https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4227-999X
References
- Liu X, Song N, Qian D et al. Porous inorganic materials for bioanalysis and diagnostic applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00733 (2021) ( Epub ahead of print).
- Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 87(9–10), 1051–1069 (2015).
- Cai G, Yan P, Zhang L, Zhou H-C, Jiang H-L. Metal–organic framework-based hierarchically porous materials: synthesis and applications. Chem. Rev. 121(20), 12278–12326 (2021).
- Limongi T, Susa F, Allione M, di Fabrizio E. Drug delivery applications of three-dimensional printed (3DP) mesoporous scaffolds. Pharmaceutics 12(9), 851 (2020).
- Schlumberger C, Thommes M. Characterization of hierarchically ordered porous materials by physisorption and mercury porosimetry – a tutorial review. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 8(4), 2002181 (2021).
- Klobes P, Meyer K, Munro RG. Porosity and Specific Surface Area Measurements for Solid Materials. NIST Recommended Practice Guide. (960th Edition). National Institute of Standards and Technology, DC, USA (2006).
- Gregg SJ, Sing KSW. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity. (Second Edition). Academic Press, London, UK (1982).
- Bertier P, Schweinar K, Stanjek H et al. On the use and abuse of N2 physisorption for the characterization of the pore structure of shales. In: The Clay Mineral Society Workshop Lectures Series (Volume 21. Chapter 12). The Clay Minerals Society, VA, USA, 151–161 (2016).
- Elshaer D, Moniruzzaman M, Ong YT et al. Facile synthesis of dendrimer like mesoporous silica nanoparticles to enhance targeted delivery of interleukin-22. Biomater. Sci. 9(22), 7402–7411 (2021).
- Witting M, Molina M, Obst K et al. Thermosensitive dendritic polyglycerol-based nanogels for cutaneous delivery of biomacromolecules. Nanomedicine 11(5), 1179–1187 (2015).
- Navarro L, Theune LE, Calderón M. Effect of crosslinking density on thermoresponsive nanogels: a study on the size control and the kinetics release of biomacromolecules. Eur. Polym. J. 124, 109478 (2020).
- Yan R, Ren J, Wen J et al. Enzyme therapeutic for ischemia and reperfusion injury in organ transplantation. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202105670 (2021) ( Epub ahead of print).
- Qin M, Cao Z, Wen J et al. An antioxidant enzyme therapeutic for COVID‐19. Adv.Mater. 32(43), 2004901 (2020).
- Beloqui A, Kobitski AY, Nienhaus GU, Delaittre G. A simple route to highly active single-enzyme nanogels. Chem. Sci. 9(4), 1006–1013 (2018).
- Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24), 2529–2543 (2000).
- Di Luca A, Lorenzo-Moldero I, Mota C et al. Tuning cell differentiation into a 3D scaffold presenting a pore shape gradient for osteochondral regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5(14), 1753–1763 (2016).
- Walthers CM, Nazemi AK, Patel SL, Wu BM, Dunn JCY. The effect of scaffold macroporosity on angiogenesis and cell survival in tissue-engineered smooth muscle. Biomaterials 35(19), 5129–5137 (2014).
- Iturriaga L, Van Gordon KD, Larrañaga-Jaurrieta G, Camarero‐Espinosa S. Strategies to introduce topographical and structural cues in 3D‐printed scaffolds and implications in tissue regeneration. Adv. NanoBiomed Res. 1(12), 2100068 (2021).
- Pinelli F, Ortolà ÓF, Makvandi P, Perale G, Rossi F. In vivo drug delivery applications of nanogels: a review. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 15(27), 2707–2727 (2020).
- Rodriguez-Abetxuko A, Sánchez-deAlcázar D, Muñumer P, Beloqui A. Tunable polymeric scaffolds for enzyme immobilization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 830 (2020).
- Echeverria Molina MI, Malollari KG, Komvopoulos K. Design challenges in polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 617141 (2021).