The ‘Interanimation’ of Worlds: Creative Metaphors in Art and Design

REFERENCES

• Abercrombie, L. (1926). Theory of Poetry. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, V. C. (1968). ‘Visual Metaphor’. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2, 73–80
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. C. (1964). ‘The Psychology of the Metaphor’. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 105, 53–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual Thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. (1971). Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avital, T. (2003). Art Versus Nonart: Art Out of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
   Google Scholar
• Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, M. (1993). ‘More About Metaphor’. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (19-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, E. (1912). ‘”Psychical Distance” as a Factor in Art and as an Aesthetic Principle'. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Cupchik, G. C., Leonard, G., Axelrad, E. & Kalin, J. (1998). ‘The Landscape of Emotion in Literary Reception: Generating and Receiving Interpretations of James Joyce'. Cognition and Emotion, 12 (6), 825–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degel, J., Piper, D. & Köster, E. P. (2001). Implicit Learning and Implicit Memory for Odors: The Influence of Odor Identification and Retention Time'. Chemical Senses, 26, 267–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1963). The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (2002). ‘The Identification of Target and Source in Pictorial Metaphors'. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R. J. (1989). ‘Empirical Constraints on Computational Theories of Metaphor: Comments on Indurkhya'. Cognitive Science, 13, 235–241.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1990). ‘The Process of Understanding Literary Metaphor'. Journal of Literary Semantics, XIX, 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetic of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. (1963). Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art. London: Phaidon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handelman, S. A. (1982). The Slayers of Moses: The Emergence of Rabbinic Interpretation in Modern Literary Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, C. R. (1989). Metaphor and Art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, P. & Van Dijk, M. B. (2001). ‘Designing from Context: Foundations and Applications of the VIP Approach'. In P. Lloyd & H. Christiaans (Eds.), Designing in Context: Proceedings of Design Thinking Research Symposium 5 (383-394). Delft: DUP Science.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. M. (1982). ‘Metaphor in Pictures'. Perception, 11, 589–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, V. (1994). ‘Pictures as Metaphors in Thackeray's Illustrated Novels'. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9 (2), 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, N., Connor, K., Gross, A. & Fava, D. (1980). ‘Understanding Visual Metaphor: Developmental and Individual Differences'. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 45 (1, Serial No. 183).
   Google Scholar
• Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor'. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (202-251). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1969). The Psychology of Literary Change. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1990). The Clockwork Muse: The Predictability of Artistic Change. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moles, A. (1968). Information Theory and Esthetic Perception (translated by J. E. Cohen). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. (Original work published in 1958.)
   Google Scholar
• Ortony, A. (1979). ‘Beyond Literal Similarity’. Psychological Review, 86, 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. (1953). Method and Theory in Experimental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. & Walsh, M. (1993). ‘Psychological Processes in Metaphor Comprehension and Memory'. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (307-328). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. & Cupchik, G. C. (In press). ‘Scented Memories of Literature’. Memory.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, I. A. (1965). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1936.)
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1975). The Rule of Metaphor: Multidisciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language (translated By R. Czerny with K. McLaughlin & J. Costello). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, A. (1980). ‘Homospatial Thinking in Creative Process'. Leonardo, 13, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, A. (1988). The Creative Process of Psychotherapy. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, A. (1990). Creativity and Madness: New Findings and Old Stereotypes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1993). ‘Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social policy’. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (137-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1993). ‘Metaphor’. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (83-111). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. (1994). Understanding Metaphor in Literature. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Tourangeau, R. & Nigro, G. (1993). ‘Metaphor, Induction, and Social Policy: The Convergence of Macroscopic and Microscopic Views'. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (277-303). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, E. W. (1958). ‘Aesthesiology and Hallucination’. In R. May, E. Angel & H. F. Ellenberger (eds.), Existence (139-169) (translated by E. W. Straus & B. Morgan). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. (1977). ‘Features of Similarity’. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (1988). The Point of Words: Children's Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. & Gardner, H. (1993). ‘Metaphor and Irony: Two Levels of Understanding'. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (425-443). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar