Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Uterine Cervical Cancer

References

• Jemal A , SiegelR, WardEet al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J. Clin.58(2), 71–96 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda Y , Abu-RustumNR, GemignaniMLet al. A fertility-sparing alternative to radical hysterectomy: how many patients may be eligible? Gynecol. Oncol. 95(3), 534–538 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L , SkapaP, RobovaH. Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol.12(2), 192–200 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT , ParejaR, RendonGJ, MillanC, FrumovitzM, SchmelerKM. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?Gynecol. Oncol.132(1), 254–259 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauerberg L , HogdallC, LoftAet al. Vaginal radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Results of the Danish National Single Center Strategy. Gynecol. Oncol.138(2), 304–310 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar L , PalfalviL, HoggRet al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a fertility-preserving option for women with early cervical cancer. BJOG112(3), 366–369 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd JH , SpencerC, HerodJ, IndTE. Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer-cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women. BJOG113(6), 719–724 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel H , KohlerC, GrundDet al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy: prospective multicenter study of 100 patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.103(2), 506–511 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchiole P , BenchaibM, BuenerdA, LazloE, DargentD, MathevetP. Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent’s operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH). Gynecol. Oncol.106(1), 132–141 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareja FR , RamirezPT, BorreroFM, AngelCG. Abdominal radical trachelectomy for invasive cervical cancer: a case series and literature review. Gynecol. Oncol.111(3), 555–560 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiner ME , CovensA. Surgery insight: radical vaginal trachelectomy as a method of fertility preservation for cervical cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol.4(6), 353–361 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonoda Y , ChiDS, CarterJ, BarakatRR, Abu-RustumNR. Initial experience with Dargent’s operation: the radical vaginal trachelectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.108(1), 214–219 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L , PlutaM, StrnadPet al. A less radical treatment option to the fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.111(2 Suppl), S116–S120 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz JP , SonodaY, LeitaoMMet al. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol.111(2), 255–260 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y , XuH, ZhangQ, LiY, WangD, LiangZ. A fertility-preserving option in early cervical carcinoma: laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.136(1), 90–93 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishio H , FujiiT, KameyamaKet al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer in a series of 61 women. Gynecol. Oncol.115(1), 51–55 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibula D , SlamaJ, SvarovskyJet al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy in fertility-sparing treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer19(8), 1407–1411 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeremic K , PetkovicS, StefanovicAet al. Radical abdominal trachelectomy in managing early cervical invasion. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol.30(3), 309–312 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao T , MoS, LinZ. The functional reconstruction of fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.151(1), 77–81 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanowska M , ManglerM, SpekAet al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: prospective study of 225 patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer21(8), 1458–1464 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du XL , ShengXG, JiangTet al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy as guidance for radical trachelectomy in young patients with early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer11, 157 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J , LiZ, WangHet al. Radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical malignancies: surgical, oncological and fertility outcomes in 62 patients. Gynecol. Oncol.121(3), 565–570 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante M , GregoireJ, RenaudMC, RoyM. The vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update of a series of 125 cases and 106 pregnancies. Gynecol. Oncol.121(2), 290–297 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nick AM , FrumovitzMM, SolimanPT, SchmelerKM, RamirezPT. Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: open vs. robotic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.124(2), 276–280 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wethington SL , CibulaD, DuskaLRet al. An international series on abdominal radical trachelectomy: 101 patients and 28 pregnancies. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer22(7), 1251–1257 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CH , Abu-RustumNR, ChiDSet al. Reproductive outcomes of patients undergoing radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.125(3), 585–588 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saso S , Ghaem-MaghamiS, ChatterjeeJet al. Abdominal radical trachelectomy in west London. BJOG119(2), 187–193 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaia I , MusellaA, BellatiFet al. Simple extrafascial trachelectomy and pelvic bilateral lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.126(1), 78–81 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju SK , PapadopoulosAJ, MontaltoSAet al. Fertility-sparing surgery for early cervical cancer-approach to less radical surgery. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer22(2), 311–317 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraji M , SudoT, NakagawaEet al. Type II versus type III fertility-sparing abdominal radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a comparison of feasibility of surgical outcomes. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer22(3), 479–483 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karateke A , KabacaC. Radical abdominal trachelectomy is a safe and fertility preserving option for women with early stage cervical cancer. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol.33(2), 200–203 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wethington SL , SonodaY, ParkKJet al. Expanding the indications for radical trachelectomy: a report on 29 patients with stage IB1 tumors measuring 2 to 4 centimeters. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer23(6), 1092–1098 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante M , GregoireJ, RenaudMCet al. Simple vaginal trachelectomy in early-stage low-risk cervical cancer: a pilot study of 16 cases and review of the literature. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer23(5), 916–922 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J , WuX, LiX, JuX. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: Is it safe for IB1 cervical cancer with tumors ≥ 2 cm?Gynecol. Oncol.131(1), 87–92 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao DY , YangJX, WuXHet al. Comparisons of vaginal and abdominal radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: preliminary results of a multi-center research in China. Br. J. Cancer109(11), 2778–2782 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebisawa K , TakanoM, FukudaMet al. Obstetric outcomes of patients undergoing total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.131(1), 83–86 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokunaga H , WatanabeY, NiikuraHet al. Outcomes of abdominal radical trachelectomy: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in a Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit. Int. J. Clin. Oncol.20(4), 776–780 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhman Y , AkinO, ParkKJet al. Stage IB1 cervical cancer: role of preoperative MR imaging in selection of patients for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. Radiology269(1), 149–158 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppercorn PD , JeyarajahAR, WoolasRet al. Role of MR imaging in the selection of patients with early cervical carcinoma for fertility-preserving surgery: initial experience. Radiology212(2), 395–399 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams NL , WernerTL, JarboeEA, GaffneyDK. Adenocarcinoma of the cervix: should we treat it differently?Curr. Oncol. Rep.17(4), 17 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu T , WuL, XingHet al. Development of criteria for ovarian preservation in cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol.20(3), 881–890 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu J , SunT, TanX. Ovarian preservation in young patients with stage I cervical adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer24(8), 1513–1520 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentivegna E , GouyS, MaulardA, ChargariC, LearyA, MoriceP. Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol.17(6), e240–e253 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercellino GF , PiekJM, SchneiderAet al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection should be performed before fertility preserving treatment of patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.126(3), 325–329 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landoni F , ParmaG, PeirettiMet al. Chemo-conization in early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.107(1 Suppl 1), S125–S126 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niikura H , OkamotoS, OtsukiTet al. Prospective study of sentinel lymph node biopsy without further pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with sentinel lymph node-negative cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer22(7), 1244–1250 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y , LiZ, WuH, YuJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Mol. Clin. Oncol.1(6), 1025–1030 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bats AS , MathevetP, BuenerdAet al. The sentinel node technique detects unexpected drainage pathways and allows nodal ultrastaging in early cervical cancer: insights from the multicenter prospective SENTICOL study. Ann. Surg. Oncol.20(2), 413–422 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoneda JY , BragancaJF, SarianLO, BorbaPP, ConceicaoJC, ZeferinoLC. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer25(4), 694–698 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadkhodayan S , HasanzadehM, TregliaGet al. Sentinel node biopsy for lymph nodal staging of uterine cervix cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent literature. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.41(1), 1–20 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Rustum NR , NeubauerN, SonodaYet al. Surgical and pathologic outcomes of fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.111(2), 261–264 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darai E , LavoueV, RouzierR, CoutantC, BarrangerE, BatsAS. Contribution of the sentinel node procedure to tailoring the radicality of hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.106(1), 251–256 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slama J , DundrP, DusekL, CibulaD. High false negative rate of frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.129(2), 384–388 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bats AS , BuenerdA, QuerleuDet al. Diagnostic value of intraoperative examination of sentinel lymph node in early cervical cancer: a prospective, multicenter study. Gynecol. Oncol.123(2), 230–235 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y , WuYM, ZhaoQet al. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1). Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer24(7), 1306–1311 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L , RobovaH, ChmelR, KomarM, HalaskaM, SkapaP. Surgical options in early cervical cancer. Int. J. Hyperthermia28(6), 489–500 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomao F , CorradoG, PeccatoriFAet al. Fertility-sparing options in young women with cervical cancer. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol.17(1), 5 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kalbani M , McveighG, NagarH, MccluggageWG. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer22(2), 291–295 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JC , KeyCR, QuallsCR, SmithHO. Population-based study of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Obstet. Gynecol.97(5 Pt 1), 701–706 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD , NathavitharanaR, LewinSNet al. Fertility-conserving surgery for young women with stage IA1 cervical cancer: safety and access. Obstet. Gynecol.115(3), 585–590 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L , RobovaH, HalaskaMJ, HrudaM, SkapaP. Current status of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of cervical cancer. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther.13(7), 861–870 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu B , WangY, GongKet al. Comparison of emergent versus elective laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with or without nonsevere acute cholangitis complicated with common bile duct stones. J. Surg. Res.187(1), 72–76 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagotti A , GagliardiML, MoruzziC, CaroneV, ScambiaG, FanfaniF. Excisional cone as fertility-sparing treatment in early-stage cervical cancer. Fertil. Steril.95(3), 1109–1112 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneo A , SideriM, ScambiaGet al. Simple conization and lymphadenectomy for the conservative treatment of stage IB1 cervical cancer. An Italian experience. Gynecol. Oncol.123(3), 557–560 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanowska M , ManglerM, SpeiserDet al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy after laparoscopic staging and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with early-stage cervical cancer over 2 cm: oncologic, fertility, and neonatal outcome in a series of 20 patients. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer24(3), 586–593 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintner B , SasoS, TarnaiLet al. Use of abdominal radical trachelectomy to treat cervical cancer greater than 2 cm in diameter. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer23(6), 1065–1070 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti-Panici P , GreggiS, ColomboAet al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study. J. Clin. Oncol.20(1), 179–188 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robova H , HalaskaMJ, PlutaMet al. Oncological and pregnancy outcomes after high-dose density neoadjuvant chemotherapy and fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.135(2), 213–216 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneo A , ChiariS, BonazziC, MangioniC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conservative surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.111(3), 438–443 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider A , ErdemogluE, ChianteraVet al. Clinical recommendation radical trachelectomy for fertility preservation in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer22(4), 659–666 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun P , LeblancE, NogueiraMC. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (Dargent’s operation): a critical review of the literature. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.33(8), 933–941 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiner ME , HauspyJ, RosenBet al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case–control study. Gynecol. Oncol.110(2), 168–171 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arimoto T , KawanaK, AdachiKet al. Minimization of curative surgery for treatment of early cervical cancer: a review. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.45(7), 611–616 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD , GrigsbyPW, BrooksRet al. Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer110(6), 1281–1286 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steed H , CapstickV, SchepanskyA, HonoreL, HiltzM, FaughtW. Early cervical cancer and parametrial involvement: is it significant?Gynecol. Oncol.103(1), 53–57 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegeman M , LouwenM, Van Der VeldenJet al. The incidence of parametrial tumor involvement in select patients with early cervix cancer is too low to justify parametrectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.105(2), 475–480 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L , CharvatM, RobovaHet al. Less radical fertility-sparing surgery than radical trachelectomy in early cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer17(1), 304–310 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto A , MartinelliF, BoganiGet al. Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer patients: oncologic and reproductive outcomes. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer25(3), 493–497 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay R , PaulJ, SiddiquiN, DavisJ, GaffneyDK. Survey on the management of early cervical cancer among members of the GCIG. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer22(9), 1617–1623 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanfani F , LandoniF, GagliardiMLet al. Sexual and reproductive outcomes in early stage cervical cancer patients after excisional cone as a fertility-sparing surgery: an Italian experience. J. Reprod. Infertil.15(1), 29–34 (2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andikyan V , Khoury-ColladoF, DenesopolisJet al. Cervical conization and sentinel lymph node mapping in the treatment of stage I cervical cancer: is less enough? Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 24(1), 113–117 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JY , JooWD, ChangSJet al. Long-term outcomes after fertility-sparing laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in young women with early-stage cervical cancer: an Asan Gynecologic Cancer Group (AGCG) study. J. Surg. Oncol.110(3), 252–257 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Q , ZhangY, WangSet al. Neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy followed by total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in stage IB1 cervical cancer. Fertil. Steril.101(3), 812–817 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J , ImbodenS, ReynissonP, AnderssonB, BorgfeldtC, BossmarT. Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy. Gynecol. Oncol.127(3), 484–488 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong DG , LeeYS, ParkNY, ChongGO, ParkIS, ChoYL. Robotic uterine artery preservation and nerve-sparing radical trachelectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer21(2), 391–396 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchiole P , TigaudJD, CostantiniSet al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and vaginal radical trachelectomy for fertility-sparing treatment in women affected by cervical cancer (FIGO stage IB–IIA1). Gynecol. Oncol.122(3), 484–490 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareja R , RendonGJ, VasquezM, EcheverriL, Sanz-LomanaCM, RamirezPT. Immediate radical trachelectomy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery for patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumors 2 cm or larger: a literature review and analysis of oncological and obstetrical outcomes. Gynecol. Oncol.137(3), 574–580 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salihi R , LeunenK, Van LimbergenE, MoermanP, NevenP, VergoteI. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by large cone resection as fertility-sparing therapy in stage IB cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.139(3), 447–451 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robova H , RobL, HalaskaMJ, PlutaM, SkapaP. Review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trachelectomy: which cervical cancer patients would be suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery?Curr. Oncol. Rep.17(5), 446 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruinsma FJ , QuinnMA. The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG118(9), 1031–1041 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbyn M , KyrgiouM, SimoensCet al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ337, a1284 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrgiou M , KoliopoulosG, Martin-HirschP, ArbynM, PrendivilleW, ParaskevaidisE. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet367(9509), 489–498 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speiser D , ManglerM, KohlerCet al. Fertility outcome after radical vaginal trachelectomy: a prospective study of 212 patients. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer21(9), 1635–1639 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishio H , FujiiT, SugiyamaJet al. Reproductive and obstetric outcomes after radical abdominal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in a series of 31 pregnancies. Hum. Reprod.28(7), 1793–1798 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JY , KimDY, SuhDSet al. Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. J. Gynecol. Oncol.25(1), 9–13 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Rustum NR , SonodaY, BlackD, LevineDA, ChiDS, BarakatRR. Fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical carcinoma: technique and review of the literature. Gynecol. Oncol.103(3), 807–813 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar