Bringing personalized medicine to the community through public engagement

• Collins F . The Language of Life: DNA and the Revolution in Personalized Medicine. Harper Collins, New York, NY, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg G , WillardH. Genomic and personalized medicine: foundations and applications. Trans. Res.154(6) , 277–287 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Manolio T , ChisholmR, OzenbergerB et al. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet. Med. 15(4) , 258–267 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salari K , WatkinsH, AshleyE. Personalized medicine: hope or hype? Eur. Heart J.33 , 1564–1570 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen JA , SteffenJS. Driving forces behind the past and future emergence of personalized medicine. J. Pers. Med.3 , 14–22 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guttmacher A , McGuireA, PonderB, StefanssonK. Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine. Nat. Rev. Genet.11(2) , 161–165 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence J . Getting personal: the promises and pitfalls of personalized medicine. Tran. Res.154(6) , 269–271 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnette R , SimmonsLA, SnydermanR. Personalized healthcare as a pathway for the adoption of genomic medicine. J. Pers. Med.2 , 232–240 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reydon T , KampourakisK, PatrinosG. Genetics, genomics and society: the responsibilities of scientists for science communication and education. Per. Med.9(6) , 633–643 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride C , BowenD, BrodyL et al. Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral and social sciences research. Am. J. Prev. Med. 38 , 556–565 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn S , LetvakS, PowellK et al. A community‘s awareness and perceptions of genomic medicine. Public Health Genomics 13 , 63–71 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haga S , BarryW, MillsR et al. Public knowledge and attitudes towards genetics and genetic testing. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers 17(4) , 327–335 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke A , WolfW, Herbert-BeirneJ, SmithM. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics13 , 368–377 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess M , O‘DohertyK, SeckoD. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.Per. Med.5(3) , 285–296 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman D , MurphyJ, ErbyL et al. Veterans‘ attitudes regarding a database for genomic research. Genet. Med. 11 , 329–337 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuner M , SieverdingP, ShekelleP. Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult disease: a systematic review. JAMA299 , 1320–1334 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey A . Opinion leaders‘ views on issues in personalized medicine. Per. Med.9(2) , 127–131 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth S , HopkinsM, FaulknerA. Personalized medicine: renewing the social science research agenda. Per. Med.9(2) , 121–126 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juengst E , FlattM, SetterstenR. Personalized genomic medicine and the rhetoric of empowerment. Hastings Cent. Rep.42(5) , 34–40 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafzadeh M , DavisJ, JoshiP, MarraC. Barriers for integrating personalized medicine into clinical practice: a qualitative analysis. Am. J. Med. Genet.9999(Pt A) , 1–6 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Blacksher E . Participatory and deliberative practices in health: meanings, distinctions, and implications for health equity. J. Public Deliber.9(1) , Article 6 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hurle B , CitrinT, JenkinsJ et al. What does it mean to be genomically literate? National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report. Genet. Med. 15(8) , 658–663 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess M , O‘DohertyK, SeckoD. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement. Per. Med.5(3) , 285–296 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Doherty K , HawkinsA. Structuring public engagment for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking. Public Health Genomics13 , 197–206 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daudelin G , LehouxP, AbelsonJ et al. The integration of citizens into a science/policy network in genetics: governance arrangements and asymmetry in expertise. Health Expect. 14 , 261–271 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attree P , FrenchB, PovallS, WhiteheadM, PopayJ. The experience of community engagement for individuals: a rapid review of evidence. Health Soc. Care Community19(3) , 250–260 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popay J . Community empowerment and health improvement. In: Health Assets in a Global Context: Theory Methods Action. Morgan A, Davies M, Ziglio E (Eds). Springer, NY, USA 245–276 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Webler T , TulerS. Unlocking the puzzle of public participation. Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc.22(3) , 179–189 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Rowe G , FrewerL. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci. Tech. Hum. Values30(2) , 251–290 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelson J , BlacksherE, BoesveldS, Goolds. Public deliberation in health policy and bioethics: mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field. J. Public Deliber.9(1) , Article 5 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Blacksher E , DiebelA, ForestPG, GooldS, AbelsonJ. What is public deliberation? Hastings Cent. Rep.42(2) , 14–17 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe G , FrewerL. Evaluating public participation exercises: a research agenda. Sci. Tech. Hum. Values29(4) , 512–556 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbar A , AbelsonJ. Development of a framework for effective community engagement in Ontario, Canada. Health Pol.101 , 59–69 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longstaff H , BurgessM. Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks. Public Underst. Sci.19(2) , 212–224 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe G , Horlick-JonesT, WallsJ, PidgeonN. Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops. Public Underst. Sci.14 , 331–352 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einsiedal E . Assessing a controversial medical technology: Canadian public consultations on xenotransplantation. Public Underst. Sci.11 , 315–331 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Doherty K , EinsiedelE. Public Engagement and Emerging Technologies. UBC Press, British Columbia, Canada (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman D , MurphyJ, ScottJ et al. Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet. Med. 10 , 831–839 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman D , MurphyJ, ErbyL et al. Veterans‘ attitudes regarding a database for genomic research. Genet. Med. 11 , 329–337 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godard B , MarshallJ, LabergeC. Community engagement in genetics research: results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARGaGENE project. Community Genet.10 , 147–158 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoeyer K , OlofssonB, MjorndalT et al. Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scand. J. Public Health 32 , 224–229 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddow G , Cunningham Burley S, Bruce A, Parry S. Generation Scotland: consulting publics and specialists at an early stage in a genetic database‘s developent. Crit. Pub. Health18(2) , 139–149 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rotimi C , LeppertM, MatsudaI et al. The International HapMap Consortium. Community engagement and informed consent in the International HapMap Project. Community Genet. 10 , 186–198 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemke A , WuJ, WaudbyC, PulleyJ, SomkinC, TrinidadS. Community engagement in biobanking: Experiences from the eMERGE network. Genomics Soc. Policy6(3) , 35–52 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Etchegary H , DicksE, HodgkinsonK, PullmanD, GreenJ, ParfreyP. Public attitudes about genetic testing in the newborn period. J. Obstet. Gyne. Neonatal Nursing41(2) , 191–200 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etchegary H , GreenJ, DicksE, PullmanD, StreetC, ParfreyP. Consulting the community: public expectations and attitudes about genetics research. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.64 (2013) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pullman D , EtchegaryH, GallagherK et al. Personal privacy, public benefits, and biobanks: a conjoint analysis of policy priorities and public perceptions. Genet. Med. 14(2) , 229–235 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C , StackhouseR, ShawA, IredaleR. The National DNA database on trial: engaging young people in South Wales with genetics. Public Underst. Sci.20(2) , 146–162 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Daniel J , RosanbalmK, BolesL, TindallG, LivingstonT, HagaS. Enhancing geneticists‘ perspectives of the public through community engagement. Genet. Med.14(2) , 243–249 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornel MC , van El C, Borry P. The challenge of implementing genetic tests with clinical utility while avoiding unsound applications. J. Comm. Genet. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0121-0121 (2012) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Haga S , KhouryM, BurkeW. Genomic profiling to promote a healthy lifestyle: not ready for prime time. Nat. Genet.34(4) , 347–350 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury M . Dealing with the evidence dilemma in genomics and personalized medicine. Clin. Pharma. Therap.87(6) , 635–638 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marris C , RoseN. Open engagement: Exploring public participation in the biosciences. PLoS Bio.8(11) , e1000549 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodolfo V , YoonP, QureshiN, GreenR, KhouryM. Family history in public health practice: a genomic tool for disease prevention and health promotion. Ann. Rev. Pub. Health31 , 69–87 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra D , PiperM, HaddowJ et al. Improving the efficiency and relevance of evidence-based recommendations in the era of whole-genome sequencing: an EGAPP methods update. Genet. Med. 15(1) , 14–24 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie I , NewtonN, WelnerS, CowellW, LipG. Underuse of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am. J. Med.123 , 638–645 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf S . The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA299(2) , 211–213 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auffray C , CaufieldT, KhouryM, LupskiJ, SchwabM, VeenstraT. Genome medicine: past, present and future. Gen. Med.3(6) , 1–5 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• McGuire A , BeskowL. Informed consent in genomics and genetics research. Ann. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.11 , 361–381 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke L , Zheng-BradleyX, SmithR et al. The 1000 Genomes Project: data management and community access. Nat. Methods 9(5) , 459–462 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai Y , KoromilaT, SagiaA et al. A critical view of the general public‘s awareness and physicians‘ opinion of the trends and potential pitfalls of genetic testing in Greece. Per. Med. 8(5) , 551–561 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makeeva O , MarkovaV, RosesA, PuzyrevV. An epidemiologic-based survey of public attitudes towards predictive genetic testing in Russia. Per. Med.7(3) , 291–300 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Websites

• Zhu C. Community Engagement: a summary of theoretical concepts (2011). www.albertahealthservices.ca/poph/hi-poph-surv-comm-phids-engage-concepts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Human Genome Research Institute. Community Genetics Forum (2007). www.genome.gov/19518473
   Google Scholar