A Pre- and Post-Implantable Pain Device Procedure Assessment Model: Psychiatric Symptoms, Functioning, and Goals

References

• Turk DC , OkifujiA. Psychological factors in chronic pain: Evolution and revolution, J. Consult. and Clin. Psychology70(3), 678–690 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskin DJ , RichardP. The Economic Costs of Pain in the United States.National Academies Press (US), 2011. [ Online]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92521/ (Accessed: Jan.11, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Nahin RL . Severe Pain in Veterans: The Impact of Age and Sex, and Comparisons to the General Population. J Pain18(3), 247–254 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell D , HaegerichTM , ChouR. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016. JAMA315(15), 1624–1645 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmond SN et al. Project STEP: Implementing the Veterans Health Administration’s Stepped Care Model of Pain Management. Pain Med19(Suppl. 1), S30–S37 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tieppo Francio V , PolstonKF , MurphyMT , HagedornJM , SayedD. Management of Chronic and Neuropathic Pain with 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Technology: Summary of Findings from Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Biomedicines9(6), 6 (2021).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchikanti L et al. Spinal Cord Stimulation Trends of Utilization and Expenditures in Fee-For-Service (FFS) Medicare Population from 2009 to 2018. Pain Physician24(5), 293–308 (Aug. 2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama CA et al. The Use of Preoperative Psychological Evaluations to Predict Spinal Cord Stimulation Success: Our Experience and a Review of the Literature. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface19(4), 429–436 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RS , DesaiMJ , RigoardP , TaylorRJ. Predictors of Pain Relief Following Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Back and Leg Pain and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Pain Practice14(6), 489–505 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odonkor CA . Fantastic Four: Age, Spinal Cord StimulatorWaveform, Pain Localization and History of SpineSurgery Influence the Odds of Successful SpinalCord Stimulator Trial. Pain Phys1;23(1;1), E19–E30 (2020).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giordano N , LoflandK. A literature review of psychological predictors of spinal cord stimulator outcomes. J. Pain6(3), S67 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grinberg AM , D’EonMS , EllisonJK , RutledgeT , CastellanosJ , ChakravarthyKV. A revised psychosocial assessment model for implantable pain devices to improve their evidence basis and consensus with updated pain management guidelines. Pain Manag9(2), 139–149 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparkes E , RaphaelJH , DuarteRV , LeMarchandK , JacksonC , AshfordRL. A systematic literature review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation therapy. Pain150(2), 284–289 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson M . Psychological factors as predictors of outcomes in Spinal Cord Stimulation. ACC Research: Evidence-based Healthcare Review1–46 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Gould HM , D’EonMS , GrinbergAM , ChakravarthyKV , CastellanosJ , RutledgeT. Psychosocial characteristics of candidates for implantable pain devices: validation of an assessment model. Pain Management11(2), 159–172 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas MK . The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account. European Journal of Pain11(2), 153–163 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis CE , KyleBN , ThorpJ , WuQ , FirnhaberJ. Comparison of pain, functioning, coping, and psychological distress in patients with chronic low back pain evaluated for spinal cord stimulator implant or behavioral pain management. Pain Med16(4), 753–760 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN , WashingtonTA , FanciulloGJ , RossEL , McHugoGJ , BairdJC. Do Implantable Devices Improve Mood? Comparisons of Chronic Pain Patients With or Without an Implantable Device. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface11(4), 260–266 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders JB , AaslandOG , BaborTF , dela Fuente JR , GrantM. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption–II. Addiction88(6), 791–804 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner HA . The drug abuse screening test. Addictive Behaviors7(4), 363–371 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams N . The GAD-7 questionnaire. Occupational Medicine64(3), 224–224 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer RL , KroenkeK , WilliamsJBW , LöweB. A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine166(10), 1092–1097 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard CA . Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Mot Skills59(3), 974 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M , BishopS , PivikJ. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment7, 524–532 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K , SpitzerRL , WilliamsJB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med16(9), 606–613 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke K , SpitzerRL , WilliamsJBW. The PHQ-15: Validity of a New Measure for Evaluating the Severity of Somatic Symptoms. Psychosomatic Medicine64(2), 258–266 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs EE et al. Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference. J Gen Intern Med24(6), 733–738 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buysse DJ , ReynoldsCF , MonkTH , BermanSR , KupferDJ. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research28(2), 193–213 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D , ClarkLA , TellegenA. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol54(6), 1063–1070 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howland M , TatsuokaC , SmythKA , SajatovicM. Detecting Change over Time: A Comparison of the SLUMS Examination and the MMSE in Older Adults at Risk for Cognitive Decline. CNS Neurosci Ther22(5), 413–419 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson DA , BurtonDB , ParkerJD , GoddingPR. A confirmatory factor analysis of the cognitive capacity screening examination in a clinical sample. Int J Neurosci111(3–4), 221–233 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R . Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Science Research Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, 1984, 148 pp. Educational Researcher15(8), 18–20 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Longo UG et al. Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in Patients Who Underwent Rotator Cuff Tear Repair. Int J Environ Res Public Health18(16), 8666 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer-Staeb C et al. Effective dose 50 method as the minimal clinically important difference: Evidence from depression trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology137, 200–208 (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahreini M , SafaieA , MirfazaelianH , JaliliM. How much change in pain score does really matter to patients?The American Journal of Emergency Medicine38(8), 1641–1646 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beemster T , van BennekomC , van VelzenJ , RenemanM , Frings-DresenM. The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent. Health Qual Life Outcomes16(1), 1 (2018).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Hecke O , TorranceN , SmithBH. Chronic pain epidemiology and its clinical relevance. Br J Anaesth111(1), 13–18 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar