Mending the Gaps: Ethically Sensitive Cells and The Evolution of European Stem Cell Policy

References

• Landeweerd L , TownendD , MesmanJ , HoyweghenIV. Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: a contribution to ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’. Life Sci. Soc. Policy11(8), (2015). https://lsspjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40504-015-0026-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) . Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation (2021). www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/all-isscr-guidelines/2021-guidelines/isscr-guidelines-for-stem-cell-research-and-clinical-translation-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=979d58b1_4
   Google Scholar
• Baylis F . ISSCR guidelines fudge heritable human-genome editing. Nature594(7863), 333 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein R . Controversial new guidelines would allow experiments on more mature human embryos. National Public Radio. (2021). www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/05/26/1000126212/new-guidelines-would-allow-experiments-on-more-mature-human-embryos
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . “Horizon Europe: research and innovation funding programme until 2027. How to get funding, programme structure, missions, European partnerships, news and events”. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en (Accessed 13 Dec. 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine. Oviedo, 1997 Apr. 04. www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=164
   Google Scholar
• Estonia – artificial insemination and embryo protection act (1997). www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/1048155?leiaKehtiv
   Google Scholar
• Greece – law on application of medically assisted reproduction (2005). www.kodiko.gr/nomothesia/document/164338/nomos-3305-2005
   Google Scholar
• Additional protocol to the convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine, on the prohibition of cloning human beings (ETS No. 168). Paris, 1998 Dec. 1. https://rm.coe.int/168007f2ca
   Google Scholar
• Busardò FP , GulinoM , NapoletanoS , ZaamiS , FratiP. The evolution of legislation in the field of medically assisted reproduction and embryo stem cell research in European union members. Biomed. Res. Int.2014 (2014). www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/307160/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithuania – Law on ethics of biomedical research (2000). https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/7aa28cc261bb11e5b316b7e07d98304b
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands – Embryo Law (2002). https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0013797/2021-07-01
   Google Scholar
• Isasi RM , KnoppersBM. Beyond the permissibility of embryonic and stem cell research: substantive requirements and procedural safeguards. Hum. Reprod.21(10), 2474–2481 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isasi R , KnoppersBM. Toward commonality? Policy approaches to human embryonic stem cell research in Europe. In: Embryonic Stem Cell Patents: European Patent Law and Ethics.TorremansP, PlomerA ( Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 29–56 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission, ‘Recommendations on the Ethical Review of hESC FP7 Research Projects: Opinion No. 22’ (June 20, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Beings (ETS No. 168). Paris, 1998 Dec. 1. https://rm.coe.int/168007f2ca
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda E . The next frontier for human embryo research. Nature597, S15–S17 (2021).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munsie M , HyunI , SugarmanJ. Ethical issues in human organoid and gastruloid research. Development144(6), 942–945 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan T , WuJ , SiCet al. Chimeric contribution of human extended pluripotent stem cells to monkey embryos ex vivo. Cell184(8), 2020–2032.e14 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews KRW , IltisAS , MarquezNGet al. Rethinking human embryo research policies. Hastings Cent. Rep.51(1), 47–51 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Y , TaniguchiK , TownshendRF , MikiT , GumucioDL , FuJ. A pluripotent stem cell-based model for post-implantation human amniotic sac development. Nat. Commun.8(1), (2017). www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-00236-w
   Google Scholar
• Haremaki T , MetzgerJJ , RitoT , OzairMZ , EtocF , BrivanlouAH. Self-organizing neuruloids model developmental aspects of Huntington’s disease in the ectodermal compartment. Nat. Biotechnol.37(10), 1198–1208 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brink SC , van OudenaardenA. 3D gastruloids: a novel frontier in stem cell-based in vitro modeling of mammalian gastrulation. Trends Cell Biol.31(9), 747–759 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossant J , TamPPL. Opportunities and challenges with stem cell-based embryo models. Stem Cell Reports16(5), 1031–1038 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulgaria – Health law (2004). www.lex.bg/laws/ldoc/2135489147
   Google Scholar
• Iceland – Act on artificial insemination and the use of human gametes and embryos for stem cell research (1996). www.althingi.is/lagas/nuna/1996055.html
   Google Scholar
• Slovenia – Law on the treatment of infertility and biomedical assistance procedures (2000). http://pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO2518
   Google Scholar
• Spain – Law on biomedical research (2007). www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2007-12945#:~:text=Esta%20Ley%20tiene%20por%20objeto,humana%20que%20impliquen%20procedimientos%20invasivos
   Google Scholar
• Belgium – Law relating to research on embryos in vitro (2003). www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/loi/2003/05/11/2003022592/justel
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands – Embryo law (2002). https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0013797/2021-07-01
   Google Scholar
• Malta – Embryo protection act (2007). https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/524/20181001/eng
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom – Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 explanatory notes (2008). www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/notes
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom – Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (1990). www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/37
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom – Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (2008). www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22
   Google Scholar
• McCracken J . Review of the human fertilization & embryology authority and the human tissue authority. 2013 Apr. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216947/Justin_McCracken_report_of_review_of_HFEA_and_HTA.pdf (Accessed 2021Dec. 14).
   Google Scholar
• Additional protocol to the convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine, on the prohibition of cloning human beings (ETS No. 168). Paris, 1998 Dec. 1. https://rm.coe.int/168007f2ca
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom – Human Fertilization and Embryology Act (1990). www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/37
   Google Scholar
• Sweden – Genetic Integrity Act (2006). www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2006351-om-genetisk-integritet-mm_sfs-2006-351
   Google Scholar
• Belgium – Law relating to research on embryos in vitro (2003). www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/loi/2003/05/11/2003022592/justel
   Google Scholar
• Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Oviedo, 1997 Apr. 04. www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=164
   Google Scholar
• Blackshaw BP , RodgerD. Why we should not extend the 14-day rule. Journal of Medical Ethics47, 712–714 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun I , WilkersonA , JohnstonJ. Embryology policy: Revisit the 14-day rule. Nature533, 169–171 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cyprus – Law on the Implementation of Medically Assisted Reproduction (2015). www.cylaw.org/nomoi/enop/non-ind/2015_1_69/full.html
   Google Scholar
• Portugal – Law on Medically Assisted Procreation (2006). https://dre.pt/dre/legislacao-consolidada/lei/2006-34529775
   Google Scholar
• Switzerland – Federal Act on Research on Embryonic Stem Cells (2011). www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2005/104/de
   Google Scholar
• CHIMBRIDS – Chimeras and Hybrids in Comparative European and International Research – Scientific, Ethical, Philosophical and Legal Aspects. Taupitz J , WeschkaM. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (2009).
   Google Scholar
• France – Law relating to the donation and use of elements and products of the human body, medically assisted procreation and prenatal diagnosis (1994). www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000000549618
   Google Scholar
• France – Law relating to bioethics (2004). www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000441469/
   Google Scholar
• France – Law on bioethics (2011). www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000024323102/
   Google Scholar
• French National Consultative Ethics Committee for Life and Health Sciences . An ethical reflection on research on cells of human embryonic origin, and research on the human embryo in vitro, Paris, 2010 Oct. www.cfef.org/archives/bricabrac/avis112.pdf
   Google Scholar
• France – Law n 2021-1017 of August 2, 2021 relating to bioethics (2021). www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000043884384
   Google Scholar
• Denmark- Act amending the Act on artificial insemination in connection with medical treatment, diagnostics and research, etc. (Research on embryonic stem cells) (2003). www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2003/427
   Google Scholar
• Norway – Act amending the Biotechnology Act (pre-implantation diagnostics and research on redundant fertilized eggs) (2007). https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/lov/2007-06-15-31
   Google Scholar
• Iceland – Act amending Act no. 55/1996, on artificial insemination, with subsequent amendments (2008). www.althingi.is/altext/stjt/2008.054.html
   Google Scholar
• Spain – Law on Biomedical Research (2007). www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2007-12945#:~:text=Esta%20Ley%20tiene%20por%20objeto,humana%20que%20impliquen%20procedimientos%20invasivos
   Google Scholar
• Iceland – Act amending Act no. 55/1996, on artificial insemination, with subsequent amendments (2008). www.althingi.is/altext/stjt/2008.054.html
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom – Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (2008). www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22
   Google Scholar
• German Reference Center for Ethics in the Biosciences. II. Selected national and international laws and regulations. www.drze.de/im-blickpunkt/stammzellen/gesetze-und-regelungen (Accessed 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Nations under God: How Churches Use Moral Authority to Influence Policy A1 – Grzymala-Busse, Anna M. PY – 2015 PB – Princeton University Press CY – Princeton SN – 9781400866458 UR – https://muse.jhu.edu/book/62410ER
   Google Scholar
• Lyons B . The Irish Council for Bioethics: An Unaffordable Luxury?Camb. Q Healthc Ethics21(3), 375–383 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough F . Deliberating or dithering? Ireland and human embryonic stem cell research. Eur. J. Health Law20(2), 145–165 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M.R. v T.R. [2009] IESC 82 www.courts.ie/Judgments.nsf/597645521f07ac9a80256ef30048ca52/0973cbd1fd5204028025768d003d60f7?
   Google Scholar
• Sivaraman MAF . Using Surplus Embryos and Research Embryos in Stem Cell Research: Ethical Viewpoints of Buddhist, Hindu and Catholic Leaders in Malaysia on the Permissibility of Research. Sci. Eng. Ethics24, 129–149 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrame L . The Italian Way to Stem Cell Research: Rethinking the Role of Catholic Religion in Shaping Italian Stem Cell Research Regulations. Dev. World Bioeth.17(3), 157–166 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasotti J , StaffordN. It’s legal: Italian researchers defend their work with embryonic stem cells. Nature442, 229 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler D . Vatican toughens stance on embryo research. Nature (2008). www.nature.com/articles/news.2008.1306
   Google Scholar
• https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/campaign-against-stem-cell-research-in-spain.94784
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) . Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation (2021). www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/all-isscr-guidelines/2021-guidelines/isscr-guidelines-for-stem-cell-research-and-clinical-translation-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=979d58b1_4
   Google Scholar
• Kimmelman J , HyunI , BenvenistyNet al. Policy: Global standards for stem-cell research. Nature533(7603), 311–313 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomax GP , HullSC , IsasiR. The DISCUSS Project: Revised Points to Consider for the Derivation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines From Previously Collected Research Specimens. Stem. Cells Transl Med.4(2), 123–129 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isasi R , KnoppersBM. Mind the gap: policy approaches to embryonic stem cell and cloning research in 50 countries. Eur. J. Health Law13(1), 9–25 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isasi R , NamoradoJ , MahN , BultjerN , KurtzA. A pathway for attesting ethical provenance of cell lines: Lessons from the European human pluripotent stem cell registry (hPSCreg). Stem. Cell Res.40 (2019). www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506119301692?via=ihub
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgium – In Vitro Embryo Research Act (2003). www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/loi/2003/05/11/2003022592/justel
   Google Scholar
• Greece – Law on Application of Medically Assisted Reproduction (2005). www.kodiko.gr/nomothesia/document/164338/nomos-3305-2005
   Google Scholar
• Hungary – Law on Health (1997). https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=99700154.tv
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro – Law on Treatment of Infertility with Assisted Reproductive Technologies (2009). www.gov.me/dokumenta/621c6f39-0ae4-4656-9406-657c6d2ded31
   Google Scholar
• North Macedonia – Law on Biomedical Assistance in Fertilization (2008). http://zdravstvo.gov.mk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/0-ZAKON-ZA-BIOMEDITSINSKO-POTPOMOGNATO-OPLODUVAN-E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Portugal – Law on Medically Assisted Procreation (2006). https://dre.pt/dre/legislacao-consolidada/lei/2006-34529775
   Google Scholar
• Slovenia – Law on the Treatment of Infertility and Biomedical Assistance Procedures (2000). http://pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO2518
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom – Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (1990). www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/37
   Google Scholar
• Cyprus – Law on the Implementation of Medically Assisted Reproduction (2015). www.cylaw.org/nomoi/enop/non-ind/2015_1_69/full.html
   Google Scholar
• Czechia – Act on Research on Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Related Activities (2006). www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2006-227
   Google Scholar
• France – Public Health Code (2021). www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006072665/
   Google Scholar
• Spain – Law on Biomedical Research (2007). www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2007-12945#:~:text=Esta%20Ley%20tiene%20por%20objeto,humana%20que%20impliquen%20procedimientos%20invasivos
   Google Scholar
• Switzerland – Stem Cell Research Act (2003). www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2005/104/de
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) . Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation (2016). www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/all-isscr-guidelines/guidelines-2016/isscr-guidelines-for-stem-cell-research-and-clinical-translationd67119731dff6ddbb37cff0000940c19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) . Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation (2021). www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/all-isscr-guidelines/2021-guidelines/isscr-guidelines-for-stem-cell-research-and-clinical-translation-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=979d58b1_4
   Google Scholar
• Dyer O . Swedish stem cell “pioneers” are found guilty of research misconduct. BMJ357, j1808 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Editorial retraction [retraction of: Cell Cycle. 2012 Jan 1;11(1):65–78]. Cell Cycle16(3), 296 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann S , StegmaierP , KonradK. The tentative governance of emerging science and technology – a conceptual introduction. Research Policy48(5), 1091–1097 (2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France – Law n 2021–1017 of August 2, 2021 relating to bioethics (2021). www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000043884384
   Google Scholar
• Germany – Stem Cell Act (2002). www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stzg/BJNR227700002.html
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands – Embryo Law (2002). https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0013797/2021-07-01
   Google Scholar
• French Parliamentary Office for the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Choices . Impact Study: Project of Law Relating to Bioethics. 2019 Jul. 23. https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/textes/l15b2187_etude-impact#_Toc14771040
   Google Scholar
• French Parliamentary Office for the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Choices . Impact Study: Project of Law Relating to Bioethics. 2019 Jul. 23. https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/textes/l15b2187_etude-impact#_Toc14771040
   Google Scholar
• French National Consultative Ethics Committee (CCNE) . Opinion no. 129: “Contribution of the National Consultative Committee of ethics to the revision of the law of bioethics”, p. 52. https://www.ccne-ethique.fr/sites/default/files/2021-02/avis_129_vf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• France – Law on Bioethics (2011). www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000024323102/
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands – Embryo Law (2002). https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0013797/2021-07-01
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands – Medical Ethics Note, no. 34990. 2018. Parliamentary paper, House of Representatives of the States General (2018). https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-34990-1
   Google Scholar
• Germany – Stem Cell Act (2002). www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stzg/BJNR227700002.html
   Google Scholar
• Germany – Ordinance on the Central Ethics Commission for Stem Cell Research and on the competent authority under the Stem Cell Act (2002). www.gesetze-im-internet.de/zesv/BJNR266300002.html
   Google Scholar
• Central Ethics Committee for Stem Cell Research. Report of the Central Ethics Committee for Stem Cell Research (ZES): 16th Report after the Enactment of the Stem Cell Act (StZG) for the Reporting Period 1 January to 31 December 2018 (2019). www.rki.de/EN/Content/Institute/Committees/StemCell/16th-ReportZES.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
   Google Scholar
• Germany – Ninth report by the federal government on the implementation of the Stem Cell Act (2021). https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/19/325/1932595.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Germany – Ethics Council Act (2007). www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ethrg/BJNR138500007.html
   Google Scholar
• German Ethics Council. Stem cell research – new challenges for the ban on cloning and treatment of artificially created germ cells? 2014 Sep. 15. www.domradio.de/sites/default/files/pdf/empfehlung-stammzellforschung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Queen on the application of (1) Quintavalle (2) CLC Claimant v Human fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA). England and Wales High Court. [2008] EWHC 3395 (Admin). www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2008/3395.html
   Google Scholar
• Mummery C , AnthonyE. New guidelines for embryo and stem cell research. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.22(12), 773–774 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adashi EY , CohenIG. Who will oversee the ethical limits of embryo research?Nat. Biotechnol.40, 463–464 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar