Trend Surfaces of American Agricultural Patterns: A Macro-Thünian Analysis

Literature Cited

• Abler, R., J. S. Adams, and P. Gould. Spatial Organization: The Geographer's View of the World. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Becht, J. E. A Geography of Transportation and Business Logistics. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown Company, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, M. Location Theory. New York: Random House, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, B. W. “Revolutions in American Agriculture,” Monthly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (June, 1972), pp. 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Blyn, G. “A Diagram for Demonstrating Certain Concepts in Economic Crop Geography,” The Professional Geographer, 12 (March, 1960), pp. 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burghardt, A. F. “The Relative Productivity of Differing Types of American Agriculture,” Journal of Geography, 69 (April, 1970), pp. 225–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casetti, E. and R. K. Semple. A Method for the Stepwise Separation of Spatial Trends. Ann Arbor: Michigan Inter-University Community of Mathematical Geographers, Discussion Paper No. 11, University of Michigan, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Census of Agriculture: 1964. Vol. I, Statistics for the State and Counties. Washington: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1965–1969.
   Google Scholar
• Chayes, F. “On Deciding Whether Trend Surfaces of Progressively Higher Order are Meaningful,” Geological Society of America, Bulletin, 81 (April, 1970), pp. 1273–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, M. Rural Settlement and Land Use: An Essay in Location. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, M. Rural Settlement and Land Use: An Essay in Location. 2nd rev. ed. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, M. “The Relevance of Von Thünen,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59 (June, 1969), p. 401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorley, R. J. and P. Haggett. “Trend-Surface Mapping in Geographical Research,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37 (1965), pp. 47–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffman, G. W. Corporations With Farming Operations. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service (Agric. Econ. Rpt. No. 209), U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, E. S., Jr. The Location of Agricultural Production. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht, T. H. “Der Standort der Landwirtschaftsweige in Nordamerika,” Landwirtschaftliche Jahrbücher, 12 (1883), pp. 459–509.
   Google Scholar
• Esler, J. E., P. F. Smith, and J. C. Davis. KWIKR8: A Fortran IV Program for Multiple Regression and Geologie Trend Analysis. Computer Contribution 28. Lawrence: State Geological Survey, University of Kansas, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Haggett, P. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London: Edward Arnold, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., ed. Von Thünen's Isolated State: An English Edition of “Der Isolierte Staat” by Johann Heinrich Von Thünen. Translated by C. M. Wartenberg. London: Pergamon Press, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Harshbarger, C. E. “Farm Firm Growth: Transition to an Industrialized Agriculture?” Monthly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (May, 1971), pp. 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J. F. “A Map of the Agricultural Implosion,” Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers, 2 (1970), pp. 68–71.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. “Locational Change in the Kentish Hop Industry and the Analysis of Land Use Patterns,” Readings in Economic Geography: The Location of Economic Activity. Edited by R. H. T. Smith, E. J. Taaffe, and L. J. King. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968, pp. 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. “Theoretical Concepts and the Analysis of Agricultural Land-Use Patterns in Geography,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 56 (June, 1966), pp. 361–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. “Models of the Evolution of Spatial Patterns in Human Geography,” Models in Geography. Edited by R. J. Chorley and P. Haggett. London: Methuen, 1967, pp. 549–608.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, E. M. An Introduction to Regional Economics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, R. J. “Von Thünen and Urban Sprawl,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57 (December, 1967), pp. 811–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, R. J. “Von Thünen's Isolated State and the Area Around Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59 (June, 1969), pp. 308–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isard, W. Location and Space-Economy: A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Jonasson, O. “Agricultural Regions of Europe,” Economic Geography, 1 (October, 1925), pp. 277–314.
   Google Scholar
• Jumper, S. R. “The Fresh Vegetable Industry in the U.S.A.: An Example of Dynamic Interregional Dependency,” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 60 (September-October, 1969), pp. 308–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L. J. Statistical Analysis in Geography. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• King, L. J. “The Analysis of Spatial Form and Its Relation to Geographic Theory,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59 (September, 1969), pp. 573–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, O. E. Cropland Trends Since World War II: Regional Changes in Acreage and Use. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service (Agric. Econ. Rpt. No. 177), U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Krumbein, W. C. and F. A. Graybill. An Introduction to Statistical Models in Geology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. A. “The Spatial Properties of Population Mobility Within Puerto Rico,” Journal of Tropical Geography, 29 (December, 1969), pp. 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. The Economics of Location. Translated by W. H. Woglom and W. F. Stolper. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano, E. E. Location and Regions: Agricultural Land Use in an Integrated Economy. Geography and the Properties of Surface Series, Paper No. 12. Cambridge: Laboratory for Computer Graphics, Harvard University, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, G. T. Trend Surface Analysis of Farm Size Patterns in Ontario and Quebec, 1951–1961. Research Report No. 8. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, P. J. Economies of Size in Farming. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service (Agric. Econ. Rpt. No. 107), U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, P. I. and L. J. Tweeten. The Location of Cotton Production in the United States Under Competitive Conditions: A Methodological Development in the Study of Crop Location and Comparative Advantage. Mimeographed. Palo Alto: Food Research Institute, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Melamid, A. “Some Applications of Thünen's Model in Regional Analysis of Economic Growth,” Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 1 (1955), pp. L1–L5.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. G. and D. J. Old. “Some Comments on the Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of a Population Potential Surface,” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 62 (January-February, 1971), pp. 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrill, R. L. The Spatial Organization of Society. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, P. O. “Further Thoughts on Thünian Analysis,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 60 (September, 1970), pp. 601–02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, P. O. “Thünian Analysis at the Macro-Scale: A Trend Surface Analysis of the Spatial Organization of American Agriculture.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolitch, R. Our 31,000 Largest Farms. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service (Agric. Econ. Rpt. No. 175), U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Norcliffe, G. B. “On the Use and Limitations of Trend Surface Models,” Canadian Geographer, 13 (1969), pp. 338–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, J. R. “The Present Pertinence of Von Thünen Theory,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57 (December, 1967), pp. 810–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, J. R. “The Spatial Expansion of Commercial Agriculture in the Nineteenth Century: A Theoretical Analysis of British Import Zones and the Movement of Farming into the Interior United States.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, J. R. “The Spatial Expansion of Commercial Agriculture in the Nineteenth Century: A Von Thünen Interpretation,” Economic Geography, 45 (October, 1969), pp. 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pred, A. Behavior and Location: Foundations for a Geographic and Dynamic Location Theory, Part I. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, Human Geography, No. 27 (1967).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. “Some Comments on Trend Surface Analysis,” Area, 2 (1970), pp. 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, J. “Agricultural Geography as a Discipline: A Suggested Conceptual Foundation for University Coursework,” Jerusalem Studies in Geography, 1 (1970), pp. 37–105.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, J., M. I. Logan, and G. J. Missen. New Viewpoints in Economic Geography. Sydney, Australia: Martindale Press, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Schlebecker, J. T. “The World Metropolis and the History of American Agriculture,” Journal of Economic History, 20 (June, 1960), pp. 187–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, R. “Von Thünen and Urban Sprawl,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57 (March, 1967), pp. 72–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, R. “Comment in Reply,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57 (December, 1967), pp. 812–15.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, J. E. and R. J. Horvath. “How Does an Agricultural Region Originate?,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 53 (March, 1963), pp. 74–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swackhamer, G. L. “The Growth of Corporate Farming,” Monthly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (May, 1968), pp. 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant, J. R. “Some Spatial Variations in Irish Agriculture,” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 60 (July-August, 1969), pp. 228–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinkler, K. J. “Trend Surfaces With Low ‘Explanations’: The Assessment of Their Significance,” American Journal of Science, 267 (January, 1969), pp. 114–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. “Geographical Filters and Their Inverses,” Geographical Analysis, 1 (July, 1969), pp. 234–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R., ed. “GEOFIT,” Michigan Geographical Publications, 1 (1970), pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, E. L. “The Role of Transportation and the Bases for Interaction,” Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Edited by W. L. Thomas, Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956, pp. 862–80.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, D. J. “Percentage RSS in Trend Surface Analysis,” Area, 1 (1970), pp. 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Yeates, M. H. “The Use of Trend Surface Analysis in Geography,” Quantitative Methods in Geography—A Symposium. Edited by A. Getis and G. W. Carey. Mimeographed and Offset Publication No. 6. New York: American Geographical Society, 1969.
   Google Scholar