A Voyage From 3D to 4D Printing in Nanomedicine and Healthcare: Part I

References

• Wong KV, Hernandez A. A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech. Eng. 2012, 208760 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Zarek M, Layani M, Cooperstein I, Sachyani E, Cohn D, Magdassi S. 3D printing of shape memory polymers for flexible electronic devices. Adv. Mater. 28(22), 4449–4454 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf H, Meer B, Naz R et al. 3D-bioprinting: a stepping stone towards enhanced medical approaches. Life Sci. 5(4), 143–153 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, McClinton A, Laurencin CT. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials 226, 119536 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodziuk H. Applications of 3D printing in healthcare. Kardiochir. Torakochirurgia Pol. 13(3), 283 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jadhav RG, Das AK. Four dimensional printing in healthcare. In: 3D Printing in Medicine. Kalaskar DM ( Ed.). Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK, 207–218 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Tibbits S. 4D printing: multi-material shape change. Archit. Des. 84(1), 116–121 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gladman AS, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, Mahadevan L, Lewis JA. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat. Mater. 15(4), 413–418 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashammakhi N, Ahadian S, Zengjie F et al. Advances and future perspectives in 4D bioprinting. Biotechnol. J. 13(12), 1800148 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AY, An J, Chua CK. Two-way 4D printing: a review on the reversibility of 3D-printed shape memory materials. Engineering 3(5), 663–674 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naficy S, Oveissi F, Patrick B, Schindeler A, Dehghani F. Printed, flexible pH sensor hydrogels for wet environments. Adv. Mater. Technol. 3(11), 1800137 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Demir KG, Gu GX. Developments in 4D-printing: a review on current smart materials, technologies, and applications. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 10(3), 205–224 (2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momeni F, Liu X, Ni J. A review of 4D printing. Mater. Des. 122, 42–79 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li X. 4D printing reversible actuator with strain self-sensing function via structural design. Compos. B. Eng. 211, 108644 (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Liu Q, Han Z et al. 4D Printing strain self-sensing and temperature self-sensing integrated sensor–actuator with bioinspired gradient gaps. Adv. Sci. 7(13), 2000584 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Ouyang W, Liu Z et al. Computational design of self-actuated deformable solids via shape memory material. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3039613 (2020) ( Epub ahead of print).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfagharian A, Kouzani AZ, Khoo SY, Moghadam AAA, Gibson I, Kaynak A. Evolution of 3D printed soft actuators. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 250, 258–272 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodaghi M, Damanpack A, Liao W. Self-expanding/shrinking structures by 4D printing. Smart Mater. Struct. 25(10), 105034 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Invernizzi M, Turri S, Levi M, Suriano R. 4D printed thermally activated self-healing and shape memory polycaprolactone-based polymers. Eur. Polym J. 101, 169–176 (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Huang WM, Kang SF et al. From 3D to 4D printing: approaches and typical applications. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 29(10), 4281–4288 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Yu K, Isakov MS, Wu J, Dunn ML, Qi HJ. Sequential self-folding structures by 3D printed digital shape memory polymers. Sci. Rep. 5(1), 1–12 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Ángeles F, Odriozola G, Lozada-Cassou M. Entropy effects in self-assembling mechanisms: also a view from the information theory. J. Mol. Liq. 164(1–2), 87–100 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok T-H, Wang CC, Deng D, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Four-dimensional printing for freeform surfaces: design optimization of origami and kirigami structures. J. Mech. Des. 137(11), 111413–111423 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter FB, Ianakiev A. 4D printing inflatable silicone structures. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2(3), 140–144 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Zafar MQ, Zhao H. 4D printing: future insight in additive manufacturing. Met. Mater. Int. 26, 564–585 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Chen P, Yan C, Cai C, Shi Y. Four-dimensional printing of a novel acrylate-based shape memory polymer using digital light processing. Mater. Des. 171, 107704 (2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolowski W, Metcalfe A, Hayashi S, Raymond J. Medical applications of shape memory polymers. Biomed. Mater. 2(1), S23 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather PT, Luo X, Rousseau IA. Shape memory polymer research. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 39, 445–471 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng Q, Hu J. A review of shape memory polymer composites and blends. Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 40(11), 1661–1672 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal M, Kadam SS, Xiao R et al. Bio-origami hydrogel scaffolds composed of photocrosslinked PEG bilayers. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2(8), 1142–1150 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkinis D, Schaffner M, Studart AR. Multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing of composite materials. Nat. Commun. 6(1), 1–10 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Yuan C, Ding Z et al. Multi-shape active composites by 3D printing of digital shape memory polymers. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 1–11 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu K, Ritchie A, Mao Y, Dunn ML, Qi HJ. Controlled sequential shape changing components by 3D printing of shape memory polymer multimaterials. Procedia IUTAM 12, 193–203 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Nadgorny M, Xiao Z, Chen C, Connal LA. Three-dimensional printing of pH-responsive and functional polymers on an affordable desktop printer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(42), 28946–28954 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Lv J-A, Tian X, Wang Y, Yu Y, Liu J. Miniaturized swimming soft robot with complex movement actuated and controlled by remote light signals. Sci. Rep. 5(1), 1–8 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Piedade AP. 4D printing: the shape-morphing in additive manufacturing. J. Funct. Biomater. 10(1), 9 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman GB, Mayo I. The story of nitinol: the serendipitous discovery of the memory metal and its applications. Chem. Educ. 2(2), 1–21 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Nakano T. Physical and mechanical properties of metallic biomaterials. In: Metals for Biomedical Devices (2nd Edition). Niinomi M ( Ed.). Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK, 97–129 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Liang C, Rogers C, Malafeew E. Investigation of shape memory polymers and their hybrid composites. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 8(4), 380–386 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabanlit M, Maitland D, Wilson T et al. Polyurethane shape-memory polymers demonstrate functional biocompatibility in vitro. Macromol. Biosci. 7(1), 48–55 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratna D, Karger-Kocsis J. Recent advances in shape memory polymers and composites: a review. J. Mater. Sci. 43(1), 254–269 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Qin H, Mather P. Review of progress in shape-memory polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 17(16), 1543–1558 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul JZ, Sajid M, Rehman MM et al. 3D printing for soft robotics – a review. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 19(1), 243–262 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzacki SZ, Thwar PK, Yang M, Ugaz VM, Burns MA. Integrated microsystems for controlled drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 56(2), 185–198 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Yadav T, Sharma S, Nayak A, Kumari AA, Mishra N. Polymers in drug delivery. J. Biosci. Meds. 4(1), 69–84 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 76, 321–343 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, Gao Q, Xia B, Fu J. Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 1–13 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J. Biol. Eng. 9(1), 1–14 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharm. Ther. 39(10), 704 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Norman J, Madurawe RD, Moore CM, Khan MA, Khairuzzaman A. A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing: 3D-printed drug products. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 108, 39–50 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji S, Guvendiren M. Recent advances in bioink design for 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 5, 23 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramya A, Vanapalli SL. 3D printing technologies in various applications. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7(3), 396–409 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Basit AW, Gaisford S. 3D Printing of Pharmaceuticals. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Germany (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Francis SL, Di Bella C, Wallace GG, Choong PF. Cartilage tissue engineering using stem cells and bioprinting technology – barriers to clinical translation. Front. Surg. 5, 70 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S et al. Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials 31(28), 7250–7256 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odde DJ, Renn MJ. Laser-guided direct writing for applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 17(10), 385–389 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron JA, Ringeisen BR, Kim H, Spargo BJ, Chrisey DB. Application of laser printing to mammalian cells. Thin Solid Films 453, 383–387 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP et al. 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv. Mater. 25(36), 5011–5028 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raof NA, Schiele NR, Xie Y, Chrisey DB, Corr DT. The maintenance of pluripotency following laser direct-write of mouse embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 32(7), 1802–1808 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, Kim D-H. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol. Adv. 34(4), 422–434 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CM, Stone AL, Parkhill RL et al. Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating viable tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng. 10(9–10), 1566–1576 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moon S, Hasan SK, Song YS et al. Layer by layer three-dimensional tissue epitaxy by cell-laden hydrogel droplets. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 16(1), 157–166 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Censi R, Schuurman W, Malda J et al. A printable photopolymerizable thermosensitive p (HPMAm-lactate)-PEG hydrogel for tissue engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21(10), 1833–1842 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescosolido L, Schuurman W, Malda J et al. Hyaluronic acid and dextran-based semi-IPN hydrogels as biomaterials for bioprinting. Biomacromolecules 12(5), 1831–1838 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauvin R, Chen Y-C, Lee JW et al. Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials 33(15), 3824–3834 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou M, Qu X, Zhu W et al. Bio-inspired detoxification using 3D-printed hydrogel nanocomposites. Nat. Commun. 5(1), 1–9 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, Zhang X, Zhong W, Xing M. 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: a review of recent trends and advances. Bioact. Mater. 3(2), 144–156 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco F, Mattoli V. Introduction to active smart materials for biomedical applications. In: Piezoelectric Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Ciofani G, Menciassi A ( Eds). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1–27 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Van Norman GA. Drugs, devices, and the FDA: part 2: an overview of approval processes: FDA approval of medical devices. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 1(4), 277–287 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin J. FDA authorization of medical devices. JAMA 311(4), 435–435 (2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goo B, Hong C-H, Park K. 4D printing using anisotropic thermal deformation of 3D-printed thermoplastic parts. Mater. Des. 188, 108485 (2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer B, Köhler G, Rasmussen S. Simulation and dynamics of entropy-driven, molecular self-assembly processes. Phys. Rev. E 55(4), 4489 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongaonkar AV, Metkar RM. Reconstruction of damaged parts by integration reverse engineering (RE) and rapid prototyping (RP). In: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Kumar LJ, Pandey PM, Wimpenny DI ( Eds). Springer, Singapore, 159–171 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Sachs E, Cima M, Cornie J. Three dimensional printing: rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a CAD model. CIRP Ann. 39(1), 201–204 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Chung S, Song SE, Cho YT. Effective software solutions for 4D printing: a review and proposal. Int. J. Pr. Eng. Man. GT 4(3), 359–371 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morouço P, Lattanzi W, Alves N. Four-dimensional bioprinting as a new era for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 5, 61 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regar E, Sianos G, Serruys P. Stent development and local drug delivery. Br. Med. Bull. 59(1), 227–248 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baek JY, Rha SW, Choi BG et al. The angiography-guided spot versus entire stenting in patients with long coronary lesions trial: study design and rationale for a randomized controlled trial protocol. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 17, 100523 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal C, Vince K, Hodgson M. Biodegradable surgical implants based on magnesium alloys – a review of current research. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 4, 012011 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Morrison RJ, Kashlan KN, Flanangan CL et al. Regulatory considerations in the design and manufacturing of implantable 3D-printed medical devices. Clin. Transl. Sci. 8(5), 594–600 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao S, Castro N, Nowicki M et al. 4D printing of polymeric materials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater. Today 20(10), 577–591 (2017).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemán J, Chadwick AV, He J et al. Definitions of terms relating to the structure and processing of sols, gels, networks, and inorganic-organic hybrid materials (IUPAC Recommendations 2007). Pure Appl. Chem. 79(10), 1801–1829 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid M, Haleem A. 4D printing applications in medical field: a brief review. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 7(3), 317–321 (2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An J, Teoh JEM, Suntornnond R, Chua CK. Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues. Engineering 1(2), 261–268 (2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas SM, Bachelet I, Church GM. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335(6070), 831–834 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrahari V, Agrahari V, Chou M-L, Chew CH, Noll J, Burnouf T. Intelligent micro-/nanorobots as drug and cell carrier devices for biomedical therapeutic advancement: promising development opportunities and translational challenges. Biomaterials 260, 120163 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Zhang P, Liu Y, Lv L, Zhou Y. Four-dimensional bioprinting: current developments and applications in bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 101, 26–42 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandon C, Blum L, Marquette C. Adding biomolecular recognition capability to 3D printed objects: 4D printing. Proc. Technol. 27, 1–2 (2017).
   Google Scholar