43
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Legal Logics of Scale and Racial Consciousness in Affirmative Action Jurisprudence

Pages 31-41 | Published online: 16 May 2013

References

  • Blomley, N. and Pratt, G., 2001, Canada and the political geographies of rights. Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien , Vol. 45, 151-166.
  • Brenner, N., 2001, The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography , Vol. 25, 591-614.
  • City of Richmond v. Croson , 488 U.S. 469 (1989).
  • Clark, G. L., 1992, The legitimacy of judicial decision-making in the context of Richmond v. Croson. Urban Geography , Vol. 13, 205-229.
  • Cox, K. R., 1998, Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics. Political Geography , Vol. 17, 1-24.
  • Crenshaw, K., 1988, Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review , Vol. 101, 1331-1387.
  • Delaney, D., 1994, The boundaries of responsibility: Interpretations of geography in school-desegregation cases. Urban Geography , Vol. 15, 470-486.
  • Delaney, D., 1998, Race, Place and the Law , 1836-1948. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Delaney, D. and Leitner, H., 1997, The political construction of scale. Political Geography , Vol. 16, 93-97.
  • Forest, B., 2002, Hidden segregation? The limits of geographically based affirmative action. Political Geography , Vol. 21, 855-880.
  • Fullilove v. Klutznick , 448 U.S. 448 (1980).
  • Gratz v. Bollinger , 539 U.S. ___ (2003). Slip opinion retrieved June 23, 2003 from http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/opinions.html
  • Grutter v. Bollinger , 539 U.S. ___ (2003). Slip opinion retrieved June 23, 2003 from http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/opinions.html
  • Hopwood v. Texas , 94 Ed. Law Rep. 760 (1994). Retrieved June 23, 2003 from http://www.law.utexas.edu/hopwood/hoptxt.htm
  • Hopwood v. Texas , 78 F. 3d 932 (1996).
  • Marston, S. A., 2000, The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography , Vol. 24, 219-242.
  • Martin, D., McCann, E. and Purcell, M., 2003, Space, scale, governance, and representation: Contemporary geographical perspectives on urban politics and policy. Journal of Urban Affairs , Vol. 25, 113-121.
  • McCann, E. J., 2003, Framing space and time in the city: Urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs , Vol. 25, 159-178.
  • Morrill, R., 1998, Inequalities of power, costs and benefits across geographic scales: The future uses of the Hanford reservation. Political Geography , Vol. 18, 1-23.
  • New York State Club Association v. New York City , 487 U.S. 1 (1988).
  • Purcell, M., 2003, Islands of practice and the Marston/Brenner debate: Toward a more synthetic critical human geography. Progress in Human Geography , Vol. 27, 317-332.
  • Silvern, S. E., 1999, Scales of justice: Law, American Indian treaty rights and the political construction of scale. Political Geography , Vol. 18, 639-668.
  • Sneddon, C., 2003, Reconfiguring scale and power: The Khong-Chi-Mun project in Northeast Thailand. Environment and Planning A , Vol. 35, 2229-2250.
  • United States (2003a). Amicus brief in support of petitioner ( Gratz v. Bollinger 02-516). Theodore B. Olson, Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530.
  • United States (2003b). Amicus brief in support of petitioner ( Grutter v. Bollinger 02-241). Theodore B. Olson, Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530.
  • Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education , 476 U.S. 267 (1986).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.