Some Equilibrium Models of Consumer Behavior

Literature Cited

• Arrow, K. J. and L. Hurwicz. “On the Stability of the Competitive Equilibrium I and II,” Econometrica, 26 (1958), pp. 522–54; and 27 (1959), pp. 82–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. and M. McManus. “A Note on Dynamic Stability,” Econometrica, 26 (1958), pp. 448–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., Bowers, and Crothers. An Introduction to Mathematical Learning Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, R. R. and F. Mosteller. Stochastic Models for Learning. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, E. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• Christaller, W. Central Places in Southern Germany. Translated by C. Baskin. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Enke, S. “Equilibrium Among Spatially Separated Markets: Solution by Electric Analog,” Econometrica, 19 (1951), pp. 4067.
   Google Scholar
• Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. E. and R. W. Pfouts. “Learning and Expectations in Dynamic Duopoly Behavior,” Behavioral Science, 7 (April, 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., et al. Conflict, Decision and Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Fetter, F. A. “The Economic Law of Market Areas.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 38 (1924).
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. “Conceptualizing The Market Decision Process,” Journal of Regional Science, 7 (Supplement) (Winter, 1967), pp. 239–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. and L. Brown. “Search, Learning, and the Market Decision Process,” Geografiska Annaler (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Gould, P. “Wheat on Kilimanjaro: the Perception of Choice within Game and Learning Model Frameworks,” General Systems Yearbook, 10 (1965), pp. 157–66.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, G. H., Jr. “A Theory of Market Behavior After Innovation,” Management Science, 10 (1964).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. “Behavioral Postulates and the Construction of Theory in Human Geography.” Department of Geography, Bristol University, Seminar Paper No. 6, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. “Stability in Competition,” Economic Journal, 39 (1929), pp. 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, D. “A Probabilistic Analysis of Shopping Center Trade Areas.” Land Economics (February, 1963), pp. 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hyson, W. P. and C. D. “The Economic Law of Market Areas,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 44 (1950), pp. 319–27.
   Google Scholar
• Isard, W. Location and Space Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Isard, W. and M. Dacey. “On the Projections of Individual Behavior Part I,” Journal of Regional Science, 4 (1962).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. L. and A. M. Cohen, “Experiments in Behavioral Economics: Siegel and Fourker Revisited,” Behavioral Science, 12 (September, 1967), pp. 353–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, L. J. “The Analysis of Spatial Form and its Relation to Geographic Theory,” Annals, Association of American Geographers, 59 (1969), pp. 573–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L. J. and R. G. Golledge. Bayesian Analysis and Models in Geographic Research. University of Iowa, Department of Geography, Discussion Paper No. 12, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P. “Behavioral Models for Analyzing Buyers,” Journal of Marketing, 29 (1965), pp. 37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P. “Mathematical Models of Individual Buyer Behavior,” Behavioral Science, 13 (1968), pp. 247–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehn, A. A. “A Model for Budget Advertising,” Mathematical Models and Methods in Marketing. Edited by F. M. Bass. Homewood, Ill.: L. D. Irwin, 1961. pp. 302–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lefeber, L. “General Equilibrium Analysis of Production, Transportation, and the Choice of Industrial Location,” Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 4 (1958), pp. 77–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. The Economics of Location. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial,” American Economic Review, 57 (1967), pp. 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayberry, J. P., J. N. Nash, and M. Shubek. “A Comparison of Treatments of a Duopoly Situation,” Econometrica, 21 (1953), pp. 141–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, E. and Lav. “A Model of Market Areas with Free Entry,” Journal of Political Economy (June, 1964), pp. 278–88.
   Google Scholar
• Pfouts, R. W. and C. E. Fergusen. “Learning and Expectations in Dynamic Duopoly Behavior,” Behavioral Science, 7 (1962), pp. 223–37.
   Google Scholar
• Pred, A. Behavior and Location: Foundations for a Geographic and Dynamic Location Theory, Part I. Lund Studies in Geography, Ser. B, Human Geography, No. 27 (1967).
   Google Scholar
• Pred, A. Behavior and Location: Foundations for a Geographic and Dynamic Location Theory, Part II. Lund Studies in Geography, Ser. B, Human Geography, No. 28 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Rumkel, P. J. and D. P. Peizer. “Two-Valued Orientation of Current Equilibrium Theory,” Behavioral Science, 13 (January, 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Smithies, A. and L. J. Savage. “A Dynamic Problem in Duopoly,” Econometrica, 13 (1940), pp. 130–43.
   Google Scholar
• Smithies, A. and L. J. Savage. “Optimum Location in Spatial Competition,” Journal of Political Economy, 44 (June, 1941), pp. 423–39.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, B. H. and C. A. Brackett. Industrial Location Bibliography. Philadelphia, Regional Science Research Institute, 1967.
   Google Scholar