Rights, Property, and Community

Literature Cited

• Ackerman, B. Private Property and the Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, E. Social Contract: Locke, Hume, and Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. “Taking Rights Seriously: Rawls' Utilitarianism and Land Compensation,” Urban Law and Policy, 3 (1980), pp. 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R. Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, W. Commentaries on the Laws of England, Ed. W. C. Jones. Baton Rouge: Claitor's Publishing, 1915.
   Google Scholar
• Branfman, E.J., B. I. Cohen, and D. M. Trubek. “Measuring the Invisible Wall: Land Use Controls and the Residential Patterns of the Poor,” Yale Law Journal, 82 (1973), pp. 483–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabresi, C. “About Law and Economics: A Letter to Ronald Dworkin,” Hofstra Law Review, 8 (1980), pp. 553–62.
   Google Scholar
• Calabresi, C. and A. D. Melamed. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” Harvard Law Review, 85 (1972), pp. 1089–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L. “Law, the State, and the Spatial Integration of the United States,” Environmental and Planning A, 13 (1981), pp. 1197–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L. “Democracy and the Capitalist State: Towards a Critique of the Tiebout Hypothesis,” Political Studies from Spatial Perspectives. Edited by A. Burnett and P. Taylor. New York: Wiley, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Demestz, R. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review, 57 (1967), pp. 347–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. “Why Efficiency?” Hofstra Law Review, 8 (1980), pp. 563–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. “Is Wealth a Value?” Journal of Legal Studies, 8 (1979), pp. 191–226.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Ely, J. H. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, C. Right and Wrong. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Frug, G. E. “The City as a Legal Concept,” Harvard Law Review, 93 (1980), pp. 1057–154.
   Google Scholar
• Galson, W. A. Justice and the Human Good. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Haar, C. M. and L. Liebman. Property and Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Hampshire, S. Two Theories of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Law Review. “Exclusionary Zoning and Equal Protection,” Harvard Law Review, 84 (1971), pp. 1645–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, M. “Law and Economics: Science or Politics,” Hofstra Law Review, 8 (1980), pp. 905–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, David. “Review of How Nations Behave,” Harvard International Law Journal, 1 (1980), pp. 301–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Duncan, and F. Michelman. “Are Property and Contract Efficient?” Hofstra Law Review, 8 (1980), pp. 711–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Duncan. “The Structure of Black- stone's Commentaries,” Buffalo Law Review, 28 (1979), pp. 205–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Large, D. W. “This Land Is Whose Land? Changing Concepts of Land as Property,” Wisconsin Law Review, 25 (1973), pp. 1039–83.
   Google Scholar
• Library of Congress. The Constitution of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Government Printer, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Lichfield, N. “Land Policy: Seeking the Right Balance in Government Intervention—An Overview,” Urban Law and Policy, 3 (1980), pp. 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J. Two Treates of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Melden, A. I. Rights and Persons. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, G. “Social Values and Social Justice,” Economic Geography, 60 (1980), pp. 110–19.
   Google Scholar
• Polinsky, A. M. “Controlling Externalities and Protecting Entitlements: Property Right, Liability rules and Tax-subsidy Approaches,” Journal of Legal Studies, 17 (1975), pp. 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. A. “Utilitarianism, Economics and Legal Theory,” Journal of Legal Studies, 8 (1979), pp. 103–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, R. A. “The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication,” Hofstra Law Review, 8 (1980), pp. 487–507.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R. A. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, C. A. “The New Property,” Yale Law Journal, 73 (1964), pp. 733–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M.J. “The Mirage of Efficiency,” Hofstra Law Review, 8 (1980), pp. 641–59.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. and O. Hetzel. “The Inevitable Accretion: Federal and State Takeover of Land-Use Control,” Urban Law and Policy, 3 (1980), pp. 105–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, L. G. “Pareto Superiority, Consent, and Justice,” Hofstra Law Review, 8 (1980), pp. 913–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, L. G. “Tight Little Islands: Exclusionary Zoning, Equal Protection and the Indigent,” Stanford Law Review, 21 (1969), pp. 767–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. “Rights, Goals, and Fairness,” in S. Hampshire ed. Public and Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. “Nozick on Rights, Liberty, and Property,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6 (1976), pp. 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. The Urban Land Nexus and the State. London: Pion, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Siegan, B. M. Economic Liberties and the Constitution. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Siegan, B. M. Planning Without Prices. Lexington: D. C. Heath, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, P. “On the Relevance of Philosophy to Law: Reflections on Ackerman's Private Property and the Constitution,” Columbia Law Review, 79 (1979), pp. 44–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolley, G. S., P. S. Graves and J. L. Gardner. “The Urban Growth Question,” Law and Contemporary Problems, 43 (1979), pp. 211–38.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, R. M. Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Law Librar), 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, K. R. “Exclusionary Zoning and the Provision of Education: An Effect of Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mt. Laurel,” Journal of Urban Economics, 8 (1980), pp. 294–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. “A Critique of Utilitarianism,” in J. J. Smart and B. Williams Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. and S. Gabriel, “Urban Housing Prices and Land Development Behavior of the Local State,” Environment and Planning A, 13 (1981), pp. 1253–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E. M. “The Separation of the Economic and Political in Capitalism,” New Left Review, 127 (1981), pp. 66–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. R. “Constitutional Rights and Land Use Planning: The New and Old Reality,” Duke Law Journal, 19 (1977), pp. 841–68.
   Google Scholar
• Yale Law Journal, “The Equal Protection Clause and Exclusionary Zoning After Valreirra and Dandridge,” Yale Law Journal, 81 (1971), pp. 61–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar