Using the Coronary Lithotripsy System for Coronary Artery Disease

References

• Généreux P , MadhavanMV, MintzGSet al. Ischemic outcomes after coronary intervention of calcified vessels in acute coronary syndromes. Pooled analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) TRIALS. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 63(18), 1845–1854 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori S , YasudaS, KataokaY, MoriiI, KawamuraA, MiyazakiS. Significant association of coronary artery calcification in stent delivery route with restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circ. J., 73(10), 1856–1863 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemer M , ButzT, SchmidtW, SchmitzKP, HorstkotteD, LangerC. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of different drug eluting stents after failed implantation: from nearly undamaged to major damaged polymers. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 75(6), 905–911 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzafriri AR , Garcia-PoliteF, ZaniBet al. Calcified plaque modification alters local drug delivery in the treatment of peripheral atherosclerosis. J. Control. Rel., 264, 203–210 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kini AS , VengrenyukY, PenaJet al. Optical coherence tomography assessment of the mechanistic effects of rotational and orbital atherectomy in severely calcified coronary lesions. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 86(6), 1024–1032 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danek BA , BrilakisES. Serenity, courage and wisdom: the keys to successful coronary calcification treatment. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 88(6), 897–898 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maejima N , HibiK, SakaKet al. Relationship between thickness of calcium on optical coherence tomography and crack formation after balloon dilatation in calcified plaque requiring rotational atherectomy. Circ. J., 80(6), 1413–1419 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccheri S , FranchinaG, RomanoSet al. Clinical outcomes following intravascular imaging-guided versus coronary angiography–guided percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a systematic review and Bayesian Network meta-analysis of 31 studies and 17,882 patients. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv., 10(24), 2488–2498 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secco GG , BuettnerA, ParisiRet al. Clinical experience with very high-pressure dilatation for resistant coronary lesions. Cardiovasc. Revascularization Med.1083–1087 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felekos I , KaramasisGV, PavlidisAN. When everything else fails: high-pressure balloon for undilatable lesions. Cardiovasc. Revascularization Med., 19(3), 306–313 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raja Y , RoutledgeHC, DoshiSN. A noncompliant, high pressure balloon to manage undilatable coronary lesions. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 75(7), 1067–1073 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbato E , ShlofmitzE, MilkasA, ShlofmitzR, AzzaliniL, ColomboA. State of the art: evolving concepts in the treatment of heavily calcified and undilatable coronary stenoses - From debulking to plaque modification, a 40-year-long journey. EuroIntervention, 13(6), 696–705 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri L , BonanR, WeinerBHet al. Cutting balloon angioplasty for the prevention of restenosis: results of the Cutting Balloon Global Randomized Trial. Am. J. Cardiol., 90(10), 1079–1083 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Z , BaiJ, SuS-Pet al. Cutting-balloon angioplasty before drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions. J. Geriatr. Cardiol., 11(1), 44–49 (2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahmood A , BanerjeeS, BrilakisES. Applications of the distal anchoring technique in coronary and peripheral interventions. J. Invasive Cardiol., 23(7), 291–294 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokami M , SaitoS, MutoH. Anchoring technique to improve guiding catheter support in coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 67(3), 366–371 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn MT , GreenP, NicholsonWet al. Mother-daughter-granddaughter double guideliner technique for delivering stents past multiple extreme angulations. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv., 9(8), doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003961 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta T , WeinreichM, GreenbergM, ColomboA, LatibA. Rotational atherectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Interv. Cardiol., 14(3), 182–189 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serruys PW , KatagiriY, OnumaY. Shaking and breaking calcified plaque: lithoplasty, a breakthrough in interventional armamentarium?JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging, 10(8), 907–911 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Wahab M , RichardtG, JoachimBüttner Het al. High-speed rotational atherectomy before paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions: The randomized ROTAXUS (Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent Treatment for Complex Native Coronary Artery Disease) trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv., 6(1), 10–19 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK , KiniA, MehranR, LanskyA, KobayashiY, MarmurJD. Randomized trial of Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Diffuse In-stent Restenosis (ROSTER). Am. Heart J., 147(1), 16–22 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi Galougahi K , ShlofmitzRA, Ben-YehudaOet al. Guiding light: insights into atherectomy by optical coherence tomography. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv., 9(22), 2362–2363 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlofmitz E , JeremiasA, ShlofmitzR, AliZA. Lesion preparation with orbital atherectomy. Interv. Cardiol., 14(3), 169–173 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamoto MH , MaeharaA, KarimiGalougahi Ket al. Mechanisms of orbital versus rotational atherectomy plaque modification in severely calcified lesions assessed by optical coherence tomography. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv., 10(24), 2584–2586 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes DR , MehtaS, GeorgeCJet al. Excimer laser coronary angioplasty: the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) experience. In: American Journal of Cardiology, Elsevier Inc (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Bilodeau L , FretzEB, TaeymansY, KoolenJ, TaylorK, HiltonDJ. Novel use of a high-energy excimer laser catheter for calcified and complex coronary artery lesions. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 62(2), 155–161 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dini CS , NardiG, RistalliF, MattesiniA, HamitiB, DiMario C. Contemporary approach to heavily calcified coronary lesions. Interv. Cardiol. Rev., 14(3), 154–163 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azzalini L , LyHQ. Laser atherectomy for balloon failure in chronic total occlusion when the going gets tough. Int. Heart J., 55(6), 546–549 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Maria GL , ScarsiniR, BanningAP. Management of calcific coronary artery lesions: is it time to change our interventional therapeutic approach?JACC Cardiovasc. Interv., 12(15), 1465–1478 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassimis G , RainaT, KontogiannisNet al. How should we treat heavily calcified coronary artery disease in contemporary practice? from atherectomy to intravascular lithotripsy. Cardiovasc. Revascularization Med., 20(12), 1172–1183 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali ZA , BrintonTJ, HillJMet al. Optical coherence tomography characterization of coronary lithoplasty for treatment of calcified lesions: first description. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging, 10(8), 897–906 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warisawa T , GotoS, SalazarCH, AkashiYJ, EscanedJ. Safety and feasibility of coronary lithotripsy supported by guide extension catheter for the treatment of calcified lesion in angulated vessel. Cardiovasc. Revascularization Med., 20(11), 6–8 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daemen J , NataliaM, ForeroT. Coronary calcified lesions the coronary intravascular lithotripsy system. Interv. Cardiol. Rev., 14(3), 174–181 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azzalini L , BelliniB, MontorfanoM, CarlinoM. Intravascular lithotripsy in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention, 15(11), e1025–e1026 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini L , AnconaMB, BelliniB, ChieffoA, CarlinoM, MontorfanoM. Intravascular lithotripsy and microaxial percutaneous left ventricular assist device for complex and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Can. J. Cardiol., 35(7), 940.e5–940.e7 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venuti G , D’AgostaG, TamburinoC, LaManna A. Coronary lithotripsy for failed rotational atherectomy, cutting balloon, scoring balloon and ultra-high-pressure non-compliant balloon. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 94(3), E111–E115 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinton TJ , AliZA, HillJMet al. Feasibility of shockwave coronary intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcified coronary stenoses. Circulation, 139(6), 834–836 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali ZA , NefH, EscanedJet al. Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary stenoses: the Disrupt CAD II Study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv., 12(10), e008434 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong B , El-JackS, NewcombeR, GlenieT, ArmstrongG, KhanA. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy for calcified coronary lesions: first real-world experience. J. Invasive Cardiol., 31(3), 46–48 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksoy A , SalazarC, BecherMUet al. Intravascular lithotripsy in calcified coronary lesions: a prospective, observational, multicenter registry. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv., 12(11), e008154 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong B , El-JackS, NewcombeRet al. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy of calcified coronary lesions in st-elevation myocardial infarction: first-in-man experience. J. Invasive Cardiol., 31(5), E73–E75 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh J , CottensD, CosgroveCet al. Management of stent underexpansion using intravascular lithotripsy–defining the utility of a novel device. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.1–8, November 2019 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alawami M , ThirunavukarasuS, AhmedJ, El-OmarM. Intravascular lithotripsy to treat an underexpanded coronary stent: 4-Month angiographic and OCT follow-up. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.014 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Manna A , D’AgostaG, VenutiG, TamburinoC. Cracking the plaque with coronary lithotripsy: mechanistic insights from optical coherence tomography. J. Invasive Cardiol., 32(1), E14 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G , ZrennerB, PyxarasSA. Combined rotational atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of severely calcified in-stent neoatherosclerosis: a mini-review. Cardiovasc. Revascularization Med., 20(9), 819–821 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ristalli F , MaianiS, MattesiniAet al. Intravascular lithotripsy and Impella support to assist complex LM angioplasty. Cardiovasc. Revascularization Med.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.014 (2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong B , El-JackS, KhanAet al. Treatment of heavily calcified unprotected left main disease with lithotripsy: The first case Series. J. Invasive Cardiol., 31(6), E143–E147 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh J , HillJ, SprattJC. Intravascular lithotripsy assisted chronic total occlusion revascularization with reverse controlled antegrade retrograde tracking. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 93(7), 1295–1297 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek C , VosJ, IJsselmuidenAet al. Coronary artery perforation after shockwave intravascular lithotripsy. JACC Case Rep., 2(2), 247–249 (2020).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar