Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the fourth-generation Cryoballoon Arctic Front Advance PRO

References

• Calkins H , HindricksG, CappatoRet al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Heart Rhythm, 14(10), e445–e494 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuck KH , BrugadaJ, FurnkranzAet al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med., 374(23), 2235–2245 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukkipati SR , CuocoF, KutinskyIet al. Pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon: a prospective, multicenter, and randomized comparison to standard radiofrequency ablation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 66(12), 1350–1360 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pooter J , StrisciuglioT, ElHaddad Met al. Pulmonary vein reconnection no longer occurs in the majority of patients after a single pulmonary vein isolation procedure. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol., 5(3), 295–305 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciconte G , VelagicV, MugnaiGet al. Electrophysiological findings following pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency catheter guided by contact-force and second-generation cryoballoon: lessons from repeat ablation procedures. Europace, 18(1), 71–77 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuck KH , AlbenqueJP, ChunKJet al. Repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation recurrence post cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol., 12(6), e007247 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeger CH , PhanHL, Meyer-SaraeiRet al. Second-generation visually guided laser balloon ablation system for pulmonary vein isolation: learning curve, safety and efficacy - the MERLIN registry. Circ. J., 83(12), 2443–2451 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuzil P , SchmidtB, ChunJ, AlE. Performance of a 3rd generation visually-guided laser balloon catheter for pulmonary vein isolation: results of the X3 study. Heart Rhythm Society’s (HRS) 40th Annual Scientific Sessions.San Francisco, CA, USA, 8–11 May 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kottkamp H , HindricksG, PonischCet al. Global multielectrode contact-mapping plus ablation with a single catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation: global AF study. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol., 30(11), 2248–2255 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottner L , BellmannB, LinTet al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: state of the art and future perspectives. Cardiol. Ther. doi:10.1007/s40119-019-00158-2 (2020) ( Epub ahead of print).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuck KH , FurnkranzA, ChunKRet al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur. Heart J., 37(38), 2858–2865 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortsell D , ArbeloE, DagresNet al. Cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a study of outcome and safety based on the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry and the Swedish catheter ablation registry. Europace, 21(4), 581–589 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun KRJ , BrugadaJ, ElvanAet al. The impact of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on healthcare utilization and costs: an economic analysis from the FIRE AND ICE trial. J. Am. Heart Assoc., 6(8), (2017). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissner E , HeegerCH, GrahnHet al. One-year clinical success of a ‘no-bonus’ freeze protocol using the second-generation 28 mm cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation. Europace, 17(8), 1236–1240 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciconte G , Sieira-MoretJ, HaciogluEet al. Single 3-minute versus double 4-minute freeze strategy for second-generation cryoballoon ablation: a single-center experience. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol., 27(7), 796–803 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade JG , ChampagneJ, DubucMet al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous monitoring: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation, 140(22), 1779–1788 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun KR , StichM, FurnkranzAet al. Individualized cryoballoon energy pulmonary vein isolation guided by real-time pulmonary vein recordings, the randomized ICE-T trial. Heart Rhythm, 14(4), 495–500 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reissmann B , WissnerE, DeissSet al. First insights into cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation taking the individual time-to-isolation into account. Europace, 19(10), 1676–1680 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryana A , KowalskiM, O’neillPGet al. Catheter ablation using the third-generation cryoballoon provides an enhanced ability to assess time to pulmonary vein isolation facilitating the ablation strategy: short- and long-term results of a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm, 13(12), 2306–2313 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeger CH , WissnerE, MathewSet al. Short tip-big difference? First-in-man experience and procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the third-generation cryoballoon. Clin. Res. Cardiol., 105(6), 482–488 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryana A , KenigsbergDN, KowalskiMet al. Verification of a novel atrial fibrillation cryoablation dosing algorithm guided by time-to-pulmonary vein isolation: results from the Cryo-DOSING study (cryoballoon-ablation DOSING based on the assessment of time-to-effect and pulmonary vein isolation guidance). Heart Rhythm, 14(9), 1319–1325 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugnai G , DeAsmundis C, HunukBet al. Improved visualisation of real-time recordings during third generation cryoballoon ablation: a comparison between the novel short-tip and the second generation device. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol., 46(3), 307–314 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pott A , PetscherK, MessemerM, RottbauerW, DahmeT. Increased rate of observed real-time pulmonary vein isolation with third-generation short-tip cryoballoon. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol., 47(3), 333–339 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnkranz A , BolognaF, BordignonSet al. Procedural characteristics of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel third-generation cryoballoon. Europace, 18(12), 1795–1800 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getman MK , WissnerE, RanjanR, LalondeJP. Relationship between time-to-isolation and freeze duration: computational modeling of dosing for Arctic Front Advance and Arctic Front Advance Pro cryoballoons. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol., 30(11), 2274–2282 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su W , AryanaA, PassmanRet al. Cryoballoon best practices II: practical guide to procedural monitoring and dosing during atrial fibrillation ablation from the perspective of experienced users. Heart Rhythm, 15(9), 1348–1355 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade JG . Cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm O, 21(1), 44–58 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Chen S , SchmidtB, BordignonS, PerrottaL, BolognaF, ChunKRJ. Impact of cryoballoon freeze duration on long-term durability of pulmonary vein isolation: ICE re-map study. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol., 5(5), 551–559 (2019).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Straube F , DorwarthU, PongratzJet al. The fourth cryoballoon generation with a shorter tip to facilitate real-time pulmonary vein potential recording: feasibility and safety results. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol., 30(6), 918–925 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottner L , MathewS, ReissmannBet al. Feasibility, safety, and acute efficacy of the fourth-generation cryoballoon for ablation of atrial fibrillation: another step forward? Clin. Cardiol., 43(4), 394–400 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moltrasio M , SicusoR, FassiniGMet al. Acute outcome after a single cryoballoon ablation: comparison between Arctic Front Advance and Arctic Front Advance PRO. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol., 42(7), 890–896 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacopino S , PieragnoliP, ArenaGet al. A comparison of acute procedural outcomes within four generations of cryoballoon catheters utilized in the real-world multicenter experience of 1STOP. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol., 31(1), 80–88 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar