The Evolution of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: From Minimal Access to Transcatheter Approaches

References

• Nguyen TC , TerwelpMD, ThouraniVHet al. Clinical trends in surgical, minimally invasive and transcatheter aortic valve replacement . Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.51 ( 6 ), 1086 – 1092 ( 2017 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health . National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. Cancer Stat Fact Sheets ( 2017 ). http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/ .
   Google Scholar
• Otto C . Timing of aortic valve surgery . Heart84 ( 2 ), 211 – 218 ( 2000 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith CR , LeonMB, MackMJet al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients . N. Engl. J. Med.364 ( 23 ), 2187 – 2198 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan JM , HolmesDR, SherwoodMWet al. The association of transcatheter aortic valve replacement availability and hospital aortic valve replacement volume and mortality in the United States . Ann. Thorac. Surg.98 ( 6 ), 2016 – 2022 ; discussion 2022 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castrovinci S , EmmanuelS, MoscarelliMet al. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery . J. Geriatr. Cardiol.13 ( 6 ), 499 – 503 ( 2016 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Segesser LK , WestabyS, PomarJ, LoisanceD, GroscurthP, TurinaM . Less invasive aortic valve surgery: rationale and technique . Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.15 ( 6 ), 781 – 785 ( 1999 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khoshbin E , PrayagaS, KinsellaJ, SutherlandFW . Mini-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement reduces the length of stay in the cardiac intensive care unit: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials . BMJ Open1 ( 2 ), e000266 ( 2011 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murtuza B , PepperJR, StanbridgeRDet al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it? Ann. Thorac. Surg. 85 ( 3 ), 1121 – 1131 ( 2008 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaisrie SC , Northwestern UniversityCI, GlennRBet al. Current era minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: techniques and practice . J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.147 ( 1 ), 6 – 14 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonacchi M , PriftiE, GiuntiG, FratiG, SaniG . Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study . Ann. Thorac. Surg.73 ( 2 ), 460 – 465 ( 2002 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phan K , XieA, Di EusanioM, YanTD . A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement . Ann. Thorac. Surg.98 ( 4 ), 1499 – 1511 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann S , MerkDR, EtzCDet al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: the Leipzig experience . Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg.4 ( 1 ), 49 – 56 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merk DR , LehmannS, HolzheyDMet al. Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison . Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.47 ( 1 ), 11 – 17 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnhart GR , ShresthaML . Current clinical evidence on rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: sutureless aortic bioprostheses . Innovations (Phila)11 ( 1 ), 7 – 14 ( 2016 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shrestha M , FolliguetTA, PfeifferSet al. Aortic valve replacement and concomitant procedures with the Perceval valve: results of European trials . Ann. Thorac. Surg.98 ( 4 ), 1294 – 1300 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon MB , SmithCR, MackMet al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery . N. Engl. J. Med.363 ( 17 ), 1597 – 1607 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CR , LeonMB, MackMJet al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients . N. Engl. J. Med.364 ( 23 ), 2187 – 2198 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popma JJ , AdamsDH, ReardonMJet al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery . J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63 ( 19 ), 1972 – 1981 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams DH , PopmaJJ, ReardonMJet al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis . N. Engl. J. Med.370 ( 19 ), 1790 – 1798 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon MB , SmithCR, MackMJet al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients . N. Engl. J. Med.374 ( 17 ), 1609 – 1620 ( 2016 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thourani VH , KodaliS, MakkarRRet al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis . Lancet387 ( 10034 ), 2218 – 2225 ( 2016 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon MJ , Van MieghemNM, PopmaJJet al. Surgical or transcather aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients . N. Engl. J. Med.376, 1321 – 1331 ( 2017 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glauber M , MiceliA, CanaruttoDet al. Early and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right minithoracotomy: a 10 -year experience in 1604 patients . J. Cardiothorac. Surg.10, 181 ( 2015 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammie JS , ShengS, GriffithBPet al. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database . Ann. Thorac. Surg.87 ( 5 ), 1431 – 1437 ( 2009 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmitto JD , MokashiSA, CohnLH . Minimally-invasive valve surgery . J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56 ( 6 ), 455 – 462 ( 2010 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramlawi B , GammieJS . Mitral valve surgery: current minimally invasive and transcatheter options . Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc. J.12 ( 1 ), 20 – 26 ( 2016 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ailawadi G , AgnihotriAK, MehallJRet al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery I: patient selection, evaluation and planning . Innovations (Phila)11 ( 4 ), 243 – 250 ( 2016 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe JA , MalaisrieSC, FarivarRSet al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery II: surgical technique and postoperative management . Innovations (Phila)11 ( 4 ), 251 – 259 ( 2016 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moscarelli M , EmmanuelS, AthanasiouT, SpezialeG, FattouchK, CasulaR . The role of minimal access valve surgery in the elderly. A meta-analysis of observational studies . Int. J. Surg.33 ( Pt A ), 164 – 171 ( 2016 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moscarelli M , FattouchK, CasulaR, SpezialeG, LancellottiP, AthanasiouT . What is the role of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in high-risk patients? A meta-analysis of observational studies . Ann. Thorac. Surg.101 ( 3 ), 981 – 989 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan V , RuelM . Leaflet resection versus leaflet preservation for repair of degenerative mitral regurgitation: does it matter how the mitral valve is repaired?J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.150 ( 3 ), 546 – 547 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castillo JG , AnyanwuAC, FusterV, AdamsDH . A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines . J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.144 ( 2 ), 308 – 312 ( 2012 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier A . Cardiac valve surgery – the ‘French correction’ . J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.86 ( 3 ), 323 – 337 ( 1983 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeburger J , FalkV, BorgerMAet al. Chordae replacement versus resection for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse: a egalite . Ann. Thorac. Surg.87 ( 6 ), 1715 – 1720 ( 2009 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falk V , SeeburgerJ, CzeslaMet al. How does the use of polytetrafluoroethylene neochordae for posterior mitral valve prolapse (loop technique) compare with leaflet resection? A prospective randomized trial . J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.136 ( 5 ), 1205 ; discussion 1205–1206 ( 2008 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lange R , GuentherT, NoebauerCet al. Chordal replacement versus quadrangular resection for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse . Ann. Thorac. Surg.89 ( 4 ), 1163 – 1170 ; discussion 1170 ( 2010 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agricola E , IelasiA, OppizziMet al. Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with functional mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction . Eur. J. Heart Fail.11 ( 6 ), 581 – 587 ( 2009 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enriquez-Sarano M , AkinsCW, VahanianA . Mitral regurgitation . Lancet373 ( 9672 ), 1382 – 1394 ( 2009 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso C , CapodannoD, TamburinoC, OhnoY . Current status and clinical development of transcatheter approaches for severe mitral regurgitation . Circ. J.79 ( 6 ), 1164 – 1171 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kherani AR , CheemaFH, CasherJet al. Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair: the Columbia Presbyterian experience . Ann. Thorac. Surg.78 ( 1 ), 73 – 76 ( 2004 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young A , FeldmanT . Percutaneous mitral valve repair . Curr. Cardiol. Rep.16 ( 1 ), 443 ( 2014 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mauri L , GargP, MassaroJMet al. The EVEREST II Trial: design and rationale for a randomized study of the evalve MitraClip system compared with mitral valve surgery for mitral regurgitation . Am. Heart J.160 ( 1 ), 23 – 29 ( 2010 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman T , FosterE, GlowerDDet al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation . N. Engl. J. Med.364 ( 15 ), 1395 – 1406 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso C , CapodannoD, TamburinoC, OhnoY . Current status and clinical development of transcatheter approaches for severe mitral regurgitation . Circ. J.79 ( 6 ), 1164 – 1171 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feldman T , YoungA . Percutaneous approaches to valve repair for mitral regurgitation . J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63 ( 20 ), 2057 – 2068 ( 2014 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiam PT , RuizCE . Percutaneous transcatheter mitral valve repair: a classification of the technology . JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.4 ( 1 ), 1 – 13 ( 2011 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy A , DevereauxPJ, PrabhakaranDet al. 5-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting . N. Engl. J. Med.375 ( 24 ), 2359 – 2368 ( 2016 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machin D , AllsagerC . Principles of cardiopulmonary bypass . Continuing education in anesthesia, critical care & pain.6 ( 5 ), 176 – 81 ( 2006 ).
   Google Scholar
• Elmistekawy E , ChanV, BourkeMEet al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting does not preserve renal function better than on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: results of a case-matched study . J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.143 ( 1 ), 85 – 92 ( 2011 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polomsky M , HeX, O’brienSM, PuskasJD . Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: impact of preoperative risk . J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.145 ( 5 ), 1193 – 1198 ( 2013 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noora J , PuskasJD . Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting through sternotomy: for whom?Curr. Opin. Cardiol.21 ( 6 ), 573 – 577 ( 2006 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atluri P , KozinED, HiesingerW, WooYJ . Off-pump, minimally invasive and robotic coronary revascularization yield improved outcomes over traditional on-pump CABG . Int. J. Med. Robot.5 ( 1 ), 1 – 12 ( 2009 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iribarne A , EasterwoodR, ChanEYet al. The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives . Future Cardiol.7 ( 3 ), 333 – 346 ( 2011 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sellke FW , DimaioJM, CaplanLRet al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research . Circulation111 ( 21 ), 2858 – 2864 ( 2005 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detter C , ReichenspurnerH, BoehmDHet al. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB): two techniques for beating heart surgery . Heart Surg. Forum5 ( 2 ), 157 – 162 ( 2002 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subramanian VA , PatelNU . Current status of MIDCAB procedure . Curr. Opin. Cardiol.16 ( 5 ), 268 – 270 ( 2001 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Derose JJ Jr , BalaramSK, RoCet al. Mid-term results and patient perceptions of robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting . Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg.4 ( 5 ), 406 – 411 ( 2005 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gong W , CaiJ, WangZet al. Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting . J. Thorac. Dis.8 ( 3 ), 459 – 468 ( 2016 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canale LS , MickS, MihaljevicT, NairR, BonattiJ . Robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery . J. Thorac. Dis.5 ( Suppl. 6 ), S641 – S649 ( 2013 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohn WE . Advances in surgical treatment of acute and chronic coronary artery disease . Tex. Heart Inst. J.37 ( 3 ), 328 – 330 ( 2010 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cao C , IndraratnaP, DoyleMet al. A systematic review on robotic coronary artery bypass graft surgery . Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg.5 ( 6 ), 530 – 543 ( 2016 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harskamp RE . Current state and future direction of hybrid coronary revascularization . Curr. Opin. Cardiol.30 ( 6 ), 643 – 649 ( 2015 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narasimhan S , SrinivasVS, DeroseJJJr . Hybrid coronary revascularization: a review . Cardiol. Rev.19 ( 3 ), 101 – 107 ( 2011 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harskamp RE , ZhengZ, AlexanderJHet al. Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease . Ann. Thorac. Surg.96 ( 6 ), 2268 – 2277 ( 2013 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne JG , LeaccheM, VaughanDE, ZhaoDX . Hybrid cardiovascular procedures . JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.1 ( 5 ), 459 – 468 ( 2008 ).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harskamp RE , VassiliadesTA, MehtaRHet al. Comparative effectiveness of hybrid coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting . J. Am. Coll. Surg.221 ( 2 ), 326 – 334e321 ( 2015 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puskas JD , HalkosME, DeroseJJet al. Hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: a multicenter observational study . J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.68 ( 4 ), 356 – 365 ( 2016 ).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical trials database: NCT03089398 . https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03089398 .
   Google Scholar