871–874 (2005).
  • Peters AH , SchübelerD. Methylation of histones: playing memory with DNA. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.17 , 230–238 (2005).
  • Irvine RA , HsiehCL. Q-PCR in combination with ChIP assays to detect changes in chromatin acetylation. Methods Mol. Biol.287 , 45–52 (2004).
  • Barski A , CuddapahS, CuiK et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129 , 823–837 (2007).
  • Garcia BA , PesaventoJJ, MizzenCA, KelleherNL. Pervasive combinatorial modification of histone H3 in human cells. Nat. Methods4 , 487–489 (2007).
  • Vermeulen M , EberlHC, MatareseF et al. Quantitative interaction proteomics and genome-wide profiling of epigenetic histone marks and their readers. Cell 142 , 967–980 (2010).
  • Vasilescu J , FigeysD. Mapping protein–protein interactions by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotech.17 , 394 (2006).
  • Ethier M , LambertJP, VasilescuJ, FigeysD. Analysis of protein interaction networks using mass spectrometry compatible techniques. Anal. Chim. Acta564 , 10–18 (2006).
  • Bauer A , KusterB. Affinity purification-mass spectrometry. Eur. J. Biochem.270 , 570–578 (2003).
  • Roque A , LoweC. Affinity chromatography: history, perspectives, limitations and prospects. Methods Mol. Biol.421 , 1–21 (2008).
  • Dunham WH , MullinM, GingrasAC. Affinity-purification coupled to mass spectrometry: basic principles and strategies. Proteomics12 , 1576–1590 (2012).
  • Puig O , CasparyF, RigautG et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24 , 218–229 (2001).
  • Li Y . The tandem affinity purification technology: an overview. Biotechnol. Lett.33 , 1487–1499 (2011).
  • Trinkle-Mulcahy L . Resolving protein interactions and complexes by affinity purification followed by label-based quantitative mass spectrometry. Proteomics12 , 1623–1638 (2012).
  • Galan JA , ParisLL, ZhangHJ, AdlerJ, GeahlenRL, TaoWA. Proteomic studies of Syk-interacting proteins using a novel amine-specific isotope tag and GFP nanotrap. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.22 , 319–328 (2011).
  • Oeffinger M . Two steps forward – one step back: advances in affinity purification mass spectrometry of macromolecular complexes. Proteomics12 , 1591–1608 (2012).
  • Breitkreutz A , ChoiH, SharomJR et al. A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast. Science 328 , 1043–1046 (2010).
  • Poser I , SarovM, HutchinsJR et al. BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals. Nat. Methods 5 , 409–415 (2008).
  • Tang X , BruceJE. Chemical crosslinking for protein–protein interaction studies. Methods Mol. Biol.492 , 283–293 (2009).
  • Sinz A . Chemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry to map three-dimensional protein structures and protein–protein interactions. Mass Spectrom. Rev.25 , 663–682 (2006).
  • Leitner A , WalzthoeniT, KahramanA et al. Probing native protein structures by chemical crosslinking, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 9 , 1634–1649 (2010).
  • Byrum SD , TavernaSD, TackettAJ. Quantitative analysis of histone exchange for transcriptionally active chromatin. J. Clin. Bioinforma.1 , 17 (2011).
  • Byrum S , MackintoshSG, EdmondsonRD, CheungWL, TavernaSD, TackettAJ. Analysis of histone exchange during chromatin purification. J. Integr. OMICS1 , 61–65 (2011).
  • Northrup DL , ZhaoK. Application of ChIP-seq and related techniques to the study of immune function. Immunity34 , 830–842 (2011).
  • Das PM , RamachandranK, VanwertJ, SingalR. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Biotechniques37 , 961–969 (2004).
  • O‘Neill LP , TurnerBM. Immunoprecipitation of native chromatin: NChIP. Methods31 , 76–82 (2003).
  • Krogan NJ , CagneyG, YuH et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440 , 637–643 (2006).
  • Stunnenberg HG , VermeulenM. Towards cracking the epigenetic code using a combination of high-throughput epigenomics and quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Bioessays33 , 547–551 (2011).
  • Dawson MA , KouzaridesT. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell150 , 12–27 (2012).
  • Ueberheide BM , MollahS. Deciphering the histone code using mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom.259 , 46–56 (2007).
  • Bartke T , BorgelJ, DimaggioPA. Proteomics in epigenetics: new perspectives for cancer research. Brief Funct. Genomics12(3) , 205–218 (2013).
  • Young NL , DimaggioPA, GarciaBA. The significance, development and progress of high-throughput combinatorial histone code analysis. Cell Mol. Life Sci.67 , 3983–4000 (2010).
  • Yates JR , RuseCI, NakorchevskyA. Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.11 , 49–79 (2009).
  • Zee BM , GarciaBA. Validation of protein acetylation by mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol.981 , 1–11 (2013).
  • Sidoli S , ChengL, JensenON. Proteomics in chromatin biology and epigenetics: Elucidation of post-translational modifications of histone proteins by mass spectrometry. J. Proteomics75 , 3419–3433 (2012).
  • Lin S , GarciaBA. Examining histone posttranslational modification patterns by high-resolution mass spectrometry. Methods Enzymol.512 , 3–28 (2012).
  • Siuti N , KelleherNL. Decoding protein modifications using top-down mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods4 , 817–821 (2007).
  • Macek B , WaandersLF, OlsenJV, MannM. Top-down protein sequencing and MS3 on a hybrid linear quadrupole ion trap-orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell Proteomics5 , 949–958 (2006).
  • Pesavento JJ , KimYB, TaylorGK, KelleherNL. Shotgun annotation of histone modifications: a new approach for streamlined characterization of proteins by top down mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc.126 , 3386–3387 (2004).
  • Thomas CE , KelleherNL, MizzenCA. Mass spectrometric characterization of human histone H3: a bird‘s eye view. J. Proteome Res.5 , 240–247 (2006).
  • Young NL , DimaggioPA, Plazas-MayorcaMD, BalibanRC, FloudasCA, GarciaBA. High throughput characterization of combinatorial histone codes. Mol. Cell Proteomics8 , 2266–2284 (2009).
  • Boyne MT 2nd, Pesavento JJ, Mizzen CA, Kelleher NL. Precise characterization of human histones in the H2A gene family by top down mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res.5 , 248–253 (2006).
  • Soldi M , BonaldiT. The proteomic investigation of chromatin functional domains reveals novel synergisms among distinct heterochromatin components. Mol. Cell Proteomics12 , 764–780 (2013).
  • Pokholok DK , HarbisonCT, LevineS et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 122 , 517–527 (2005).
  • Nelson EA , WalkerSR, AlvarezJV, FrankDA. Isolation of unique STAT5 targets by chromatin immunoprecipitation-based gene identification. J. Biol. Chem.279 , 54724–54730 (2004).
  • Voigt P , LeroyG, DruryWJ 3rd et al. Asymmetrically modified nucleosomes. Cell151 , 181–193 (2012).
  • Vinckevicius A , ChakravartiD. Chromatin immunoprecipitation: advancing analysis of nuclear hormone signaling. J. Mol. Endocrinol.49 , R113–R123 (2012).
  • Nelson JD , DenisenkoO, BomsztykK. Protocol for the fast chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) method. Nat. Protoc.1 , 179–185 (2006).
  • Collas P , DahlJA. Chop it, ChIP it, check it: the current status of chromatin immunoprecipitation. Front. Biosci.13 , 929–943 (2008).
  • Collas P . The current state of chromatin immunoprecipitation. Mol. Biotechnol.45 , 87–100 (2010).
  • Garcia BA , ShabanowitzJ, HuntDF. Characterization of histones and their post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.11(1) , 66–73 (2007).
  • Beck HC . Mass spectrometry in epigenetic research. Methods Mol. Biol.593 , 263–282 (2010).
  • Hardison RC , TaylorJ. Genomic approaches towards finding cis-regulatory modules in animals. Nat. Rev. Genet.13 , 469–483 (2012).
  • Leroy G , ChepelevI, DimaggioPA et al. Proteogenomic characterization and mapping of nucleosomes decoded by Brd and HP1 proteins. Genome Biol. 13 , R68 (2012).
  • Wang CI , AlekseyenkoAA, LeroyG et al. Chromatin proteins captured by ChIP-mass spectrometry are linked to dosage compensation in Drosophila. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20 , 202–209 (2013).
  • Price CM , CechTR. Telomeric DNA–protein interactions of oxytricha macronuclear DNA. Gene Dev.1 , 783–793 (1987).
  • Lambert JP , MitchellL, RudnerA, BaetzK, FigeysD. A novel proteomics approach for the discovery of chromatin-associated protein networks. Mol. Cell Proteomics8 , 870–882 (2009).
  • Wood A , SchneiderJ, DoverJ, JohnstonM, ShilatifardA. The Bur1/Bur2 complex is required for histone H2B monoubiquitination by Rad6/Bre1 and histone methylation by COMPASS. Mol. Cell20 , 589–599 (2005).
  • Chu DS , LiuH, NixP et al. Sperm chromatin proteomics identifies evolutionarily conserved fertility factors. Nature 443 , 101–105 (2006).
  • Griesenbeck J , BoegerH, StrattanJS, KornbergRD. Affinity purification of specific chromatin segments from chromosomal loci in yeast. Mol. Cell Biol.23 , 9275–9282 (2003).
  • Rusk N . Reverse ChIP. Nat. Methods6 , 187–187 (2009).
  • Byrum SD , RamanA, TavernaSD, TackettAJ. ChAP–MS: a method for identification of proteins and histone posttranslational modifications at a single genomic locus. Cell Reports2(1) , 198–205 (2012).
  • Déjardin J , KingstonRE. Purification of proteins associated with specific genomic Loci. Cell136 , 175–186 (2009).
  • Wu CH , ChenS, ShortreedMR et al. Sequence-specific capture of protein–DNA complexes for mass spectrometric protein identification. PLoS One 6 , e26217 (2011).
  • Fujita T , FujiiH. Direct identification of insulator components by insertional chromatin immunoprecipitation. PLoS One6 , e26109 (2011).
  • Fujita T , FujiiH. Locus-specific biochemical epigenetics/chromatin biochemistry by insertional chromatin immunoprecipitation. ISRN Biochem.2013 , 913273 (2013).
  • Agelopoulos M , MckayDJ, MannRS. Developmental regulation of chromatin conformation by Hox proteins in Drosophila. Cell Rep.1 , 350–359 (2012).
  • Eberl HC , MannM, VermeulenM. Quantitative proteomics for epigenetics. Chembiochem12 , 224–234 (2011).
  • Cox J , MannM. Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem.80 , 273–299 (2011).
  • Vermeulen M , MulderKW, DenissovS et al. Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell 131 , 58–69 (2007).
  • Katan-Khaykovich Y , StruhlK. Splitting of H3–H4 tetramers at transcriptionally active genes undergoing dynamic histone exchange. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA108 , 1296–1301 (2011).
  • Greer EL , ShiY. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet.13 , 343–357 (2012).
  • Bartke T , VermeulenM, XhemalceB, RobsonSC, MannM, KouzaridesT. Nucleosome-interacting proteins regulated by DNA and histone methylation. Cell143 , 470–484 (2010).
  • Li X , FoleyEA, MolloyKR, LiY, ChaitBT, KapoorTM. Quantitative chemical proteomics approach to identify post-translational modification-mediated protein–protein interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134 , 1982–1985 (2012).
  • Bogdanovic O , VeenstraGJ. Affinity-based enrichment strategies to assay methyl-CpG binding activity and DNA methylation in early Xenopus embryos. BMC Res. Notes4 , 300 (2011).
  • Mittler G , ButterF, MannM. A SILAC-based DNA protein interaction screen that identifies candidate binding proteins to functional DNA elements. Genome Res.19 , 284–293 (2009).
  • Spruijt CG , GnerlichF, SmitsAH et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell 152 , 1146–1159 (2013).
  • O‘Neill LP , VermilyeaMD, TurnerBM. Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nat. Genet.38 , 835–841 (2006).
  • Dahl JA , CollasP. Q2ChIP, a quick and quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, unravels epigenetic dynamics of developmentally regulated genes in human carcinoma cells. Stem Cells25 , 1037–1046 (2007).
  • Dahl JA , CollasP. MicroChIP – a rapid micro chromatin immunoprecipitation assay for small cell samples and biopsies. Nucleic Acids Res.36 , e15 (2008).
  • Dahl JA , CollasP. A rapid micro chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (microChIP). Nat. Protoc.3 , 1032–1045 (2008).
  • Flanagin S , NelsonJD, CastnerDG, DenisenkoO, BomsztykK. Microplate-based chromatin immunoprecipitation method, Matrix ChIP: a platform to study signaling of complex genomic events. Nucleic Acids Res.36 , e17 (2008).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.