References
- Jinek M , ChylinskiK , FonfaraI , HauerM , DoudnaJA , CharpentierE . A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity . Science337 ( 6096 ), 816 – 821 ( 2012 ).
- Park CY , KimDH , SonJSet al. Functional correction of large factor VIII gene chromosomal inversions in hemophilia A patient-derived iPSCs using CRISPR-Cas9 . Cell Stem Cell17 ( 2 ), 213 – 220 ( 2015 ).
- Yin H , XueW , ChenSet al. Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype . Nat. Biotechnol.32 ( 6 ), 551 – 553 ( 2014 ).
- Gratz SJ , UkkenFP , RubinsteinCDet al. Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in Drosophila . Genetics196 ( 4 ), 961 – 971 ( 2014 ).
- Chu VT , WeberT , WefersBet al. Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells . Nat. Biotechnol.33 ( 5 ), 543 – 548 ( 2015 ).
- Richardson CD , RayGJ , DeWittMA , CurieGL , CornJE . Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR-Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA . Nat. Biotechnol.34 ( 3 ), 339 – 344 ( 2016 ).
- Ran FA , CongL , YanWXet al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 . Nature520 ( 7546 ), 186 – 191 ( 2016 ).
- Zhang F , SanjanaNE , WrightJet al. High-resolution interrogation of functional elements in the noncoding genome . bioRxiv doi:10.1101/049130 ( 2016 ) ( Epub ahead of print ).
- Kleinstiver BP , PattanayakV , PrewMSet al. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects . Nature529 ( 7587 ), 490 – 495 ( 2016 ).
- Komor AC , KimYB , PackerMS , ZurisJA , LiuDR . Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage . Nature533 ( 7603 ), 420 – 424 ( 2016 ).
- Zetsche B , GootenbergJS , AbudayyehOOet al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system . Cell163 ( 3 ), 759 – 771 ( 2015 ).
- Doench JG , FusiN , SullenderMet al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 . Nat. Biotechnol.34 ( 2 ), 184 – 191 ( 2016 ).
- Chari R , MaliP , MoosburnerM , ChurchGM . Unraveling CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach . Nat. Methods12 ( 9 ), 823 – 826 ( 2015 ).
- Xu H , XiaoT , ChenCHet al. Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design . Genome Res.25 ( 8 ), 1147 – 1157 ( 2015 ).
- Hsu PD , ScottDA , WeinsteinJAet al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases . Nat. Biotechnol.31 ( 9 ), 827 – 832 ( 2013 ).
- Vouillot L , ThélieA , PolletN . Comparison of T7E1 and surveyor mismatch cleavage assays to detect mutations triggered by engineered nucleases . G3 (Bethesda)5 ( 3 ), 407 – 415 ( 2015 ).
- Fu Y , FodenJA , KhayterCet al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells . Nat. Biotechnol.31 ( 9 ), 822 – 826 ( 2013 ).
- Bell CC , MagorGW , GillinderKR , PerkinsAC . A high-throughput screening strategy for detecting CRISPR-Cas9 induced mutations using next-generation sequencing . BMC. Genomics.15 ( 1 ), 1 – 7 ( 2014 ).