An Exam Wrapper Intervention in Organic Chemistry I: Impact on Course Performance and Study Behavior

References

• Andaya, G., Hrabak, V. D., Reyes, S. T., Diaz, R. E., & McDonald, K. K. (2017). Examining the effectiveness of a postexam review activity to promote self-regulation in introductory biology students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(5), 84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. R., Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2016). Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P., Chavez, O., Ong, D. C., & Gunderson, B. (2017). Strategic resource use for learning: A selfadministered intervention that guides self-reflection on effective resource use enhances academic performance. Psychological Science, 28, 774–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (Report No. NCES 2009-61). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chew, K. J., Chen, H. L., Rieken, B., Turpin, A., & Sheppard, S. (2016, June). Improving students’ learning in statics skills: Using homework and exam wrappers to strengthen self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 123rd annual conference, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Hudesman, J., Crosby, S., Ziehmke, N., Everson, H., Isaac, S., Flugman, B., … Moylan, A. (2014). Using formative assessment and self-regulated learning to help developmental mathematics students achieve: A multi-campus program. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25, 107–130.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, A.-B. (2016, April). Factors contributing to undergraduate switching from STEM majors: Has anything changed in the last two decades? Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Seeking help in large college classes: A personcentered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 37–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C. (2013). Making exams worth more than the grade. In M. Kaplan, N. Silver, D. LaVaque-Manty, & D. Meizlish (Eds.), Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning (pp. 18–52). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Nandagopal, K., & Ericsson, K. A. (2012). An expert performance approach to the study of individual differences in self-regulated learning activities in upper-level college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 597–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilson, L. B. (2013). Creating selfregulated learners: Strategies to strengthen students’ self-awareness and learning skills. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Rozell, T. G., Johnson, J., Sexten, A., & Rhodes, A. E. (2017). Correcting missed exam questions as a learning tool in a physiology course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(5), 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Szu, E., Nandagopal, K., Shavelson, R., Lopez, E. J., Penn, J. H., Scharberg, M., & Hill, G. W. (2011). Understanding academic performance in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 1238–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderStoep, S. W., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to selfefficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar