XRCC1 632 as a Candidate for Cancer Predisposition via a Complex Interaction with Genetic Variants of Base Excision Repair and Double Strand Break Repair Genes

References

• Bishop JM . Molecular themes in oncogenesis. Cell64(2), 235–248 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine AJ . The tumor suppressor genes. Ann. Rev. Biochem.62, 623–651 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherr CJ . Cancer cell cycles. Science274, 1672–1677 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell LH , WeinertTA. Checkpoints: controls that assure the order of cell cycle events. Science246, 629–633 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber E . The multistep nature of cancer. Cancer Res.44, 4217–4223 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon ER , VogelsteinBA. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell61, 759–767 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Q , SpitzMR. The role of DNA repair capacity in susceptibility to lung cancer: a review. Cancer Metastasis Rev.16, 295–307 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot P , MundenRF. Lung cancer epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention. Radiol. Clin. North Am.50(5), 863–876 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiencke JK , KeleseyKT, VarkonyiAet al>. Correlation of DNA adducts in blood mononuclear cells with tobacco carcinogen-induced damage in human lung. Cancer Res.55, 4910–4914 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancar A , Lindsey-BoltzLA, Unsal-KacmazKet al Molecular mechanism of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Biochem.73, 39–85 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson PS , BartekJ. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature461, 1071–1078 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole BS , Gilbert-DiamondD, MooreJHet al. Analysis of gene–gene interactions. Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet.70(1), 1.14.1–1.14.10 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kim K , KwonMS, OhSet al. Identification of multiple gene–gene interactions for ordinal phenotypes. BMCMed. Genomics.6(Suppl. 2), 6 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Singh A , SinghN, BeheraDet al. Association and multiple interaction analysis among five XRCC1 polymorphic variants in modulating lung cancer risk in North Indian population. DNA Repair47, 30–41 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A , SinghN, BeheraD, SharmaS. Polymorphism in XRCC1 gene modulates survival and clinical outcomes of advanced North Indian lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Med. Oncol.34, 64 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A , SinghN, BeheraDet al. Genetic investigation of polymorphic OGG1 and MUTYH genes towards increased susceptibility in lung adenocarcinoma and its impact on overall survival of lung cancer patients treated with platinum based chemotherapy. Pathol.Oncol.Res.25 (4), 1327–1340 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Singh A , SinghN, BeheraDet al. Role of polymorphic XRCC6 (K70)/XRCC7 (DNA-PKcs) genes towards susceptibility and prognosis of lung cancer patientsundergoing platinum based doublet chemotherapy. Molecular Biol. Rep.45 (3), 253–261 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangwar R , AhirwarD, MandhaniAet al. Do DNA repair genes OGG1, XRCC3 and XRCC7 have an impact on susceptibility to bladder cancer in the north indian population. Mutation Res.680(1), 56–63 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava A , SrivastavaK, PandeySNet al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA repair genes OGG1 and XRCC1: association with gallbladder cancer in north Indian population. Ann. Surg. Oncol.16(6), 1695–1703 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szaflik J , CuchraM, PrzybylowskaKet al. Association of the 399Arg/Gln XRCC1, the 194 Arg/Trp XRCC1, the 326Ser/Cys OGG1, and the 324 Gln/His Mutyh gene polymorphisms with clinical parameters and the risk for development of primary open angle glaucoma. Mutation. Res.753(1), 12–22 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letkova L , MatakovaT, MusakLet al. DNA repair gene polymorphism and lung cancer risk with the emphasis to sex differences. Mol. Biol. Rep.40(9), 5261–5273 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylowska K , KabzinskiJ, SygutAet al. An association selected polymorphisms of XRCC1, OGG1 and mutyh gene and the level of efficiency oxidative DNA damage repair with a risk of colorectal cancer. Mutation Research745, 6–15 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian B , ZhangH, ZhangLet al. Association of genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair pathway genes with non-small cell lung cancer risk. Lung Cancer73(2), 138–146 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M , DinneyCP, LinX et al. High order interactions among genetic variants in DNA base excision repair pathway genes and smoking in bladder cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.16(1), 84–91 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi Y , JingY, YangL et al. Interaction between polymorphisms of DNA repair genes significantly modulated bladder cancer risk. Int. J. Med. Sci.9(6), 498 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michiels S , LaplancheA, BouletTet al. Genetic polymorphisms in 85 DNA repair genes and bladder cancer risk. Carcinogenesis30(5), 763–768 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil MN , DatkhileKD, BhosaleSJ et al. Role of genetic polymorphisms in XRCC4, XRCC5, XRCC6 and XRCC7 in breast cancer susceptibility in rural Indian population: a hospital based case–control study from Maharashtra. Int. J. Health Sci. Res.6(11), 24–32 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Datkhile K , VhavalRD, PatilMN et al. Role of genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes (XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC4, XRCC5, XRCC6, XRCC7) in head and neck cancer susceptibility in rural Indian population: a hospital based case–control study from south-western maharashtra. Int. J. Curr. Res.8, 25482–25492 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Horikawa Y , GuJ, WuX. Genetic susceptibility to bladder cancer with an emphasis on gene–gene and gene–environmental interactions. Curr. Opin. Urol.18(5), 493–498 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai R , KimJJ, MisraSet al. A multiple interaction analysis reveals adrb3 as a potential candidate for gallbladder cancer predisposition via a complex interaction with other candidate gene variations. Int. J. Mol. Sci.16(12), 28038–28049 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S , BhowmikA, BhattacharjeeAet al. XPD, APE1, and MUTYH polymorphisms increase head and neck cancer risk: effect of gene–gene and gene–environment interactions. Tumor Biology36(10), 7569–7579 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritchie MD , HahnHW, RoodiN et al. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen–metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am. J. Human Genetics69(1), 138–147 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L , WuC, WangY et al. Association of candidate genetic variations with gastric cardia adenocarcinoma in Chinese population: a multiple interaction analysis. Carcinogenesis32(3), 336–342 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L , WuJ, ZhongR et al. Multi-loci analysis reveals the importance of genetic variations in sensitivity of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol. Carcinog.52, 923–931 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M , DinneyCP, LinXet al. High-order interactions among genetic variants in DNA base excision repair pathway genes and smoking in bladder cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.16, 84–91 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar